Why there can be no short cuts to Wallabies success

By pm / Roar Rookie

Maybe I’m a sucker for punishment. I watched the last Wallabies game three times – once live with French commentary, once with the Aussie commentators and once with the Kiwi callers.

The second and third times were while I was doing other stuff, so I did catch more of the commentary than the games, but I was rewatching to see if the trends in how it was played that I’d thought I’d noticed were actually really there or not and how true what others on here were pointing out really were.

Hearing a different set of voices can help you spot other stuff that’s going on too.

Before going any further though, so as not to let anyone down, this isn’t going to be an attempt at in-depth analysis. I’d say broadly I’m at the stage as rugby watcher where I can pick up a fair bit of what’s going on, but I’m not so far along that I can always work out why. For instance, I might notice the centres aren’t getting into the play much, but I couldn’t tell you that’s because they’re running the wrong lines or because they’re getting mistimed delivery or the halves are moving too far laterally.

I’m supposing some commentators on here might be able explain to me – assuming my observations are valid – why these things are happening. I have theories.

(Photo by Getty Images)

My first observation is that generally our forwards just weren’t quick enough to the contest. Lachlan Swinton, Matt Philip, James Slipper, Rob Valetini even Darcy Swain seem to hit it fairly hard and purposefully, but they’re just too slow to get there.

Is this an inability to read the play well and anticipate? Or is it just that they’re not focused enough on this?

Michael Hooper, on the other hand, does an amazing job of recovering quickly. But too often he was first in, and without support he was left to be thrown over by one or two All Blacks who are each 15 to 30 kilos heavier than him.

As an aside, I was frustrated to see Folau Fainga’a picked. I’ve never watched him play and thought that he’s a bloke who works extra hard. I’m not saying he doesn’t, just that I haven’t seen it – whereas I often have with Brandon Paenga-Amosa and defensively especially with Jordan Uelese.

What I think we’d call forward-pod play seems to have deteriorated considerably compared to last year. I remember last year’s Bledisloe the Wallabies forwards generally looking very nifty in terms of quick passes between each other. Taniela Tupou was out there but wasn’t the one busting the lines. I remember it was Philip, Slipper and sometimes Harry Wilson. I suspect that this structure, purposefulness and coordination also meant better anticipation and positioning to defend the contested ball. Was it?

Sports opinion delivered daily 

   

Maybe it wasn’t. A few observers on here point out Nic White’s ability to organise play around him. I remember he and James O’Connor playing very attacking line-breaking rugby in the early games of last year’s series. That’s easy for a non-expert like me to appreciate, as is Tate McDermott’s aggressive attacking style, running hard and straight, ball in hand, this year. What I don’t have the nous for is whether it’s actually his (I’m told) poorer play as a passer and organiser that makes the forwards look like they’re not playing smart and hard when we’ve got the ball. Is it?

My main point and my main frustration is about the centres and outside backs getting the ball too quickly. I hate England mainly because Owen Farrell plays for them, but it’s also because I hate getting beaten by their clinical, machine-like way of playing. They truck it up the middle bit by bit: Mako Vunipola, Courtney Lawes et cetera chugging through. Then, like clockwork, once they get to just a little before the 22, not earlier, you’ll see Owen Farrell or George Ford start looking for Jonny May, Anthony Watson, maybe Elliot Daly et cetera.

What per cent of their ball do those backs get in the middle of the field? To me it always seems like very little. Am I exaggerating? Maybe I am.

They’re used as finishers apart from in broken play. On the other hand too often we’re trying to chuck it out to our wings to make breakaway metres as soon as we’ve got the ball. It looks desperate, and it’s now frequently intercepted. There seems to be no confidence or patience. As if we want a short cut to a try rather than a fight. As if it’s not the forwards’ job to make most of the metres up the field ball in hand.

Even though Samu Kerevi had a pretty good game, how often do you see England using their most comparable player, Manu Tuilagi, to break tackles in his defensive half? Not often from what I’ve seen. We seem to be playing so flat, with no depth to the attack, so the width has to come into it too early on.

We need to play more like England – tough and clinical, expecting to fight for those metres rather than being opportunistic. I realise we don’t have Ford and Farrell, but I’d like to see the Wallabies play more that way.

I don’t think the Pumas or Springboks backs are as likely to blow the lead right out on us, but I also think their forwards are every bit as good as those of the All Blacks, and probably better in the case of the Springboks. The Wallabies forwards need to step up and play better and be given more responsibility attack-wise. No short cuts!

The Crowd Says:

2021-09-11T20:56:48+00:00

JD Kiwi

Roar Rookie


Of course they need to be tough and disciplined, but they certainly haven’t got the players to win the way South Africa win either!

AUTHOR

2021-09-11T10:43:52+00:00

pm

Roar Rookie


But i think unless we can be committed to winning that way we aren't going to consistently compete with the better teams. We might get the odd win, but we're not building towards being the best. Our players just aren't good enough to win the way NZ win. But they can be expected to be tough and disciplined enough

2021-09-10T21:00:45+00:00

JD Kiwi

Roar Rookie


I agree JC. England and South Africa can win playing like that because they both almost always have the edge up front and on the gain line. That's clearly not the case for Australia.

2021-09-10T20:57:09+00:00

JD Kiwi

Roar Rookie


And the win!

AUTHOR

2021-09-10T16:35:11+00:00

pm

Roar Rookie


I'm in the Paris suburbs, but was down in Cassis in late June, still envying you your weather down there...i generally like the French rugby commentators. They just seem to enjoy the game and like crediting good play, and yep, identiying bad, though not dwelling on it too long

2021-09-10T14:44:21+00:00

tom

Guest


I also watched with French commentary (living in Marseille). I don't know about you but I find it hard to watch the wallabies lose with neutral commentary. they tell it like it is and don't soften the blow at all. The older french commentator seemed to have a never ending list of statistics which show how much better the all blacks are than the wallabies, I had to turn the sound off after a while. I agree with your Nic White comments, he seems to give the team structure but Tate is very good as well. It will be a big test for the forwards this weekend, will be interesting to see how they hold up.

2021-09-10T06:54:42+00:00

JC

Roar Rookie


I’ll take the brilliance, thanks. :happy:

AUTHOR

2021-09-10T06:41:45+00:00

pm

Roar Rookie


It doesn't seem like the right way to beat thw Springboks, yeah. But if we could play them at their own game and lose say 20-30, I just might be more encouraged than if we win 20-30 thanks to one or two moments of of Mcdermott, Cooper or Petaia brilliance

AUTHOR

2021-09-10T06:36:43+00:00

pm

Roar Rookie


Thanks for the positive feedback and percpetive comments so far. Also thanks to Tony Harper or whoever did the editing on here. A couple of times in the past I have written and my careless or ignorant errors have slipped through. But here i can see a few very smart, constructive tweaks to tge flow of my writing

2021-09-10T05:03:13+00:00

Tim J

Roar Rookie


I enjoyed the article pm so thank you. You are right about the forwards, they do need to keep it in closer and treasure the pill. Use pick and go’s to draw in the defence, go through multiple phases to tire the opposition forwards. Pick the right channels to run, the backs need to know when to go from there. Again a good article and look forward to seeing more from you :thumbup:

2021-09-10T03:37:24+00:00

HFunk

Guest


Just regarding your point about Nic White vs McDermott. I am not sure that the halfback should be organising the pods, it takes too long and leaves the forwards flat-footed and vulnerable. If you look at Aaron Smith, he is a voice for the forwards, agreed. But, his strength lies in his ability to find the right target when faced with multiple options and especially his ability to use his pass to 'pull' a player into a gap. The forwards are already organised, he just picks the one to pass to. Perhaps that is where McDermott needs to develop. At this point it's good to remember that White and Smith are very experienced, unlike McDermott. However, another key factor is that every ABs player that is an option to receive the ball expects it, but is ready to adjust if they don't. The Wallabies forwards are very easily flustered, if they go 2 or 3 phases where they don't get good go-forward they often lose their shape. I think it is that tendency that leads to them running down cul-de-sacs and arriving too late to the breakdown.

2021-09-10T03:21:43+00:00

Kashmir Pete

Roar Guru


Nice read pm - many thanks. Cheers KP

2021-09-10T02:37:03+00:00

Rugby Geek

Roar Rookie


PM, you talk yourself down a bit. But your observations are accurate. Our Wannabies seem to try and score off every pass which is catch-up football which is always riddled with mistakes. (all little overstated I know) Please write some more......

2021-09-10T02:36:01+00:00

JC

Roar Rookie


Earning the right to go wide is often the way to go but against the Springboks, not sure if the smaller Wallabies can afford to get dragged into an arm wrestle.

2021-09-10T01:07:41+00:00

PeterK

Roar Guru


good article, and agree wallabies need to tighten up and play a more conservative style with more emphasis on defence.

Read more at The Roar