No Finch, but Australia will be very strong at the 2023 World Cup

By jammel / Roar Rookie

Each nation that qualifies for the 2023 ODI World Cup in India will likely need to select a 15-man squad (unless the ICC allows larger squads because of COVID).

While the 2022 T20 World Cup and the Australian summer of cricket are still to come, it’s interesting to consider our best XI and four reserves.

It is easy to list the players in contention as some pundits do. Indeed, a recent Roar article named 30 players as contenders. But it’s a harder ask to settle on our best XI for this World Cup.

In this article, I seek to add value and list our best XI and four reserves.

No Finch – so who’ll be captain?
I wouldn’t include Aaron Finch. He hasn’t been reliable or dynamic for a good while now – in any form of the game – and will be nearly 37 years old by the time of this World Cup.

Australia will definitely need a fully firing top order. While Finch is a true ODI great, I’ve reluctantly formed the conclusion that he no longer offers us the necessary reliability or dynamism.

(Photo by Andy Kearns/Getty Images)

Finch has been an amazing player for Australia in ODIs and T20s since his T20 debut against England in 2011. In ODIs, Finch averages 41 at a strike rate of 88.  In T20s, Finch averages 35 at a strike rate of 145.

But unless there’s a drastic form reversal, Finch doesn’t make my squad.

I also wouldn’t bring Matthew Wade, despite his heroics versus Pakistan in the most recent T20 World Cup.

So there’s a theme of necessary regeneration in my top order.

For a settled approach across all cricket forms, Pat Cummins is my captain.

Best XI
My two imperatives when arriving at Australia’s best XI are as follows. 

1. We will need batting depth including plenty of specialist batsmen who can play long innings. Depth will be just as important as power in this World Cup (if not more important). 

2. Given this World Cup will be in India, Australia will likely need to play two specialist spinners – Adam Zampa and Ashton Agar. This means Australia will likely only be able to field two specialist quicks in most matches.

So my best XI is David Warner, Travis Head, Steve Smith, Mitch Marsh, Glenn Maxwell, Cameron Green, Alex Carey, Ashton Agar, Pat Cummins, Mitchell Starc and Adam Zampa. 

(Photo by Mark Kolbe/Getty Images)

My reserves are Marnus Labuschagne, Marcus Stoinis, Josh Inglis and Josh Hazlewood. 

Of course, a lot will depend on whether Cameron Green can reliably and economically bowl ten overs in sub-continental conditions.

I back him in to do this – and we absolutely need such a player.

Green is more likely to reliably and economically bowl ten overs than, say, Mitch Marsh or Marcus Stoinis.

I acknowledge Green is as yet unproven in ODIs. There’s certainly no clear statistical evidence that Green is currently a superior ODI bowler than either Marsh or Stoinis – even looking at their List A records.

But my opinion is based on watching Green bowl over the past several years and is based in particular on how well Green stepped up in the Test arena as both an economical and a threatening Test bowler.

I hope we all have an opportunity to enjoy watching Cameron Green bowling in ODI colours as much as possible over the next 12 months.

On Mitch Marsh, he is in our best XI right now largely as a batsman only. But Marsh will need to ensure he’s in top form and is playing long short-form innings leading up to this tournament.

Marsh averages 33 at 91 in ODIs – meaning he usually only faces around six overs. He’ll need to demonstrate the temperament to bat much longer than that.

(Photo by Francois Nel/Getty Images)

If not, I can easily see Marnus Labuschagne slipping in at four.

I am a fan of using specialists where possible in ODI cricket and Australia would be very strong with both Smith and Labuschagne in the same XI.

However – like Green – Labuschagne will need more ODI opportunities, and will need to score a lot of ODI runs, during the next 12 months.

I am a massive fan of Alex Carey in all forms of cricket, so he’d be my wicketkeeper.

Carey is sound behind the stumps, can hit out and can help rebuild an innings if required. He also presents a strong case to be Cummins’ vice-captain.

Josh Inglis joins the squad, then, principally as Carey’s back-up.

What’s Plan B?
Balance is always important for any ODI XI, and the key player for Australia in this regard is Glenn Maxwell.

If Maxwell proves able to reliably bowl ten (or close to ten) overs of off spin per match in this World Cup, Australia may consider playing one specialist spinner only.

As an ODI bowler, Maxwell averages 53 at an economy rate of 5.66. This isn’t a bad economy rate at all, but on average Maxwell only bowls a little over five overs per ODI innings when he does bowl.

This would need to increase – and if it does, Maxwell as a genuine all-rounder would offer Australia a legitimate Plan B.

(Photo by Stu Forster/Getty Images for ECB)

Under Plan B, our best XI is Warner, Head, Smith, Labuschagne, Marsh, Maxwell, Carey, Cummins, Starc, Zampa and Hazlewood. The reserves are Stoinis, Inglis, Green and Agar.

Conclusions
Of course, Australia will have plenty of quality in reserve with the likes of Josh Hazlewood and Stoinis in the squad. So there’ll always be scope to pick 11 form players for any conditions.

The main players I’d have travelling or on stand-by for injuries are Ben McDermott, Sean Abbott and Jhye Richardson.

The Indian squad will be very strong, and it’ll be hard to beat India at home. But I definitely see Australia making the semis if the above 15 make up Australia’s squad.

In fact, I see us as clear second favourites right now.

What do Roarers think?

The Crowd Says:

2022-05-06T04:55:44+00:00

Just Nuisance

Roar Rookie


Don’t disagree but for the not needing a spinner . That period neither did Australia but they had one anyway ... none other than The Great Shane Warne. The only team that could front up to that Aus team ( well almost) a quality spinner would have helped a lot methinks .

2022-05-06T04:18:29+00:00

Keith Griffen

Guest


They didn't need a spinner. Between the 90s and 2010s players like kallis,Kirsten , Amla, ABD, Gibbs, g smith, Pollock, klusner, Rhodes, ntini, donald, morkel, steyn, philander the list goes on. They even won a test series in India in the year 2000 and drew in 2010 without a recognisable spinner. Paul Adams was used sparingly as a spinner but dropped of the radar after 1996. As good as Maharaj is, he struggles in India like many do. Jansen fits the bill as a prospective all-rounder but needs to work on batting

2022-05-05T21:12:36+00:00

Clear as mud

Guest


Think they should consider opening with Max. Not really sure where his game is any more, how could you be, bubbles and baubles and quick slogs and Big Bash billions even when looking scratchy. Chuck him up to opener this summer. he will either make 200, or 2. those below who want to see if he can get set then launch, then give him the same opportunity to do so that Smarsh, finch, warner, Khawaja and Smith have benefited from with their high averages and mostly moderate strike rates. ODI is mostly fill your bags stuff these days, then huff if Maxwell and co can't accelerate and get 50 off the last 20 every time. There's a chance his form falls away faster than others if his eyes go.

2022-05-05T08:52:34+00:00

Simoc

Roar Rookie


I would have Hazelwood over Starc in the best ODI and T20 teams. He has been outstanding in the IPL. The best team looks pretty straightforward and with good backup. But so much can change between now and then.

2022-05-05T06:21:14+00:00

Just Nuisance

Roar Rookie


Biggest issue , huge actually was in the 90s and 2010s The Proteas had no spinner to talk of . Pat Symcox could at best bowl a tight line but taking wickets absolutely hopeless. Was a big drawback . Today’s team actually have various spin options . The present side also almost all in their 20s or younger . But are missing a quality all rounder . Maybe Chris Morris but the quota policy will get Phelukwayo the nod and he is plumb average . Are genuine contenders tho and definitely not just there to make up the numbers .

AUTHOR

2022-05-05T06:04:43+00:00

jammel

Roar Rookie


That's right - I loved that RSA 1990s team !! Eg GKirsten Hudson Kallis Cullinan Cronje Rhodes Klusener Boucher Pollock Symcox Donald

2022-05-05T05:59:43+00:00

Keith Griffen

Guest


South Africa’s team of the 90s and even upto the mid 2010s was even better but alas it was not to be

AUTHOR

2022-05-05T05:40:56+00:00

jammel

Roar Rookie


some good names to keep an eye on, for sure!

AUTHOR

2022-05-05T05:39:30+00:00

jammel

Roar Rookie


Good insights Bush. I think we will need up to 10 overs out of Green + MMarsh. Ie close to 30 overs from the quicks/seamers and 20 from Zampa/Agar/maybe Maxwell. Big Show can go from ball 1. But I think we should get him in earlier if possible so he can start more slowly. That's just my preference - and I don't think it's been fully explored by Australia to date. I'd have him listed at #5 - meaning he'll likely be in around the 30 over mark on average...with 60 balls to face on average.

2022-05-05T04:57:19+00:00

Just Nuisance

Roar Rookie


Most countries are going to have very strong teams . South Africa probably with its best ODI side in years . Some great new talent emerging in Marco Jansen , Kyle Verrynne and Dewald Brevis , keep an eye on him . Just 18 years old and yet to play a first class match but got picked up by The Mumbai Indians in IPL . Already making a bigger name for himself in India than in his own country where most have never heard of him .

2022-05-05T04:38:14+00:00

The Bush

Roar Guru


Hard to face a lot of balls when you bat below the top 3/4. Maxi has spent a bit of time batting anywhere as low as 6 and 7. His insane strike rate is actually the reason why he has frequently batted that low, because he's able to go from the first ball - something that's very rare for Australia. I don't mind your side, I'd just swap Green and Maxwell around, so that Green has potentially more time to bat than Maxwell (for the exact reason I just stated). I also like the use of Agar as enabling us to bat deeper. It'd be great to see Marsh really make it in the top four, he's shown glimpses in the ODI format. I don't agree that we need ten overs out of Green. Between Maxwell, Green and Marsh, we should none of the three of them should need to bowl ten overs. Having said that, his bowling is so good, that he might be capable of that, but no reason to rely on it, unless you're suggesting that one of the front line bowlers won't get through ten overs.

2022-05-05T01:37:18+00:00

Keith Griffen

Guest


As good as the big show is, he averages 30 in India.

2022-05-05T01:20:20+00:00

Once Upon a Time on the Roar

Roar Guru


I haven't studied innings by innings yet, but I have a feeling Maxwell is one of those who is only outstanding when batting first, more mediocre when chasing targets of par or above.

AUTHOR

2022-05-05T00:58:47+00:00

jammel

Roar Rookie


Maxi on song is a phenomenal player! In the article I said I'd like to see if he can be a more reliable/consistent bowler. In terms of batting, though, I'd like to see bigger scores from Maxwell - and longer innings! Maxi averages 34 in ODIs with 2 hundreds. His strike rate is 125. So he's facing on average around 27 balls only per innings... I'd love to see Maxi start his innings with responsibility, get to around 25 off 25 and then start to increase his tempo. More 50s and more 100s would hopefully follow!

2022-05-05T00:29:58+00:00

The Late News

Roar Rookie


Maxi would be the first name written on my team sheet. He is simply an incredible player!

AUTHOR

2022-05-05T00:18:51+00:00

jammel

Roar Rookie


Haha - yes! (on England) England is always a fascinating team to follow - they could be really good, they could be really bad...depends partly on who's available. Eoin Morgan mightn't be there, and what about Archer? I could see the likes of Chris Woakes getting properly tonked in India. So too Mark Wood and the likes of Sam Curran. Will Butler be motivated/firing? Who'll be their second spinner? I think England is in a state of flux right now.

2022-05-05T00:08:49+00:00

Keith

Guest


I think England's form also needs to be considered. Truth be told starc will concede a huge amount against them.

AUTHOR

2022-05-04T23:26:29+00:00

jammel

Roar Rookie


I don't agree par scores will be 350+. If a team makes 350+, that will of course be a very very good score. Look at the India v Australia ODI series in 2019 (in India): the average first innings score across 5 ODIs was 286.... I think anything around 300 might be par in this World Cup - I'm talking about when two quality teams play (not against a minnow nation). Even when India played England in 2021 in ODIs (in India): the average first innings score across 3 ODIs was 320 odd. My view on Australia's best XI is that we need to be ensuring that we make 300+ when batting first. I think our attack will be able to defend those sorts of scores most of the time (other than against India). Agar will be crucial in this respect in terms of drying up runs. The key is as always not to lose early wickets and make <300.

2022-05-04T22:43:00+00:00

Keith Griffen

Guest


The 2023 world cup will be in India. Starc Cummins and Hazelwood will all be over 30. So will Maxwell, warner and stoinis. If it were hosted outside the subcontinent I'd say you'd be right. Par scores will be 350+

2022-05-04T18:34:55+00:00


Does the Cricket World actually play 50 over cricket anymore? The ICC's reaction to the enormously successful 2019 World Cup that England fluked ove NZ, was to......you guessed it -- promote a different, lesser interesting version called 20/20 even more than normal, with 50 over cricket all but disappearing off the World Cricket Calendar. Well done ICC...not.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar