Why Super Rugby AU is the competition we never knew we needed

By Carrick Ryan / Roar Rookie

It’s Tahs vs Brumbies week. We have two of them every year. But for some reason, this one feels different.

For the first time in years, I just want my team to win. I’m not looking at the table to think which Aussie team has the best chance of a home semi-final. I’m not hoping that the loser gets a bonus point. I just want my team to play well and smash the opposition.

This sensation, this genuine tribalism in my team, is something I haven’t felt in years and now I understand why.

The amazing strength of Super Rugby was that almost every game was an international fixture, but in a way, I think this ultimately became its flaw. Every week was a mini Bledisloe, and during a period of unprecedented New Zealand international dominance, we were losing every week.

As much as it pains my Aussie pride to say, it simply isn’t fun getting beaten every weekend. Now to be fair, I would wager that over the past three years there would be few clubs from any rugby-playing nation that could beat the Crusaders or the Hurricanes at home, but as fate would have it, that was our domestic duty.

I suspect this has played a large part of why so many former Super Rugby fans have turned to Shute Shield and Hospital Cup in recent years, they were sick of seeing their team getting flattened to New Zealand commentary.

Super Rugby AU has reinvigorated my love for the Super Rugby franchises. I know that every week the fans of two Australian franchises will be cheering while even the losers can look forward to seeing the best players from the other team in Wallaby gold later in the year.

Now I don’t know enough about TV rights deals to know if Super Rugby AU can financially sustain itself on its own, maybe we need to expand internally (South Australia?), maybe we need to allow more foreign players, all I know is that this feels different in a good way and I want this feeling to continue.

The concept of a Super 8 post-season would make the international clashes between our best clubs something special again, something to look forward to all year, especially if that means we can see some of the best Japanese Top League clubs (full or former Wallabies) play against our clubs.

But in the meantime, a domestic competition that crowns a domestic champion is the key to reinvigorating the Australian public’s love of the game. Once that passion returns, then we can worry about how to beat the All Blacks again.

The Crowd Says:

2020-08-26T23:22:57+00:00

Ulrich

Roar Rookie


Jacko, NZ said NZ Aotearoa and maybe ANZAC. NZRU excluded all of SA (and Arg) with that statement. So, respectfully, don’t pretend to be on a high-horse now. AUS are doing their own thing. SA would love to do its own thing if not for the government. At the same time, SA has reminded both NZ and AUS they actually have a contractual obligation in a press release. Yes, no doubt SA has interests in the NH, but we at least appear to be the only ones publically stating “hang on”. I suspect we’re also doing it on behalf of Argentina. Because around here it seems everyone just thinks “oh well f ’em”. The initial plan was for the Pumas (RSA PUMAS as in the franchise from Nelspruit) and Griquas (Kimberley) to join some competition, not necessarily the PRO 14. Now, SARU’s hand appears to be forced. The Kings are out and probably the Cheetahs with them and all the rest heading north. Thanks for the dialogue.

2020-08-26T22:47:12+00:00

Ulrich

Roar Rookie


What you're talking about is the modern equivalent of an Australian "Currie Cup" the way it used to be. It's also good to hear things are improving. I've had the feeling as a South African that Australia are not far off and things may be coming together. What COVID allows, is for the administration to put something out there and see how it goes. That's not an option ordinarily. Australia now has the freedom to try things outside of other commitments, while taking financial implications into consideration, of course. So, might as well swing and try hit a six. Go for all or nothing! I've been advocating for SA to keep the game local during this time and perhaps next year. Get the Jaguares and Georgia involved. We would have the 4 SR franchises and the two PRO 14 franchises + 2 additional teams. They can be located in SA for the duration of the tournament. Full strength. Will be an immense challenge for SA to win its own "Currie Cup" with a virtual Argentina team on shores, but they will have the disadvantage of lacking supporters so it all evens out. Georgia has been granted permission to include a team in the Currie Cup 1st division so they may as well go all out with their best - notwithstanding the players committed to NH clubs. We can call it the Safari Cup or something. Obviously we'd never share the CC with any other because it's sacred and was gifted to SA over a century ago so we'd share it among ourselves.

AUTHOR

2020-08-26T00:44:47+00:00

Carrick Ryan

Roar Rookie


pretty sure they're only allowed 10% or something? I know GIO stadium is capped at 1500 people

2020-08-25T06:23:59+00:00

JD Kiwi

Roar Rookie


That would also be a massive climb down Sluggy. But let's see what eventuates before jumping to conclusions.

2020-08-24T23:26:56+00:00

The Late News

Roar Rookie


Is Qantas money like Monopoly money?

2020-08-24T22:47:00+00:00

Sydney Awards

Roar Rookie


No harm in crossover games mid season so we can all muse over how we are doing.. Then go back finish our respective seasons and finals and let the competition winners battle it out. You get local rivalry and then you also get the exposure to the other nation. I really can't see how anyone is a loser. The crossover games provide interest and lengthen the season for fans and broadcasters. Then the best NZ teams fight it out and the best AU teams fight it out. The winners of each playoff. Pretty simple and something to write about on both sides of the Tasman. Australia needs to revive interest in our teams because most casual sports fans here are not going to watch the Crusaders no matter how good they are. If Australian professional rugby goes down then some pain could eventually be felt by NZ so it is in everyone's interest to work together.

2020-08-24T22:38:47+00:00

Sydney Awards

Roar Rookie


That's the point. Like fries with a schnitzel it maybe just filler to some but part of a complete meal to others!

2020-08-24T22:02:49+00:00

Sluggy

Roar Guru


The " massive climb down" appears to be on the way, but from the NZR, if Matt McILraith's article in the Guardian this morning is correct. The same thing is being reported on Stuff by Paul Cully. Things are starting to point towards a 5+5 team TT in 2022.

2020-08-24T16:22:15+00:00

The Ferret

Roar Rookie


And even with Covid limiting the crowd sizes... NSW have the same size crowds they usually got Pre Covid.

2020-08-22T23:57:20+00:00

Sterling

Guest


Jacko, Teams in our domestic comp will be based in the largest metro areas. So outside of the big 5, I only see Gold Coast, Newcastle and Adelaide as the other options.

2020-08-22T23:41:10+00:00

Sterling

Guest


Pirate, I'm suggesting a Gold Coast team replace QC as just Gold Coast. Not representative of QC at all. Just on the basis of the next largest populated city from a business point of view.

2020-08-22T20:31:24+00:00

JD Kiwi

Roar Rookie


Sluggy, I was replying to OOP, an Aussie, who favours fewer Aussie teams (for the same reasons as Ben Darwin, Eddie Jones etc). If you were on here more regularly you’d understand the context of our long running discussions and my thoughts on NZR’s diplomatic fail. Even my first post on this thread should have provided a bit of a clue.

2020-08-22T15:18:14+00:00


Jacko, this is all becoming rather confusing. Does NZRU want Super Rugby matches played between SA, OZ and NZ? Because baed on current information it doesn’t seem to be. Your country may be great at rugby, but you aren’t the only cash cow when it comes to tests. Pardon my judgment but it all is starting to become a tad too arrogant from the land of the long white cloud.

2020-08-22T12:19:27+00:00

Sluggy

Roar Guru


Excellent post Ray L. Jacko, can you please print that out and study how you structure a persuasive contribution, instead of just dashing a few lines off on your phone complete with misquotes, and calling someone else’s post “total BS” and accusing them of pure ignorance. There is a line and you have crossed it. And incidentally, Ray didn’t say that, and the word you want is spelt “furphy”.

2020-08-22T12:10:22+00:00

Sluggy

Roar Guru


“EFF I see your Force Owner or Backer is trying to buy into the NZ SR comp and set up his own team in the NZ domestic comp.” Here we go again, making stuff up Jacko. What Brett Harris said in the Guardian was that the BOP/China GRR team might be putting in an EOI to NZR. Far from Twiggy Forrest trying to buy into NZ and set up his own team. I expect that BOP/China needed to talk to him about whether existing GRR based funding would be continued for that purpose. I suspect the answer was “no”. I don’t know whether you read things too quickly, or get the wrong idea about what people mean and then “quote” that, but if you want your posts to be taken seriously, you need to stick to actual word for word quotes, and stop it with the straw man arguments. At the moment (three times in this thread) you have misquoted a post, or a news article, in such a way that you sound like you are doing it deliberately to troll people.

2020-08-22T11:59:42+00:00

Sluggy

Roar Guru


Jacko doesn't let accuracy get in the way of his "quotes".

2020-08-22T11:55:33+00:00

Sluggy

Roar Guru


It's on Kayo Micko. You can stream it on your computer.

2020-08-22T11:48:06+00:00

Sluggy

Roar Guru


“What RA are saying is we cant compete so we dont want to play you at Domestic level” RA did not say that Jacko. That is not true. They simply rejected NZR’s ultimatum about a TT comp. Stop making things up.

2020-08-22T11:43:29+00:00

Sluggy

Roar Guru


"a more evenly matched 5+3 would be a massive climb down." RA acted in the interests of Australian rugby after NZR delivered its ultimatum about wanting only 2 teams, and wanting control of the finances and the competition as a whole. It was a no-brainer to say no thanks. No amount of semantics will get past the fact that NZR's arrogant dictatorial approach locked itself into a competition which it has belatedly admitted is not sustainable after the short term. They now say they will be reviewing the EOIs next week. Apparently they have a couple from BOP and Tasman, or something. EOIs that will both fail one of the McKinsey recommendations - keeping NZ players concentrated in the existing 5 teams, and therefore, so the management consultants say, brand All Black strong. The McKinsey plan for NZR to take single control of TT rugby has crashed and burned, and the only massive climb down here will be the one NZR have to make to maximise broadcast money and get into the 500% larger Australian TV market. Lastly, your making provocatory, & deprocatory statements like "Of course, if Australia find that five teams are too many, they can always join us with fewer teams at a later date" is churlish. We get it that you Kiwis are so full of yourselves and how good you are at rugby that you can't understand how RA could have knocked back NZR's ultimatum, and chosen its own path. But it did, eh?

2020-08-22T07:15:12+00:00

Joe King

Guest


It's funny isn't it? I've never enjoyed SR so much! Every Aussie game, win or lose, has been enjoyable. I even enjoy watching the Kiwi teams play more because it's their own comp. I'm sure it would be the same if I was watching SA teams in their own comp.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar