The best two-and-a-half-day wonders in Test history

By Kersi Meher-Homji / Expert

England convincingly defeating Australia in two-and-a-half days in the Birmingham Test made me go for a walk down memory lane.

Australia routed England by an innings in two-and-a-half days in the Leeds Ashes Test in August 2009.

These are not the shortest Tests. Nineteen Tests have ended in two days in the 138-year history of Test cricket.

The first such instance was between England and Australia at The Oval from 28 to 29 August 1882, with Australia winning the mini thriller by 7 runs.

All three Ashes Tests in the 1888 series ended in two days. Australia (116 and 60) vanquished England (53 and 62) by 61 runs at Lord’s, but lost by innings at The Oval and in Manchester.

At one stage in Manchester, Australia was 6 down for 7 runs, the worst start in Test annals. The first four Aussie batsmen made ducks. This was the shortest Test, England completing their 21-run victory before lunch, at 1.55 pm, on the second day.

The next two Tests between South Africa and England at Port Elizabeth and Cape Town in March 1889 also ended within two days, England winning both times. Thus five Tests in a row from July 1888 to March 1889 had finished in two days.

Fifteen of the 19 two-day Tests were played before 1947 when the pitches were not covered and rain made them batsmen’s nightmares.

For 54 years between 1946 and 2000, there were no Tests which ended in two days, but the new millennium produced four such micro Tests. England beat West Indies at Leeds in August 2000, Australia beat Pakistan at Sharjah in October 2002, South Africa beat Zimbabwe at Cape Town in March 2005 and New Zealand beat Zimbabwe at Harare in August 2005.

All four of these two-day wonders were won by an innings.

My selection of six of the best two-day Tests are as below.

1. Fred Spofforth grabs 14 (England vs Australia, The Oval, 28 – 29 August 1882)
Australia won the toss, batted first, were routed for 63 and yet won. England was dismissed for 101, ‘Demon’ Spofforth capturing 7 for 46. Despite 55 by opener Hugh Massie, Australia collapsed for 122.

England needed a token 85 to win and were cruising at 2-51 with WG Grace on 32. But incredibly they lost their last 8 wickets for 26 runs to be shot out for 77, Spofforth bagging 7 more scalps to finish with 14-90.

Australia won by seven runs.

After this Test the legend of the Ashes was born when The Sporting Times carried a mock obituary notice, stating that the body of English cricket would be cremated and the Ashes taken to Australia.

2. Fred Martin’s amazing debut (England vs Australia, The Oval, 11-12 August 1890)
In this the second Test of the series Australia won the toss, batted and were shot out for 92. Making his Test debut, England’s left-arm medium pacer Fred Martin took 6 for 50.

England led by eight runs. Martin struck again with a six-wicket haul for match figures of 12 for 102 and the visitors toppled for 102. Needing 95 to win, England was 8 for 93 and any of the four results was possible – a win, loss, draw or tie.

The home team won by two wickets from an overthrow when Australian fielder John Barrett missed an easy run-out.

3. Bradman outscores the Windies (Australia vs West Indies, Melbourne, 13-14 February, 1931)
Australia’s stout and awkward Herbert ‘Dainty’ Ironmonger was a left-arm medium-pacer who spun the ball. He took 7 for 23 and 4 for 56 in this intriguing Test and shot out the touring Windies for 99 and 107.

Any suggestion that the pitch was unplayable was challenged by Australian skipper and opener Bill Woodfull (83 run out) and Don Bradman (152) adding 156 runs for the second wicket. Australia declared at 8 for 328 and won by an innings and 122 runs.

George Headley, the Windies’ master bat nicknamed ‘Black Bradman’, could manage only 33 and 11.

4. ‘Tiger’ tames Kiwis (New Zealand v. Australia, Wellington, 29-30 March, 1946)
This was the first Test between Australia and New Zealand and they did not play another one until 1973-74.

Perhaps the Kiwis’ mauling by an innings and 103 runs within two days was the reason. The home team erred in batting after winning the toss on a rain-affected pitch. They were rolled out for 42 and 54, ‘Tiger’ O’Reilly snatching 5 for 14 and 3 for 19, bowling his fast spinners with fire and brimstone.

Australian captain and opener Bill Brown scored 67, more than New Zealand in either innings, and declared the innings at 8-199.

5. Caddick grabs four wickets in an over (England v. West Indies, Leeds, 17-18 August, 2000)
This was the first two-day Test in 54 years. The touring West Indians were dismissed for 172 and England took a round 100 runs lead, Michael Vaughan top-scoring with 76.

In an amazing collapse, the tourists were routed for 61, the lowest total at Leeds. The reason for the Windies’ collapse was the tall seam and swing Somerset bowler Andy Caddick.

His analysis read 11.2-5-14-5, capturing the last 5 wickets for 5 runs off 15 balls. This included 4 wickets in one over, a wicket off first, third, fourth and sixth balls. England won by an innings.

6. Hayden beats Pakistan by an innings (Australia v. Pakistan, Sharjah, 11-12 October 2002)
Pakistan won the toss and batted on a batting paradise on a neutral venue but was bundled out for their lowest ever total for 59. This record lasted for only a day as they were spun out for 53 in the second innings.

Shane Warne was the destroyer taking 4 for 11 and 4 for 13 with his slider deliveries. There was no devil in the pitch as Australia amassed 310, opener Matthew Hayden scoring 119 runs.

The temperature was 50°C and Hayden thought he was in an oven and publicly wondered whether hell was any hotter.

He reached his century with a six. As Pakistan totalled 112 in two innings, it can be surmised that Hayden (119) had beaten Pakistan by an innings and seven runs off his own bat.

The Crowd Says:

2015-08-03T10:50:49+00:00

Nick

Guest


Weren't the early tests played over two days? If so, it isn't too surprising that most of the two day results were in the nineteenth century.

2015-08-03T06:01:24+00:00

Kersi Meher-Homji

Guest


Thank you, Allunthus. Isn't it paradoxical that three one-sided Tests ending within 11 days have produced an engrossing series?

2015-08-03T04:56:37+00:00

Allanthus

Guest


Kersi, I'm a little late in, but thanks for the interesting piece. Cricket is indeed a game of statistics, which lead us in all sorts of wonderful directions.

2015-08-02T23:25:18+00:00

Harvey Wilson

Roar Rookie


You would have to be a little miffed to get four wickets in an over and not have a hatrick.

2015-08-01T07:43:44+00:00

Kersi Meher-Homji

Guest


Yes, Sheek, what an up and down journey! A roller coaster ride, no less. An engrossing series so far. Now it's Aussies' turn to be rooster and Poms' turn to be the feather duster! Ashes to Ashes, dust to dust indeed.

2015-08-01T07:39:45+00:00

Kersi Meher-Homji

Guest


B2, Hope you are well. As there are so many writers who specialise in reporting the Tests, I want to give readers something they do not know.

2015-08-01T06:16:22+00:00

B2

Guest


Sir Kersi ! I do not believe it. Only talk of History? I am sure you felt the blood boiling ! Need a more befitting write up on this. I mentioned after the last test that England might DOCTOR the wicket.Seems they did it in the mind.

2015-08-01T06:11:25+00:00

sheek

Roar Guru


Thanks Kersi, For the trip down memory lane. Well, so much for the theory of batting first to win in England in modern times. So much for the theory that England was "gone" for the Ashes after the 2nd test. If you live long enough & follow sport long enough, you come to realise that last week's rooster can become this week's feather duster, or vice-versa, very quickly.

2015-08-01T04:22:36+00:00

Paul D

Roar Guru


No doubt he helped make sure it went for 3 days - given the cause and all the functions on the 3rd day, I can't say that I blame him doing it. No-one is going to remember, 5-0 is the only number that counts from that series.

2015-08-01T03:46:55+00:00

Kersi Meher-Homji

Guest


The Sydney Ashes Test of January 2014 could also have ended in two days but went on the third day as skipper Michael Clarke did not go for the jugular on day two. He preferred to rest in-form wicket-takers Mitchell Johnson and Ryan Harris and gave the bowling to Nathan Lyon, Peter Siddle and Shane Watson instead. Some thought that the Pink Day for charity being on the third day influenced his judgement. Also the third day being Sunday could also have been the reason Australia did not want to lose revenue. But this is all "iffy". What do Roarers have to say?

2015-08-01T01:53:41+00:00

Andy

Guest


I know we complain about these short tests and all but this has been great viewing. Yes we have lost 2 but i am loving the bowlers being so dangerous looking pretty much all the time, but also the batsman if they are patient or lucky early on have also shown some beauty aswell. This is just so much more interesting than seeing one team bat for 2 days the other one bat for 1 and a half days and then the last day and a bit are a scramble.

2015-08-01T00:03:16+00:00

Paul D

Roar Guru


The shortest ever test match was the one against South Africa in 1931/32 - I think it was the 5th test. It actually was played over 4 days, but finished in 2 days - technically one a bit! The first day saw South Africa & Australia both bowled out, the 2nd day was washed out, the third day was a rest day, and then the game finished on the 4th day when Australia bowled out South Africa a second time. Australia won by an innings and 72 runs despite only scoring 153 in their first innings! This was the game where Bert Ironmonger took 11 wickets for 23 runs in the match, the most miserly ten-for I think we will ever see in test cricket. Wisden says the match lasted a total of 656 deliveries, or just under 6 hours playing time.

2015-07-31T23:57:42+00:00

Kersi Meher-Homji

Guest


Apart from Matthew Hayden (119) defeating Pakistan (59 and 53) by an innings, there have been four other such instances: England's Robert Abel (120), v. S Africa (47 and 43), Cape Town, 1888-89 England's Len Hutton (364) v. Australia (201 and 123), The Oval, 1938 Australia's Don Bradman (185) v. India (58 and 98), Brisbane, 1947-48 and Pakistan's Inzamam-ul-Haq (329) v. New Zealand (73 and 246), Lahore, 2002. But they were not 2-day wonder Tests.

2015-07-31T23:03:42+00:00

Kersi Meher-Homji

Guest


Thank you Rustom and Targa for your interesting additions.

2015-07-31T22:36:43+00:00

Targa

Guest


I would add NZ's win against England in 1984 when Hadlee's 99 was more than England's total in either innings and he took 8 wickets for good measure. Game over in about 170 overs (only rain took it to a 3rd day). www.espncricinfo.com/ci/engine/current/match/63362.html

2015-07-31T19:37:52+00:00

Rustom Deboo

Roar Guru


Hi Kersi, nice post. Interesting to note that there were no two dayers between 1946 and 2000. Also interesting that none of the post-2000 instances feature early-2000s Bangladesh, as they were at the receiving end of many a thrashing during that period. I recall that Zimbabwe were bowled out twice in a day in the Harare Test against New Zealand - the second such instance after India at Old Trafford in 1952. The third instance also incidentally involved Zimbabwe against New Zealand, at Napier in 2011-12.

Read more at The Roar