Constantly reshuffling the batting order doesn’t work

By Stephen Vagg / Roar Guru

Despite Australia retaining the Ashes, there are a lot of articles going around at the moment about our supposed batting order woes.

These articles say “gee the Australian batting order is unsettled, hey? Only two spots locked down come first Test against Pakistan – Marnus Labuschagne and Steve Smith.”

But we’re reassured that there’s a four rounds of Sheffield Shield before the first Test to enable a “bat off”.

Haven’t we been here before? Having a bat off?

That’s right – it was at the beginning the Ashes earlier this year. That Australia A game was a “bat off”. The one that saw Cam Bancroft and Matt Wade get in the Test team.

There was a bat off at start of last summer, too, before the India series… the batting line up was unsettled then and a bat off saw Harris get in the side.

Oh, yeah – and on the Australia A tour in 2018, and in the UAE tour games. They were batting off for the top six. Pete Handscomb batted himself out of the side.

Oh, and at the beginning of the Ashes in 2018-19… there was a big bat off then.

Why are we still having bat offs?

Why is our top order so unstable?

Let’s go back to the summer of 2017-18. Australia had lost five matches on the trot, but had blooded some new players and bounced back to win against Pakistan. The top six in that third Test team was: Matt Renshaw, Dave Warner, Usman Khawaja, Smith, Handscomb and Hilton Cartwright.

That’s not a bad top six. Cartwright would turn out to be, well, Cartwright, but his form was decent at the time.

Cameron Bancroft (left) and Hilton Cartwright (AAP Image/Richard Wainwright)

Come the India tour… Cartwright doesn’t even make the cut. Khawaja, who has had a superb summer, gets the boot because he’s considered “bad in Asia”.

Australia’s top six for the first Test is Renshaw, Warner, Shaun Marsh, Smith, Handscomb, Mitch Marsh (two changes). Smith and Steve O’Keefe lead Australia to an unexpected victory, but Australia’s dodgy batting sees them blow an excellent chance to win the second Test – they lose.

Glenn Maxwell replaces Mitch Marsh for the third Test and scores a century in a draw. Bad Australian batting see them blow a chance to win the fourth Test which India win.

Neither Marsh brother is on the tour to Bangladesh. Khawaja replaces Shaun in the top six for the first Test, where the Bangladeshis beat us. Cartwright comes in for Khawaja in the second Test, which we win. By then the top six is Renshaw, Warner, Smith, Handscomb, Maxwell and Cartwright.

Usman Khawaja trudges off after another cheap dismissal in the Ashes. (Photo by Lindsey Parnaby / AFP / Getty Images)

At the start of the following summer. Darren Lehmann declares the number six spot (Maxwell) is open. Justin Langer lobbies noisily for Cam Bancroft and the Marshes. By the first Test, Renshaw and Maxwell are out, and Bancroft and Shaun Marsh are in (two changes – plus Tim Paine for Wade).

Two Tests later Mitch Marsh is in for Handscomb. Australia thump England in the series and Australia keep its top six for three Tests in a row against South Africa.

We’ve achieved stability. Yay!

Then sandpaper gate happens.

Bancroft, Smith and Warner get dropped (they are later banned). Handscomb returns to the side and Renshaw, Burns and Maxwell are flown over to join the squad; the first two are picked in the Test team. Australia’s top six for the fourth Test is Renshaw, Burns, Khawaja, Shaun Marsh, Handscomb, Mitch Marsh (three changes, but exceptional circumstances).

Australia lose.

Langer takes over as coach. There’s an Australia A tour to India and neither Maxwell or Burns are on it, and neither make the squad to the UAE to play Pakistan. Australia’s top six in two Tests against Pakistan are Khawaja, Aaron Finch (picked on the back of ODI form), the Marshes, Travis Head, and Marnus Labuschagne (three changes). Australia are lucky to escape with a draw in the first Test and lose the second.

The team returns to Australia. For the first two Tests against India, Marcus Harris is in for Labuschagne and Handscomb for Mitch Marsh (two changes). Australia narrowly lose the first game and win the second. In the third Mitch Marsh comes in for Handscomb and Australia loses. For the drawn fourth Test, Handscomb replaces Mitch Marsh while Labuschagne comes in for Finch (two changes).

“Everything the light touches…” (AP Photo/Matt Dunham)

For two games against Sri Lanka, Shaun Marsh and Handscomb get the boot and Burns and Kurtis Patterson come in (two changes). Australia wins both Tests – the final six in the last Test is Harris, Burns, Khawaja, Head, Labuschagne, and Patterson. Patterson, Burns and Khawaja all score centuries in that game.

Patterson and Burns aren’t picked on the Ashes squad. Neither is Shaun Marsh or Handscomb. Labuschagne, Harris and Mitch Marsh make the squad… as does now-available Bancroft, Smith and Warner. Oh, and Matthew Wade is picked as a specialist batsman.

Australia’s first six for the first Test: Bancroft, Warner, Khawaja, Smith, Head and Wade (four changes). Only Khawaja and Head have survive from that top six against Sri Lanka. By the fifth Test both will be out of the team.

Bancroft lasts two Tests and is dropped; Harris replaces him and fails in three Tests. Khawaja fails in three Tests and is dropped for Labuschagne. Head gets dropped for the fifth Test for Mitch Marsh. Wade hangs on.

That is a lot of instability.

It’s become extremely for Australia to keep the same top six. Usually they’ll change one or two players – sometimes three. They’ve even gone up to four.

There’s always been justifications for these selections.

People being banned/coming back from bans.

Needing to protect the quicks with an all rounder.

Form.

But you know what I think?

The selectors have developed a taste for change. They’re addicted to it. And they can’t stop.

Here’s an idea – why don’t they give stability a try?

Give people three dud Tests before dumping them instead of two.

Show faith with the players who did well a previous test, even if it was a few months ago.

Don’t be so impatient to rush people back into the side, unless they are super champions. (Smith and Warner yes, but Bancroft?)

If someone new is in red hot form with the bat, then great – they can wait their turn.

I think for the first Test against Pakistan let’s just go with the top six that played the fifth Test against England: Warner, Harris, Labuschagne, Smith, Head and Wade.

(I’m going to ignore the Mitch Marsh section because it was too silly. And by the way Australia has lost the last four Tests Mitch Marsh played in the side.)

If these players struggle in the early Shield games and someone else bats the house down, well, that someone else can wait.

There’s no hurry.

And let’s try to limit changes to the top six to one batsman per Test.

Because this Master Chef technique of throwing in ingredients and stirring willy-nilly?

That’s not working.

It didn’t work in India or in the UAE and in England we only got away with 2-2 because of Smith. (If he’d been injured we could have lost 5-0).

Maybe it’s time we tried something really radical.

Like stability.

The Crowd Says:

2019-09-18T00:00:27+00:00

Shellbell

Guest


Well done SV. I was thinking of working out all the changes made in recent years to the top 6 but felt a migraine coming on. Of course in recent history we had Ferguson and Maddison and Neville batting as well. Many of the selections have been capricious and disastrous. Marsh has a losing record over 32 tests (last seven, six losses, one draw). That is very hard to achieve at Aussie level.

2019-09-17T23:03:27+00:00

Seriously?!

Roar Rookie


Seriously, SV shouldn't the bigger question be, why is our whole middle order (bar Smith) so poor at batting. there are hundreds of players wanting to have a go but NONE have shown any real ability since Lehmann took the reins. When that happened not one middle order batsman improved - lets just look at Handscombe - how come no-one amongst the thousand support staff that are employed around the country haven't been able to improve him. Plenty others have flaws but none improved - and the problems stems from this CA mantra developed under Lehmann - don't work on their weaknesses, work to their strengths! Well the opposition bowl to our weaknesses and hence they keep getting out. The waste of money by CA on so many staff and facilities to then not improve cricketers is an absolute joke and slap in the face to paying fans and juniors who pay ridiculous fees to play cricket. Forget about selecting new players - improve the ones you have already chosen. Seriously!

2019-09-17T13:41:15+00:00

Noah Barling

Roar Pro


Maybe selectors could work out a system to weight test performances when it comes to picking?

2019-09-17T07:01:35+00:00

Yawn of the Dead

Guest


I thought we had a decent line in the sand coming back from Bangladesh. I liked that team. They played with verve. but did well. Langer wanted his boys in there instead. We can't draw the line in the sand when the form of so many was so toilet. It is just completely unfair to those trying to get in, or who were turfed for not much (Maxwell)

2019-09-17T06:22:22+00:00

U

Roar Rookie


That’s the team I’d go for in the first summer test apart from Warner. We still need some right handers

2019-09-17T06:21:17+00:00

U

Roar Rookie


Harris and Bancroft aren’t up to it for now. It’s not like they’ve only had a few games

AUTHOR

2019-09-17T05:28:59+00:00

Stephen Vagg

Roar Guru


i think batting at home is different to batting in england... so i'm giving them an extra chance... i'm not a harris fan (i'd open with khwaja and warner) but i'm trying to break the cycle of selectors constantly re-imagining the batting line up... drawing a line in the sand

AUTHOR

2019-09-17T05:02:42+00:00

Stephen Vagg

Roar Guru


i just want to draw the line in the sand somewhere - if it were me i'd open with khwaja and warner, but then i'd have maxwell at six... i just want them to draw a line in the sand and move forward and if harris wasn't worth an extended trial then he had no business being picked in the first place

AUTHOR

2019-09-17T05:01:25+00:00

Stephen Vagg

Roar Guru


i used to think along these lines but should we pick solely off a few games just before hand? some batsmen audition better than others - mitch marsh is fantastic at auditions - i'm not convinced it's the best guide lets just keep that fourth test time, and if someone goes great in the first few rounds then they can be next cab in the rank

AUTHOR

2019-09-17T04:59:43+00:00

Stephen Vagg

Roar Guru


I accept Harris struggled big time - personally I'd open with Khwaja and Warner - but we need to break the cycle somewhere and it's as good a spot as any

2019-09-17T03:36:44+00:00

Yawn of the Dead

Guest


you make a case for change after 3 dud tests ina row and then refuse to enact it with Warner and Harris. discuss...

2019-09-17T02:11:12+00:00

DaveJ

Roar Rookie


A good approach. It kind of worked for England with Denley and Buttler. But why the hell would you pick Harris? He’s had his three dud games. Got lucky a couple of times against India, but I can’t work out why you would pick him ahead of ahead of Burns, Khawaja or Bancroft. Harris makes Bancroft’s supposed technicality flaws look entirely trivial.

2019-09-17T00:40:32+00:00

James

Roar Rookie


I agree with the sentiment about stability. I believe a batsman should earn his place in the side. However your team to start the Pakistan test already features a change. Marsh replaced by Head! You haven't given Marsh three tests. Marcus Harris has failed in the last three tests yet you are willing to retain him. Your team doesn't follow your own rules. I would start with: 1. David Warner (superb average in Australia) 2. Usman Khawaja (very good average in Australia) 3. Marnus Labuschagne 4. Steve Smith 5. Travis Head (very good average in Australia) 6. Matt Wade 7. Tim Paine 8-12 Cummins, Starc, Pattinson, Hazlewood, Lyon Then make the others wait their turn. Next overseas tour? Dart board and blind fold required.

2019-09-17T00:08:08+00:00

Noah Barling

Roar Pro


Great article Stephen, definitely worth a shot, however, I would pick the team from Shield form, and then keep it stable, rather than keep last matches team.

2019-09-16T22:53:24+00:00

boes

Roar Pro


When it's laid bare like that it's utterly ridiculous. Change for change sake a lot of the time.

2019-09-16T22:52:52+00:00

El Loco

Roar Rookie


Yes, the much-vaunted bat-off has become supremely tiresome. Schoolyard garbage that rarely results in a clear winner, yet does lead to the slimmest of warranted test caps. Of course incumbents should be aware that there is competition for their spot, but outright fear is counterproductive. Confidence in your place in the team on the other hand leads to a freedom to play to your ability, and would serve well in the domestic lead-up. If it transforms to complacency then it can be called out by team management, but it will soon transform to poor output anyway. Harris is a question mark in that top six, personally I still see Khawaja and Burns as proven performers with strong claims. But it's not outrageous to persist with him.

Read more at The Roar