The all-time Rest of the World XI to play England in England

By Tim Ponnusamy / Roar Rookie

Having picked my all-time England XI, I need a side to play against them.

Below is my all-time Rest of the World XI to play the England XI in England. As with my article on the ROW XI to play Australia, I’ve selected a team of XI mainly based on performance in England.

Similarly as before, only players who played the majority of their careers post-WW1 are considered.

1. Gordon Greenidge – 19 matches – 1570 runs at 56.07, six 100s, four 50s
No opener has made more runs (1570) or scored more centuries (six) in Test match cricket in England than the great West Indian, who went on four tours of the country and ended up on the winning side all four times.

Greenidge’s best series in England came in in the 1984 5-0 clean sweep of England by the West Indies side, topping the run-scoring with 572 runs at 81.71 including two wonderful double centuries in the series. His 214 not out achieved on the fifth and final day of the second Test at Lord’s in that series helped the West Indies chase 342 at Lord’s, still the highest run chase at the ground.

Greenidge and his opening partner from Barbados Desmond Haynes still hold the record for the most runs put on by an opening pair in Test history: 6151. He rightfully takes his place at the top of the order for my ROW side to play in England.

2. Graeme Smith (captain) – 12 matches – 1355 runs at 67.76, five 100s, three 50s
When compiling this list, I was genuinely shocked at how good Graeme Smith’s record in England was. He is by far the most successful overseas Test match opening batsman in the country statistically, averaging almost 68 in three tours to the country.

Smith made his debut in England in 2003, fresh from assuming the captaincy from Shaun Pollock after the debacle of the 2003 World Cup. He would compile one of the great all-time series a batsman has had in England with 714 runs at 79.33, highlighted by two imperious double hundreds at Edgbaston and Lord’s.

Smith would return to England in 2008 and 2012 averaging over 50 on both subsequent tours and leading the Proteas to two series wins. Assuming the captaincy of a side full of legends, Smith became the first man to captain his country in 100 Test matches and forged a reputation as one of the greatest leaders ever. He assumes a spot at the top of the order and takes the captaincy of this line-up.

3. Don Bradman – 19 matches – 2674 runs at 102.84, 11 100s, three 50s
Bradman’s 2674 runs and 11 hundreds in England are a record for an overseas batsman in any country in Test match cricket history. The great man actually had a better record in England (averaging 102.84) than Australia (98.23), travelling to the UK on four tours.

(Photo by S&G/PA Images via Getty Images)

Bradman’s run-scoring feats in England are legendary, headlined by his first tour of the country in 1930. His 974 runs at 139.14 with four centuries on that tour remains to this day the highest aggregate run tally scored in a Test match series.

The Don scored two triple centuries and three doubles in England and his worst tour of the country came in 1948 as the 39-year-old skipper of the famous Invincibles that beat the English 4-0 in the Test series and went unbeaten on the tour to the UK. To put things in perspective, Bradman scored 508 runs that tour at 72.57 in five Tests. I’ll remind you again – this was the bloke’s worst tour of England.

His is the easiest of selections.

4. Viv Richards – 24 matches – 2057 runs at 64.28, five 100s, 12 50s
While I perhaps controversially left him out of my ROW side to Australia, there’s no way I’m leaving Richards out of my side to England.

Nowhere was Richards better than in England, not even in the Caribbean. In five tours of the country, Richards never ended up on the losing side in a series, skippering the last two touring parties.

The great batsman’s finest tour to England was his first in 1976, scoring 829 runs at 118.42 with three centuries including two double hundreds. The 291 scored in the fifth and final Test of that tour at the Oval remains his highest score in Test match cricket.

There are some men that transcend cricket, and to talk about Richards’ run-scoring feats in England as purely statistics perhaps misses the point.

Richards strode to the crease like a king and batted with the kind of arrogance and confidence rarely seen before. Many an Englishman was sent chasing leather all around the ground when the king was in full flow. He rightfully assumes his place in this line-up.

5. Allan Border – 25 matches – 2082 runs at 65.06, five 100s, 12 50s
The third and final middle order spot for this XI came down to a three-way battle between three greats and former Australian captains: Allan Border, Steve Waugh and Steve Smith.

Waugh had the highest average (74.22) and the most hundreds of the trio (seven), and Smith probably the greatest single Ashes series performance (2019 with 774 runs at 110.57), but my selection in the end was Border, who played a record 25 Tests in England over five tours and never finished a tour to the country averaging less than 54.

(Photo by Adrian Murrell/Getty Images)

While Steve Smith might run away with this spot in a couple of years’ time, I just couldn’t ignore Border’s consistency time and time again in England. Beginning his Test career amid an Australian team in crisis in the late ’70s and ’80s, Border matured into the finest Australian batsman of the era and a formidable captain.

Border’s 1989 Australians, labelled as the worst touring Australian side to the UK, firmly etched themselves in folklore, trouncing the Poms 4-0 and setting the wheels in motion for the great Australian side of the 1990s.

With the cavalier Richards and stylish Bradman coming in before him, Border adds some steel and grit to the batting order.

6. Garfield Sobers – 26 matches – 2408 runs at 57.33, seven 100s, 12 50s; 83 wickets at 29.03, four five-wicket hauls, best bowling in an innings 6-21 (stats include ROW tour in 1970)
The great West Indian backs up his selection in the ROW team to Australia with selection in this team (the only man selected in both sides). Sobers’ record in England is actually better than Australia, averaging 57.33 with the bat and 29.03 with the ball over six tours to the country (one as captain of the Rest of the World team in 1970).

Sobers put together two great all-round tours of England. As captain of the 1966 West Indies side that beat the English 3-1, Sobers topped the run-scoring with 722 runs at 103.14 with three hundreds and finished as the third leading wicket-taker of the series with 20 wickets at 27.25.

In 1970, leading a Rest of the World outfit against the English, Sobers led both the batting and bowling with 588 runs at 73.50 and 21 wickets at 21.52, leading the side to another 3-1 series win.

The greatest all-rounder of all time, he’s an easy pick for this side.

(Photo by S&G/PA Images via Getty Images)

7. Adam Gilchrist – ten matches – 521 runs at 40.08, one 100, two 50s; 45 dismissals
Another relatively straightforward pick, Australia’s Adam Gilchrist takes the gloves in this XI.

Replacing the great Ian Healy in the Australian side in the late 1990s, Gilchrist took to Test cricket like a duck to water. No wicketkeeper in Test match history influenced more matches with his dynamic batting, coming in at five down. Gilchrist’s first tour of England was a successful one as part of the victorious Australian side of 2001 scoring 340 runs at 68 and taking 26 dismissals.

His return tour to the country as part of the ill-fated 2005 series for Australia was less successful, but he was one of several in a side to perform poorly against the rejuvenated Poms. Nevertheless, he holds off Rod Marsh and Healy to take his place in this side.

8. Shane Warne – 22 matches – 129 wickets at 21.94, eight five-wicket hauls, three ten-wicket hauls, best bowling in an innings – 7-165
Has anyone ever announced themselves in Test match cricket in a country like Shane Keith Warne? If you don’t know what I’m referring to, type in ‘Shane Warne Gatting ball’ on YouTube.

Over four series to England, Warne bamboozled, mystified and dominated English batsmen with a brand of spin bowling never seen in the country before. It adds salt to the wound that the English endured their worst era of spin bowling ever during Warne’s dominance – Robert Croft, Peter Such, Ashley Giles and Phil Tufnell sound familiar?

Hugely influential in three Ashes series wins, Warne’s finest performance on English soil came in the famous 2005 Ashes tour when Australia’s dominance was finally broken by an inspired English side. Warne’s 40 wickets at 19.93 included ten-wicket match hauls at Edgbaston and the Oval.

Sri Lanka’s Muttiah Muralitharan actually has better stats on a per-match basis but I just couldn’t ignore Warne’s total body of work in England. He is the leading overseas wicket-taker in Test matches in England and rightly takes the spin-bowling spot in this XI.

(Photo by Rui Vieira/EMPICS via Getty Images)

9. Dennis Lillee – 16 matches – 96 wickets at 20.56, six five-wicket hauls, two ten-wicket hauls, best bowling in an innings 7-89
The great DK Lillee was actually my third seamer picked for this side in a tight contest with many others. In the end, selection came down to Lillee and Malcolm Marshall and you could toss a coin to make the pick.

I ended up going with Lillee, who is the highest wicket-taker among overseas pacemen in Test cricket in England. The great Australian went on three Ashes tours to the UK, finishing as the leading wicket-taker in the series twice.

Lillee’s third and final Ashes tour in 1981 was his finest. Forming an outstanding new-ball attack with Terry Alderman, he finished with 39 wickets for the series (his greatest ever tally for a series). Having won man-of-the-match honours in the first Test, Lillee signed off in England for good in the fifth and final Test at the Oval with his best ever match figures in the country of 11-159 (including 7-89 in the first innings). He is the senior statesman in this bowling unit, leading the way for my next two picks.

10. Glenn McGrath – 14 matches – 87 wickets at 19.34, eight five-wicket hauls, best bowling in an innings 8-38
How accurate is it to suggest that a stray cricket ball on Day 1 of the second Test of the 2005 Ashes served to end Australia’s 16-year Ashes stranglehold?

Perhaps I’m stretching things a little but such was the influence of this man against the Poms throughout his career. Like his great Aussie mates Lillee and Warne, Glenn McGrath just loved bowling to the Poms. The man from Narromine in New South Wales averaged less than 21 against England with the ball in all conditions but was at his absolute masterful best in English conditions.

Like Lillee, McGrath went on three Ashes tours and finished as the leading wicket-taker in the series twice, spearheading the Australian attack to series wins in 1997 and 2001. Only Terry Alderman has more five-wicket hauls in England than McGrath’s eight and his 8-38 at Lord’s in 1997 remains the best innings return for a paceman in England post-WW1. McGrath’s strike rate of 39.8 is also the best among all overseas bowlers to have taken more than 35 wickets in England. He deserves his place in this side, although his batting at ten suggests this tail might be fairly brittle!

Sports opinion delivered daily 

   

11. Terry Alderman – 12 matches – 83 wickets at 19.33, ten five-wicket hauls, one ten-wicket haul, best bowling in an innings 6-128
Other than Bradman, Terry Alderman has claim to being the greatest per-series performer in England of any overseas cricketer. Alderman’s record was relatively modest in Australia and New Zealand and downright terrible in the West Indies and Pakistan but he was a demigod among bowlers in the motherland.

The ultimate swing bowler, Alderman thrived in English conditions with the Dukes ball. His returns of 42 wickets in 1981 and 41 wickets in 1989 are numbers one and two on the list of wickets taken in a series in England for an overseas bowler and beaten only by Jim Laker’s 46 wickets in 1956 among all bowlers. His ten five-wicket hauls are also a record for an overseas bowler in England.

Alderman’s 41 wickets in 1989 were instrumental in helping Allan Border’s young side reclaim the Ashes, kick-starting an era of utter dominance for the Aussies. He takes the new ball for this side.

So there you have it. Graeme Smith leads seven Aussies and three West Indians into battle against the all-time England XI. To make things fun, how about I make this side play a five-Test series against my all-time England XI at Lord’s, Old Trafford, Trent Bridge, Headingley and the Oval.

Who do you think prevails and by what score? Who do you think will be the man of the series?

The Crowd Says:

2020-06-23T18:47:02+00:00

Pierro

Roar Rookie


Smiths record is weighing in ahead of pontings on average now and in front of border chapell and waugh but will be good to see him play India (if possible this summer) and England again although thats in Aus next year , he’s been robbed of a key year or so (not that we had much touring this year anyway ) . Ponting interestingly had an average of 60 until he took the captaincy where the ashes series got in his head a bit and he may have played on a tad too long. As a batsman he’s got to be rated as Australias second best post war but Smith may change that if he can keep it going a few more years and hold his average above 55 as he gets older and bats on which will no doubt lower a bit surely. Marshall could well be the best pace bowler of all time given his average and record

2020-06-20T15:33:16+00:00

Micko

Roar Rookie


I think something that should be taken into account when selecting teams like this is the England team itself: what were the better generations and teams that England had? Who feasted on a weak England team, and who stood up under pressure and delivered when England were on top and dominant at home?

AUTHOR

2020-06-20T13:55:33+00:00

Tim Ponnusamy

Roar Rookie


Thanks for the kind words mate (what is your name btw so I can call you that) haha. I'm planning to do India next so keen to hear your opinion on that!

AUTHOR

2020-06-20T13:54:33+00:00

Tim Ponnusamy

Roar Rookie


......you're joking right Rowdy? Wouldn't make your best Aussie X1 of cricketers without qualification? Or do you mean your best Aussie X1 discounting all people called Don? Wowweeee!!

AUTHOR

2020-06-20T13:53:28+00:00

Tim Ponnusamy

Roar Rookie


Hi Pierro, My god leaving Marshall out was tough! Maybe I should've just gone for the copout and put a touring squad of 15. I think Steve Smith is one more great Ashes tour away from cementing the #5 spot too.

2020-06-18T16:06:29+00:00

Pierro

Roar Rookie


Like the team alot , could flip a coin between Steve Waugh , border and smith . Was good to be reminded just how good alderman Was there . McGrath slaughtered them . Line and length lbw specialists . How does one leave Marshall out what a task

2020-06-18T13:14:02+00:00

Rowdy

Roar Rookie


I thought l'd see whats going on in the cricket pages. Well Bradman wouldn't be in my Best Aussie Team so no fear of him being captain. Too divisive.

2020-06-18T11:02:03+00:00

All day Roseville all day

Roar Guru


Hi Tim, it's all good. The beauty of these exercises is that none of us can prove the others wrong ! I honestly believe that a champion in one era would be a champion in any era, and therefore that the first 90 years of Test cricket had great players who would be equally great today. That's probably why all-time teams named by Bradman himself, Cricinfo, Wisden etc, and the ICC's all-time peak player ratings, include a fair number of pre-1970s and even pre-1920s players. And I didn't write that the players that you cited, would be "equally as strong." I wrote that they would be in a "competitive 2nd XI," if "numbers in England" were the criteria. So let's all keep researching, entertaining each other, and challenging each other. You, me, Tigerbill, Jon, JGK, DaveJ, matth, Paul, Patrick, Josh, Arnab and anyone else who wants to.

2020-06-18T09:53:32+00:00

JGK

Roar Guru


All great captains have friction (Chappell and Border included). But Bradman had a razor sharp cricket mind and of course gravitas in spades.

AUTHOR

2020-06-18T09:11:42+00:00

Tim Ponnusamy

Roar Rookie


Really? No arguments that he's the best player but I haven't read too much about his captaincy in positive light. Far more stuff about him having friction with people like Bill O'Reilly, Jack Fingleton, Keith Miller etc.

2020-06-18T08:33:21+00:00

JGK

Roar Guru


I think Smith is a highly admirable skipper but it is unthinkable that Bradman isn’t the captain in any team he is in.

AUTHOR

2020-06-18T08:10:11+00:00

Tim Ponnusamy

Roar Rookie


Hi mate, The problem with judging cricketers of yesteryear is that the game has changed so much that it's incredibly hard to equate levels of success between eras. Having said that, nobody would question Dennis Lillee's effectiveness today so we're obviously looking for a cutoff point. For me that cutoff point was Bradman, who made his debut just after WW1 (hence why I picked this date). I think most if not all of us would say that Bradman would have been a star in any era. Not sure where you've gotten your bowling average of 17 equating to 25 and corresponding batting average comment from. The problem I have with someone like Fred Spofforth is that he was noted as a demon in his day but how quick did he really bowl? If he's around the 120kph mark then he's just a trundler by today's standards. We know that Larwood was around the 140-150kph mark and this was in the 1930s. Almost all the players you've picked were considered by me with the most unlucky being Steve Waugh, Smith and Malcolm Marshall. Your comment though was 'one could select quite a few teams equally as strong, drawn from 143 years and 10 countries.' Would you really hand over heart look me in the eye and tell me that Dravid, Smith and Chanderpaul is 'equally as strong' as Bradman, Richards, Border..... Also Amla only opened the innings twice in 215 innings.

AUTHOR

2020-06-18T07:59:09+00:00

Tim Ponnusamy

Roar Rookie


Marshall was your first bowler chosen, interesting! I'm big wraps on Graeme Smith as a skipper. He's my skipper in any side he plays in unless Mark Taylor is in the team too.

2020-06-18T03:22:47+00:00

JGK

Roar Guru


No. I think with McGrath in you need a bit more pace from the other quicks, hence Marshall (who was actually my first bowler chosen anyway). And actually, I missed that Smith was skipper. But no, Bradman would have been skipper of my team.

AUTHOR

2020-06-18T03:18:27+00:00

Tim Ponnusamy

Roar Rookie


Hi JGK, you didn't have Alderman in your side? Interesting! Agree with Graeme Smith as skipper?

2020-06-18T03:16:20+00:00

JGK

Roar Guru


Nice team. I had 3 different to you - Waugh for Border, Healy for Gilly and Marshall for Alderman. I limited myself to bowlers with more than 60 wickets (hence excluding Garner and his ridiculous 55 wickets at 16.56 in 10 Tests). My alternate team of players you didn't pick (min 60 wickets, 1000 runs and current players): Morris (1,033 runs at 57.39) Bruce Mitchell (1,336 runs at 55.67) Dravid (1,376 runs at 68.80) Chanderpaul (1,399 runs at 66.62) S Waugh (1,633 runs at 74.23) Macartney (1,054 runs at 45.83, 22 wickets at 26.41) Healy (60ct, 7st, 624 runs at 31.20) Lindwall (60 wickets at 20.97, 386 runs at 22.71) Trumble (67 wickets at 20.36, 464 runs at 23.20) Marshall (94 wickets at 18.70) Ambrose (88 wickets at 20.77) The batting is a bit stodgy (hence I added Macartney as the allrounder) but full of batsmen who hated getting out so I reckon they would bat any bowling side into submission. And imagine seeing off Marshall and Lindwall, only for Ambrose to come steaming in!

2020-06-18T01:13:21+00:00

All day Roseville all day

Roar Guru


Hi Tim, your team, your call. But everything's relative. More than 40% of all Ashes matches and cricketers pre-dated WWII, so surely a corresponding proportion would have been "great" ? And if a past bowler's average of 17 (eg Spofforth) is equivalent to 25 today, then a past batsman's average of 39 (eg Trumper) must equally be similar to 60 today ? Anyway, if this is just a "numbers in England" game, then here's a competitive 2nd XI- Bill Ponsford, ave 62 Hashim Amla, ave 60 Rahul Dravid, ave 68 Steve Smith, ave 65 Shiv Chanderpaul, ave 66 Steve Waugh, ave 74 Kumar Sangakkara (wk), ave 41 Malcolm Marshall, 18 matches, 94 wkts at ave 18 Joel Garner, 10 matches, 55 wkts at ave 16 Fred Spofforth, 7 matches, 38 wkts at ave 17 Murali, 6 matches, 48 wkts at ave 19

AUTHOR

2020-06-18T00:51:46+00:00

Tim Ponnusamy

Roar Rookie


Select an equally as strong X1 and let's compare!

AUTHOR

2020-06-18T00:29:51+00:00

Tim Ponnusamy

Roar Rookie


Hi Patrick, Alderman is probably my first pick in either this or the Australian ROW side that I wouldn’t consider an All Time Great. His record in England though justified selection. Lillee’s selection was close with Marshall, Ambrose, Garner, Alan Davidson and Michael Holding chasing at his tail. I agonised over Smith vs Waugh vs Border. I went with Border for two reasons. 1) His consistency series after series in England – he never had a bad or subpar tour of England 2) He often played a lone hand in England in a poor Australian side and faced much better bowling than Waugh. This argument is also valid for Steve Smith though!

AUTHOR

2020-06-18T00:26:35+00:00

Tim Ponnusamy

Roar Rookie


Hi mate, I see your point. I should have called it the Greatest Post WW1 Rest of the World X1 to play England in England (the heading just seems a bit clunky). As for the period from WWI to 1970, I don’t think anyone’s performances were good enough to unseat anyone in this team. Everyone from that period was considered. This wasn’t just a team done off the top of my head I genuinely looked at batting and bowling records in England for this.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar