The Demons not sinful, just lost

By Andrew Sutherland / Roar Guru

With all the righteous wrath sent raining down upon the Melbourne Football Club this week, it was a pleasant surprise to find some rare words of compassion glittering like polished diamonds in the sludge.

Tony Shaw – as hard a player as there ever was but also a considerate person – was one commentator who refused to put Melbourne’s dreadful performance against Port Adelaide down to moral culpability.

“The lack of effort is sometimes… you don’t know what you’re doing”, were his wise words. And any committed footballer who has played in an extremely poor side over an extended period or been part of a single appalling performance should have known exactly what he was talking about.

There may be one or two players within that side who don’t care about their performance, and they’re not going to give themselves away, but after the game this group of men looked like they cared. They looked genuinely shocked and traumatised.

Melbourne’s choice of a demon as a mascot (rather than a majestic animal or bird) is an interesting one and so Mike Sheahan lamely took the opportunity to highlight seven deadly sins, devised by him, that he believed the players committed during the game.

Sins? The Oxford English Dictionary defines a sin as the breaking of a divine or moral law especially by a conscious act.

The most fundamental moral law of football is providing maximum effort. The footage that Sheahan revealed included a couple of acts of apparent laziness but mainly it showed dropped marks, fumbles, poor decision making, reactive play, and lack of a game plan.

The Demons were awful but it wasn’t a conscious or deliberate act. They’re not sinners. Rather, they appear not to know what they’re doing.

If anything their performance seemed free of the actual seven deadly sins.

There appeared to be little pride in their performance, or lust for possession, they certainly weren’t envious of the success of the opposition, there was little anger, just despair, and they were gluttons for punishment rather than the ball.

Sheahan himself, when referring to the nervous young defender Daniel Nicholson, commented: “This is a bloke clearly without confidence”, rather than: “This bloke clearly doesn’t care”.

And he spoke of Port Adelaide’s rapid improvement as being a result of Ken Hinkley restoring the players’ confidence, not to superior moral fibre.

No one could question the commitment of Mark Neeld whose appears to have developed a tic in his right eye. At the post match press conference his demeanour mirrored that of the actor in a current television commercial masking his toilet odours with a can of Glen 20: the look of men who realise they’ve made a bad choice in their careers.

That is not to say there is not something seriously wrong with the Melbourne Football Club. It has a poor list obviously. Its young players, forced to play too early and too often, are succumbing to stress related injuries.

The valuable Jared Rivers departed for Geelong, and the experienced players they did recruit were rejects, not in great demand elsewhere, or in the case of Chris Dawes, uncertain they wanted to come.

It was mentioned during Sunday’s game that apart from the suspect ploy of running in numbers into the defensive zone without putting pressure on the opposition ball carrier, Melbourne appeared to have no game plan.

Whether that was because the players were too overwhelmed to carry it out, or that there wasn’t one, we’ll never know. But if it’s the latter, the honest hardworking Neeld and his coaching staff may have to go.

Clearly, the fundamental problem is mental. The psyche of a club that has collected two wooden spoons (even if they were engineered) and failed to finish higher than 12th in the past six seasons can’t be good.

And then it lost its much feted number one draft pick who left for greener pastures in 2012. And just days before that season’s opening it also lost its inspirational president.

In February, the lengthy and detailed tanking investigation finally ended. Despite Neeld’s denials it must have affected the morale of the players, even though many of them weren’t around in 2009. It certainly brought into question the integrity of the coaches, administration and board.

There’s no doubt Melbourne have demons that need to be exorcised. But not caring is not one of them.

The Crowd Says:

2013-04-07T02:03:53+00:00

JohnD

Guest


I like the Gold Coast, happy, but to be fair to Melbourne, they started with a significantly better list than Melbourne had two years ago.

2013-04-06T11:37:23+00:00

JR Salazar

Guest


If GWS does not beat Melbourne this year...I want Sheedy out, and make it quick.

2013-04-04T12:02:57+00:00

Myles Stedman

Roar Guru


Yes, Mike Sheahan is an idiot, and yes, Dean Bailey with Mark Neeld did nothing. Neeld must go

2013-04-04T04:14:18+00:00

TomC

Roar Guru


So, is your point that Melbourne would've have delisted more players if there fewer teams? Because they moved on quite a lot of players at the end of last season. I tend to agree with Redb. I think the problem is more Melbourne-specific. Over a number of years they have done a poor job of identifying and developing talent. Clubs like Sydney have done an excellent job of identifying and developing talent. If we had 18 Sydneys I doubt it would occur to anyone that the talent pool might be a bit diluted. On a side issue, I happen to think Frawley is a damn fine player. Seemed to go better under Bailey than Neeld, though.

2013-04-04T03:11:53+00:00

Redb

Roar Guru


The better clubs have good development systems, talent is not a problem for Melbourne it's a whole club problem.

2013-04-04T03:09:15+00:00

Redb

Roar Guru


Sailosi, Not sure this is relevant. There are several clubs with lists at different stages. Melb have botched many recruiting decisions and are poorly managed..

AUTHOR

2013-04-04T02:59:59+00:00

Andrew Sutherland

Roar Guru


Cam, I must admit I didn't see myself ever quoting Shaw but there we go! :)

2013-04-04T02:43:36+00:00

Sailosi

Guest


TomC, that explains my point. Viney is a very talented young player, possibly the best of his age, he's an exception. The other players, some who have been in the system for 3-5 years, their games have gone nowhere. When you surround young players with older players who aren't up to it you get mediocrity and in the Demons case you get crap. Most of these Melbourne players will never improve, this is their best. Watts, Frawley this is their level, their not going to get much better. -- Comment left via The Roar's iPhone app. Download it now [http://itunes.apple.com/au/app/the-roar/id327174726?mt=8].

2013-04-04T01:47:12+00:00

Cameron Rose

Expert


I've long wondered how it's possible that Tony Shaw is still employed to talk about football.

2013-04-04T00:48:10+00:00

TomC

Roar Guru


Yeah, good point Iangou. I don't really follow Sailosi's argument, to be honest. Melbourne's best player on the weekend was an 18 year old. He seems ready at the moment. It was mostly the blokes who've been in the system a few years that committed the 'seven deadly sins'.

2013-04-03T23:49:25+00:00

langou

Roar Guru


On the other hand look at Goodes from the Bulldogs. I am sure there are plenty of others running around in the reserves who could fit into the AFL if given the chance. With 18 teams, young talent may be spread about but that simply means that teams need to widen their vision when looking for players.

2013-04-03T23:34:56+00:00

Sailosi

Guest


The real heat should be on the AFL for allowing 18 teams. We are just witnessing the fact that there is a finite amount of sporting talent in Australia and a number of these players are participating at a level they are not ready for. They are simply not good enough. They may be in 3 years but in a team such as this their talent may never be fulfilled. Shame on the AFL for throwing these young lambs to the slaughter. -- Comment left via The Roar's iPhone app. Download it now [http://itunes.apple.com/au/app/the-roar/id327174726?mt=8].

2013-04-03T22:55:56+00:00

Happy Hooker

Guest


Mike has been strident in his comments, but he is not Robinson Crusoe. As we saw on the telly, even their most ardent fans gave them an absolute roasting, which let's face it, was well-deserved.

2013-04-03T22:52:03+00:00

Happy Hooker

Guest


Ahhh, a rebuilding year. You mean just like 2012, 2011, 2010 .... As was mentioned on one of the AFL shows on Fox last night, they're in the 5th year of a 5 year plan! Melbourne are stuffed. Gold Coast started from scratch less than 3 years ago, and are in a better place than the Demons. Which says to me, they have to start again, right from the beginning - administration, coaching staff and list.

2013-04-03T21:55:38+00:00

Brendan

Guest


This week will show how much effort the Melbourne players are putting in.Andrew there early nickname was the fuchsias so lets hope they play like Demons this week.

2013-04-03T21:21:58+00:00

TomC

Roar Guru


The thrust of this piece is that MIke Sheehan is an idiot. I completely agree. Losing coaches always look they're doing a bad job, but it's really hard to see what Neeld's strategy is, and it's not hard not to conclude that this team has been absolutely terrible at every point since he started coaching. Watch out for Melbourne v GWS in round 4. If Melbourne start the season with an 0-4 record the pressure will really ramp up on the Demons to make some changes.

2013-04-03T21:16:46+00:00

Johnno

Guest


There young, be patient, It's a rebuilding year.

Read more at The Roar