Why the Reds have the best defence in Australia

By Nicholas Bishop / Expert

It was probably the worst professional defence in Australia, but now it is the best. At the beginning of the (pre-COVID) Super Rugby season, the title of top defence in the country belonged to the Brumbies – now it is Queensland’s.

Whether it will be enough to swing the Reds across the finish line ahead of their rivals from Canberra will be decided in the final of a highly enjoyable Super Rugby AU competition this coming weekend. Nonetheless, it has been an astonishing transformation, ever since that watershed 45-12 loss to the Waratahs back in Round 6.

The Reds conceded half a dozen tries in that game, but they have only given up half that number in the following matches. They have been conceding an average of 0.75 tries and seven points per game in four matches against the Rebels (who they played twice), Force and Brumbies.

One of the more remarkable stats from that run of defensive success has been the kicking ratio. While the Reds have authored 25.5 kicks per game, their opponents have averaged only 19.25. That is quite a significant difference.

Moreover, the majority of those kicks have come from the boot of halves Tate McDermott and James O’Connor, neither of whom would claim even in their most intoxicated moments that the kicking game is their strong suit.

Since Round 6, Queensland have been able to hand over the lion’s share of possession to their opponents in the sure knowledge that they would not be able to hurt them with it.

One of the major planks in that new-found confidence has been the selection of the back five forwards, as I have outlined extensively in previous articles. The combination of Fraser McReight and Liam Wright on the flanks, plus the shift of another recent ex-flanker in Lukhan Salakaia-Loto into the second row, has paid out spectacular dividends.

Lukhan Salakaia-Loto. (Photo by Bradley Kanaris/Getty Images)

The Reds have been able to blanket the width of the field while sustaining the momentum of the rush on their defensive line, and that has been at the heart of their success.

This is really the essence of the modern defensive approach. Shortage of numbers is very rarely a reason for the men on the line to stop rushing upfield, but there is a correlative premium placed on the ability of players to cover the space they leave behind them.

The start of the semi-final at Suncorp Stadium provided an excellent case in point, with the Rebels looking to run the ball out of their own 22:

On the offensive side, there are two passes behind the first line of forwards between the halfback and Matt To’omua, and then between To’omua and second receiver Billy Meakes.

On defence, despite the fact openside wing Filipo Daugunu has dropped off in anticipation of a clearing kick, there is no stopping the rush from a short-handed line:

There are essentially only two rushers – Liam Wright and Hamish Stewart – at the top of the screenshot. They will be looking to drive up and infield, and pressure Meakes and the men outside him.

It is the responsibility of two players currently in midfield or on the right side of the field – scrumhalf McDermott (1) and lock Salakaia-Loto (2) – to fill the space on the wide left.

This kind of defensive policy was a pipe-dream only ten or 15 years ago. The defenders of that era would have followed the yellow lines, pushing only a short distance upfield before drifting out towards the sideline. The scrumhalf would have trotted across the field behind the line as a sweeper.

The aerobic demands now are far greater than they were back then. All four of those key Reds defenders have to cover more ground and fulfil more difficult roles.

Why bother? Why not just amble across the park and meet the attackers on the right touchline? The principal idea is to introduce a sense of pressure into the minds and bodies of the Rebels’ primary distributors:

Significantly, the pass off Meakes’ left hand hits grass before it reaches Reece Hodge. Although the Rebels eventually pass halfway before Hodge is taken by McDermott, there is a second significant moment as the ruck forms, with Daugunu digging in hard over the tackle ball and causing a delay in the release.

Both these themes would be revived in more important contexts in the remainder of the game.

The great Boston Celtics centre Bill Russell once said “The idea is not to block every shot. The idea is to make your opponent believe you might block every shot.”

It is vital to sow those seeds of doubt:

Here is another similar example. The ball travels more or less successfully through the hands of Meakes and To’omua, and beyond the steep rushing lines of Jordan Petaia and Chris Feauai-Sautia. But by the time it arrives in the hands of Dane Haylett-Petty out on the left, he is confronted by two defenders who have run from the opposite side of the pitch to greet him (Stewart and Fraser McReight):

Like Daugunu before him, McReight is in a strong position to force a turnover at the end of the play.

It was no coincidence that the Reds’ first try of the game derived from Queensland’s unwillingness to dilute their pressure on the ball:

Petaia is attacking the space between To’omua and Meakes, Feauai-Sautia the space between Meakes and his outside support. The ball will never reach those three extra attackers out on the Rebels left:

The same themes were reiterated throughout the match:

In the first example, McReight and Petaia both choose to stand and stick and cut the outside attackers loose, but the play ends with a turnover by the Reds openside flanker.

In the second instance, the Queensland defence rightly calls a rush on the short side after recognising that the first two Rebels receivers will be tight forwards:

Nominally the Rebels have a five-to-three overlap, but because the ball has to travel through lock Matt Philip and prop Cameron Orr to exploit it, it ends up in the hands of emergency wing Moses Sorovi instead!

The two main aspects of pressure evident from that very first sequence – on Billy Meakes’ passing and at the tackle from Filipo Daugunu – both proved to be influential factors at critical moments in the game.

Meakes stuffed up an overlap close to the Reds goalline because he believed that, to borrow Bill Russell’s phrase, ‘his shot might be blocked’:

Daugunu was the game’s outstanding on-ball exponent, surpassing the efforts of Liam Wright, Richard Hardwick and even McReight. He had two turnovers off the wing, and another in the scramble after a long Rebels break down the middle of the field:

Those are no lightweights trying to remove the Reds left winger, either – Philip and Hodge in the first instance, Marika Koroibete and Meakes in the second, Jermaine Ainsley and Hodge in the third.

Summary
The one remaining objective of the Reds’ Australia-leading defence is now to travel to Canberra and bring a championship back home to Ballymore. It all seems a long, long way from that dark night at the Sydney Cricket Ground on August 8.

The way in which the Reds defend is a graphic illustration of how the modern game has changed, as professional standards of aerobic conditioning have steadily improved. They deliver constant frontal pressure on the major distributors, either by sticking the man or by attacking space between the passer and his target, in the knowledge that their halfback and back five forwards can cover most of the spaces they leave behind.

(Photo by Chris Hyde/Getty Images)

Even if the ball does manage somehow to get to the edge, they have one of the best on-ball exponents in the Australian game in Filipo Daugunu, ready to pick off any inaccuracies at the tackle area. Don’t even mention Liam Wright or Fraser McReight.

It is largely as a result of that defensive improvement that as many as nine Queenslanders may find themselves selected in Dave Rennie’s first Wallabies team on October 11 – Brandon Paenga-Amosa and Taniela Tupou in the front row with Lukhan Salakaia-Loto behind them, Liam Wright and Harry Wilson in the back row, and Tate McDermott, James O’Connor, Jordan Petaia and Filipo Daugunu in the backline.

That lot may even be able to convince a few All Blacks that they can block the shots, and manage the Kiwi attack successfully.

The Crowd Says:

AUTHOR

2020-09-25T06:04:09+00:00

Nicholas Bishop

Expert


Yes because they had to shift the lineout captaincy Fin, and I'm not sure LSL was ready for it. Angus Blyth has made trojan efforts but add Rodda to that back five and you prob have the SRA winners!

2020-09-24T13:03:36+00:00

Phil

Roar Rookie


Agree Tom English has definitely been missed. should have been Wallabies 13.

2020-09-23T10:57:34+00:00

Phil

Roar Rookie


A bit late to read this article but I enjoyed what you've highlighted Nick. A few points on it: 1. The key in your first clip is that Daugunu doesn't rush up which is contrary to the type of defence I am critical of. So for me this highlights the benefits of not rushing up out wide. 2. Whilst I like the idea of inside defenders and inside backs rushing up, the idea of outside defenders cutting loose guys like Koroibete, or at Test level Sevu Reece or George Bridge, is still not something I would ever buy into. It's a massive risk. Those kind of players relish the opportunity of being given even the tiniest bit of space and a one on one with the last defender. 3. The idea of relying on players like LSL to cover these types of backs in defence in the wider channels is also bemusing. He's been found out one too many times at the highest level for his poor defensive reads and poor technique. Was it any surprise he knocked himself out getting his head in the wrong spot?

2020-09-20T03:23:37+00:00

Fin

Guest


Hi Nick, Do you think not having Rodda around for the second half of the season caused problems for the Reds lineout?

2020-09-19T23:02:35+00:00

Fox

Roar Guru


Hi Nick thought you find this an interesting read https://www.stuff.co.nz/sport/rugby/all-blacks/300110601/from-reject-to-respect-rieko-ioane-a-shining-light-on-centre-stage Note his stats next to Jack Goodhues this season and especially his defensive stats in the tackle success rate next to Goodhues.

2020-09-19T00:08:16+00:00

Phantom

Roar Rookie


I think the chiefs would beat them his year.

2020-09-18T11:19:23+00:00

Fin

Guest


Nick, This is my all time greatest Southport School First XV; 1. Rob Lawton; 2. Tom Lawton; 3. James Slipper; 4. Angus Blyth; 5. Nathan Sharpe; 6. Rob Simmons; 7. Nathan Grey; 8. Scott Higginbotham; 9. Noah Lolesio; 10. Mat Rogers; 11. Barry Lea; 12. Peter Jackson; 13. Ben Tapuai; 14. Luke Morahan; 15. Jock Campbell Coaches - Mat Taylor & Nathan Grey

AUTHOR

2020-09-18T11:07:53+00:00

Nicholas Bishop

Expert


That's quite a team Fin!

2020-09-18T10:43:16+00:00

Fin

Guest


Hi Nick, When are you going to pen an article about The Southport School down on the Gold Coast? Up front they have had Tommy Lawton and James Slipper. In the second row Nathan Sharpe, Rob Simmons, and Angus Blyth. In the backrow Higgers and Nathan Grey who was #7 at school. At stand-off Noah Lolesio and Mat Rogers, on the wing Luke Morahan, and at the back Jock Campbell. On the coaching front they are well served with defence covered as two past old boys are the current and previous wallabies defence coach - Nathan Grey & Matt Taylor. Dave Rennie has decided to reside on the Gold Coast and has attended some of their games this year with Taylor.

2020-09-18T09:54:47+00:00

Brian Westlake

Roar Rookie


Yep... And McDermott is going to rate up there with some of the greatest halves mentioned. Like Matt Henjak

2020-09-18T07:00:15+00:00

Bentnuc

Roar Pro


Yep Wright has been great too. The wing and fullback stocks look very good for the next few years :stoked:

AUTHOR

2020-09-18T06:42:47+00:00

Nicholas Bishop

Expert


There really does often seem like a too much focus on what they want to do in attack rather than preparing for the constraints and opportunities of the individual defence systems as a priority Yes that is a very good point. :thumbup:

AUTHOR

2020-09-18T06:40:16+00:00

Nicholas Bishop

Expert


Yes I do Fin - they could always rotate responsibilities from time to time to ensure freshness...

2020-09-18T05:39:42+00:00

Fin

Guest


Nick, On this point Do you think the game would improve if there were specialist referees assigned to areas like scrum and breakdown?

2020-09-18T01:40:36+00:00


Scotty...In a way we are saying similar things. Yep Im happy to say that the ABs havnt exactly excelled at handling the rush defence. But I certainly dont blame that as the reasons for the WC loss to England. It is a part of it but it doesnt allow for the fact that the ABs have issues other than the rush defence of other teams. NZ s forwards were not dominant and the backline didnt exactly function as it had been. Changes were made constantly after Dmac was injured as Mounga at 10 bought a different need to the 12 and 13 and this ( to me ) was the area where the Abs lacked the precision of the past WCs. That along with the forwards issues are more to blame for the loss than the rush defence was. Having said all that I am very comfortable with the facts that SA and England have raised their game and that was as much a part of the losses, or near losses, as the effects of rush defence were. Mounga loves going forward but struggles with going backward ( as all 10s do ) and the experience of Bb at 10 would have been better in my opinion but the injury to Dmac forced Hansen to go with Mounga when his gameplan from the pasy 2 years prior had been based around BB at 10 not RM. Even with the full WC completed RM has only had 18 tests and most from the bench so another years worth of tests ( 10-14 more ) would have really helped.

2020-09-17T21:21:03+00:00

soapit

Roar Guru


ps if i were the brumbies for eg. i’d be looking at exploiting the pace of their cover across and testing the inside of the covers angled seam on a switch. check out the samu try the week before. dont think it was planned but see how much space opened up and how little power the defence had for a runner coming back at that angle after coming across at pace. pull them wide and then test out the centre at pace. see how much of the cover has ended up outside the play on koro’s half break above (tho he goes outside again unfortunately) and how much space to the tight five 2nd wave of cover on some of the others. even on the hodge break if he switches after committing tate he’s got a winger with a couple of metres head start on lsl which could well have good outcomes even the one where kellaway gets tackled look how much space is inside, if he managed to step the front and then the first cover defender inside (not unheard of for a winger) theres plenty to work with. . would also like outside runners to have a little more depth in general so they dont have to slow down to catch a rushed pass.

2020-09-17T20:21:58+00:00

soapit

Roar Guru


Yes the Reds seem to be more the selective pressure rather than the full consistent rush of some of the test teams so perhaps not the best example for my complaint. (maybe the test tests dont do exclusively anymore?) There really does often seem like a too much focus on what they want to do in attack rather than preparing for the constraints and opportunities of the individual defence systems as a priority

AUTHOR

2020-09-17T14:58:03+00:00

Nicholas Bishop

Expert


I'm not sure I can allow that much time for the journey Sarge.... :shocked:

2020-09-17T11:45:36+00:00

Sgt Pepperoni

Roar Rookie


I was thinking more about the journey to the plate rather than the digestion :laughing: :laughing:

AUTHOR

2020-09-17T11:41:44+00:00

Nicholas Bishop

Expert


"It" is a very broad complex of systems now, and much of the rush component will only occur in specific situations - which means the surprise value can be preserved...

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar