The rugby league casualty ward is filling up at fast

By Tony / Roar Guru

The 2021 season was one of the worst ever for injuries, and towards the end of the year there were around 90 players unavailable through injury.

To put that into perspective, 90 injured players is the equivalent of the 30-man playing rosters of three clubs.

There wasn’t a single club that wasn’t seriously impacted by injuries at some stage of the season.

So here we are in March 2022, and after just a couple of weeks of trials and one full round of the competition, the casualty list is already growing rapidly, with some 50 players unavailable this week.

Many of these players will only miss one or two weeks, but there are also a significant number who will be out for an extended period, and some won’t be back at all this year.

Players like the Knights’ Bailey Hodgson, Hymel Hunt and Jayden Brailey; Moses Leota from Penrith; Jamal Fogarty from Canberra; Maika Sivo and Sean Russell from Parramatta; and the Warriors’ pair of Tohu Harris and Dallin Watene-Zelezniak will all be out for extended periods, and may struggle for both form and match fitness when they return.

Jayden Brailey (Photo by Tony Feder/Getty Images)

Far worse news though for Harley Smith-Shields (Raiders), Shallin Fuller (Titans), Hayze Dunster (Eels), Shawn Blore (Tigers), and both Christian Welch and George Jennings from the Storm, as their seasons are already over.

Just to illustrate the impact injuries are already having on the competition, here’s a team made up of players unavailable this week through injury:

1. Blake Taaffe (Rabbitohs)
2. Maika Sivo (Eels)
3. Adam Doueihi (Tigers)
4. Joseph Suaalii (Roosters)
5. Dallin Watene-Zelezniak (Warriors)
6. Shaun Johnson (Warriors)
7. Jamal Fogarty (Raiders)
8. Christian Welch (Storm)
9. Josh Hodgson (Raiders)
10. Moses Leota (Panthers)
11. Tohu Harris (Warriors)
12. Wade Graham (Sharks)
13. Brandon Smith (Storm)
14. Jayden Brailey (Knights)
15. Josh Schuster (Sea Eagles)
16. Shawn Blore (Tigers)
17. Liam Knight (Rabbitohs)

That’s quite a handy squad, and includes many players who are key components of their club’s 2022 premiership aspirations.

The current injury rate seems unsustainable. The increased speed of the game, the focus on the correct treatment of concussed players, COVID-19, and the force of the impact as bigger bodies collide are all contributors to the increase in injuries and unavailability, and these factors now appear to be permanent features of the game.

It raises the question whether the current squad size of 30 players is sufficient to get through a season, and we saw many games last year where a team’s bench was severely depleted as a result of injury – the Dogs had to call on their 18th man in their Round 1 clash with the Cowboys.

Perhaps it’s time to expand the bench to seven players, either with or without changing the total number of available interchanges? Perhaps it’s time to limit the number of players in the tackle? Is a 30-man squad big enough these days?

We all love watching a faster game played by big, powerful players, and who doesn’t enjoy watching the heavy contact, but injury rates like these are becoming a problem. It will be interesting to monitor this position across the rest of the season.

Sports opinion delivered daily 

   

The Crowd Says:

2022-03-18T21:18:08+00:00

Maxtruck

Roar Rookie


Bigger squads ?, more players on the bench ? Heading backwards ! Despite the obvious pay decrease by spreading the cap over more players, and the cost to clubs of travelling with bigger squads the game is built around fatigue & bringing the smaller blocks into action as forwards tire. I suggest, 1/ a pre nominated player as 18th man to cover injury from deliberate foul play, with a send off 2/ Four on the bench, with 6 interchanges, a except to cover additional injury from deliberate foul play, with a send off. This would force coaches to carry a utility like Connor Watson on the bench to cover all injuries until late in the game

AUTHOR

2022-03-17T09:21:58+00:00

Tony

Roar Guru


Too true Mono. In fact all the extra work might actually weaken the joints.

2022-03-17T09:17:48+00:00

Monorchid

Roar Rookie


Tony, you're right. But it doesn't matter how big a player gets. The weakest parts are still the joints. No amount of weight work strengthens the few muscles and cartridges across places like the knees, ankles, elbows, and arms.

2022-03-17T09:12:23+00:00

Monorchid

Roar Rookie


Price for the Cumberland Throw JA? Thought it was Alfie Langer. The first time I saw it, as an ex-Judo player of no fame at all, I recognised it as one of the foot throws we were taught. Ironically in my case, in the Lang Park Police Boys Club abutting Lang Park where Alfie practised his trade.

AUTHOR

2022-03-16T09:42:07+00:00

Tony

Roar Guru


I think you've nailed it John.

2022-03-16T09:34:17+00:00

JOHN ALLAN

Guest


Hoppa was promoting “the digital age”. He tried to keep his finger on the pulse however his aim was inaccurate.

2022-03-16T08:03:40+00:00

Nat

Roar Guru


Good to see you kk. The 25min quarters is an interesting concept. I'm normally not in favour of quarters because I like the fatigue factor but with longer quarters, therefore, a longer game as well does pique my interest. Don't you worry about Al, you would make a very solid recruit.

2022-03-16T07:56:13+00:00

Nat

Roar Guru


I understand they can but you lose so much across the park. Most teams would have done scenario training but wouldn't be it be better to have a specialist back available even if not used?

2022-03-16T06:31:17+00:00

UAP

Guest


I cannot remember to many players in the past seriously injuring themselves like snapping an achillies tendon without any contact. Are the players actually fitter now or just shaped differently from possibly too much gym time and weights. Brad Thorn talked about how he was genetically blessed with a body tailor made for rugby league and union. He said that he never twisted an ankle in all of his playing time. Cameron Smith was another player who always appeared to front up week in week out without any injury. I am not sure this current spike of injury numbers is a trend or not to be honest. I played in the 70s for about 18 years both league and union with little injury. Yet I played in a game with my best mate where a tackle that went wrong put him in a wheelchair for the last 40 years now. It has always been a high risk sport.

AUTHOR

2022-03-16T03:36:46+00:00

Tony

Roar Guru


And that way covering more positions

2022-03-16T03:07:11+00:00

Redcap

Roar Guru


Yep, we should definitely have a look at expanding the bench. Football gradually expanded over the years and the restrictions never made much sense in a squad game, especially when teams were restricted to 3 or 5 bench players and often ran the risk of not carrying a reserve goalkeeper. In response to COVID, football has increased available substitutions from 3 to 5 because of the fixture crunch caused by the initial lockdowns and because so many players caught COVID in Europe and Sth America during the first waves. But there's a catch. While you can make 4 substitutions, you have limited windows - essentially, you can only stop the game 3 times. The NRL already limits interchanges. I'd be happy for teams to nominate 7 or 8 players but have a limit on how many they can use in a single game. Five, perhaps.

2022-03-16T02:37:12+00:00

Albo

Roar Rookie


I'm sure you wouldn't see the likes of Ken Irvine, Steve Gearin, or Slippery Morris getting a run on the wing today, and being peppered with bombs, getting smashed coming off their own line, or getting bundled into the corner post diving into the corner !

AUTHOR

2022-03-16T02:36:14+00:00

Tony

Roar Guru


Matt, none of these are grabbing me at the moment I’m afraid. I was thinking of the Wedding Tackle but that’s an assault of a different kind.

AUTHOR

2022-03-16T02:34:52+00:00

Tony

Roar Guru


So you've obviously got the same calculator as I have :happy:

2022-03-16T01:53:00+00:00

Broken Shoulder

Roar Rookie


"90 injured players is the equivalent of the 30-man playing rosters of three clubs." Yes, this checks out.

AUTHOR

2022-03-16T01:52:29+00:00

Tony

Roar Guru


Makes you wonder how some of the smaller players of yester year (and that’s most of them) would go in the game today.

2022-03-16T01:44:33+00:00

Albo

Roar Rookie


Yep ! There is not a lot of difference in the body sizes of the forwards and backs these days. The game is all about leg speed, yardage & impact with and without the ball. The quicker of these big bodies now goes into the backs where they need to do as much bullocking work as the forwards, but now doing it as the hard yards off their own lines. Yardage out of defence is vital for field position before any attack can be launched. Little guys in the back 5 are generally a liability these days.

AUTHOR

2022-03-15T23:03:20+00:00

Tony

Roar Guru


I guess you just can't help bad luck

2022-03-15T22:41:43+00:00

Adam

Roar Guru


Silver lining! Bet he wished he served his suspension fully now...

AUTHOR

2022-03-15T22:31:40+00:00

Tony

Roar Guru


13 beats the bench I guess?

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar