Test XIs we should have had: Pakistan 1982

By Stephen Vagg / Roar Guru

With COVID and everything I figured it was time to do another one of these nerd-intensive-but-not-entirely-irrelevant nostalgia pieces about Test XIs of the past I wish Australian had chosen. This one looks at Australia’s 1982 tour of Pakistan (called 1982-83 but it all happened in 1982).

That tour doesn’t get talked much about in Australia these days. One can understand why – it wasn’t broadcast on TV here and we (well, the national men’s team, and I’m Australian) lost the Test series 3-0, and one-day series 2-0.

In fact Australia failed to win a single game on the entire tour. Maybe only Geoff Lawson, for whom the trip was something of a personal breakthrough, remembers it well. Oh, and Greg Ritchie, who scored a Test century. And connoisseurs of tours where games were called off by riots.

In Pakistan I’m sure it’s a different story. The series was a deserved triumph for cricket in that country, and in particular leg spinner Abdul Qadir, who took 22 wickets over three Tests. I remember when Pakistan came out here in 1983-84 Qadir had such terrifying mystery about him. What did he look like? How did he bowl? What was his secret?

(S&G/PA Images via Getty Images)

Touring Pakistan seems like such ancient history now but was quite common in the 1980s – we went to Pakistan in 1980, 1982, and 1988. Pakistan came out here quite often too – ’81-82, ’83-84, and ’89-90.

And they were a big deal – not bigger than the West Indies or England but still pretty popular, full of sex symbols (Imran Khan), cult figures (Qasim Umar), pantomime villains (Javed Miandad) and never-ending mystique for Australians (‘did they really debut Test players at 16?’, ‘why were they always feuding?’, ‘why were all their first-class teams named after banks and railways?’).

Pakistan cricket dominated the early comedy stylings of The Twelfth Man. (Sidebar: has The Twelfth Man been cancelled? I’m not sure where he sits these days…)

Anyway, some background to the 1982 tour. Australia had beaten Pakistan 2-1 at home in 1981-82 but knew the going would be tougher over there. That tour in 1980 resulted in a 1-0 defeat, including two bat-heavy draws and one of Dennis Lillee’s worst bowling performances.

And we were terrible tourists at the time. From the 1977 Ashes until the 1989 Ashes Australia only won one overseas Test series, against Sri Lanka.

(Photo by S&G/PA Images via Getty Images)

To make things worse three of Australia’s best players would not be available: Greg Chappell, Len Pascoe and Dennis Lillee. But mind you, Pakistan would be missing Sarfraz Nawaz, one of their best bowlers. And Greg Chappell was still on the selection panel (not that that necessarily was a positive).

Sports opinion delivered daily 

   

Anyway the Australia squad selected was as follows.

1. Kim Hughes (captain)
2. Allan Border (vice-captain)
3. Graeme Wood
4. Bruce Laird
5. John Dyson
6. Greg Ritchie
7. Wayne Phillips (also back-up wicketkeeper)
8. Jeff Thomson
9. Geoff Lawson
10. Ian Callen
11. Terry Alderman
12. Bruce Yardley
13. Peter Sleep
14. Ray Bright
15. Rod Marsh

(Photo by Murrell/Allsport/Getty Images)

A lot of ink was spilt on the captaincy issue. Hughes had led Australia to an unsuccessful Ashes campaign in 1981 and there was a strong movement to replace him with Rod Marsh.

Apparently this went right down to the wire in March 1982, just before the squad for Pakistan was selected, but in the end the Australian Cricket Board decided to back Hughes (Christian Ryan’s book Golden Boy is the best source on this). This would turn out to be one of the most disastrous decisions of Australian cricket in the 1980s.

The selection of Hughes, Border, Wood, Laird and Dyson as batsmen was uncontroversial – all had enjoyed strong performances in the Test team. Both Ritchie and Phillips were coming off excellent domestic seasons… but both were very green.

1981-82 was only the second full season for Ritchie and first for Phillips. In hindsight maybe such an inexperienced batting line-up wasn’t ideal, especially considering Greg Chappell’s absence…

David Hookes and Graham Yallop had both enjoyed decent domestic summers and both toured Pakistan before (Hookes without great success admittedly). Phillips could be a back-up keeper, true, but so could John Dyson.

This is no knock on Phillips or Ritchie by the way, I really liked both batsmen growing up, along with Rick Darling, who also had a claim to selection that summer – I just think Hookes and Yallop offered more experience. Yallop in particular was one of the best players of spin in Australia. I would’ve split the difference and taken an extra batsman.

(S&G/PA Images via Getty Images)

For pacemen, Lawson, Callen and Alderman had all performed excellently over the summer. Jeff Thomson hadn’t but one can understand why he was picked in Lillee’s absence. Fast bowlers, as always, have never been too lacking in Australia. Still, four of them may have been too many in a tour that only went for six weeks on which two spinners were expected to be used in every game.

The spin choices were interesting. Bruce Yardley had an amazing ’81-82 – he was a lock. Ray Bright hadn’t done as well but he’d done okay… and he did really well touring Pakistan in 1980. Neither wound up having a good tour in the end but both were totally understandable selections.

Peter Sleep’s selection was generally held to be a surprise. His Test career had been unexceptional. He had taken 26 wickets that summer at 34, which isn’t bad. Jim Higgs, generally held to be Australia’s best leg spinner at the time, took 29 at 39.

I still think they should’ve taken Higgs… or Bob Holland, who had just clocked 27 first-class wickets at 24 in 1981-82… and over the two previous summers had taken 30 and 25 wickets respectively, so was clearly consistent.

Australia needed bowlers who could win them matches – and Higgs and Holland had far more potential to do that than Sleep. I get that Sleep’s batting would’ve been attractive but selecting spin bowlers for their batting rarely pays off (e.g. Cameron White) and it didn’t in 1982-83. To be fair Sleep went on to have some decent Tests in ’87-88.

As an aside, in 1981-82 John Inverarity took 30 first-class wickets at 21 but sort of came out of nowhere and you can understand why he wasn’t in the discussion. The player journalists around this time were always going on about was a Tasmanian called Stuart Saunders, who had all this promise, but ultimately lacked consistency and ended his career with a first-class bowling average of 57.

So the squad we should’ve taken to Pakistan in 1982?

1. Hughes
2. Border
3. Laird
4. Wood
5. Dyson (back-up keeper)
6. Yallop
7. Hookes
8. Marsh (captain)
9. Thomson (over Callen because of his experience)
10. Lawson
11. Ritchie (I would’ve taken the extra batsman)
12. Alderman
13. Bright
14. Yardley
15. Holland or Higgs

(Photo by S&G/PA Images via Getty Images)

Would that team have won the series? Not necessarily (Pakistan were really good). But it had a better captain, a stronger batting line-up and a more potent bowling attack.

It wouldn’t have lost 3-0. And appointing Marsh as permanent captain would’ve avoided a hell of a lot of problems down the track.

My takeouts from looking back on this period, for whatever they’re worth.

1. Pick the best captain even if he tends to sulk when not appointed captain in the first place.

2. If you lose experienced players from a team, don’t double down with inexperienced ones to replace them – replace them with other experienced ones.

3. Pick bowlers with a view to them dismissing sides rather than their all-round-package factor.

P.S. Some vision of the tour is here.

The Crowd Says:

2021-08-21T13:43:32+00:00

Lawrence

Roar Rookie


I reckon Australia in the 80s ( had it gone right ) could have had a very good top 6 Wood, McCosker(C) Hughes Border Yallop, Hookes ( but it never happened ), After McCosker retired Border could have become captain & Wayne Phillips could have been an aggressive opener. Poor selection and management.

2021-08-16T04:31:10+00:00

Paul

Roar Guru


That's the thing Stephan, I don't think they'd given it their all. On the field with individual performances, they absolutely gave it their best, but again, they were key players in the WSC/Board fiasco and I don't think they did a lot to mend relationships with players, once the two factions returned to play together. This was also a young, developing group and badly needed these guys to mentor them or at the least provide advice and guidance. I don't think this was their strong suit, not while they were playing anyway.

2021-08-16T03:59:23+00:00

Mitchell Hall

Roar Rookie


Great article and i liked reading your thoughts on team selection.

2021-08-15T02:51:29+00:00

Renato CARINI

Roar Rookie


Some good points there, Stephen. My main bone of contention is with Greg and his attitude to the captaincy. He should have just played as a batsman from 1981 onwards. Of course, the selectors allowed him the luxury of this off and on captaincy format. Ironically, he wasn't that great a captain.

AUTHOR

2021-08-14T15:05:55+00:00

Stephen Vagg

Roar Guru


Yes the South Africans loved that 1970 series. Can't say I blame them. Their team of the 70s would've been amazing.

AUTHOR

2021-08-14T15:04:57+00:00

Stephen Vagg

Roar Guru


That's maybe a little rough. They'd certainly given their all over the years. And they started the same season in tests (70-71) it wasn't that shocking they ended it at the same time. I think it was the replacements. Lillee didn't seem to leave as big a hole at first bc Australia had so many good fast bowlers but then a bunch of them went to South Africa and the cupboard suddenly became bare. That's not his fault. For Marsh, he would've kept playing for a bit if he'd been captain, but the selectors made a big mistake not replacing him with Rixon, who would've been perfect. Instead they tried to convert Phillips into a keeper. Chappell I think was more affected by the events of 80-81 (eg underarm) than he let on. But Yallop and Hookes looked as though they'd step up to replace him but it didn't work out that way. South African defections did more damage to Oz cricket in the mid 80s that Lillee, Marsh, Chappell retirements, IMHO.

AUTHOR

2021-08-14T14:55:16+00:00

Stephen Vagg

Roar Guru


Gilchrist learned how to keep at state level first though. Test cricket is not a good place to learn a whole new skill set.

2021-08-14T11:00:56+00:00

Paul

Roar Guru


I don't think initially anyone had a problem at the time with Chappell not touring but when he did it more than once AND made it clear he expected to be captain when he made himself available, that's when it became an issue. In effect, he treated Australian cricket with contempt and that was tough to accept, certainly from my point of view.

2021-08-14T10:53:09+00:00

Paul

Roar Guru


I completely agree but in that era, where "no Chappell" meant no series win, the Australian Board felt almost beholden to him to play, if and when he liked. I also don't think it was any coincidence he, Lillee and Marsh all retired at the same time. I'm very sure by that stage the Board had had enough and let Chappell know his days were numbered and his mates decided to pull the pin at the same time. All three were outstanding cricketers but equally outstandingly selfish IMO.

2021-08-14T10:41:17+00:00

Paul

Roar Guru


OR he could have been Gilchrist before Gilchrist but the selectors wanted him to be an early version of Slater AND a great keeper at the same time. Sadly for Phillips and Australian cricket, that was never going to work.

2021-08-14T08:10:57+00:00

Renato CARINI

Roar Rookie


*through

2021-08-14T05:16:23+00:00

Renato CARINI

Roar Rookie


Another interesting article, Steve. The selections of Thomson and Alderman were complete duds. Thommo relied 100 percent on pace so mark him down as 1-100, each Test. Alderman relied on swing so mark him down as 1-80. We needed three spinners. I had forgotten we went threw the tour without a single victory, that must have destroyed the players confidence in themselves, and their captain.

2021-08-14T05:09:38+00:00

Dwanye

Roar Rookie


Hi Paul. It another time. Imagine a player or even captain having a media conference saying they need a break for mental health. They’d let them I think, prob not chop and change captains back and forth, he was drained after wsc. Probably lots of nigglying from both sides once reformed.

2021-08-14T05:06:18+00:00

Renato CARINI

Roar Rookie


Maybe. But would have given others the chance to step up.

2021-08-14T05:02:18+00:00

Once Upon a Time on the Roar

Roar Guru


That's all true but we were scared of him after the 82 series over there.

2021-08-14T04:59:29+00:00

Renato CARINI

Roar Rookie


Qadir wasn't a patch on Warne. His leg break was grossly inferior, too loopy, no in-dip at the last minute, no vicious turn from leg. As a consequence, Qadir bowled an off stump line which was innocuous to those who picked his bosie. Given that 80 percent of balls are the leg-break, Warne on as in another class. Not to mention a superior temperament.

2021-08-14T04:57:59+00:00

Once Upon a Time on the Roar

Roar Guru


Yeah 1982 in Pakistan should be as legendary as 1970 in South Africa. If there'd been a 4th test we would surely have lost it too. Add 2013 in Indiabto that as well.

2021-08-14T04:56:17+00:00

Once Upon a Time on the Roar

Roar Guru


Yeah we can say for certain his absence would have not cost us the 83-84 series against Pakistan. Might have cost us the Ashes the previous summer though.

2021-08-14T04:50:01+00:00

Renato CARINI

Roar Rookie


You know Paul, looking back on this period in Australian history, the selectors should have taken a bold stand and dumped Chappell completely. Make a statement that he either gives his all to Australian test cricket or he's gone, period. This would have either fired GC up to go out on his terms or, saved us the despair of 1983-84 when the simultaneous retirement of Marsh, Lillee and Chappell, left our side in tatters.

AUTHOR

2021-08-14T04:49:28+00:00

Stephen Vagg

Roar Guru


Wayne Phillips is a big "one that got away" for me. Exciting, aggressive opening batsman. Slater before Slater. Career wrecked by being a wicketkeeper.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar