Belgium’s “Golden Generation” are like the Tottenham Hotspur of 2014-2019 – the ‘Nearly’ Men.
The common view seems to be one of underachievement.
Now, perhaps they have underachieved, but I’d argue – objectively – that they’ve ultimately performed at the level most people would’ve expected them to.
Did anyone really believe that, going into the 2014 and 2018 World Cups, or the 2016 and 2020 Euros, Belgium would be outright favourites? That it was their tournament to lose?
I don’t think so.
In looking at their performances across the last four major tournaments, face value would suggest mediocre results for a squad possessing the likes of Kevin de Bruyne and Eden Hazard, although the latter has had a hard time of late at club level.
Three quarter-final exits and one semi-final exit (WC 2018). However, in looking at who beat them, we see a somewhat different picture.
Can falling to the likes of 2014’s Messi-led Argentina, the unstoppable Le Bleus of 2018 or Mancini’s Euro 2020 Italian finalists really be considered a failure?
Such a claim would be at best, harsh, and at worst, a gross overestimation of the true talent this group of players possess.
(Photo by Peter Lous/Soccrates/Getty Images)
The 2016 exit to Wales was, of course, a very disappointing result, but pales in comparison to the likes of the Netherlands and Italy missing the 2018 World Cup all together, Brazil’s 7-1 home-soil thumping by the Germans, or then-world champions Spain’s 2014 group stage exit.
Let’s not forget that despite the household names of De Bruyne, Hazard and Romelu Lukaku, Belgium have also been made to utilise a number of solid, yet far from spectacular players.
In 2014, Divock Origi was no Gonzalo Higuaín, and Mousa Dembele is no N’Golo Kanté, while Thomas Vermaelen epitomises the phrase, “on his last legs”.
So why is it then, that so many people label Belgium a disappointment, that failed on the biggest stage? Maybe it was media hype, or simply the excitement of a ‘new’ nation that haven’t had great success before, competing for football’s top prizes.
A “Golden Generation” is defined as being a team that “reach or are expected to reach a level of success beyond that which their team had previously achieved”.
The reality is – Belgium did just that.
Admittedly, they did place second in Euro 1980, so technically this isn’t their very best result, however they’ve never had such a consistently sustained run of strong performances. This is also evident in being ranked No.1 in the FIFA World Rankings.
Losing to a team that go on to win, or make the final of a major tournament, is not anything to be ashamed of.
Furthermore, Belgium did actually give Argentina (2014 WC quarter-final), France (2018 WC semi-final) and Italy (Euro 2020 quarter-final) a very strong showing, in the end losing just 1-0, 1-0 and 2-1 respectively.
If not for the disastrous loss to Wales, it would have been interesting to see how Belgium matched up against Portugal in the Euro 2016 semi-final, after they had met just months earlier in what was a tight 2-1 win for the Portuguese.
Looking forward, it’s difficult to see Belgium seriously challenging for the 2022 World Cup in Qatar – though, of course, anything is possible.
With an ageing defence, and both Kevin de Bruyne and Eden Hazard heading towards the twilight of their careers, it would appear 2018’s third place World Cup finish will mark the peak of the Belgium “Golden Generation”.
A title no nation, or team, truly desires, but nonetheless one that highlights what has been a great era of success for the nation.
The greatest they’ve had.
Overall, Belgium have been unlucky in that they’ve typically come up against the ‘good’ teams early on in tournaments – distorting their degree of success.
Thus, in judging the ultimate success of their “Golden Generation” – or any nation’s, for that matter – it is crucial we take a closer look at the nation that ultimately knocks them out of various tournaments.
In doing so, we see a team that did not, by any stretch, underachieve.
Rather, they just weren’t quite good enough.
Caimin
Roar Rookie
Yeah its really important that they're ruthless in their decisions with bringing in the new young players. It's simply just unrealistic to continue to rely on those ageing defenders, as you've mentioned. I agree KDB, Hazard and Lukaku will still play in the next couple of tournaments, but just question if they'll be as impactful as they have been in the last 3-4 years. I can certainly see why you think they'll not fall away soon, but I also think a lot will depend on how those young players you've mentioned progress in the next couple years. Doko looks the goods atm though.
Caimin
Roar Rookie
Will certainly be interesting to see his approach
TheSecretScout
Roar Guru
martinez is confirmed staying on, time to refresh the team :)
jamesb
Roar Guru
Unfortunately for Belgium, injuries and an aging defence did play a part in Euro 2020. But I don't think it's over for them just yet. Lukaku, KdB and E.Hazard are still young enough to play in two more major tournaments (WC 2022 and Euro 2024). During the next few years, they should try and get some new blood in the squad, particularly in defence, before those three players retire from international duty. One bright spot for Belgium was Jeremy Doku. He looks likely. He is 19 and he may well represent the start of Belgium's next generation. I don't think Belgium will fall away anytime soon.
Caimin
Roar Rookie
It will be an interesting few years ahead for Belgium, and I think if Martinez leaves it would almost certainly mark the end of the road for the current defenders.
TheSecretScout
Roar Guru
the replacements are already there, bornaus comes off a great season with koln and inter have taken up a 16 million offer on zinho. the time to be ruthless is now and get the 2 youngsters in especially if the coach leaves
Caimin
Roar Rookie
I agree they'll still cause trouble for a few teams - just find it hard to see them beating the likes of Brazil, Italy, France etc on a consistent basis. 2018 was their best crack and if they'd managed to beat France in that semi they may well have won the whole thing. Having said that, it will be interesting to see the progression of bornauw & vanuesden between now and 2022, with some tough calls needing to be made regarding Vertonghen and Vermaelen (and possibly Alderweireld although he may have one more tournament left in him) if they're serious about competing in Qatar.
TheSecretScout
Roar Guru
injuries curtailed there tournament. (hazard, witsel, de bruyne were nowhere near full fitness) they will still cause trouble for many teams in qatar, but they have to reinvigorate that aging backline. sebastiaan bornauw & zinho vanheusden should be fast tracked straight into the first XI, couple of really talented centrebacks
Caimin
Roar Rookie
Cheers Waz
Waz
Roar Rookie
A good point well made :thumbup:
Caimin
Roar Rookie
Thanks for the comment Ian. Completely agree having that depth is crucial - something Belgium just didn't have. It's a shame as on their day they could beat anyone, but consistency is key in tournaments. It would have been interesting to see the recent Belgium v Italy game had Eden Hazard been like his Chelsea days, a real difference maker - but we'll never know for sure.
Ian
Roar Rookie
I couldn’t agree more.Their first choice 11 is as good as anyone’s going around at the moment.The problem is that in tournament football you need a strong bench and Belgium simply don’t have it.All it takes is a couple of injuries,a suspension or a player having a shocker (Eden Hazard,2 out of 3 there)and you’re on you’re way home.It’s a shame as on their day they’re a great side to watch but it’s a sad reality that you need 20 very good players,not 11,if you want to win the big ones.