Heroes to zeroes: How will the Reds make up their red zone deficit?

By Nicholas Bishop / Expert

Just how far have the Queensland Reds fallen? It is the biggest single conundrum in Australian provincial rugby at the present moment. The golden boys from the Gold Coast were sitting pretty after the domestic portion of Super Rugby Pacific 2022 had finished.

They had reeled off seven wins from their first eight games, punctuated by the exclamation mark of resounding 21-7 victory over their bitter local rivals the Brumbies on 2nd April at the Suncorp. The sun was shining, the wind was in their sails, and the course looked set fair for the finals.

Shuffle the clock on a couple of short months, and a very different picture has emerged. Queensland has lost five of its last six matches and dropped to seventh in the table, behind both the Brumbies and the Waratahs. The Reds suddenly look rudderless and becalmed in the face of those fluttering black flags on the horizon.

They have acquired an unwanted distinction. With both Force and Rebels winning in the final round, Queensland has become the only Australian franchise which failed to win a game against one of the five original regions from New Zealand during the regular SRP season.

The Reds still had most of the cards falling out in their favour over the first three rounds of cross-border competition, and that is where they lost the plot. They played all of the matches in Australia (the first at AAMI stadium in Melbourne, the next two at the Suncorp), against the least threatening Kiwi franchises – in order, the Hurricanes, the Chiefs and the Highlanders.

The kneejerk reaction from the lazy-boy armchair is ‘Look at the number of injuries the Reds have sustained!’ Does it stand up under scrutiny? In the first two games, Queensland was able to field two starting XVs close to full-strength: Harry Hoopert, Richie Asiata and Taniela Tupou in the front row, with Ryan Smith and Angus Blyth behind them, and Angus Scott-Young, Fraser McReight and Harry Wilson in the back row; Tate McDermott at number 9, Hunter Paisami and Hamish Stewart in the centres, and a mix of Jock Campbell, Suli Vunivalu, Josh Flook and Filipo Daugunu in the back three. That list looks pretty good to the casual observer.

The only significant absentee is James O’Connor at number 10, with the inexperienced Lawson Creighton picked to take his place. Even after the Tongan Thor was lost during the game against the Chiefs, the Reds could still put a respectable unit on to the pitch for the game against the Highlanders, the lowest-ranked of all the Kiwi sides. That Landers team was missing key players of its own, like Shannon Frizell and Jona Nareki.

Injuries are the easy way out, and there has to be significant doubt that a shooter as straight as Reds’ head coach Brad Thorn would buy into it as an excuse:

“I think we were five games in and I got interviewed and I wasn’t happy about the Australia AU competition. Like I said, we were playing the Waratahs, 19 turnovers, yet we were winning. We won five straight.

“But we’re looking for quality rugby, and New Zealand teams are showing if you turn over the ball, you have some lapses in D, boom try – another try. That’s why I was unhappy five games into the AU season, because I know the reality. I’ve played it, I know what it is, and that’s why I was saying we had to play the Kiwis.

“If you look at it a couple of years ago, the margins were under 10 points if we lost. It’s important that we play them, you want to play the best.”

Those were the prophetic words of the Queensland head honcho exactly one calendar year ago, after the finish of the regular Super Rugby Trans-Tasman season.

In the meantime, Thorn has repaired some of the damage. The average 19 point losing margin against New Zealand teams in Trans-Tasman 2021 has dropped to just over 12 points one year later, with only one blow-out against the Blues; the average of tries conceded from six per game in 2021, to four and a half in 2022. That is still too high, but it is an improvement.

Dig deeper into the raw data, and you find that another pattern has taken shape. As I suggested in last week’s Coach’s Corner , the two most successful Australian sides against Kiwi opposition in 2022, the Brumbies and the Waratahs, play the game a different way.

Take a look at the way they score their tries: well over 60% from lineout, and less than 20% from counter-attack. The Reds are closer to a typical New Zealand side like the Blues, who tend to make their scores from both sources equally – exactly 43% from each platform for the Blues, 41% from each for the Reds.

The big problem for Queensland is the weakness of their lineout, which ranks just above the Fijian Drua and Moana Pasifika at the bottom of the table with a lowly 79% retention rate. Compare that with the class leaders in Aussie (the Rebels at over 88%) and New Zealand (the Highlanders at 91%), and the Brumbies and Waratahs, who both weigh in at 87%. You can feel the difference.

Half of all the tries scored in Super Rugby Pacific 2022 start from a lineout. If you do not have a reliable set-piece, you cannot hope to occupy those crucial positions in and around the opponent’s 22 (the so-called red zone) for long enough to make it count.

The Reds’ interim captain Tate McDermott, who has provided tremendous value with his honest and often heart-felt post-match interviews, referred it to the failing indirectly after the weekend loss to the Crusaders:

“Really proud of how we managed to claw back into it and we’ll take that going forward. Not too many teams get two cracks at the Crusaders in a row and we’ll take the positives out of that game because we’ve got to.

“It was as simple as holding the ball, when we stuck to things better as a team and worked hard and put phases together, we looked really good … but it’s about doing that for longer periods of time.”

If Brad Thorn’s Queensland charges want to have a chance of upsetting the same opponents on Friday evening, he needs to send his salvage team straight to the lineout, and to the set-piece in the red zone.

The rot began to set at the first Queensland red zone lineout in the 13th minute, on the edge of the Crusaders’ 22:

The Reds had already won ball from this set-up by throwing to the obvious target (Seru Uru) with his lifters already locked on at the front. In this case, the Queensland caller Ryan Smith opts for the typical second play in this rotation, with Uru dropping out as a decoy and the ball hitting the player behind him, Angus Scott-Young.

Scott Barrett does not give himself up to the fake by Uru but ‘mirrors’ Queensland movement instead, turning to boost for Cullen Grace. That spells immediate trouble for the Reds, because Scott-Young lacks the natural spring of his opponent:

Angus Scott-Young’s lack of speed off the ground caused the next Reds’ malfunction a few minutes later.

In this instance the Reds were saved by a Crusaders’ knock forward, only to give the ball back promptly from the ensuing scrum:

Harry Wilson tries for the low percentage offload to Scott-Young on second phase, the ball goes loose and the Crusaders pick it up. There is no chance to spend time in the opponent’s 22 and build pressure on the home defence, the kind of pressure which leads to points, penalties and yellow cards for persistent infringement.

Queensland responded to the competition at the lineout by looking for smart gadget plays, or quick tapped penalties to avoid the orthodox lineout entirely:

In the first instance, Ryan Smith calls for a quick exchange between Harry Wilson and Richie Asiata around the front of the line, but Wilson’s pass is far too clumsy and that is another turnover scrum. In the second example, Tate McDermott avoids the lineout completely only five metres from the goal-line, but his two supports (Vunivalu and Campbell) are too slow and Leicester Fainga’anuku is able to wrestle the ball away.

When Queensland went to the back of the line, they were no more successful:

The last two clips are particularly instructive. Although Queensland recover the ball from Asiata’s unintended overthrow, the damage has already been done. The throw will go down in the stats book as a ‘win’, but it is a loss in reality because all attacking structure has been lost. 

Harry Wilson is rocked back on second phase, and the Reds are still struggling to pass the 22 three phases later, when Dane Zander is robbed of the ball in the tackle and the Crusaders break out down their left-hand side.

Even when the Reds finally scored a try from a short-range lineout late on in the match, it came from a broken set-piece rescued by great hands down the short-side from the maroon back-row:

Again, there is no pressure from structure applied over time, but rather from instinctive skills beautifully executed by Connor Vest and Fraser McReight.

The Reds had found their stairway to red zone heaven around the hour mark, keeping the ball for two minutes and 15 phases from a lineout deep in the Crusaders’ 22 – eating the clock, exhausting the D and racking up the full seven pointer:

Summary

Don’t believe the folk who would tell you that the Reds’ problems against New Zealand opposition are all the result of a bad run of injuries. It is really only James O’Connor and Taniela Tupou who have been missing from action for any length of time, and the best teams know how to close ranks and lock shields even when key players are missing.

Queensland also enjoyed the bonus of playing the three weakest Kiwi sides first, with all of the games in Australia and two of them at the Suncorp. There are no excuses, but the good news is that plenty of fixes can be made in time for the return fixture in Christchurch, at the knockout stage of the tournament.

One of the very best ways to combine defence with the opportunity to score points is by occupying space and time in and around the opponent’s red zone. Once you enter the opposition 22, do not leave until you come away with concrete profits.

Like the Brumbies and Waratahs, the Reds have to be able to tighten the tourniquet and apply pressure progressively from those situations. They need to be sure they can win nine out of every 10 throws that they deliver to the lineout, keep the ball and sit on positions until the D begins to squeak. 

It may come through points, it may come via penalties and yellow cards, but there will be a snowball effect. Do that, and the unthinkable may yet occur – an Australian upset win in the citadel of Kiwi rugby, and redemption in red.

The Crowd Says:

2022-06-11T13:24:07+00:00

The Late News

Roar Rookie


Lost track of time while we have been away Nicholas. So yes got home this afternoon. Heavy rain where we were. So the last 300km were easy bitumen but the 60 before were something else! I'd guess 5km low range 4wd and the rest hi range. Plenty of creek crossings with water over the bonnet!! La Nina...

AUTHOR

2022-06-03T06:44:32+00:00

Nicholas Bishop

Expert


Always good to enjoy your work :thumbup:

AUTHOR

2022-06-03T06:43:57+00:00

Nicholas Bishop

Expert


I would say that the answer for any top coach would be a very straightforward 'No' right now Haze. He's obviously a very talented individual, but to get to international level you need work ethic and a deep understanding of what you are trying to do on a rugby field, in the position you play. Neither of those is yet in evidence with Suli, nor is he first choice for his club on the wing. DR may well add him to the squad to develop him quicker, but that is all. A coach has to be responsible for his selections, people outside do not!

2022-06-03T06:26:04+00:00

Hazel Nutt

Roar Rookie


Hi Nick, a divergence on a divergence because I didn't know where else to put this question. Paul Cully named Suliasi Vunivalu in his preferred Wallabies squad, saying "Vunivalu needs work, but he has done enough to warrant a closer look." I've seen and heard similar sentiments from any number of commentators, but I honestly just don't see it. He's obviously athletic, but I'm yet to note any real rugby skills. Given the analysis you've done on the work and support various wingers provide, especially a number of Brumbies wingers over the years, do you think Vunivalu has earned a call up this year? I am highly suspicious that the rugby establishment may have fallen into the sunk cost fallacy.

2022-06-03T01:43:00+00:00

The Late News

Roar Rookie


Work my good fellow. But of course I enjoy myself!

2022-06-02T23:10:50+00:00

numpty

Roar Rookie


1. He did do something. Which I list above, but that something wasn't effective (enough). 2 I totally agree I think his recruitment hasnt been up to scratch. 3 Brumbies have kicked more than the reds and the NZ teams and done fine.

AUTHOR

2022-06-02T14:52:39+00:00

Nicholas Bishop

Expert


There is a tendency among confident muscular guys to dismiss the analysis and just rely on their physical ability. If that is the case, how’s that working out for the reds? It's hard in any organisational role to keep the mind cool and clear in the heat of battle, and that is just what a good lineout caller is able to do. There are a lot of factors to consider and it you don't consider them all you get the results as in this game. Rob Simmons and Izack Rodda stand out as good ones - Force not only win 87% of their own ball but 23% of the opposition throw too!

AUTHOR

2022-06-02T14:49:22+00:00

Nicholas Bishop

Expert


Plenty of others Ken... :stoked:

AUTHOR

2022-06-02T14:48:42+00:00

Nicholas Bishop

Expert


Let's hope it helps!

AUTHOR

2022-06-02T14:48:14+00:00

Nicholas Bishop

Expert


That is a little disturbing at this stage of his career - there is a lot to go through just to survive as a number 7 in the Test arena...

2022-06-02T11:23:11+00:00

Fin

Guest


Nick, I am not sure his demotion is entirely down to performance. I find this a little hard to beleive but I have heard it from more than one source that FM thinks he’s pretty hot stuff and is a bit difficult to manage. I gather that has been relevant in his Reds and Wallabies selection. If that is the case then hopefully it’s a temporary issue.

2022-06-02T10:45:40+00:00

Nick Maguire

Roar Rookie


NB, common history mate, both ex Storm!

2022-06-02T09:36:34+00:00

Ken Catchpole's Other Leg

Roar Guru


Ahhh! The Power and the Glory. At the time I read it I thought him the only one. A few years later I discovered that there were others.

2022-06-02T08:59:18+00:00

savant

Roar Rookie


Im not saying he hasn't bled players. He has had to because of injury. Im questioning his forward strategic planning. Lawson didn't play a single minute at 10 before he was chosen to start against a kiwi side. Thats poor development strategy. You could argue that Campbell was second in line at 10 and he did give him some minutes there. But then why didnt he play he play Campbell at 10 when he retuned from injury? He has a wealth of options at full back. It was obvious Tate was frustrated at this curious development strategy when he mouthed off about it after one of the games. And im still flummoxed as to why Stewart is no longer an option at 10. Ive never seen him play a bad game there (well one bad half in 2019). It could well be that McKay is a factor in all this.

2022-06-02T08:38:21+00:00

savant

Roar Rookie


Yes its a great and important art that needs a coach to respect it in all its detail. When you consider all of the variables, and there are many, a caller has to be observant and bright. They need to have inbibed all the research on the opposition, remember where all the throws have gone as the match goes on (under fatigue) and what the opposition did to react to them, who is doing what particularly as replacements are made, as well as all the team strategies on numbers in the line out in different field positions, set plays and mauls in different field positions etc. Thats just some of the consideration on attacking line outs. Theres also the defensive line out strategies as well. You would know this much better than I. Its a while since I played! I first started posting my concerns both the Reds line out in Thorns second year. Things have not improved. And its a concern when players such as ASY were reported as saying (when he took over as line out caller after yet another line out crisis) that he could do the job because 'how hard can it be'. Its just about jumping higher right? There is a tendency among confident muscular guys to dismiss the analysis and just rely on their physical ability. If that is the case, how's that working out for the reds? The problem has gone on and in my opinion its partly because no one above Thorn has been able to demand changes to coaching (I would love to be wrong on this), and because every now and then it comes right and the Reds will have a good line out game (so what's there to worry about?) The Reds used to have a great line out coach around their premiership time (I cant recall who it was, maybe Scott Allen) who taught Rob Simmons who went on to be one of the best callers the Wallabies ever had. I think its time for Thorn to relinquish the job for the betterment of the side.

AUTHOR

2022-06-02T07:16:42+00:00

Nicholas Bishop

Expert


Stout man!

AUTHOR

2022-06-02T07:15:42+00:00

Nicholas Bishop

Expert


They often go together - for example in 'whiskey priests'!

AUTHOR

2022-06-02T07:15:07+00:00

Nicholas Bishop

Expert


I buy the rotation, not the excuses - there is a diff :laughing:

AUTHOR

2022-06-02T07:06:19+00:00

Nicholas Bishop

Expert


Rather longer than that I feel :silly: :laughing:

AUTHOR

2022-06-02T07:03:08+00:00

Nicholas Bishop

Expert


There are quite a lot of 6/7's around atm and some teams like to select exclusively from that group. SA for example have picked Kwagga Smith but he is the exception not the rule. They (and sides like Saracens and France) tend to like an extra 6 or 8 in the spot. Yip, you are obviously a fan and actually according to you last year (san’s Hooper) he was the best 7 across both NZ and Oz teams. A bit of 'creative remembering' there I think :laughing:

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar