Seven talking points from the Rugby World Cup Final

By Oliver Matthews / Expert

South Africa are World Champions for the third time having completed a comprehensive victory over the much fancied England in the World Cup Final.

It’s been a fabulous tournament and South Africa have proven themselves to be worthy winners. Never has a team lost a group stage game and gone on to win the whole thing, but the Springboks have shown that it can be done.

The England team will be bitterly disappointed. Not just because they lost, but because they never lived up to the standards that they had set themselves based on their semi-final performance.

So for one final time, let’s get stuck into some of the major talking points from the game.

What a difference five days makes
South Africa’s victory over Wales just five days ago was derided by many as a boring game of rugby that had no place at this point in the sport’s biggest stage.

Fans and pundits were saying that they would have to change things up if they wanted to avoid being torn to pieces by the English.

Five days later did South Africa change things up? Nope! They brought the same game style and it proved impossible for the English to break down.

The thing they did change was their accuracy. Everything they did was pretty much the same as against Wales, but just that bit tighter and with an absence of errors.

Box kicks weren’t too long, chasers weren’t too slow and the defence was that little bit extra mean.

It is quite a testament to Rassie Erasmus and the Boks leadership that they didn’t change their style of play in response to England’s demolition of the All Blacks.

Instead, they trusted their plan and trusted their players to execute on the day.

(Photo by Juan Jose Gasparini/Gallo Images/Getty Images)

England’s set piece broken in half
England had been building momentum nicely throughout the tournament and were deserved favourites going into the Final. They had an all-round game that was proving impossible for sides to deal with.

However in the Final the Boks focused on challenging them right at the very heart of that game plan and took on their set piece.

And when I say they took it on, I mean ripped they it into pieces, threw it on the ground, jumped all over it and were given a penalty by Jerome Garces.

The Boks scrum especially was turned from a solid platform into a points-scoring weapon that the English just couldn’t cope with.

The English pack and forwards coaches will have been so disappointed in the way that they couldn’t compete consistently when the teams packed down and when they get back into camp next year ahead of the Six Nations it will be a key area they look to rectify.

Yes the Springboks are known for having a big, effective pack, but the way they managed to bully the English – who are hardly minnows – was incredible.

The loss of Kyle Sinckler in the third minute will have had an effect for sure but the Boks lost two of their first-choice front five early doors too and just kept rolling.

(Photo by David Rogers/Getty Images)

Brutal but not a hint of a yellow card
The game was played with a brutal intensity. Both sides put in huge hits and even the average level of impact had fans and commentators wincing throughout.

The Springboks’ defence was meaner than ever and the English put in their fair share of bone-shakers.

But even with the pressure of the Final and the natural physical nature of both sides, there wasn’t a single tackle that could have been considered as a yellow card.

This really was a great demonstration of how the game of rugby can be played with power and with aggression but also with discipline, and both sides should be applauded for that.

Given how the World Cup started with red cards galore, it’s a testament to the two best teams that they found ways to blow others off the park without having to spend time on the naughty step when it mattered.

Boks much more than a battering ram
South Africa were huge in the physical contest and their pack scrummaged England off the park, but don’t let that leave you thinking that the Springboks had a one-dimensional game plan.

When the chances presented themselves, the Springboks killed off their opponents with two tries that were executed with razor point precision and deft skill.

The chip ahead from Makazole Mapimpi and then the side step and finish from Cheslin Kolbe were both exquisite and highlighted two things.

Firstly, South Africa are much more a complete team than some people give them credit for. And secondly, that having genuine wingers is such a huge advantage compared to using utility players.

Handré Pollard is not in the same style of fly-half as say Beauden Barrett but that doesn’t mean that he isn’t still a threat with ball in hand and both in the semi-final and final, Pollard’s direct running and half breaks were crucial for the Boks.

(Photo by Shaun Botterill/Getty Images)

Fairytales do exist
Faf de Klerk might have the hair of a Disney Prince, but that’s not the reason to now believe in fairytales.

When Siya Kolisi lifted the trophy high above his head a new story was written into the history books and one that could have an impact well beyond the boundaries of rugby.

In a post-match interview the Springboks skipper shared an emotional insight into his life when he commented that as a child all he was thinking about where he would be able to get his next meal.

Nothing so lofty as whether he might become a pro rugby player or challenge for a Springboks jersey, wear the skipper’s armband, and certainly not be crowned World Champion.

With rugby being a sport for so many more lucky and privileged people around the world, there is something very special about this South Africa win.

It’s not going to be some incredible solution to the problems the country faces, but it’s hard not to smile when you see Kolisi hold his child in one arm and the Webb Ellis trophy in the other.

(Photo by David Rogers/Getty Images)

Where now for English rugby?
England have played some fantastic rugby and were so close to becoming World Champions. Eddie Jones has done some good things with this team and there is obviously more that could be done.

Will England use this World Cup as a launching pad to go on and try and dominate the rugby world over the next few years?

Or will the heartbreak of getting so close and just missing have a negative effect that this playing group finds it impossible to recover from?

Jones was non-committal about his future in post-match interviews and there could be some interesting offers coming his way.

He’s been through some ups and downs with England over the past four years but has taken them to the heights of the game and shown that England can play the beautiful game in a beautiful way.

The challenge will be now can England learn how to do one of the hardest things in sport – change their game plan during a match when Plan A just isn’t working? There aren’t many sides who can do this consistently and effectively.

If England learn how then they could have a period in front of them where they dominate, especially when you consider they’ve got a lot of young players dotted throughout their first choice team.

(Photo by David Rogers/Getty Images)

The future of Rugby
Finally, what will the legacy of this 2019 Rugby World Cup be for players and fans alike around the world? It has been a fantastic tournament and the hosts have done so many things right both on and off the pitch.

If this momentum and success isn’t built and capitalised upon then it is a crime against the sport.

Tier Two nations clearly deserve more support and game time against their Tier One rivals and the major competitions need to find a way to work together more.

Various nations will be going back to their national unions and club competitions inspired by what has happened over the past few weeks, and let’s hope that the impact of a great tournament continued to ripple through the game over the coming months and years.

The Crowd Says:

2019-11-06T05:29:51+00:00

Malotru

Roar Rookie


Not what I was asking sunshine... Anyway enough of the debate, I've got better things to do.

2019-11-05T22:35:15+00:00

Train Without A Station

Roar Guru


Because somebody shared a video of it on twitter in response to comments from people like you...

2019-11-05T22:12:57+00:00

Malotru

Roar Rookie


How the hell would you know? Of course you're an all-knowing omnipotent person. Obviously you don't know me, but that won't stop you making stupid comments.

2019-11-05T11:34:50+00:00

Train Without A Station

Roar Guru


Also Justin Harrison, Matt Cockbsin and Stirling Mortlock did the same thing in 2003. But you didn’t have a dig at them.

2019-11-05T09:38:32+00:00

Dilly Willy

Roar Rookie


Easier route????? we faved japan in our QF’s (who finished top of their group and dispatched Ireland). So NZ got the easier QF????. Also, Wales beat Oz and finished top of their group and we got them in the semis. Then we played England in the final (who also, surprise suprise, finished top of their group. ????. So the boks has the top teams in all their knockout games????

2019-11-05T08:06:01+00:00

Ex force fan

Guest


Most of the 31 in the Boks squad played Superugby - next year most won't.

2019-11-05T06:43:54+00:00

Train Without A Station

Roar Guru


By not wanting to wear a medal that signifies their failure to achieve their goal he was being petulant? I never said not being successful made somebody pathetic. I said not being successful, but wanting to tear down those who have achieved much more does.

2019-11-05T05:40:46+00:00

Malotru

Roar Rookie


I'm too polite to say what I think of your comments TWAS. But I will say my comment isn't predicated on tearing people down, rather that I believe people should be big enough to give credit where it's due. My take on it all is that Farrell was being somewhat petulant and unwilling to give credit where due, if he really wants to be successful perhaps he should grow up a little. You might consider taking a similar stance rather than tossing insults around. Whether I'm successful or not is immaterial, but people who aren't 'successful' in your terms aren't necessarily pathetic.

2019-11-05T05:09:06+00:00

Train Without A Station

Roar Guru


Farrell doesn’t have to be effusive in his praise to be sporting in defeat. We’re all entitled to different opinions. But if yours is predicated on trying to tear people down you’re a jerk. Given they’re much more successful people, my spin is you’re probably pathetic too.

2019-11-05T04:59:46+00:00

Malotru

Roar Rookie


Ha ha TWAS gracious of you to say that I'm a nobody, you might be right. But just because my opinion is different to yours doesn't mean you have to be insulting. And you're the person spouting rationality and objectivity ad nauseum on the Roar. Please point out the bit where Farrell was effusive in his praise. By the way you have no idea about who I am. Ever heard of projection? It's where people see things in others that are actually what they are about.

2019-11-04T22:43:21+00:00

Train Without A Station

Roar Guru


Yeah you definitely are. Actually players who’ve won World Cups like Corey Jane have come out in defence of the players. Just the pathetic nobodies looking to tear them down.

2019-11-04T22:28:10+00:00

AndyS

Guest


But they aren't preventing concussions, as just seen. So if that is the intent, apply them properly and consistently. If they want to go for the full 'stick' principle of deterrence and expect perfection under all circumstances from the first tackler, then the same should be required of the second tackler. Even if the result was friendly fire. And if the tackled player contributed to contact with the tacklers head, same again. That at least could be defended as a global approach. Would not be my choice, but would at least be consistent. Because IMO it is not just RL that will have a problem. Having recognised an issue, a halfhearted response is almost worse than none. If you knew your workplace could blind someone, but then only issued eye protection to a third of the staff, do you think you would be safe from prosecution?

2019-11-04T21:01:19+00:00

Malotru

Roar Rookie


You reckon TWAS? From what I heard Farrell certainly wasn't overly effusive in his 'praise' for SA. I'm definitely a nobody in your view.

2019-11-04T20:38:40+00:00

Crustymtb

Guest


Really? Apart from the game against the AB's which was damn near perfect, I don't think England played that well through the rest of the tournament. The wobblies were soft and easily shut down, and they fumbled their lines a bit in the pool play.

2019-11-04T17:10:35+00:00

Nobrain

Roar Guru


Only 3 played in the final.

2019-11-04T14:39:44+00:00


Thanks mate, I pull the Bryce Lawrence every time someone tells me we get the easy routes at RWC :thumbup:

2019-11-04T12:55:18+00:00

Derek Murray

Roar Rookie


Precisely. Stupid to suggest otherwise. Offensive to Kiwi fans everywhere to suggest England outplayed them

2019-11-04T12:54:12+00:00

Derek Murray

Roar Rookie


I think you’re missing the point of the cards. They’re intended as much as a deterrent as they are punishment. We, as a game, need to get tackles lower so people see that the people who play it are protected as much as possible. If RL doesn’t wake up to this reality it will have problems within a decade

2019-11-04T12:50:37+00:00

Derek Murray

Roar Rookie


I loved it. Some absolutely classic matches and the pleasure people took from watching was very evident from the TV and all the feedback I took from friends who traveled

2019-11-04T12:49:17+00:00

Derek Murray

Roar Rookie


Agreed. I look at what happened to the Boks under Rassie and am full of optimism

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar