France centre banned from playing over medical condition

And yet I've been commenting regularly for years.

It’s always guests that come stirring the pot and then disappear. Usually, they don’t back up their incendiary comments. I’m not debating statistics here with people that don’t really understand them.

Yes, what did I post earlier- the Thailand study revealed a high number of sub-clinical Myocarditis post Vaxx.

Maybe he could play Rugby League also?

No I suggested you visit a Chatroom with myocarditis patients so that you can update your understanding of what it really means to have one. Then you most likely wont refer the the CDC description again. Be good if you stick to what i wrote instead of twisting it for your own means. It‘s not a conspiracy when it has been proven. What facts do you base your opinion on? I named mine, they‘re easily verifiable.

Oh riiiiight - sorry, you actually get your info from chat rooms. This just gets better. And a conspiracy theorist to boot. I thought I could draw that out. It’s been fun playing.

Thats an interesting Theseus. Most of the comments on this particular thread have indeed questioned some peoples belief in the Covid fairy tale. However I have made numerous posts on other threads. Have you checked them all? You must have had a very busy few hours. Perhaps you would have spent your time more wisely had you checked the links that I posted on this thread. It would have improved your understanding immeasurably.

I made a speculation before the BBC posting. My other posts relate to the ongoing conversation that resulted from that. If you don‘t like it ignore it. As to it being some kind of conspiracy- I haven‘t posted anything that can‘t be verified. If you choose to ignore new developments, that may or may not be in alignment of your opinion then thats your personal right to do so. I respect your right to share your opinion. I don‘t agree with you, but I continue to remain polite towards other posters. If you think the „science“ gets written in stone, and shouldn‘t be questioned then obviously you follow the narrative that started 2 years ago. A narrative that tipped scientific practice on it‘s head. There is and never will be only one answer for scientific problems. Medical information generally has a half life of 6 months. Only the blindly indoctrinated believe that the „Cov facts“ (helped by FBI/US Govt. and FB and subsidiaries- check the Joe Rogan interview with Mark Zuckerberg episode 1863 where he admitted they suppressed alternative information) can‘t/shouldn‘t be revised. The whole Cov Narrative is slowly unraveling.

Obviously they do, otherwise they wouldn‘t go to the trouble to post an answer. Thx for your insight.

I hope for you, you never develop a Myocarditis, from what I‘ve seen first hand working with recipients, and trusting the opinion of people like the most published Cardiologist world wide it looks like something I personally never want to experience. A total loss of quality of life. You may like to visit a Chatroom of people with first hand experience, people actually suffering a Myocarditis. It may be enlightening for you, and not just quote the CDC spin. According to several FOIA-freedom of information act requests it is apparent that the CDC does not have possession of any studies to prove their assertion regarding Myocarditis.

"Also amazing how people spend their spare time doing google research and think they know more than the experts who do this for a living." Amazing how you say this without knowing my level or expertise, or any realization that actually there are a lot of people with expertise in the medical field who share my opinion.

"And you paragraphs shows precisely why you don’t understand statistics." My paragraphs show something that you do not even expand upon? That is a criticism without any substance. "Mainstream media for science? Wow." Exactly. That is also my reaction to people who fail to look beyond that outlet, which it turns out, is most people. If you have seen statistics (from sources other than mainstream media) that counter those I have seen, or adverse reaction databases that counter those I have seen, then good luck to you, I'm glad you've at least tried to look for yourself.

That’s not me saying that, hence the quotation marks. CDC and Dept of Health both say this, but you’re saying that with your internet research you know more.

It‘s interesting that so many people refuse to see what‘s going on around them. All cause death is up everywhere as reported by Life Insurance companies. At some point even they wont be able to deny it. Litigation is already running in the USA thats worth keeping an eye on. Seems like a lot of evidence that the Pfizer’s of this world (Pfizer’s own documents being released due to court ruling) and their enablers will lose their liability protection due to fraudulent behaviour.

Good facts Armtwister – I feel a class-action (multiple class-actions) coming on. It’s irrefutable and the correlation and causation cannot be denied.

No Armtwister, you are living in a world where the rest of us have moved on from. Any person who has more experience with court rulings than armchair lawyers understands the legal technicalities that get in the way of fact and reality. We are all not dead yet. Don’t bother to reply as I won’t read it.

Literally every comment you've ever made on this site is antivax related Why are you here?

Shhh now no one here cares

Myocarditis is never „Mild“ and they never recover fully. You may like to reference the most published Cardiologist world wide with more that 450 published papers. Peter A. McCollough.

If you are referring to my posts, you may like to have a look at the two links that I posted. They are both factual, and leave no room for interpretation, especially the court ruling. The court ruling is very interesting when regarding the official narrative of „effective and safe“. Effective was never established, quite the contrary when looking at official data from Britain. Safe is quite clearly not working either- life Insurance companies (USA) are paying out more than 3 times what they did before the Cov injectables entered the market system. Anyone stating that they were safe and effective, quite clearly without any prior info were simply lying. That is what the court ruling, and the reply from the EMA has proven.