Cricket and baseball: Compare and contrast, Part 2 – global reach

By DaveJ / Roar Rookie

This week marks the opening of US Major League Baseball’s playoffs, good timing for a second article comparing aspects of cricket and baseball.

The first article compared how the respective games are played on the field. This one looks at the global spread and influences of the two sports and the countries that play them.

Global playing numbers and spread
Getting robust statistics on the popularity of different sports is hard. Websites with figures for participation are mostly clickbait, with unsourced and wildly differing numbers.

Most sites list cricket in the top ten sports by number of participants, usually between third and eighth – either just ahead or well ahead of baseball. Estimates of park or street players are rubbery while peak associations have an interest in brandishing high numbers of registered players when pitching for funding or sponsorship.

Australia is an example. Cricket Australia’s National Cricket Census in 2019 showed 684,000 registered club cricketers. However, a Sun-Herald investigation found that a lot of the names in the Cricket Australia database had multiple entries. It put the real number of registered players at nearly 250,000.

An Indian government survey in 2015 reportedly estimated that 55 million or nearly five per cent of their people played some form of cricket. If this is accurate, adding other countries together suggests a total in the range of 60-80 million players worldwide.

(Photo by Adam Davy/PA Images via Getty Images)

The ICC has 12 full members and 94 associate members, to which we should add 14 West Indian countries and territories, which are represented in the ICC as a single association. So 120 territories in all.

The World Baseball Softball Confederation (WBSC) claims to have 141 members, and that about 65 million people worldwide play baseball or softball. On the other hand, ten years ago the International Baseball Federation (now part of the WSBC) had 124 members and claimed 33 million baseball players worldwide.

Nearly 16 million reportedly people play baseball in the US, nearly half the world total, and about ten million play softball. So 65 million globally might be on the high side.

The WBSC has been quoting the same figure of 65 million since 2013, when it launched a (successful) bid to get baseball and softball reinstated in the Olympics. Some of its member federations are in ICC non-member countries that probably have fewer baseballers than cricketers, and many countries in both organisations have only a handful of players.

It might depend on whether you consider baseball and softball two versions of the same sport, as the Olympics do. But overall the cricket and baseball sports each have an organised presence in a similar number of countries, with cricket possibly having more players.

International competitions
Cricket is more global insofar as its top competitions are international contests – Tests, ODIs and T20Is – although the IPL commands a big place given the size of its paychecks and audiences.

In baseball, US MLB dominates attention much more than international competitions like the World Baseball Classic (WBC), held every four years, or the Olympics. The US gets very few of its very best players to go to the WBC, but still won it in 2017.

Literally no one from the 30 MLB clubs’ senior rosters of 26 players played on the US silver-medal winning team at the Tokyo Olympics. In other words, the top 500 players or more were unavailable because it clashed with the MLB season.

Cricket’s playing strength is less dominated by one country, with four or five countries able to challenge for the top spot – although a team of the top Dominican players could run the best US selection close (see below). Cricket’s strong nations also have a broader global span, over six continents, while baseball’s centre on the Americas and East Asia.

Japan and South Korea are the only countries outside the US with strong professional leagues. The top Japanese salaries are in the same ballpark as the Indian Premier League’s (four million-plus USD).

(Photo credit should read SAJJAD HUSSAIN/AFP/Getty Images)

Baseball has a strong Hispanic and Caribbean flavour
While nearly all MLB players were American prior to World War Two, the share of foreign players has grown steadily since the 1940s. Of 906 players in the 30 MLB clubs’ top squads at the start of the 2021 season, 256 (28 per cent) were from outside the US, sourced from 20 countries.

The biggest contingents were from Hispanic nations in and around the Caribbean: the Dominican Republic (98, or 11 per cent), Venezuela (54), Cuba (19), Puerto Rico (18), Mexico (10), Colombia (6), plus Dutch territory Curacao (5) and Panama (2). Canada had ten, Japan seven and Korea four, although many of the top Japanese players stay at home thanks to the good salaries there.

Other Latin American countries with one player include Nicaragua, Honduras, Aruba, the Bahamas and Brazil. The remainder with one player each are Taiwan, Germany and Australia.

Identifying the top 900 professional cricketers for comparison isn’t straightforward. But across Test cricket, ODIs, English county cricket and the top T20 competitions I found players from 24 countries: 11 Test nations and ten West Indian states – Jamaica, Trinidad, Barbados, Guyana, Antigua, St Kitts, St Lucia, St Vincent, Dominica and Grenada – plus the Netherlands, Nepal and the USA.

The Dominican Republic, with 11 million people (three per cent of the US), punches well above its weight in supplying great ballplayers, echoing how Barbados (300,000) nurtured great cricketers historically (Garfield Sobers, the three Ws, Malcolm Marshall, Joel Garner). In 2021 Dominicans ranked in three of the top five places among batters in MLB.

The number of foreign players per team in MLB is not limited, unlike in the IPL or BBL. In Friday’s first playoff game between the Houston Astros and the Chicago White Sox, 13 of the 26 who took the field were Latin American – six Cubans, three Dominicans, two Puerto Ricans and two Venezuelans. The other 13 were US-born and raised.

The presence of Americans of Hispanic heritage in MLB has also grown. Five of the seven most common surnames among MLB players (including from overseas) are Rodriguez, Gonzalez, Ramirez, Martinez and Sanchez. It is perhaps reminiscent of how every Test cricket nation has had representatives with roots in India or Pakistan.

(Photo by Alex Davidson/Getty Images)

African heritage
It is surely no coincidence that the strongest baseballing nations per capita are, as in cricket, Caribbean countries or territories with a lot of descendants of African slaves – Dominican Republican, Cuba, Curacao, Aruba and Puerto Rico.

The role of African-Americans in baseball has also been a big sub-plot in the sport’s history. MLB was racially segregated until 1947, when Jackie Robinson became the first African-American hired by a major league club. Subsequently, black players took an outsized role in baseball as in other US sports, producing some of the biggest stars, such as Willie Mays, Hank Aaron, Barry Bonds and Ken Griffey Junior.

However, African-American representation on MLB rosters peaked in 1986 at 19 percent and had dropped to below eight per cent in 2021. Reasons include the higher cost of baseball at school (paying for extra coaching or playing in the winter), fewer college scholarships than in gridiron or basketball and the popularity of basketball in African-American communities.

This sounds similar to issues in English cricket, where the number of black professional cricketers – most of Caribbean descent – has fallen by 75 per cent since the 1990s, according to Sky Sports UK. The disappearance of cricket from English state schools is one factor.

Echoes of empire?
Cricket is played almost exclusively by former British colonies and others, like Afghanistan, who had the honour of being invaded by the British Empire.

(Photo by Shaun Botterill/Getty Images)

Many baseballing territories likewise feature on the list of places that the US has variously invaded, occupied, colonised, intervened or supported coups in or liberated.

They include Canada (1812), Mexico (1835, 1846, 1859, 1891, 1914, 1916 ), Korea (1871, 1945, 1950), Hawaii (1893-), American Samoa (1898-), Puerto Rico (1898-), Cuba (1898, 1906, 1912, 1961), Philippines (1899-42, 1944), Panama (1903, 1941, 1989), Nicaragua (1909, 1912-33, 1981-90), Haiti (1915-1934, 1994), Dominican Republic (1916-34, 1961, 1965), Japan (1863, 1945-52), Guatemala (1954), Brazil (1964), Chile (1973) and El Salvador (1979-92).

Aussies and Canadians
The first Australian in the US big leagues was Joe Quinn, born in Queensland and spending his childhood in Campbelltown near Sydney. Quinn played 17 seasons for various clubs from 1884 and was the only Australian-born player to reach the US majors until 1986. Liam Hendriks, a leading pitcher with the Chicago White Sox, is the only Australian currently with a regular MLB gig.

Canada has lots of links with US baseball, with various cities hosting teams in lower-tier US leagues. Since 1969 it has been home to either one or two MLB franchises – currently just one, the Toronto Blue Jays.

Sports opinion delivered daily 

   

While a sprinkling of Canadian players have distinguished themselves in MLB, they haven’t been a force in the same way that Dominicans, Venezuelans or Cubans have. I guess the shorter summers are to blame? Cricket is played in Canada, but as in the US it remains a minor sport dominated by ex-pats and recent immigrants.

Viewers and audiences
Attention from viewers and spectators is another measure of global interest in sport. Cricket can probably boast more pairs of eyes watching on TV or in person – over one billion according to some estimates versus around 500 million-plus for baseball. I will cover how the two sports match up in the money stakes in the next article. I also plan to compare traditions, controversies, statistics and umpiring.

The Crowd Says:

AUTHOR

2021-10-11T07:43:51+00:00

DaveJ

Roar Rookie


Of course. And a lot more people overall watch on TV. Figures for ave attendance are pre -pandemic - 30,000 for IPL in 2018 (26,000 in 2019 affected by hot weather), 28,000 for MLB in 2019.

2021-10-11T06:48:30+00:00

Brainstrust

Roar Rookie


Biggest sport in South Africa, they had a professional all white league in the old days, and their all white team not exactly welcome in other parts of Africa was left to tour Australia and New Zealand around the 50's and dominated both. They had four different associations based on racial category . They had players in Europe professionally around that era as well. How strong a combined race team would have been in that era. South Africa have won the African cup a difficult feat since they got readmitted. Seemingly by coincidence Australia played Rhodesia as it was called then for 1970 world cup qualification so they must have done well in qualfying . They also had both the top scorer in the professional white South African League history Bobby Chalmers combining with local black legend Shaya. Also produced some players who played at the top level in Europe including Grobbelar. Australia won in the third match after the previous games were draws. Just because Zimbabwe were amongst the worlds best with a cricket team from the small white minority in the Flower era doesn;t mean its popular with the rest of the population there and cricket despite South Africa being one of the worlds best in cricket its way back in third place in popularity there.

2021-10-11T06:48:17+00:00

The PTA has disbanded

Guest


IPL average attendance per ball game is just a few thousand higher than MLB average, but MLB has 40 times as many games in a season. What are the latest stats you are citing on this? Noting a few IPL's have been held abroad is all which would drop the crowd average WAY down. There's probably also a thing or two about disposable income that needs to be considered. The average American will have much more to play with.

2021-10-11T05:18:15+00:00

The PTA has disbanded

Guest


Yes, the MLB plays the equivalent amount of IPL matches in 4-5 days.

2021-10-11T05:17:15+00:00

The PTA has disbanded

Guest


Yeah, just the FOUR that are used in one ODI match - presuming none are lost - almost equate to the 70 being used in an MLB game. The other oddity is the highly personalised kit for cricket. None of it is shared, very little of it is rigidly standardised, including the bat, and that bats can vary in weight and thickness. When you think that Steve Smith generally turns up to a match with 7 or 8 bats and each bat is the top of the range of that brand, he's turning up with about $6000 of willow in his bag. The regulations governing a baseball bat are tighter so they're all pretty much the same hence why costs are lower.

AUTHOR

2021-10-11T03:56:07+00:00

DaveJ

Roar Rookie


16 million baseball players in the US is still a fair number. Slightly more per capita than for cricket in Aus which is men and women. If you add softball to US numbers they are way ahead per capita. 15-20 million often watch World Series games. Twice as many people attend MLB baseball games in a season than any other sports league in the world. IPL average attendance per ball game is just a few thousand higher than MLB average, but MLB has 40 times as many games in a season.

AUTHOR

2021-10-11T03:41:52+00:00

DaveJ

Roar Rookie


Lucky for baseball they don’t cost as much seeing they use about 70 balls in an average MLB game - not that that would be a big deal in their terms.

AUTHOR

2021-10-11T03:31:42+00:00

DaveJ

Roar Rookie


Will do. IPL gets a lot more revenue per match than either MLB or NPB - in fact 4 times as much than MLB - but MLB has 40 times as many games per season!

2021-10-11T02:14:39+00:00

The PTA has disbanded

Guest


Will you be breaking down the revenue on a per game basis? The NPB should generate more revenue than the IPL on a season basis. The IPL lasts for 60 games. The NPB plays 858 regular season games. Proportionally speaking, I think the IPL leaves the NPB for dead.

2021-10-11T02:06:23+00:00

The PTA has disbanded

Guest


Cricket is an elite sport in India if you want to make a career out of it. Any Indian can follow it, but the talented wunderkind from the slums playing barefoot using a stump as a bat with his slum friends isn't going to be anywhere near the professional set up.

2021-10-11T02:01:17+00:00

The PTA has disbanded

Guest


Rebel sport do them for $85 + postage. Kookaburra for $95+ postage, so maybe not $120, but definitely flirting the $100 mark and certainly FAR more expensive than MLB balls. I grew up in the country where there was always a mark up on these things as well so they were always north of $100. Little wonder the crowd can't keep them when they get belted into the stands! Too costly to just chuck away. I remember in high school when a ball was over the fence into the paddock, we'd all have to stop and search for the ball until we found it. They were just way too expensive to let go.

AUTHOR

2021-10-11T01:10:18+00:00

DaveJ

Roar Rookie


Great point. Same applies to grounds seeing pitches are more cost/skill to build or maintain if grass. I’m a bit surprised baseball hasn’t taken off more in South America the way it has in Central America and places like Venezuela. In Africa there is no winter other than in the far south, so football is easiest and hugely popular throughout the year. Do cricket balls really cost $120 now!

2021-10-11T00:52:09+00:00

Once Upon a Time on the Roar

Roar Guru


Yeah I guess. The Malay Peninsula basically runs parallel to the top half of Sumatra and my comparison with Indonesia was based more on the lower half of Sumatra and of course Java. Even there, the further east you go across the southern part of the archipelago, the drier it is for longer during the year.

2021-10-11T00:47:33+00:00

The PTA has disbanded

Guest


Baseball is also easier to organise cost wise as well. Baseball equipment is WAY cheaper than cricket kit. A baseball costs about $6. A four piece red ball costs $120+ A wooden baseball bat costs anywhere between $30-200. Even an entry level cricket bat starts at $150. Baseball helmets are dirt cheap compared to cricket ones. And then the rest of the kit a cricketer needs that a baseball player doesn't... It's actually a surprise that considering the out of pocket expenses for baseball are so low, it hasn't exploded in other developing nations.

2021-10-11T00:42:32+00:00

Exiled in Singapore

Guest


Malaysia is simply too wet. There is no dry season in Malaysia. There is the monsoon months where it is very wet and then the other months where it would be unlikely to get 5 days consecutive dry weather. To get a proper dry season you need to be a few degrees further away from the equator (kind of like Darwin, or indeed India). There's probably also an argument to be had that the British dealt with the Chinese elite in Malaysia at the time when Malays were suppressed, and the Chinese have shown absolutely zero interest in cricket, so it was never going to get any kind of promotion. Even now in Malaysia, while Malays are the majority, the most popular sports are Chinese introduced ones: badminton and table tennis.

2021-10-10T23:34:46+00:00

Sedz

Guest


Good comments. As you told if you start counting the street plays in Indian subcontinent, actual count would be 10 times higher than what it is. All that you need to walk down the street to near by ground in any city/town or even a village only to see a lot of tennis ball cricket with wooden sticks(as stumps) played.

2021-10-10T23:27:46+00:00

Sedz

Guest


Dave J, Malaysia weather is very similar to South India. Do not see a reason really with the weather. Malaysia gets monsoon season 3 months every year. Also I am not buying the argument that elites just took the game from British. There must be a reason why cricket is popular but not football. If football(soccer) is more prevalent than Cricket in India it would have been immense for football world.

2021-10-10T23:22:21+00:00

Sedz

Guest


Cricket is not an elite sport in India, at least 10% of population would have played cricket one or other way. Even though most kids don't get to play in lush green outfield or with proper pitches(and proper techniques taught) cricket is still a famous game in India. Indians call them as gully cricket. Those who have money can go to next level to play proper cricket tournament or play badminton/tennis in indoor facilities. Of course volley ball and football(soccer) is also famous game in schools at least when I was brought up but just that we never learnt the techniques and strategies. Over here in US, baseball is not a game all of 'em play. It's not accessible to people form all walks of life, compared to basketball. Schools prioritize basketball and Gymnastics more than Baseball. Every American knows the different NBA teams and NFL teams but they may not know about different MLB teams. MLB is very local and has limited fan base comparatively.

2021-10-10T13:06:05+00:00

Jeff

Roar Rookie


Yeas, but not all African ex-British colonies. South Africa for example. Rhodesia also soccer was / still isn’t, huge.

2021-10-10T12:48:32+00:00

Bobbo7

Guest


With T20, cricket has room to grow with big expat communities from everywhere from India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, England, Bangladesh. When I was in the US I was surprised how mmany people knew cricket and had watched a bit in tv.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar