Forgotten series: Australia’s 1984 ODI triumph in India

By Stephen Vagg / Roar Guru

The sagas of old great Test series get passed on throughout the years – even now you can flick through the scorecards of, say, the 1932-33 Ashes or the 1960-61 Australia-West Indies matches and imagine how exciting and dramatic those games must have been.

ODI series seem to have less of a narrative shelf life, unless they’re World Cups. We remember individual games – the underarm, Michael Bevan’s last-ball four, various streakers, etc – but series? Not so much.

Still, I thought it was time to shed some light on an ODI series that has, I feel, been unfairly forgotten: the 1984 Australian tour of India, aka The Ranji Trophy Golden Jubilee Series.

There’s a couple of reasons why this series was – or, rather, should be – memorable.

It was an Australian triumph – we beat India 3-0 with two games being washed out – during a rough period for our cricket, that was about to get rougher. We’d just been thrashed by the West Indies and were about to be thrashed by them again.

It was our first ODI series win on the subcontinent.

It was an overseas ODI series win after a number of disasters: the West Indies in 1984, the World Cup in 1983, Sri Lanka in 1982 (we easily won the Test but lost the ODI series) and Pakistan in 1982. It was Kim Hughes’ sole series victory overseas while captain (after unsuccessful ones in 1979 (twice), 1981, 1982 and 1983).

And it was with a squad of Australians who would mostly be banned from international cricket within a few months.

The series was cobbled together at relatively short notice – it happened in September but wasn’t firmed until early July. The Indian Cricket Board had invited the Australians for a five-match ODI series as as part of the celebrations for the Golden Jubilee of the Ranji Trophy, the premier domestic competition in India.

The Australian team had a very packed schedule coming up, including five Tests against the West Indies, a WSC tournament, a World Championship Cricket ODI tournament in honour of Victoria’s 150th birthday (talk about forgotten ODI series!), and the Ashes.

But still, accommodation were made and a squad of players (chosen by a brand new selection panel of Lawrie Sawle, Rick McCosker and the recently-retired Greg Chappell) sent.

The squad was:

1) Kim Hughes (c)
2) Allan Border
3) Kepler Wessels
4) Graeme Wood
5) Steve Smith
6) Graham Yallop
7) Greg Ritchie
8) Geoff Lawson
9) Carl Rackemann
10) John Maguire
11) Rodney Hogg
12) Tom Hogan
13) Murray Bennett
14) Wayne Phillips

Everyone had been part of the recent West Indies tour, except Yallop, who had been injured and who replaced Dean Jones (who had only gone to the West Indies because of Yallop’s injury) and Bennett, who replaced Greg Matthews (who the selectors had gone off).

David Hookes was overlooked from the side that went to the West Indies, an indication the selectors had become sick of him (again).

(Photo by S&G/PA Images via Getty Images)

This was a good side. It lacked a bat and ball all-rounder (not needed in a Test side but essential in ODIs) but there weren’t that many around at the time. This was just before Simon O’Donnell established himself, though they’d tried Ken Macleay and I’m surprised they never gave Peter Faulkner a go.

They did have Wayne Phillips as keeper, which gave the batting extra depth and Kepler Wessels was a good fifth bowling option (curiously under-used in Tests). The selectors would be Hughes, Border and Hogg (often regarded as a firebrand moron, but an astute player). The manager was Bob Merriman.

India had a good team too – players like Dilip Vengsarkar, Sunil Gavaskar, Kapil Dev, Ravi Shastri and Madan Lal. However, it was a tense time for the hosts: Dev, who’d led them to victory in the 1983 World Cup, had been replaced as captain after a series of failures by Sunil Gavaskar. This can’t have been helpful.

The Australians prepared for the tour over four days at the AIS in Canberra.

“I’ve got more enthusiasm for the game now than I’ve ever had in my life,” gushed Hughes before leaving for India.

“My philosophy is really simple. I will play the game as long as I’m loving it and as long as I feel I’m developing as a person. I think all the problems have strengthened me. I’m a lot, lot better person now than when I started out. I want the people of Australia to be proud of is, proud of the team.”

In the first ODI, under lights at Jawaharlal Nehru Stadium in New Delhi, Australia made 220 (Wessels 107, Hughes 72) – admittedly collapsing from 2-200. It was Wessels’ first ODI century. But the bowlers did well to dismiss India for 172 (Rackemann 4-41, Hogan 3-44, Phillips three catches and one stumping), winning easily.

“The Australian cricket team is at last unconditionally united,” beamed journalist Mike Coward, who was following the tour for Fairfax, and who perhaps wasn’t the best fortune teller. “This has become patently clear to observers after just four days of this brief visit to India.”

Hughes said, “I’ve felt really relaxed for the past three or four months simply because we have a group of fellows and there is a genuine feeling that they are committed and happy.”

Australia played an extra batter for the second ODI at Trivandrum, capital of Kerala, on what Wisden called “a pitch barely adequate for cricket at this level.” The match was called off due to rain but not until Australia dismissed India for 175, with more excellent work from Rackemann (3-7) and Hogan (4-33).

The third game, at Jamshedpur, only lasted for five overs before being called off as well (Rackemann still taking 2-3). The match started three hours late because the truck carrying the Indian and Australian players’ clothes and equipment had gone missing, which is the sort of high comedy badly missing from cricket these days.

For the fourth ODI, Australia restricted India to 6-206 (Lawson 3-25, Hogan 2-40). Australia easily chased this down within 43 overs for the loss of three wickets (Border 62).

(Credit: Ben Radford/Allsport via Getty Images)

In the fifth and last game, in front of a sellout crowd at Nehru Stadium in Indore, Australia replaced Hogan with Murray Bennett. Hogan had played so well I think this was done to give Bennett a game – it was his 28th birthday and his dad was travelling with the team in the hope of seeing his son play.

India batted well to make 235 (Shastri 102, Maguire 3-61, Bennett 0-37), but Australia got that within 40 overs, led by Smith (56 off 54 balls), Phillips (33 off 23 balls), Yallop (42) and Ritchie (59).

To wrap it up/rub it in, Australia won a game against Bombay (now Mumbai) by five wickets, Border taking 3-33 and scoring 70.

It had been a real team effort. Wessels won man of the series but everyone got runs and wickets (except Hogg who had to return home early when his asthma played up).

Coward called the tour “a triumph for Hughes, who meticulously planned each of the matches and ensured that this young team played the limited over game at a much more sophisticated level.”

“This Australian team has made a most favourable impression on me,” observed Gavaskar graciously. “Their attitude was very impressive. They were very, very determined.” He felt Australia could challenge the West Indies in the one layers, although not necessarily the Tests.

The tour ended with a gala banquet at the Taj Mahal Hotel in Mumbai to celebrate the Ranji Trophy, with the Australians among a guests who also included superstars of Indian cricket such as Vijay Merchant and Gundappa Viswanath.

Hughes accepted a replica of the Trophy to take back to Australia (wearing Merriman’s clothes – there had been a laundry mix-up). The Australians won prize money of 25,000 rupees, most of which they donated to a home for crippled children in Ahmedabad.

A report on this evening from Coward added casually: “some of the players will stop over in Singapore before returning for the Australian season”.

In hindsight, this would be the most impactful element of the tour.

Sports opinion delivered daily 

   

Those players were meeting with South African cricket officials to discuss touring in that country, then banned from international sport. By the end of the Australian summer, it was revealed that Wood, Smith, Yallop, Rackemann, Maguire, Hogg, Hogan, Philips and Bennett had signed to go to South Africa.

Bennett, Phillips and Wood would change their minds but the others didn’t and they would eventually be joined by Hughes and Wessels (along with a number of other players).

By the time Australia toured India in 1986, only Border and Ritchie from the 1984 squad were left. When Australia returned to India compete at the 1987 World Cup, it was just Border.

Still, I like to think the experience of the 1984 trip helped Border on that brilliant 1987 campaign. Because in hindsight, the Ranji Trophy Challenge was (arguably) a sort of turning point in our one-day cricket. Australia’s Test team would be notoriously weak until 1989 but not its ODI side, not after 1984.

We fought well against the West Indies in the WSC competition in 1984-85, beat England 2-1 in 1985, won the 1985-86 WSC comp at home against New Zealand and India, and of course took home the 1987 World Cup. There were blips of course (eg 1986-87 WSC), but following the 1984 Ranji Trophy Challenge, Australia was no longer an overseas easy-beat in one-day cricket.

The tour also gave some indication that Kim Hughes could lead a successful Australian side overseas. I wonder how he might’ve done had he not resigned the captaincy in 1984-85… he would’ve had pressure to do so, maybe overwhelmingly crushing pressure, especially with Greg Chappell whispering in his ear all the time, but if he’d held on until the South African defections became apparent maybe that would’ve brought him time. Or not.

On the downside, the tour reinforced the idea that Wayne Phillips was an ideal wicketkeeper. Maybe at ODI he was – but in Tests it was damaging to Australia and Phillips.

Still, a pleasant memory, at least for Australian cricket fans, particularly admirers of players like Smith, Hughes and Hogan, who had their last chance to star for Australia at ODI level.

The Crowd Says:

2022-10-14T00:12:43+00:00

Brainstrust

Roar Rookie


Thats because the pay in cricket was so low back then and Greg Chappell always liked money first , if Greg Chappell played during the current era he would be harder to shift than Smith and Finch from the T20 outfit. I could easily imagine Greg Chappell in his 40's making sure he wrung every last cent from the T20 circuit.

2022-10-09T23:42:46+00:00

The Knightwatchmen who say Nii

Roar Rookie


No Greg Chappell was cooked by then, and in terms of balancing his business commitments with cricket in a not yet fully professional era, we were prolly lucky he played as long as he did. I have heard him talk about back in the 70s how it "was just getting harder and harder for me to justify continuing to play cricket".

2022-10-09T06:03:44+00:00

Clear as mud

Guest


Greg wasn't really an "asker". another classic case of the Chappells knowing best I suspect. yes the saddest bit of Golden Boy is reading that he was gonna pull the pin, and his advisors and financials changed his mind when he got back to Perth. it all seemed to blow over, winning does that, in 83-4 but the decision to anoint new selectors in GSC and McCosker (a great mate of Ian's) in mid-84, both having literally just retired, both being senior WSC figures, it was pretty bleugh.

2022-10-07T19:26:42+00:00

Mitchell Hall

Roar Rookie


Fantastic effort to defeat a World Cup winning India on their home soil in that era. Also India would come to Australia and win the World Championship of Cricket a short time later in 1985.

2022-10-07T07:58:34+00:00

Kalva

Roar Rookie


True…there was no such thing as a ODI specialist for a few years.

2022-10-07T07:57:42+00:00

Kalva

Roar Rookie


I guess when you talk about the selections for the 1985 Ashes series, you have to ask “what did the captain want?” If Border didn’t want him, then it makes sense. If Border wasn’t asked, then that’s another matter. I read Cricket Rebels and Golden Boy (again) recently and it’s obvious that if Kim had been placed on standby when the rebel tour was announced then, he would have stayed loyal. Instead, he saw Kerry Packer giving money to guys like Dirk Wellham and Peter Clifford to not tour SA and it’s obvious that his future was pretty dim. The other thing that’s pertinent is that I don’t think he had good advice. The Parry family were a big part of his life and they tended to increase his paranoia rather than keep him level headed. Very sad all round.

AUTHOR

2022-10-07T03:56:48+00:00

Stephen Vagg

Roar Guru


Not underrated in Queensland! He got injured in 1982-83 and 83-84 which made selectors gunshy. But with better care he would've had an amazing international career.

AUTHOR

2022-10-07T03:55:20+00:00

Stephen Vagg

Roar Guru


Windies still v hard to beat but NZ and India against a full strength Oz team (not the case in 85-86) would've been a lot closer (although NZ still excellent). Regardless of who captained though - the South African defections would've happened. That was impossible to avoid so sixteen players would've gone out of the team from 1985 onwards.

2022-10-07T03:47:29+00:00

Clear as mud

Guest


destined, almost self-determined, to play great innings, rather than be a great bastter still, either continuing as captaun as he had in 83-4 and batting well... or never captaining, and batting as well as he did from late 81-early 84... definitely a different story. oh well... as for averages. obviously you can't exclude the early learning period or the late decline. but Kim's late decline seems so contextual, so mental, as much as about the captaincy and the team as the Windies (who he averaged 50 against in 79-80 and 45 in 81-2), and so rapid (not a single 50 in 9 tests after 2 tons and 5 fifties in the 9 tests before it). but if you did exclude it, and imagine that he instead retired after winning against Pakistan in 83-4, well his test average is 41+. I think he played 2-3 years too long at Natal as well, where he was a senior player and captain, but could barely buy a run. he also didn't always take tour games as seriously as others, so the FC average is a bit of a grain of salt - averaged 41 in the Shield in 77-8, then 30, didn't play, 37, 77, 68 (player of the year I think), and even 61 in the horrible summer of 84-5, he even got a good ton against Qld after being dropped from the test team, but Greg C decided to drop him from England on non-form matters and based on farcical one day circus form.

2022-10-07T03:36:02+00:00

Kalva

Roar Rookie


It was Greg Chappell who said he wasn’t a great player but he played great innings…Hughes agreed with this assessment. I recall when the golden generation of Slater, Martyn, Ponting and co were coming through…they all said he was their favourite batsman growing up.

2022-10-07T03:10:51+00:00

The Bush

Roar Guru


Yet his ODI record was really pretty poor. Hughes is a weird player. His record suggests he was really mediocre - FC batting average of 36 and a Test batting average of 37 and really had List A/ODI stats. Yet people who actually saw him bat maintain he was, at certain points, a fabulous batsman.

2022-10-07T02:16:38+00:00

Kalva

Roar Rookie


Rackemann was outstanding but injury-prone in the mid 1980s…he then did really well on the Rebel tours. I was surprised that he was never quite the same when he returned to the Test team. Funnily enough, when he was recalled for the 1995 WI tour, he basically knew he wasn’t going to play and spent the tour “enjoying himself”.

2022-10-07T02:13:38+00:00

Kalva

Roar Rookie


If the Windies weren’t touring in 1984-85, then the trio of Chappell/Lillee/Marsh might not have retired…obviously just unavailable for the WI away series in 1984! I think Kim’s days as captain were numbered anyway but I think as a batsman, he would have been good enough to play had it not been for so many matches vs WI. I saw a classic ODI between Aus-WI from the 1983-84 series and he batted brilliantly and basically held the team together. After he got out, the team just fell away. I know people will say it was only a ODI but in those days, the tactics and the pressures were quite similar with the only difference being that you could expect 10 overs from Viv/Gomes. He was a really good, consistent batsman between 1982-84.

2022-10-06T23:54:50+00:00

The Knightwatchmen who say Nii

Roar Rookie


At that point, Jones had only debuted nine months earlier and would not become our best one day batsman until another two years.

2022-10-06T23:54:01+00:00

The Knightwatchmen who say Nii

Roar Rookie


Allan Border said in his autobiography that the selectors were always terrified Rackemann would break down at a vital point in a vital test match.

2022-10-06T23:48:11+00:00

JOHN ALLAN

Guest


Two comments. Carl Rackemann was a vastly underrated bowler. Two of his most memorable Sheffield Shield contributions: taking 5-50 (relying on my memory) in a final at the SCG in a losing side (NSW were as lucky as they were in 2005). Secondly. Taking the winning catch off Paul Jackson to deservedly break the drought for Queensland. It’s also interesting going back to ODI’s when 250 was regularly a winning score. No longer the case.

2022-10-06T23:00:36+00:00

The Bush

Roar Guru


Holding played until '87, it was Roberts who retired circa '84. So if they'd come out in 1985-86, they'd have still had Garner, Holding, Marshall, Patterson and Walsh - more than enough to destroy Australia. Still perhaps the defections aren't as bad if Australia plays 'well' against NZD and India and Hughes doesn't step down, but instead is still playing well. But still, it's hard to imagine that having Yallop, Hughes and Smith would have done much to our fortunes against that Windies team.

2022-10-06T21:14:40+00:00

cruyff turn

Roar Rookie


Actually, 1984-85 should have been three Tests each against New Zealand and India. However, the ACB in all their wisdom, brought the West Indies out - who at the time were red-hot. It makes me wonder how things would have panned out had the WI come in 1985-86, one year after the retirements of Lloyd and Holding, with an ageing Joel Garner not far behind. And it hadn't yet discovered Curtley Ambrose. So while their attack would still have been exceptional with Marshall, Walsh and Patterson, it wouldn't have been as lethal as in 1984 or in 1988. Had Australia played NZ and India in 1984-85, maybe Kim Hughes would have fared better with the bat? Then again, maybe Richard Hadlee would have been as brilliant as he was a year later?

2022-10-06T19:57:49+00:00

Kalva

Roar Rookie


Interesting article and well done for producing this. As a Kim Hughes fan, this was a great series to follow! India were a good ODI team in that era with their wins in 1983 and the 1985 World Championship of Cricket but this season was to be their worst home season in many years as they ended up losing to England as well. I think the team spirit was destroyed by the Gavaskar- Kapil feud. 2 things- 1) in retrospect, imagine picking Yallop over Dean Jones for a ODI series; 2) hypothetically speaking, what would have happened to Kim Hughes's career had they not had to play 10 Tests in a row vs that WI team?

Read more at The Roar