Has Formula One fallen victim to cancel culture?

By Jawad Yaqub / Roar Guru

Although a new year has begun with the hope of fresh optimism ahead of a new era for Formula One, the outcome of the controversial Abu Dhabi Grand Prix continues to garner debate.

The late Safety Car deployed to assist in the recovery of Nicholas Latifi’s stricken Williams, was called in at the end of the penultimate lap by the now former Race Director Michael Masi – setting up a final lap dash for the world championship between Lewis Hamilton and Max Verstappen.

Hamilton, who led the race from the start was usurped by Verstappen with a fresh set of tyres on the final lap, after Masi made the contentious call to allow the five lapped cars between the title protagonists to unlap themselves.

Under the regulations, Masi was entitled to make that call and his intentions for not wanting the season and the championship conclude under the Safety Car were just.

Even the protest by Mercedes post-race over the Australian’s use of the rulebook was dismissed.

Though the widespread reaction to the manner in which the titanic 2021 world championship was decided, tarnished the reputation of Formula One and brought the sport into disrepute.

What transpired in the following days and months, was nothing short of one of the most vicious witch-hunts in Formula One – particularly on social media. Calls for Masi to be sacked and for Hamilton to be instated as the 2021 world champion was the bulk of the rhetoric from fans, followers, media and content creators.

Any sort of constructive criticism was unwelcome or non-existent, with a baying for blood more necessary than forging collectively a future in which another situation such as what happened in Abu Dhabi can be prevented.

Even respected pundits such as former world champion Damon Hill were lambasted on Twitter, for even suggesting rational and logical thinking as supposed to the dissonance that was thriving amongst the public.

This essentially felt like Formula One was falling victim to cancel culture; defined as a way of ‘expressing disapproval and exerting social pressure’. Masi being the true victim of being ostracised and cancelled.

(Photo by Mario Renzi – Formula 1/Formula 1 via Getty Images)

Now in February, the FIA who under the new presidency of former world rally driver Mohammed Ben Sulayem, announced their changes to the officiating structures for Formula One ahead of the new season – with the chief change being the dismissal of Masi, who’s position was essentially made untenable by the continuous discontent.

The new rules too, that the FIA have announced come at the cost of the scapegoated Masi, who took over the enormous role vacated by the late Charlie Whiting on the eve of the 2019 Australian Grand Prix.

Having two Race Directors instead of one, in the form of the highly rated Eduardo Freitas and Niels Wittich – assisted by Whiting’s former deputy in Herbie Blash who returns in an advisory role.

Along with the banning direct radio communications between team bosses and race control, which should’ve been done during the 2021 season in which for the first time, the incessant lobbying between the likes of Christian Horner and Toto Wolff to the Race Director could be heard by the public.

A Virtual Race Control Room will also be in place remotely to assist in the decision making in the event of any on-track incident.

Overall, the changes made are the for the better and the desire is to never see Formula One befall this farce again. The ambiguity in interpreting the rules and giving out differing penalties for track limits violations and even racing incidents have been infuriating to say the least.

Though the vitriol in the journey toward this outcome was unnecessary and arguably far more damaging to the sport than Masi’s actions in Abu Dhabi alone.

Officiating in any sport as any fan would know is a contentious subject. Little credit is given when the referees get the decision right, but it’s the equivalent of a natural disaster if a human makes an error.

On that note, it is ironic for seven-time world champion Hamilton during the launch of the Mercedes W13 saying the following in the defence of Latifi, who in the Abu Dhabi aftermath was hurled death threats online because his crash brought out the Safety Car.

“Mental health is a real thing and through these social platforms, people are experiencing abuse and no one deserves that and that should never be tolerated.”

In agreement with Hamilton’s statement and his thoughts on accountability being key for the likes of the FIA and its Race Director, spare a thought perhaps for Masi and the abuse he has received.

And while in utopia, we’d be a lot more constructive and forgiving. Regrettably that doesn’t exist in this highly strung digital age.

Had social media existed in 1989 when Ayrton Senna had the title stripped from him in Japan by an archaic regulation, it’d have been far worse than the reaction to Abu Dhabi. Thankfully we’ll never know what would’ve happened.

The Crowd Says:

2022-02-23T20:44:48+00:00

andrew

Roar Rookie


Hey Jawad. Looks like you've upset all the Mercedes fans. About time someone had the cahunas to stand up to Mercedes. Go Max, another world title awaits in 2022.

2022-02-23T08:17:00+00:00

Peter Darrow

Roar Guru


I would suggest to Golden Army and Horses for Courses that you put pen to paper yourselves sometime so that we can show you how to decently critique an article. Or would that take too much bravery?

2022-02-22T21:57:49+00:00

Simoc

Guest


I see lots of clueless comments here from ignorant fools. Mercedes pretty much made Masis job untenable. What a total Ass Wolff made of himself. Blew his reputation totally from a bad day out. Noticeably Masi gets the support of the F1 drivers apart from the losers at Mercedes. Hamilton of course overtook Verstappen while off the track early in the race and didn't give the place back. So it came back and bit him because Red Bull then threw caution to the wind as Mercedes would have done if behind. The ending was fine and fantastic apart from for the rabid British Hamilton supporters. Masis actions were entirely in line with what was happening on the track. Marshals on the track clearing debris so cars not allowed to unlap initially. And then a sprint to the line. A great end to a great season. So many pitiful, sore losers out there. Great article Yawad.

2022-02-22T11:52:12+00:00

PeterCtheThird

Guest


All the genii who have come charging in here frothing at the mouth. Have you never heard of an appeal to a higher court being dismissed as being without merit? No? But on your rationale ALL appeals would be upheld because if it wasn’t wrong there’d be no appeal, innit? AND it is also possible for an existing rule to be applied correctly, but for that rule to be subsequently reviewed and amended (hopefully to improve matters rather than just pandering to the baying mob). Doesn’t invalidate the original decision. And none of you have actually specified which Formula 1 rules you think have been broken, and exactly how - you know, with evidence and all that crap. Or is it just the vibe of the thing?

2022-02-22T02:54:16+00:00

Horses for courses

Guest


This is an absurd article 1. You are falsely suggesting that the actions of Masi were within the rules. That's absolutely untrue. 2. We know it's untrue because a review needed to take place. 3. Masi is being held to account for a series of genuinely incompetent decisions that were made and had a massive impact on the championship and brought signficant controversy to the sport. His job is to manage races in accordance with the rules. He didn't. So he is getting the sack. 4. You - based on dangerously incorrect information - have then presumed Masi is a victim of cancel culture. Not only do you have a juvenile understanding of cancel culture, your entire premise is based on a falsehood. 5. You have said Masi was entitled to make the call, and then later in the article you called the situation a farce. You can't have it both ways. If you believe the former, then it can't be the latter. Clueless. Even the protest by Mercedes post-race over the Australian’s use of the rulebook was dismissed. This is the most laughably stupid comment of the whole article, although I doubt you'll have the intelligence to understand why. You may be a fan because you watch motor racing, but you are an absolutely clueless fan.

2022-02-22T02:30:47+00:00

Golden Army

Guest


What a rubbish article. What an insanely wrong defence of Masi, and a juvenile use of cancel culture. Sherlock, if what Masi did was fine, why the review? Masi broke stacks of rules to engineer an outcome, and has now been held to account. To say otherwise is absolutely ignorant. You may watch racing, but you are utterly clueless with the rules. Maybe you read the regulations before you write such utter dribble again.

2022-02-21T23:28:58+00:00

astro

Roar Rookie


Masi didn't lose his job because of 'cancel culture' or public pressure...His lost his job because his position was untenable. His choice decided the championship and took it out of the hands of the drivers. Sport is about competition, not simply entertainment. Masi obviously aimed to make the end of the race more exciting, but that's not how sport works. You don't stop a game of tennis when one player is up 2 sets to 1 and leading 5-3 in the final set, and say, 'Hey everyone, lets just forget the previous 3 sets and make the next game winner takes all!' You're really stretching to say that social media is to blame...

2022-02-21T20:06:46+00:00

max power

Guest


an incorrect use of the term cancel culture

Read more at The Roar