The gorgeous, wonderful madness of Steven Peter Devereux Smith

By Lewis Atkins / Roar Rookie

Steven Smith is on the ground. He fell while flashing his bat quickly, very wide outside off.

He connected of course. The ball pierced the ring of course. And of course it went for four. This shouldn’t work. Everything we’ve learnt from before we can even remember tells us that this idiosyncratic, self-conscious, fidgeting, constantly moving ‘technique’ should result in LBWs and edges to the slip cordon.

But it works. It works a treat. In four Test matches this year Smith went from 0 to 774 runs, including three centuries, and tops the run charts for the year. The next best, Ben Stokes, has made 627 runs from eight matches. Virat Kohli has played six matches and scored 476 runs.

Smith is so far beyond the curve that you could argue he cannot be compared to any contemporary player. His batting average is ten runs higher than Kohli’s and 12 runs higher than Kane Williamson’s. It is 16 runs higher than Joe Root’s, who is one more bad year away from falling out of the ‘Fab Four’.

Sports opinion delivered daily 

   

Smith is the avant-garde. He bats like a cubist painting. He’s Marcel Duchamp’s Fountain, a wonderful and strange imposition on cricket’s incredibly ordered world. Kohli is the Vitruvian Man of this world, the perfect meeting place of power, timing and technique. Williamson is a Vermeer, tight and controlled, subtle strokes directing the ball rather than hitting it. Root’s like Pop Art: fast-paced, smart running, then powerful attacks against the ball – Boom! Wow! Pop! Four! Out!

So how does Smith’s technique work as effectively as it does? The shot that ended with Smith on the ground was played during his innings of 211 at Old Trafford. He does his step across. His back foot is on off stump, his front foot remains outside leg, and middle and leg stump are visible in the gap.

At the point of release his head remains perfectly still and his eye line is flat along the horizon. As the ball travels down, it moves away and is a little over a metre from Smith’s hands. He shifts his weight to his back leg as he enters the shot, almost half crouching as he lifts the bat behind his head.

When he connects he begins to fall, his front foot lifting from the ground. All his weight is now on his back foot, which is over a metre away from where the ball pitched, but it’s this back leg directing the power and trajectory of the ball. Smith’s back knee is pointing through cover and his head is directly over this knee, looking through cover. His body is not square; his chest and stomach are directed through cover also.

As Smith lands on the ground, back knee first, he becomes square, but his head, eyes and that back knee are all pointing in the direction of the ball and his front leg is splayed wide outside leg stump. As he loses balance and finally ends up with his body on the ground he follows the direction and power of the ball, falling dramatically through cover.

The ball pierces the ring and runs away quickly for four. Ben Stokes, the bowler, can only smile, chuckle and look slyly in Smith’s direction. When Smith stands up he raises his bat. He’s on 51 now and will score another 160 runs to set up Australia’s most comprehensive win of the series.

Smith’s weird and silly batting always makes me smile, and it is a whole lot less chaotic than it looks to even the most dedicated follower of the game. His game is based largely on his incredible hand-eye coordination. This is matched with perfect balance from head to toe. Smith often uses his back foot to direct power and trajectory when playing a traditionally front-foot shot. It’s a common feature of his cover driving and also his on drives.

He looks very odd, tapping this and tapping that, looking here and looking there. But he averages 64 in Test cricket, so who really cares when he’s doing that and we just get to smile and laugh.

The Crowd Says:

2019-11-13T04:13:53+00:00

DaveJ

Roar Rookie


Thanks Db, saved me from resorting to Wikipedia! Probably a good point that Broad (and Archer?) were even more dangerous against lefties.

2019-11-12T09:00:13+00:00

dungerBob

Roar Rookie


Vitruvian Man: That famous drawing by Da Vinci of the naked dude with the 4 arms and the circle around him. .. Broad was huge against our lefties Dave. His pace was up and he was making it talk. I recall an over that started with a good ball followed by 5 virtually unplayable ones. Exactly as you described. Angled or even swinging in then cutting away towards slips. That’s magnificent bowling. He didn’t get a wicket that over, he got it in the next one. One huge advantage Smith had was that he’s not left handed. The form and the mood he was in, Broad would have cleaned him up too if he was imho.

2019-11-12T01:38:39+00:00

DaveJ

Roar Rookie


Liked the art comparisons though confess to ignorance about Vitruvian Man. Not sure about Joe Root as Pop Art though- sounds a bit too much fun and glamorous. Maybe Warner, Maxwell or even Jason Roy - flashy but not worth the money (Roy, not Warner, that is)?. A valiant effort to describe a Steve Smith shot, though for those of us lacking imagination a video or photo might have helped: didnt seem clear where the shot went: I deduced it was cover from the last sentence. But interesting insight on the back foot as fulcrum - must watch closely, you may have cracked it. However, for me Smith’s execution of the attacking strokes in the Ashes series was nowhere as astounding as the fact that he didn’t getting out to at least a couple of low scores to balls that were moving off the seam. This was the cause of most of the low scores by his teammates and the opposition. It was not easy batting most of the time. Warner has been demonised but he got quite a few balls from Broad and Archer that cut away off the seam after aiming in towards the stumps. Root got a couple of unplayable balls from Cummins. With a lot of good leg cutters there isn’t much a batsman can do other than minimise the risk of an edge and hope for the best. It’s far from clear to me that Smith did this better than, say, Rory Burns, and in a couple of his innings he played and missed quite a few times. I’m still grappling with the question of whether the actual margin of his superiority over everyone in the recent series (if not the fact of his superiority) was due to a good dollop of fortune, or whether his defensive technique has some hitherto unexplained superior element. His previous, very modest Test series in South Africa last year did bring back to the field on seaming wickets- were the Ashes just evening up the luck a bit?

AUTHOR

2019-11-11T14:54:26+00:00

Lewis Atkins

Roar Rookie


my nickname was once "number 16"

2019-11-11T11:59:57+00:00

Josh H

Roar Rookie


ouch

2019-11-10T06:41:31+00:00

dungerBob

Roar Rookie


I think Smith may have even softened the pommy fans a bit. Between his eccentricity and raw output of runs I thought I saw a begrudging clap or two. It's not much but it's the start of the decent down the vileness meter I'd say. When he landed in England he was evil incarnate, by the time he left he was approaching very naughty boy status. That's not a bad effort.

AUTHOR

2019-11-10T00:30:44+00:00

Lewis Atkins

Roar Rookie


never heard that one, though when it came to batting I rarely received any compliments

2019-11-10T00:24:26+00:00

The Late News

Roar Rookie


never blinks...

2019-11-10T00:24:09+00:00

The Late News

Roar Rookie


It's a club cricket saying that someone has unbelievable hand eye coordination!

AUTHOR

2019-11-10T00:17:23+00:00

Lewis Atkins

Roar Rookie


I do not understand this phrase... but I like it

2019-11-09T23:46:32+00:00

The Late News

Roar Rookie


Eye like a dead fish mate.

2019-11-09T20:54:36+00:00

JC

Roar Rookie


I enjoyed reading this article. Good stuff. My screen saver shows the shot he practiced whilst prostate on the ground during the ashes. He’s single handedly destroying kids techniques around the country but so be it. Love him.

Read more at The Roar