Why Test cricket is the best, and worst, game

By Ben Pobjie / Expert

My dad always taught me that the best way to avoid disappointment in sport was to lower your expectations.

As a man who not only lived through the mid-80s wasteland of Australian, but who has also supported the Parramatta rugby league club for more than thirty years, he knew what he was talking about.

When your expectations are low, you’re bound to either be pleasantly surprised, or simply have your beliefs confirmed. It numbs you nicely.

But I’ve never gotten the hang of it. Sport – and in particular, cricket – has always teased me, keeping my hopes alive to the bitter, devastating end.

It’s like a beautiful woman who leads you on, forever promising something magical, but ends up stabbing you in the neck and throwing you in the river. The 1989 grand final was especially similar to this situation.

And Test cricket is the worst game of all for this, because almost nothing is impossible.

A man can walk out and miss his first ten balls, and edge the next ten inches wide of fielders, but it doesn’t mean he won’t get a hundred.

A team can cruise to 1-300, but it doesn’t mean they won’t be bowled out for 320.

A team can be nine down and 98 behind when a teenager debutant walks out for his first Test innings, but it doesn’t mean they won’t take the first innings lead…

The first Ashes Test was breathtaking, unbelievable Test cricket, and by that I mean it was the most painful thing to watch I can imagine.

In classic Test style, it teased, raising hopes, then dashing them, then raising them again, then dashing them, then taking a few minutes to laugh derisively at me, then raising them again…

In all my time watching Test cricket, Australia has been the champion of losing close matches. A couple of two-wicket wins in South Africa, when Pat Cummins stunned everyone, and back when Ian Healy smacked a six over square leg, were exceptions, but

generally it’s been a disaster for our boys when things are tight – even in the years when the team has been generally dominant. From McDermott’s “maybe it hit the glove, maybe it hit the helmet” to Kasprowicz’s “maybe his hand was on the bat, maybe it wasn’t” to Lyon’s “OK his stumps are all over the place, he’s pretty much just out”, stirring last-wicket partnerships have made us all believe in miracles, only to subject us to the violent face-punch of disappointment.

And when the boot is on the other foot, as in Mark Taylor’s first Test as captain, what came to be known as the Karachi Kalamity, of course the stirring last-wicket partnership wins out, Inzamam and Mushtaq putting on 57 and Healy missing a stumping to gift them victory. I just can’t stand it.

In the first Test, it seemed that every time I’d come to terms with Australia’s basic inferiority, they pulled a surprise out of the hat to prove me wrong. And every time I was convinced I’d been wrong, they poked a hole in the hat to prove me right again.

First with wayward bowling on the first day and a serene-looking English batting line-up – here we go again – but no! Peter Siddle roars in, bangs the ball down, and suddenly the Poms are skittled! Hooray! Maybe we can win the Ashes!

But then we fall apart to 4-53. Nope, turns out we still can’t cut it. Oh well, the Ashes are gone, let’s get used to it.

But no! Steve Smith and Phil Hughes, whose positions were most uncertain before the match, play a steadying partnership that begins to bring things back to somewhere near level terms. Maybe, after all –

No! Bang! Bang! Bang! Smith is out and Australia falls in a screaming heap! 9-117 and a deficit of nearly 100. Just another humiliation coming then. As the 19-year-old making his Test debut against all expectations and even logic walks out to bat, we resign ourselves to a winter of pain.

But no! Ashton Agar starts stroking the ball with impossible elegance to all corners, flashing through the covers like Sobers, hitting thunderclap pull shots like Gilchrist, thumping it down the ground like Hayden and even late-cutting like a left-handed Trumper, and he, along with Hughes playing with a cool assuredness that we all thought beyond him, breaks records and sends the score scurrying past England’s.

He’s out, tragically, for 98, but still, 65 ahead and bang! Bang! Mitch Starc has two wickets in the blink of an eye, and England is on its knees begging for mercy. Revenge is about to be extracted. This whole series is turning on its head. Miracles DO happen!

But no! Cook and Pietersen slowly and remorselessly grind away and they are going to put this match out of reach and –

No! They’re out! And two more with them! Agar has two! The quicks are on fire! Watson is miserly! The advantage only needs to be pressed home, and Australia have this game. We were, after all, right to not give up hope.

But no! Edges are dropped, and one edge is caught, but apparently doesn’t count, and Bell plays superbly and Broad, for whatever reason, remains on the field, and England powers away and out of sight. But…the tail falls quickly…maybe a glimmer of hope? But, 311 runs…on a wearing pitch…beyond this team’s reach surely? Still…a glimmer…

Yes! More than a glimmer! Watson and Rogers set about fulfilling their destiny, playing with ease and authority. At 0-84 the Aussies have the momentum and 311 suddenly looks quite tiddly. Here we go, here we go, here we go…

Oh. They’re out. Watson’s missed one and Rogers has chipped a sitter, and in between Ed Cowan has reaffirmed his inexplicable love of lavish cover drives played at precisely the wrong moment, and…does the glimmer remain?

It does! For Clarke and Smith dig in and slowly, surely, pull us out of the mire, and hope springs eternal…

But no! Clarke goes. Smith goes next ball. Hughes an over later. Six down, only halfway there, and all hope lost.

Unless Agar does it again. Promoted three places in the order, he plays some lovely shots, and Haddin looks secure, and maybe, just maybe…

Nup. Agar’s gone. Starc follows him quickly. It’s all over.

But wait! Siddle is useful, and he’s cracked a couple of fours, and AHA! Cook drops him at slip! The gods are with us boys, we’re heading to glory! Especially after this flowing, Cowan-esque drive Siddle is unfurling zooms through the covers…

Cook leaps like a salmon and holds on to an even faster bullet than the one he missed. Siddle’s gone. It’s nine down. Agar’s not out there, it’s Pattinson. Eighty to get. Pattinson and Haddin. Stick a fork in this Test match, it is done. We were idiots to ever think it would end any other way. It won’t even be close…

But…Anderson’s tired, and Finn replaces him, and Haddin smashes him far and wide. Pattinson is getting behind everything. Haddin sweeps Swann to the rope, and again, through Finn’s despairing hands. The ball flies for byes. Pattinson steps out and hammers Swann into the crowd. Anderson goes off the field. England are frayed. Haddin and Pattinson look secure. The target is under twenty.

It’s going to happen. It’s really going to happen. Surely this time. After Adelaide 93 and Edgbaston 05, surely the universe owes us this one. And these two are playing beautifully, and after lunch there’s just a handful to knock off, and this will be a FAMOUS victory.

And now only fifteen to get, and Anderson’s back on, and he bowls, and Haddin drives, and…

Finally, hope dies.

No other game could possibly have dealt out the five days’ worth of twists and reversals that this Test did. No other game could have exhilarated and devastated so often, ignited the flame of hope after extinguishing it so many times.

It’s why Test cricket is the best game, and the worst game. The most thrilling, and the most painful.

It’s why I’ll be riveted to the second Test, sure all the way through that Australia can’t win, and sure all the way through that hang on, they just might.

The Crowd Says:

2013-07-18T13:33:25+00:00

Megan Maurice

Expert


Typically hilarious article Ben. My Dad similarly prepared me to lower my expectations by telling me I'd never play netball for Australia. When I was 10 years old. In front of the whole club while making a speech about my team at netball presentation. On the upside, I've never been disappointed since.

2013-07-18T12:50:20+00:00

Ben Pobjie

Guest


True. Australia should have easily played out a draw in Kolkata 2001, but batting defensively proved too hard.

2013-07-18T12:47:58+00:00

Ben Pobjie

Guest


Well Adelaide was an amazing comeback, but Australia actually won easily in the end. And in Sydney, Clarke's amazing over snatched victory from the jaws of a draw, not a defeat.

2013-07-18T12:47:30+00:00

Andrew Dove

Guest


I remember admiring Tim Mays batting effort on that fateful day, very heartbreaking. I love test cricket.

2013-07-18T12:46:03+00:00

Ben Pobjie

Guest


Oh it wasn't the 80s that killed the soul for a Parra supporter, just Parra in general. And yeah there have been *great* victories, but in those absolute knife-edge ones, where one ball can end it all...it always does!

2013-07-18T09:36:38+00:00

Wilson Flatley

Roar Rookie


It is a wondrous game Test Cricket. "Who is winning?'; a question that any cricket puritan will have been asked and answered uncountable times, and it is in the answer that lies test crickets' greatest asset. The way in which a team can be millimetres from defeat and still clasp victory, or one ball from victory and still taste defeat. No one is ever truly winning a test match until the umpire rules a result, and from the most desperate of situations the greatest moments can rise, like a phoenix through the black ashes of hopelessness.

2013-07-18T07:35:04+00:00

langou

Roar Guru


Great list Thanks Mark

2013-07-18T07:11:55+00:00

Hossey

Roar Guru


Good piece, the incredible highs and lows were definitely mutual. Extraordinary match, cannot wait for tonight.

2013-07-18T05:44:31+00:00

Viren

Guest


The other side? Heck, it was a feast for neutrals like myself. What is it about the Ashes that produces such satisfying thrillers?

2013-07-18T03:10:40+00:00

Timmuh

Roar Guru


Australia has played a very aggressive game, trying to dominate with the bat and playing out a draw doesn't seem to fit with the selections made for domination. That Australia doesn't have a team capable of such dominance any more doesn't seem to have changed the approach that is taken. If a team goes with the "hit out or get out" strategy they won't play many draws, and when those they do wiill be when the opposition digs in with the bat. When the side was good it probably resulted in more wins than a more conservatibe approach, now as a middle team there needs to be more flexibility in approach, sometimes to avoid losses.

2013-07-18T02:54:02+00:00

Mark

Guest


JGK, My other thought is that rarely do the Aussies hang on for a draw, whereas the opposition often do (like Cardiff 2009, Brisbane 1992/93 vs WI). Still working on how to quantify that though. Re SL 2004, I think you are thinking of the 2nd test in Kandy, where the Aussies won by 27 runs having made only 120 in their 1st innings.

2013-07-18T02:33:20+00:00

JGK

Roar Guru


This one: Australia won 2 wickets v South Africa Johannesburg 31-Mar-2006 was really one wicket as Langer was unable to bat in that innings. Also, I reckon 3 wickets is "close". That would then include the Trent Bridge Test from 2005 (and maybe others). What you list also doesn't include is: - "Draws that we should have won" eg: Cardiff in 09, Adelaide 12, probably others - "Wins that should have been draws" eg: Adelaide 06, Monkeygate, - "Wins that we should have lost" eg SCG 2009 Also, we won 3 Tests against SL in 2004 after trailing on the first innings in each. I could have sworn that one of those matches ended up being very close in runs.

2013-07-18T02:24:54+00:00

Mark

Guest


Wanting to back up my feeling that the Aussies rarely win the close ones, I have done some research (thanks to Statsguru on ESPN Cricinfo) Since 1980, and defining close as losing by 20 runs or less or by 2 wickets or less, the Aussies are won 4 and lost 14! A number of them have got a mention above, but here is the list (apologies if the formatting is a bit ugly) the wins (4) Australia won 16 runs v Sri Lanka Colombo (SSC) 17-Aug-1992 Australia won 2 wickets v South Africa Port Elizabeth 14-Mar-1997 Australia won 2 wickets v South Africa Johannesburg 31-Mar-2006 Australia won 2 wickets v South Africa Johannesburg 17-Nov-2011 the losses (14) Australia lost 18 runs v England Leeds 16-Jul-1981 Australia lost 3 runs v England Melbourne 26-Dec-1982 Australia lost 1 runs v West Indies Adelaide 23-Jan-1993 Australia lost 5 runs v South Africa Sydney 2-Jan-1994 Australia lost 1 wicket v Pakistan Karachi 28-Sep-1994 Australia lost 19 runs v England The Oval 21-Aug-1997 Australia lost 12 runs v England Melbourne 26-Dec-1998 Australia lost 1 wicket v West Indies Bridgetown 26-Mar-1999 Australia lost 2 wickets v India Chennai 18-Mar-2001 Australia lost 13 runs v India Mumbai 3-Nov-2004 Australia lost 2 runs v England Birmingham 4-Aug-2005 Australia lost 1 wicket v India Mohali 1-Oct-2010 Australia lost 7 runs v New Zealand Hobart 9-Dec-2011 Australia lost 14 runs v England Nottingham 10-Jul-2013 I was really hoping that Haddin and Pattinson might buck the trend earlier this week, but alas, just another entry on the list!

2013-07-18T02:04:26+00:00

Nick

Roar Guru


I believe Steve Bucknor won that test :P

2013-07-18T01:25:52+00:00

Alex

Guest


What about Clarke winning the test against India at sydney in 08, or amazing Adelaide?

2013-07-18T00:39:08+00:00

Sideline Comm.

Guest


I keep telling myself that biltongbek, but somehow it doesn't help. I say to myself, well in the 2000s we had the best team in cricket, arguably one of the best ever. The Waugh brothers, Ponting, Warne, McGrath and co. were breath taking. A golden era were not even cheating would win it for the poms. Surely this is our hangover, and we had this coming? But it's not just cricket. I think back to the Wallabies team of last decade. I think of Gregan, Larkham and Mortlock, and then the horrible loss this year to the Lions. Is this our due? Should we just pass around the aspirin and deal with it? And even last night, with the tyrannical reign of Queensland continuing, I think of Johns and Fittler, Daley, Stuart and the Chief. Surely our hangover should be almost done right? There's only so much barocca one man can drink. It is cyclical, and this is us at the bottom of the cycle. It means that our eventual rise again will be all the more glorious, and at the top we will look down in scorn at those who oppressed us. But does it help now? Not really.

2013-07-17T23:50:48+00:00

Tasman

Guest


One of your best articles Ben, well done. I would be happy if we lose by 14 again, what I can't stand is the debacle we saw in India. That just kills the spirit.

2013-07-17T23:45:39+00:00

JohnB

Guest


http://www.thedailymash.co.uk/sport/people-who-dont-like-cricket-are-wrong-say-experts-2013071575756?utm_campaign=17072013&utm_source=emailCampaign&utm_medium=email&utm_content=

2013-07-17T23:31:46+00:00

Fivehole

Guest


You mentioned McDermott, Kasprowicz and Lyon (well maybe not Lyon) and their almost but not quite efforts. Two other crushing moments dwell in my memory along with those. Border and Thompson 82/83 Ashes, and Damien Martyn and his many partners at the SGC against South Africa 93/94. I went out to the latter, as entry was free on the day for what most assumed would be a quick mop up of the small run chase. how wrong everyone was. Whilst i was watching this recent test, i couldn't help but think it had the feel of the above tests about it. Unfortunately i was proven right.

2013-07-17T23:14:45+00:00

pope paul v11

Guest


Nice one Ben.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar