Essendon Round 5 review

By Charlie Keegan / Roar Guru

Well that was unfortunate.

The Bombers were able to play an out-of-sorts Brisbane Lions back into form but it remains to be seen how profound the implications of last night’s match are in a disrupted 2021 season for the Bombers.

The Bombers played as well as a drenched dog, that is to say that they stunk.

Without further ado here are my take always from the Round 5 match between Essendon and Brisbane.

1. The third top-ten pick makes his debut
Starting off on a positive note, the Bombers were able to debut the last of their top ten draft picks from the 2020 draft in Zach Reid. Reid, a 202-centimetre key defender from the Gippsland, had a serviceable debut on a down night for the Bombers.

He was able to collect the ball ten times, however such was the pressure of Brisbane that he was harried and harassed resulting in a disposal efficiency of 40 per cent. However on a night when the ball entered the inside fifty 67 times for the rampant Lions, and the average disposal efficiency for the Bombers was 62 per cent, I believe that the contributions Reid made were positive and he will improve given the experience.

Fellow first year player Archie Perkins relished the experience at the coal face. He gathered the ball 20 times, tackled four times and played the best game of his short career.

Nikolas Cox on the other hand, was not suited to the torrential conditions and was comprehensively barred from impacting the contest in any consequential way, while it may be somewhat unfair to single him out this was a poor performance.

2. That was a drenching
Like a strange pathetic fallacy in film it felt like the rain was a metaphor for what was a dour performance from the Essendon Footy Club. When the ball was hitting the deck you could see the splashes on the television. The Lions were able to better respond to the brutal conditions as they played themselves back into form.

In particular, the Lions were able to build their victory on repeated inside fifties (67-41), and high quality inside fifty entries too as the Lions took far too many inside fifty marks for such a wet and waterlogged night (14 inside 50 marks-4 inside fifty marks).

While the Bombers were given the rub of the green (or pale blue) they were unable to parlay this into any period of dominance as the Lions led from start to finish.

What stood out to me as the viewer was the Bombers were never able to take clean possession of the ball, and on the rare occasion they were able to do so they panicked and sprayed the ball into the hands of a Lions player resulting in 107 intercept possessions for the Lions.

Part of this is attributable to the youth of the Bombers, but I believe this to be reductive, the Bombers’ game style does not lend itself to that climate as it relies primarily on skill by hand where as gaining territory by foot is the most important as was shown by the multiple spurious deliberate calls last night.

(Photo by Chris Hyde/AFL Photos/via Getty Images)

3. Questions about Bombers big men
Cale Hooker has been a breath of fresh air in the forward line, kicking 16 goals to be equal fourth in the Coleman so far.

Since Sam Draper has gone down with a syndesmosis injury in round two the Bombers have been hamstrung, relying on Wright as their primary ruckman along with Cox providing relief.

This has resulted in Essendon consistently losing the clearances, and forcing defenders to be on the back foot.

When the Bombers are going to come up against the premier big men of the competition I believe unfortunately they will be found wanting. However, hope is not lost the Bombers have two players in the VFL who can ably provide assistance in the ruck in Andrew “totally not Aaron Francis” Phillips and Nick Bryan both of whom have shown optimistic signs over the past few games.

4. Injuries continue to mount
The death by a thousand cuts in modern footy is the injury toll. While this season it has been misfortune leading to the Bombers missing a third of their best 22 side, they are going to struggle to fill the void left by Jordan Ridley due to concussion.

With the new 12-day protocol unfortunately this means he will miss Anzac day adding to the already troublesome injury woes the Bombers have had this year. In positive news it means that Reid will almost certainly get another opportunity to show his stuff against the Magpies on what is the biggest stage for the Bombers this year.

In addition to that, Jayden Laverde and Dyson Heppell have both found confidence with their new role as backmen and Aaron “totally not Phillips” Francis has played his most consistent football in his career to date.

Final thoughts
We are effectively a quarter of the way through the season and the Bombers are one win from six matches. But I’m a glass half full kind of person, so I choose to look at the Bombers being six points from a 3-2 record. This year is a development year and the Bombers have shown enough in their play to justify persisting with Ben Rutten and his coaching staff.

I just hope the rabble rousers in the Bombers fan-base can be patient enough for Truck’s vision of the Bombers to come to fruition.

Round 5 best: (season aggregate in brackets)

1. Andy McGrath. (12).
2. Cale Hooker. (9).
3. Zach Merrett. (18).
4. Archie Perkins (3).
5. Mason Redman (7).
6. Nick Hind (7),

Leaderboard:
1. Zach Merrett. (18).
2. Andy McGrath. (12).
3. Anthony McDonald Tippungwuti. (10).

The Crowd Says:

2021-04-22T01:54:35+00:00

JamesH

Roar Guru


This is in the fan section of the site, though. The Roar isn't so flooded with fan articles that it can pick and choose which ones it publishes just to achieve balance in that part of the site. Almost every submission gets published. The Roar needs to encourage submissions, not discourage them. If the 'experts' section had a weekly Bombers article then that would be a fair issue for non-Bombers fans to complain about. That part of the site needs some balance, for sure.

2021-04-22T01:17:34+00:00

JamesH

Roar Guru


But that's the other half of my point - we only lost the clearances by 4 against Brisbane. We were actually dead level in stoppage clearances. We just got completely out-positioned and out-bodied (particularly in the air) in general play.

2021-04-22T01:11:04+00:00

JamesH

Roar Guru


I would say Perkins looks the most capable of playing every game. His body is a bit more mature. I think they will all get spells during the year though (and so they should). Happy for Phillips to come in but I think we should retain Wright. As much as I think Jones needs the big game experience, he should be the tall to make way for Phillips (if needed). He's found it difficult to get near the ball in the last couple of weeks, let alone kick goals. A few games in the VFL could help his confidence. Waterman or Guelfi might also make way for Zaharakis.

2021-04-22T01:05:38+00:00

JamesH

Roar Guru


Whoever can kick the straightest :)

2021-04-20T20:06:06+00:00

Thatsashame

Roar Rookie


Spot on. I actually thought the Bombers were a good chance...until I saw the flood of Noah's day. (And they say Melbourne rains a lot.....yeah....). The Bombers were never a chance in those conditions. Not big enough. I would have loved to see the game on a fast dry deck. Maybe Sunday against the Pies.

AUTHOR

2021-04-20T10:19:00+00:00

Charlie Keegan

Roar Guru


I get what you mean mate, but the Bombers aren’t just another low ranking team, they’re my team. I’ve observed a pretty consistent output of content from other writers on this site regarding other sides and I think doing the round by round review gives you a framework upon which to build which when you’re starting out as a write is a good thing to have

AUTHOR

2021-04-20T10:16:13+00:00

Charlie Keegan

Roar Guru


Thanks Jeff, I’m happy to keep doing this as it gives me a creative outlet.

AUTHOR

2021-04-20T10:15:43+00:00

Charlie Keegan

Roar Guru


Thanks chief, I would say I am comparatively one eyed when viewing my beloved bombers, but I think it’s important to write not so much glowing haigiographies of last nights match but go in with clear eyes where you say what the bombers did well, which was very little on Saturday, and what they did poorly.

AUTHOR

2021-04-20T07:13:38+00:00

Charlie Keegan

Roar Guru


Yeah you’re exactly right there. Particularly Cox and Reid I think are gonna struggle going into the mid season malaise.

AUTHOR

2021-04-20T07:12:32+00:00

Charlie Keegan

Roar Guru


So the AFL elected to fine the pies 20 grand I didn’t think they had the spine.

2021-04-20T05:44:37+00:00

Chief Keeffe

Roar Rookie


As the other posters here have said, the whole point of the Roar is enabling fans to submit articles that can be reviewed and debated by other fans. If it's a Bombers piece every week, so be it, as long as it's of high enough quality. I think the balance argument goes out the window when the articles are only once a week. Just skip it if you want. I read it as a non-Bombers fan because I know that a Bombers fan is probably going to have decent insight on their own team. Would rather that than someone trying to write about a team they have only a passing interest in. Hopefully some other fans take note and decide to write their own weekly reviews, which would lead to more content and a more even spread. That's how this works.

2021-04-20T05:29:01+00:00

Hammond Jeff

Roar Rookie


I enjoy reading considered reviews on all club performances. Sadly, not enough supporters are prepared to do a review on their own club. Keep in going Chuckakhan, great job!

2021-04-20T04:07:57+00:00

Chris Lewis

Roar Guru


I think have both types of articles, specific club and overview of AFL comp.

2021-04-20T04:04:53+00:00

Kick to Kick

Roar Rookie


An Essendon fan would love it. And the pieces are perfectly acceptably written. But there are 17 other clubs! Just a strange editorial call.

AUTHOR

2021-04-20T03:55:14+00:00

Charlie Keegan

Roar Guru


Political content has a tendency to be much higher temperature in terms of rhetoric and the like. Sports can also do that, see Spruce moose’s article on Aboriginal commentators.

AUTHOR

2021-04-20T03:53:39+00:00

Charlie Keegan

Roar Guru


Can confirm they do reject pieces but they never do so without merit.

2021-04-20T03:46:53+00:00

Chris Lewis

Roar Guru


I think quality should be determined by the readers. I know myself from posting articles for 13 years that you learn from both the praise and criticism. I know that Roar does reject pieces, because I have had a couple rejected. As an Essendon supporter, I like the weekly wrap.

2021-04-20T03:31:29+00:00

Kick to Kick

Roar Rookie


It’s about the credibility of the site, it’s editorial mix and it’s appeal to general readers. Its AFL section has improved in range and comprehensiveness over the years to the point where it’s a must read for serious AFL fans. But with increased credibility there’s also a need for editorial oversight of the offering. I appreciate part of the Roar’s appeal that non professional writers get a go. It’s not a question about those writers. It’s about editorial selection. There are plenty of general sports sites in the world but I can’t think of another one that has a review of just one low ranking team every week as part of the diet.

2021-04-19T23:41:09+00:00

Chris Lewis

Roar Guru


I write political articles on another site where most comments are from oldies. It is a delight for me to write and comment on a forum with people of all ages who love sport. Good work.

2021-04-19T22:16:32+00:00

Chris Lewis

Roar Guru


don’t get the comment. No one needs to read pieces they have no interest in.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar