Calamity awaits two of Blues, Tigers, Swans, Pies

By Cameron Rose / Expert

The AFL’s first round rivalled the Essendon drugs saga for length, but Round 2 will be quickly upon us, and the question about which of four teams has the most at stake is a pressing one.

Carlton, Collingwood, Richmond and Sydney all disappointed in the first week of Round 1, and all players, coaches and fans have had two weeks to consider the consequences of a second consecutive loss.

Sadly for supporters of two of these teams, a 0-2 start to the year is going to become reality, as the Tigers and Blues kick off Round 2, and the Swans host the Magpies in the Saturday night feature.

Collingwood has a strong record against Sydney going back a number of years, but this has been mitigated in recent times with the Swans winning two of the last three.

ANZ Stadium holds no fears for the Pies though, having won their Round 20 match last year by a comfortable five-goal margin.

Nathan Buckley is already starting to feel the heat from sections of the Collingwood fan-base and media, and when you’re in charge of the biggest football club in the land, expectation will always be high.

This should be tempered by knowledge that the side is not ready to challenge for a premiership this year. They are also a long way from fielding their best 22, the configuration of which may be up in the air all season.

Still, a 0-2 start, followed by a Round 3 game against Geelong, is an uncomfortable place to be.

GWS were always going to be both Giants and giant-killers at some point, it was just a matter of which highly credentialled club would fall victim to them first. Sydney suffered the ignominy, much to the disgust of their fans who feel nothing but contempt for their spoon-fed little brother.

With the deepest midfield quality in the competition, the acquisition of the game’s hottest property in Lance Franklin, plus the promise of a full season from 2013 big-name recruit Kurt Tippett, a grand final appearance from the Swans was the minimum expectation of most people.

You have to go back to North Melbourne in 1999 to find the last grand finalist that started the season with two losses. And if they do falter again, a trip to Adelaide to play the Crows awaits, which won’t be an easy assignment.

Will we be shrugging off the first-up surprise as an aberration, or seeing it as a sign of a deeper malaise? There’d be no better way for Sydney to kick-start their premiership campaign than to defeat a bogey side on turf where they don’t have the historical advantage.

The famous Bloods culture has been renowned for the ability to dig deep and respond when challenged. This week they’ll get their chance to do exactly that.

Carlton needs to prove they’re not just treading water under Mick Malthouse, as an army of critics have been lining up to hypothesise.

They’ll be going into Thursday night’s match against Richmond as slight underdogs with the bookies, but also expected to win by many that are mindful of the hold they have over the Tigers. This ascendancy was never clearer than on the massive finals stage last September, in front of almost 95,000 people.

They played some very good, organised football against Port in Round 1, but couldn’t maintain the rage over four quarters. Malthouse will have us believe that they are just short of fitness, and will be a top four or six contender once they’ve caught up.

With Essendon, a team that beat them twice in 2013, to follow Richmond, they’re staring at another 0-3 start to the year if they go down this week. We saw they couldn’t finish in the top eight after conceding that sort of start last year, and it will be mighty difficult again.

Richmond arguably has more at stake than any of them. While many had pegged Collingwood and Carlton to be mid-table strugglers, and the feeling is that Sydney will come good anyway, the Tigers were internally bullish about their top-four prospects.

Add to that a combustible fan-base starved of success and feeling they are more than owed, plus a media that will relish the opportunity to savage a perceived ‘soft’ playing list, and the pressure is well and truly on to deliver.

Similar to the Swans they’ll be starting favourite on their home turf, but facing a side that has troubled them more than any in recent years.

To add to these problems, Richmond looked mentally and physically slow against the Suns, and were exposed by an opposition able to spread aggressively when in control of the ball.

Carlton has no shortage of foot speed, and looked fast and clean in the first and third quarters against Port. Their pressure will also cause the Tigers trouble.

Richmond’s confidence will have been shaken by the Gold Coast loss, so they need to show they’ve overcome the mental demons, as well as the accumulated scar tissue from many humiliations at the hands of the Blues.

Two losses to teams they, and most of the football world, would perceive as below them would be a catastrophic beginning to the year.

It would potentially be fatal to their top-four or even final-eight chances.

Negative news stories dominate the AFL landscape, and there always has to be at least one team and coach in the gun. We all indulge in it, and love it when it’s not our club.

Four of the biggest clubs in the game go under the microscope this round, and only two will escape it. For those that don’t, the pain is coming.

The Crowd Says:

2014-03-25T08:49:22+00:00

Axle an the guru

Guest


If Collingwood are winless by round 8 they will be on the bottom of the ladder. I carnt see Eddie likeing that to much, if they are winless by round 10 Collingwood will have a new coach. -- Comment from The Roar's iPhone app.

2014-03-25T06:26:30+00:00

macca

Guest


Jack - As a Carlton supporter I know that you can't rely on small forwards to get your goals each week, some weeks it looks like you have plenty of goal scoring power (especially when your midfield is allowed to rack up possessions at will) but other weeks you need a tall forward to stand up and asking Joe Daniher to do it over a full season is a big ask and if Chapmans 32 year old body fails him again tehn there could be real trouble.

2014-03-25T06:23:24+00:00

macca

Guest


Crows

2014-03-25T06:22:25+00:00

Jack Smith

Roar Guru


Surely they had plenty of positives that you could not criticise their forward line? I thought it was ridiculous to question where they would get the goals & and was proven correct.

2014-03-25T06:18:31+00:00

Jack Smith

Roar Guru


HELL YEAH! Swans to win of course... :P

2014-03-25T06:03:24+00:00

macca

Guest


Statisticlly yes but I once watch a mate blow through a few hundred dollars doubling up on black as red came up 8 times in a row. I agree it is unlikely they won't win at least one (more likely a couple) of those games but it is possible.

2014-03-25T05:59:44+00:00

macca

Guest


Blues

2014-03-25T05:55:15+00:00

Bogan Baiter

Guest


Even though they have a tough draw as outlined above, it's a bit of a stretch to suggest they won't win any of those games, as you say 50/50 for most of them means at least one or two will fall their way

2014-03-25T05:21:25+00:00

CSH

Guest


I vote for ambivalence. I couldn't care less that it was the Giants in particular that beat the swans in the first round. I just hate that they lost. The rivalry seems manufactured because they immediately tried to depict it as intense and deeply held. This sort of thing has to happen over time and can't be invented out of thin air by marketing types. Give it a few more seasons and a few more willing contests and maybe there will be a genuine rivalry. In the meantime, giants = snore. And just on the rivalry, I really hate 'battle of the bridge'. What stupid nonsense saying that anything west of the Anzac bridge is Giant's territory. All the swans fans in the inner west and north west must find that hilarious.

2014-03-25T05:11:41+00:00

Michael huston

Guest


Did you by any chance read of the Swans injury list going into the finals last year? Or the prior week where their players were dropping like flies and most of their midfield had to go without rotations? It probably explains why Freo were able to bundle out such an "opponent". Their team, believe it or not, is still dealing with the impact of such injuries. Players like Jetta, Shaw, Reid, Rohan, Goodes, Tippett and Roberts-Thompson are playing their first few matches in a very long time. Naturally they're going to take a while to get back into the swing of things. How can we expect Buddy to be a major asset to the Swans when he's yet to reaaally play with the Swans?!

2014-03-25T05:08:55+00:00

Christo the Daddyo

Guest


"I would rather there was no small team for the Swans to have to thrash" So now we're back to ensuring that the Giants become a big team ASAP. Glad you've finally seen common sense! Sell-out games of AFL in Sydney with two passionate sets of supporters - how can you not see that as a good thing? A Swans/Giants Grand Final - bring it on! With a one point victory to the Swans of course...;)

2014-03-25T04:20:07+00:00

Cat

Roar Guru


The more you speak DLarge the more it sounds like a genuine rivalry is already there is your head, regardless of how you try to tell us there isn't.

2014-03-25T03:56:33+00:00

D.Large

Guest


You're right Christo, I don't want to see a Swans team thrash an understrength team in front of small crowd. I would rather there was no small team for the Swans to have to thrash.

2014-03-25T03:54:48+00:00

Christo the Daddyo

Guest


Give it time...

AUTHOR

2014-03-25T03:50:38+00:00

Cameron Rose

Expert


I agree Gene. They'll certainly win some of those games, but looking at them individually, there are no gimme's at all among them.

2014-03-25T03:48:46+00:00

D.Large

Guest


Gene, When I think rivalry I think about teams that you love to hate, that you look forward to the game eagerly to get one up on them, that you respect the rival internally even though you outwardly dislike them. That isn't how I feel for GWS, I don’t care about playing them or watching the matches and judging by the attendances at those games compared to Syd v Carl / Collingwood etc., neither do the footballing public. To quote Sam Neill from Jurassic Park "T-Rex doesn't want to be fed, he wants to hunt! You can't suppress sixty-five million years of gut instinct" Give supporters a manufactured rivalry and you will get ambivalence.

2014-03-25T03:48:07+00:00

DingoGray

Roar Guru


Oh derrr....Right I'm an idiot...I'll go back in my box now!

AUTHOR

2014-03-25T03:46:04+00:00

Cameron Rose

Expert


Can't argue with that last point Olivia!

AUTHOR

2014-03-25T03:42:46+00:00

Cameron Rose

Expert


G'day Dingo, I agree it will be, but I suppose for the Dogs it won't be, and it was more the four teams I wrote about are all playing each other. If North was playing one of them, they would have been in there. The Roos had better come out breathing fire for their own sake.

2014-03-25T03:42:12+00:00

TomC

Roar Guru


Exactly

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar