How to fix cricket’s bubbling Mankad issue (by doing absolutely nothing) 

By Flea / Roar Rookie

If you’ve ventured over to cricket Twitter in the last few weeks, you’ve no doubt stumbled across the raging Mankad debate.

A lot of great points are being made, and even more rubbish ones are getting air time – it’s Twitter after all.

But amid the hysteria, it’s mostly just normal cricket fans like you or I who want the best for our game, whether we’re sitting down to watch two brightly coloured teams we’ve never heard of in some league we read about that one time, or it’s the first morning of the Ashes or Border-Gavaskar Trophy.

We just want to watch great cricket (and read about it on The Roar after the day’s play).

Calls for video umpires to start signalling short runs on non-strikers who leave early, or issuing penalties to the batting team when a runner leaves before the point of delivery, or the ICC to alter the laws and playing conditions that currently police the Mankad dismissal, or even imploring bowlers to provide an official warning before considering taking the bails at the non-striker’s end are getting louder with each fresh dismissal.

The only way to truly deal with cricket’s biggest story of 2023 (so far!) is to let it rip – like we have been.

Give it a couple months, let the inevitable media storm following a few successful non-striker run outs on the world stage play out, and it will never happen again as non-strikers finally learn to stop straying out of the crease early. 

Let. It. Rip. 

This is a solution for everybody, no matter which side of the debate you find yourself on. If you are on board with the Mankad, then you will revel in delight as a few successful dismissals result in professional cricketers the world over finally stopping the practice of backing up too early after a few harsh lessons are learnt.

If you are categorically against the Mankad, this is your solution too. The best way to stop it is to get the non-striker back in their crease, then sit back and enjoy Mankad-less cricket for the rest of time. (After all, “it’s simple Chalk, stay in your crease mate!)

If the non-striker stays in their crease until after the point of delivery, this dismissal becomes impossible. 

Cricket has done this before when changing laws. 

In 2017, the ICC determined that ‘fake fielding’, a fielder wilfully attempting to distract or deceive either batter while in the field, was against the spirit of the game and outlawed it. 

Marnus Labuschagne was the first fielder to be penalised under the new law (Law 41.5 for those playing at home), in a domestic one-day game for Queensland that same year. The long-accepted practice of a fielder chasing the ball, and then sliding and pretending to pick it up to try to get the batters to hesitate while running between the wickets literally stopped overnight once our boy Marnus and his teammates were penalised, and the practice hasn’t happened on the world stage since (Quinton de Kock may have got away with a bit of deliberate deception as a keeper in a 2021 ODI, but let’s not let the truth get in the way of a good story here).

Marnus Labuschagne (Photo by Jason McCawley – CA/Cricket Australia via Getty Images)

It really is that simple. Let the punishment play out (or, in this case, the non-striker losing their wicket) and the behaviour will be altered in due course. And quickly – it will be a long time before Virat Kohli or Steve Smith are run out as a non-striker a second time if they let their guard down and leave the crease early in the dying stages of a World Cup knockout match.

Sports opinion delivered daily 

   

The NRL has pulled this off with the crusher tackle and head-high contact in recent seasons. League fans endured a miserable couple months each time as every man and his dog was sin binned or sent off… And then it pretty much stopped.

It’s almost as if professional athletes, who are the very best at what they do, can make adjustments as they go. 

We will look back on this current debate with amusement in years ahead – the solution to the so-called Mankad issue is so blindingly simple, it beggars belief: stay in your crease. Problem solved. Forever.

If we need a few martyrs to help get the message across, so be it.

The Crowd Says:

2023-01-18T20:12:18+00:00

Clear as mud

Guest


These days tho it will have to a be a rapper named Row-D!

2023-01-18T20:10:15+00:00

Clear as mud

Guest


Maybe they should provide each player with the Laws of Cricket before each season? That sort of warning?

2023-01-18T18:11:43+00:00

Kalva

Roar Rookie


Absolutely...it happened all the time in indoor cricket and you just knew that you had to wait.

2023-01-18T18:11:07+00:00

Kalva

Roar Rookie


Not all media- mainly the English cricket media and players and ex-players.

2023-01-18T18:10:21+00:00

Kalva

Roar Rookie


I honestly think that the mankad run out is the easiest of all run outs to adjudicate for the umpire on the ground. I mean, its literally happening in front of his eyes and many times the batter is just standing there afterwards. I think that the reviews are there simply to give captains and bowlers time to withdraw the appeal. I agree that the more it happens now, the less it will happen in the future.

2023-01-18T02:32:32+00:00

JGK

Roar Guru


Exactly. But until then, you need to follow what it says.

2023-01-18T02:26:42+00:00

Clear as mud

Guest


That’s my take as well. If they want it to mean what it now means, redraft it.

2023-01-17T15:18:21+00:00

Micko

Roar Rookie


No Trumper?! :shocked:

2023-01-17T14:08:36+00:00

JGK

Roar Guru


That wasn’t the issue. The problem was that the MCC seem to be saying that you can no longer run out the non-striker once the expected normal release point had been reached. The wording of the Law doesn’t support this. The obvious reading is that you can run the non-striker out if they are out of the crease before the normal point of release but there is no time limit on when you can do this.

AUTHOR

2023-01-17T13:28:37+00:00

Flea

Roar Rookie


I seem to be one of the few that took no issue with the long-form explanation from the ICC. I actually liked that they defined the term “expected point of release” to make it closer to black and white for the poor umpires dealing with this.

AUTHOR

2023-01-17T13:27:07+00:00

Flea

Roar Rookie


Mostly the opposite but a good chance for me to clarify: the intention of this passage was specifically referring to the more recent online commentary around formalising this previously “unwritten rule” of providing a warning in professional cricket moving forward. Wasn’t intended to be a reflection on the much longer & less professional era gone by. Perhaps could have added more context in my implication that whatever happens on the big stage will eventually flow down to us little guys at the park each weekend.

2023-01-17T12:40:51+00:00

Christo the Daddyo

Roar Rookie


While I’m all for giving the bowlers a bit of help, I’m not sure this will mean much. The bowler will want to structure their run-up, and therefore the batsman will know with plenty of time to prepare. I’d just like groundskeepers to prepare juicier wickets - more of that Gabba wicket I reckon!

2023-01-17T11:57:50+00:00

JGK

Roar Guru


Couldn’t agree more. The key outstanding issue for me was the MCC’s Twitter account explanation of why the Zampa run out wasn’t out – it seemed to substantially rewrite the plain English understanding of the law with the whole arm over the vertical nonsense.

2023-01-17T10:44:49+00:00

Rowdy

Roar Rookie


Don't do it on my account.

2023-01-17T10:40:52+00:00

Red Rob

Roar Rookie


If I ever have another kid, I'm naming it Rowdy.

2023-01-17T10:31:49+00:00

DaveJ

Roar Rookie


You think imploring bowlers to provide a warning before taking the bails at the non-striker’s end is new? That’s how it’s been played for nearly the last 200 years. Doesn’t sound like you’ve played much cricket. But maybe it’s all changed recently.

2023-01-17T09:35:28+00:00

Rowdy

Roar Rookie


I meant they were both unorthodox batsmen. ------- And l forgot: Rod Laver Bjorn Borg Johnny Wynne Barry Richards Thommo Lillee Mallett (surprise choice) Merv Hughes Dougie Walters Alan Grice Clive Lloyd Billy Slater Jonathan Thurston Steve Larkham David Campese Cooper Cronk (best named footballer ever) That just about makes my Top 10

2023-01-17T08:18:03+00:00

Grand Panjandrum

Guest


Screw 'em. Put the non-striker on the side pitch. We give enough to the batsman already without the need to offer a pillow to the non-striker.

2023-01-17T07:19:29+00:00

Rowdy

Roar Rookie


They were not unorthodox batsmen. As you’d know he’s my favourite sportsperson of all-time. Vic is in my Top 10. The rest, or more, in particular no order and l could make a mistake: —— Oliver Kahn Steve Waugh Marcus Gronholm Anna Meares Garry McIntosh Michael Aish Clarrie Grimmett Ricky Ponting Shane Warne Steffi Graf Ric Charlesworth Alysson Annan Darren Lehmann Adam Gilchrist Johann Cruyff Rod Laver Lleyton Hewitt (& his crazy Uncle) Pele Mike Hailwood David Gower Michael Holding Ian Botham Mike Tyson Barrie Robran Russell Ebert (really hard to say that one)

2023-01-17T07:05:06+00:00

Chum

Roar Rookie


Nah, can't have that. Non striker needs to be on the other side of the bowler and some non-strikers like to stand close to the stumps.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar