The night I cried at the SCG

By Peter Hunt / Roar Guru

As the winning runs were scored, I glanced at Allan Border – his shoulders sagging and slumped in cold resignation – and I felt the chill of sadness rise within me.

That distant West Indian summer of 1988/89 had been tough to watch. The Aussies were swept away in the first three Test matches, before winning on a dry, spinning pitch in Sydney and garnering the best of a draw in Adelaide.

My quiescent PTSD, lingering from the 1984/85 trauma, re-emerged from its remission. The pattern was frighteningly familiar, even if the Australians “lost better” in 1988/89 than they did four years earlier.

But it was in the one-dayers where we found some measure of redemption. Competitive throughout, the Aussies twisted the West Indian tail and gave it a yank.

Now I am perched atop the Doug Walters Stand, with some uni mates, watching the deciding match of three finals. I have rarely cheered so hard in support of my team. Not just because I wanted to see my pride in the fight reflected in triumph, but also because I suspected my sub-continental mates were secretly barracking for the opposition.

Throughout the match, storm clouds lurk over my right shoulder and rain occasionally sweeps across the ground.

Batting first, Australia are making steady progress when the first utterly unwelcome interruption occurs. But the scintillating hitting which occurs after the break makes my heart race and leaves my voice hoarse. Dean Jones and Steve Waugh are on a rampage: swishing to the fence, running like demons up and down the pitch and swatting the occasional six.

The euphoria in the crowd is palpable. It’s like the concrete stands have awoken – with thousands of uncontrolled limbs and a multitude of hysterical voices – to converge upon the players. A pitch invasion – born of religious ecstasy – seems a genuine possibility.

Thanks to a final ball six from a Steve Waugh lofted cover drive, the Aussies end on 226 from their 38 overs. In that era, at that ground, it was a difficult total to chase down, even with the luxury of a full set of 50 overs. From a mere 38, the score was nigh impregnable. I could almost see my captain raising the World Series Cup in triumph.

Australian captain Steve Waugh looks over the moon to have retained the Ashes. (AP Photo/Rick Rycroft)

When the Windies lose Gordon Greenidge and Richie Richardson – and falter at 2 for 4 – I feel as close to certain as I could, in a two-horse race, that the game is won.

In the meantime, a bumptious Mexican wave is surging majestically around the ground. But with each revolution, I am in more and more danger of being sullied by partially full beer cups, chicken bones, meat pie crusts and other detritus of uncertain origin. Suddenly a solution emerges. I reach beneath my seat, find my umbrella and create the protective shield I require above my head.

It’s only when I see my Indian mate ducking and weaving, with ever increasing agitation, that I realise I’ve become a target for every well-aimed missile in the Doug Walters Stand. I feel sorry for my unprotected friend; until I remember he’s cheering for the Windies! Then I decide he deserves everything he cops.

Suddenly, the rain returns and the players again leave the field.

When battle is finally rejoined, the Windies face the infinitely less daunting task of scoring just 108 runs in 18 overs.

You see, this is before Messrs Duckworth and Lewis – cricket legends, to be sure – have put their boffin heads together. In the summer of 1988/1989, rain-affected ODIs are still decided by a linear equation of runs per over multiplied by the number of overs available. That the Aussies sustained their run-rate for 38 overs and the Windies only had to match that rate across a mere 18 overs was, at the time, unimportant.

I perform quick calculations in my head and still find some hope in my clinically optimistic mind.

Yet that flickering flame of hope is doused when Vivian Richards causes permanent damage both to the ball and the advertising hoardings at mid-wicket with two thumping shots from Terry Alderman’s first over after the break. The momentum has changed.

From then onwards the outcome is pre-ordained. The victory which seemed certain in my mind is now replaced by an equally certain dread. And then, as if to tattoo my misery onto my brain, King Viv seals the West Indian win by clouting a behemoth of a six into the Ladies Stand… followed by celebrations worthy of the heavy-weight champ he resembles.

Sports opinion delivered daily 

   

Then I see Border – utterly forlorn – wandering aimlessly from the ground, as though he were a little lost. After years of West Indian punishment, I wanted to see my hero enjoy a moment of triumph. Yet that, too, had been washed away. And suddenly my face is in my hands and I’m weeping!

I’m weeping in the Doug Walters Stand!

It’s been a tough summer – nay, a tough decade – and I’m just crushed by the injustice of this outcome. Absent the rain, the game and the series were won.

My West Indies-loving Indian mates console me by saying something about “winning in accord with the rules”. I respond, between gasping sobs, that the Windies won a game of maths, not a game of cricket.

But, to my shame, I’m still sitting in the Doug Walters stand – surrounded by the rubbish which had fallen from the heavens – and I’m blubbering like a child.

The injustice.

Oh, the injustice!

The Crowd Says:

2020-12-12T09:09:38+00:00

JGK

Roar Guru


That might have been his No 3 with the wrong batsmen.

AUTHOR

2020-12-12T04:49:44+00:00

Peter Hunt

Roar Guru


You left out Kim Hughes 100 not out on Boxing Day, from a team score of 198. Same day as Lillee getting Viv on the last ball. Still the best single day of Test Cricket ever!

2020-12-12T04:31:17+00:00

Paul

Roar Guru


Letting out the emotions as you did is a safe & gentle way to express anger, disappointment, etc. I think more than a few TV's around the world have been destroyed, especially by Kiwis last year after the World Cup, the same group again thanks to the infamous Chappell brothers incident and South African fans for any number of early exits from ODI World Cups.

2020-12-12T03:58:28+00:00

Backrower

Guest


Nice reflections on a great, even if unsuccessful, era for Aussie cricket. Can’t help thinking the punishing the Windies gave us steeled us for what was to come with one of the great teams of all time. Some great moments from the Aussie v Windies battles: 1. Gomes - caught G Chappell bowled Lillee for DK to take the record; 2. DK bowling Viv on last ball of day - Viv plays on - rarely seen a bowler as pumped as DK was then; 3. AB scoring 100 in team score of 198 against that great attack; 4. Waugh telling Curtley to get back to his mark; 5. Jones asking Curtley to take his white wrist bands off; 6. Richie Richardson no helmet against Jo Angel with new ball on old WACA pitch; 7. Lara 270 at SCG... 8. Kim Hughes finding it all too much... etc.....

2020-12-12T02:37:35+00:00

JGK

Roar Guru


It was the one where you would take the best X overs of the other team’s innings. So if team 1 played out 2 maidens and team 2 lost two overs to rain, the target wouldn’t change.

2020-12-12T02:09:17+00:00

David Shilovsky

Expert


Nice piece, Peter. Was immersed in your first-hand account.

AUTHOR

2020-12-12T02:05:04+00:00

Peter Hunt

Roar Guru


Agreed! Everything means more in the World Cup.

AUTHOR

2020-12-12T02:04:28+00:00

Peter Hunt

Roar Guru


Yep! And a game which is lesser for it.

AUTHOR

2020-12-12T02:03:57+00:00

Peter Hunt

Roar Guru


I’m not exaggerating the part about crying. I was really upset by the injustice. Yes, I’m still in touch. I’m not sure whether anybody is that excited about the Windies anymore, sadly. But I don’t think my Indian mates will be cheering on the Aussies in the First Test...

AUTHOR

2020-12-12T02:01:00+00:00

Peter Hunt

Roar Guru


I agree they were the glory days. ODIs were much less predictable. Bruce Reid is famous for twice losing an ODI which could not the lost in the last over. The other was against the Kiwis when he couldn’t get his bat on the ball to get any runs.

AUTHOR

2020-12-12T01:57:41+00:00

Peter Hunt

Roar Guru


I was at that semi-final too! The first and likely only time an SCG crowd was cheering the South Africans! Does anybody remember the system which produced a need to score 22 from 1 ball? It was pre-DL and the linear method I describe in my article couldn’t produce that outcome...

2020-12-12T00:15:27+00:00

JGK

Roar Guru


I remember this game well. I have to say at the end of it I was less worried that we didn’t win given the silliness of the rules and was satisfied that Aust were the real winners. If it was a World Cup Final I might have felt differently though.

2020-12-12T00:10:49+00:00

JGK

Roar Guru


I was at that game. Even before the rain, I thought England we’re going to win it.

2020-12-11T23:50:34+00:00

JOHN ALLAN

Guest


In the early days of 50 over cricket, a score of 250 for the side batting first would normally be a winning one. Fast forward to shorter boundaries, heavier bats, restrictions on the number of short balls per over & we have bowlers being used as cannon fodder purely “for entertainment purposes”.

2020-12-11T22:44:19+00:00

Paul

Roar Guru


That was such a tough era for Australian cricket. We didn't have a great side, but had a great skipper and the rare chances we had to beat the Windies seemed to be scuppered in the manner you described so well, Peter. I wonder how many other people "cried"? I didn't but found it very hard to watch any sort of cricket between Australia and the West Indies in that era. Even when I thought we were on top, someone wearing a maroon cap would do something outrageous and my simmering disappointment would rise again. Are your mates still West Indies supporters?

2020-12-11T22:18:55+00:00

Rob Peters

Guest


I was at the SCG a couple of years earlier, another day night affair against England. Where again Australia were on the verge of victory. Last over and England needed 18 to win. Allan Lamb, who was on strike had struggled all the time he was at bat, Defreitas was at the other end. Bruce Reid just needed to keep his line and length and victory was assured. Lamb had other ideas. He peaked at the right time, as he took five balls to create an astonishing victory out of nowhere. Those really were the glory years of one day cricket in Australia, weren't they?

2020-12-11T21:12:50+00:00

matth

Roar Guru


That was the 1992 World Cup semi final.

2020-12-11T18:51:23+00:00

JOHN ALLAN

Guest


Great article. Can anybody else recall an ODI between England & RSA at SCG (I think). Rain intervened & when play resumed, the scoreboard carried the message”RSA require 25 runs from 1 ball”. I thought at the time that the target would be difficult to achieve unless England deliver a plethora of wides, no balls & byes! Duckworth Lewis system was designed to guarantee a result barring a complete washout however in some cases it greatly favours one side. Normally the chasing team particularly if they have sufficient wickets in hand & fielding side are unable to use their bowlers for their full quota.

Read more at The Roar