The Fyfe conundrum and the future for Fremantle’s greatest ever talent

By Charlie McCormack / Roar Rookie

For Fremantle Dockers supporters, the weekend’s Round 1 display against an injury-hit St Kilda outfit was groundhog day.

For so long, the Dockers forward-line has been their Achilles heel, particularly since the retirement of club legend Matthew Pavlich. Against the Saints, their lack of cutting edge in the front half reared its ugly head again, as the Dockers were kept to just seven goals from 65 forward entries in their loss to a plucky St Kilda.

No man illustrated the meek nature of Fremantle’s performance more than their former skipper and most gifted ever player, Nathan Fyfe.

Playing his first game as a permanent forward, the dual Brownlow Medalist failed to fire, registering just nine disposals and one behind in a listless display in attack.

The emergence of young stars Caleb Serong and Andrew Brayshaw coupled with Fyfe’s injury troubles over the past two seasons has seen Longmuir opt to employ his former star-midfielder as a full-time forward. But the clearance machine was a shadow of his midfield self in attack, as he looked bereft of confidence and forward craft.

Andrew Brayshaw has become the player the Dockers hoped he would be. (Photo by Daniel Carson/AFL Photos via Getty Images)

What Longmuir does with his former skipper is his biggest challenge and will be the key to unlocking Fremantle’s forward half potency. Pundits are lining up to write Fyfe off as having an impact up forward. But writing off Fyfe so quickly would be a mistake.

Fyfe is one of the more intriguing figures in the league. He is one of the game’s deepest thinkers and speaks eloquently and articulately about some of the game’s biggest issues.

But despite being one of the games greats, there seems to always be lingering questions around him. He has been accused of caring more about ‘Fyfe the individual’ rather than Fremantle the team and has had his leadership and lack of defensive accountability questioned on numerous occasions. But for whatever shortcomings Fyfe may have as a player, what can never be questioned is his unwavering commitment to the club on field.

Time and time again, Fyfe has put his body on the line for the team, flinging himself into packs with supreme courage. His 2015 Preliminary Final performance, where he battled though a fractured leg to be one of the Dockers’ best players was the stuff of legend. He knocked back lucrative offers to stay at Fremantle and led the club through a difficult period which encompassed a full-scale rebuild and a global pandemic. His heart clearly bleeds purple.

Fyfe has the weapons to be a handful for opposition defences. He is arguably the best overhead mark the league has ever seen for a midfielder and will demand the opposition’s best medium-sized defender. While he isn’t an outstanding converter in front of goal, Fyfe is a mercurial player who can make something happen from nothing and his presence up forward should allow the likes of Matthew Taberner, Josh Treacy and Jye Amiss more opportunity to get off the leash.

Longmuir needs to resist the temptation to throw Fyfe back into the midfield and persist with him inside 50. It would be premature to abandon the experiment after one game, particularly given how slowly and conservatively Fremantle moved the ball against the Saints.

Nat Fyfe needs more time before becoming an effective permanent forward. (Photo by Carson/AFL Media/Getty Images)

On multiple occasions, the Dockers opted to retain possession of the ball and chip it around instead of sending it inside 50 and backing their forwards to compete in a one on one contest. Fyfe, as many forwards do, needs quick ball movement so he can utilise his aerial prowess against an isolated opponent.

A tall forward line of Taberner, Luke Jackson and Amiss or Treacy is unlikely to cut the mustard come September. And while Fyfe doesn’t look the finished product at the moment, it is Round 1. Fyfe is one of the game’s most diligent players and with some continuity in his body, he will likely improve his forward craft as the season goes on.

It would be silly to write off one of the game’s modern greats off the back of one mediocre performance. Longmuir must back his young midfielders to get the job done at the coalface and his champion to evolve into an effective hybrid forward that the Dockers need in order for them to take the next step.

The Crowd Says:

2023-03-26T10:59:55+00:00

Don Freo

Roar Rookie


Depends on when you post. He left the track early on Thursday.

2023-03-26T10:55:38+00:00

Opps74

Roar Rookie


I thought he wasn't injured Don?

2023-03-24T12:09:54+00:00

Don Freo

Roar Rookie


Charlie? I've seen him kick further.

2023-03-24T12:04:52+00:00

Barnburners

Roar Rookie


He had two possessions inside the 50 metre arc all game. Cannot kick a distance of 45 metres from over the mark.

2023-03-23T12:57:05+00:00

nics

Roar Rookie


I wouldn’t waste your time here Realist – the great man can’t even admit he doesn’t understand the meaning of “largely”, or that Stevic didn’t referee a certain GF ????

2023-03-23T06:55:31+00:00

Barnburners

Roar Rookie


Here is Fyfe's heat map. https://dfsaustralia.com/heat-map/?map=https://s.afl.com.au/heatmaps/2023/match-120380109-291570.png&playerId=CD_I291570&playerName=Nat%20Fyfe&season=2023&round=1 Obviously you watched the game and was unable to comprehend that the Freo forwards played high. Against Saints Fyfe was just too slow when the ball hit the ground in marking contests, got run down twice, and had hands on hips during second quarter. No influence in the game at all and never looked dangerous. Big turn around required from the coaching staff for the move of Fyfe to the forward line to be a positive transition.

2023-03-23T06:03:38+00:00

AdamDilligafThompson

Roar Rookie


I'd say Charlie wasn't a good one to refer too his extra work around the ground was awesome on the weekend taking out the 100metre penalty.lol.

2023-03-23T05:50:16+00:00

Don Freo

Roar Rookie


Fyfe kicked none and should have been 4.

2023-03-23T05:25:52+00:00

AdamDilligafThompson

Roar Rookie


Dixon did kick 3 goals though and probably should of been 5.

2023-03-23T05:21:05+00:00

AdamDilligafThompson

Roar Rookie


Silly question but thats it as good as freos young midfield is, why don't they have fyfe starting in the middle which is his strong point and then push forward like so many other teams are doing with players these days. Has there ever been a personality clash with coach and player. Just seems weird. Although he kicked 3 against.us in the practice match and handed a couple off too I think, so early days.

2023-03-23T05:07:11+00:00

Ando7369

Roar Rookie


Cumberland,ryan,Browne

2023-03-23T04:20:43+00:00

obi wan

Roar Rookie


He's forgotten already. Goldfish!

2023-03-23T04:17:13+00:00

obi wan

Roar Rookie


Geez, that's an 'outrageous prediction' considering they both signed one year contracts! Both will perform way, way better than Fyfe as forwards this year. So what are you really trying to say?

2023-03-23T04:03:30+00:00

Realist

Roar Rookie


As you know, Cotch had an excellent Season last year and I think its way too early to make that call on him, especially on the back of one game, (Round 1 mind you), where he performed quite well. His role at the Club will be different this year. He was convinced to play on for one more season by Dimma because of his experience and will play a kind of on field coaching role like Hodgy did at Brisbane and help guide some of the talented youngsters at the Club that you also must be pretty excited about?

2023-03-23T03:49:23+00:00

Ando7369

Roar Rookie


I think both teams will make finals,dusty ????what I’m seeing with cotchin is similar too Edwards last year,both been great tigers but time comes when it’s time move on,cotchin kicks lucky travel 10 meters

2023-03-23T03:23:23+00:00

Realist

Roar Rookie


Great to hear! Well, if you’re a full 100% tell me what you thought of The Tigers in Round 1 and you haven’t explained why you thought Cotchin had a poor game, yet?? Also, you must have listened to Talking Tigers this week. What did you think of what they had to say about Cotch??? And Dusty??? Looking forward to reading your response and future posts! Oh, and sorry about the edits, I sometimesdo it on purpose….it used to annoy a former poster here! :happy:

2023-03-23T03:17:49+00:00

Ando7369

Roar Rookie


100 percent tiger!!

2023-03-23T02:41:43+00:00

Realist

Roar Rookie


I was at the game Ando and 18 disposals at 70% efficiency and only on the ground for 67% of the match is definitely a good game. He went into the midfield during the 3rd quarter and was a big reason why we kicked 5.4 that quarter. If you measure disposal and effectiveness for time on ground then he’s in the top 10 players. Explain why you think he had a poor game? Oh, and welcome to The Roar. I see you’re new here. Fwiw, you don’t sound like a Richmond Supporter….I reckon you’re that Carlton supporter! I’m looking forward to following your inciteful posting! :stoked:

2023-03-23T02:04:59+00:00

Ando7369

Roar Rookie


If u think Cotchin played well I think u must been watching wrong game,by the way I’m a one eye tiger supporter.cotchin should not even be in the side!!

2023-03-22T22:48:05+00:00

obi wan

Roar Rookie


Yep. Three goals from a small forward is more than adequate. Do that every week and you're close to winning the Coleman.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar