Let every country play for the Ashes

By Peter Zitterschlager / Roar Guru

Okay, first the boring preamble bit where you lament that Test cricket is dying, before pitching a not so hare-brained idea to revitalise it:

Stadiums are empty, interest is waning, ratings are down, kids prefer T20, and it’s a mofo of a shame because Tests are superior.

Yes, I know that people are time poor, but damn, this is Test cricket we’re talking about!

Yes, I know that five-day games are an anachronism, but damn, the fans who’ve betrayed it for T20 can’t even spell anachronism.

Yes, I know the Test Championship the ICC kept promising never materialised because of logistical problems, but damn, hell will freeze over before I let those lackeys to the BCCI take hope away from me.

Yes, I know Tests can be slow, ponderous, tedious, boring and a gazillion other unappealing things, but damn, Tests are the best fit for text book batting and artistry, and searching spells of short-pitched bowling, and spinners bowling into the footmarks on fifth-day pitches, and players making triple tons, and miraculous bat-pad catches, and five slips and a gully in the cordon, and thrilling draws where heroic tail-enders hold out penetrative bowling for entire sessions against the odds (damn it!).

Right, that out of the way, now for the not so hare-brained idea to revitalise Test cricket that’s probably completely and utterly hare-brained, but you settle for something in the middle, for fear that if you didn’t, it’d be haggled down to a smidge above hare-brained (phew!).

And drum roll, please…

Let every country play for the Ashes.

Let me repeat that slowly.

Let… Every… Country… Play… For… The… Ashes.

I repeated that slowly, of course, because first time round you probably thought your eyes were playing tricks, in that you reckoned you’d never come across a crazier idea. Further, you were probably a little annoyed that you’d invested any time in this article, seeing that your first impression of every country playing for the Ashes is the nuttiest thing you’ve heard.

But upon being given time to digest it when read slowly between ellipses, you found that your love of Test cricket was given ample space to leave you open to any suggestion to save it, even though it had initially seemed hare-brained and madcap and non compos mentis.

Or perhaps you kept thinking no, even repeated slowly, that’s plum loco crazy.

Anyway, here’s the technical bit where you’re walked through how it works.

Let’s say we started this idea a few months ago and that meant England went to the Emirates to play Pakistan with the Ashes. Pakistan went on to win that series, so – joy of joy for the people of Rawalpindi – they now hold the Ashes. Whoever beats Pakistan next will then become the holders. And so on and so on and so on, infinitum.

I guess you have a few questions, yes?

“You,” I’d ask, “the crusty looking sports nut in the third row?”

“Yeah, I get your idea, mate, but why the Ashes? Why can’t it be just some sort of cup?”

I’d mentally shake my head.

“Because coming up with a cup just won’t do. The Ashes is, without par, the most sacred trophy in cricket and only the Ashes would excite the other Test-playing nations to embrace the concept.

“Next question, you, the crusty looking sports nut with the incredibly disapproving expression.”

“So, what, we Aussies and Poms have to give up our sacred trophy so as to invigorate Tests in other countries? Why would we want to do that?”

I wouldn’t even answer the question

“Next question, you, the crusty looking sports nut with an equally disapproving expression.”

“Err, how do you know this would even work?”

I would again mentally shake my head.

“What, you don’t think India, South Africa and New Zealand would love to get their hands on the urn? I imagine they’d rub it in our faces with wicked delight once they did. Indeed, striving for it would prove an adrenalin shot for every Test-playing nation.

“Next question.”

“So, what, is this like a Test championship?”

“No, it’s not a Test championship. That will never work for Test cricket; if it could, we would have found a way by now.

“This is just the Ashes, but expanded to include everyone. Whoever holds the Ashes are simply the smug bastards who hold the Ashes. They’re not champions, just keepers of the flame.

“Next, you, crusty sports nut with an expression that’s almost disturbing.”

“So, what, this means there’ll be Australia-England series that aren’t for the Ashes?”

Again I’d be mentally shakin.

“Isn’t that a small price to pay for the good of the game? And besides, mate, we’re usually shitloads better than every other country and we’ll hold it more often than not, so is it really that much of a problem?”

Feeling like I really shut that guy up, I’d point to someone who looks a little more receptive.

“Okay,” he’d ask, “so now that Pakistan hypothetically has the Ashes, we’ll be playing them for the urn next season, yeah?”

“So long as they don’t lose a series in between, yes, we’ll be playing em for the urn.”

“That’s great then.”

“Yes it is great.”

I would then field a question from a cynical-looking cockroach way at the back.

“What’s to stop India scheduling a series with them at short notice so they could beat us to a shot?”

“All of the series would be locked in four years in advance just as they are currently. There’d be no hastily arranged series to fast track a shot. You just have to wait for a scheduled series to come your way where the opponent holds the urn. Simple as that.”

He’d shift uncomfortably in his seat.

“Yeah I guess that works,” he’d say, but sounding like it killed him to say it.

He’d then figure he’d come up with a zinger.

“But have you considered that a team could go years and years before getting a shot if the cards didn’t unfold favourably?”

I had!

“Yes, I have considered that a team could go years and years before getting a shot,” I’d answer, a degree robotically and not looking a smidge obnoxious or contemptuous in doing so, because his supposed zinger was very much deserving of mockery.

“But mate,” I’d add, “don’t you think there would be plenty of instances where the team you were next scheduled to play had just been vying for the Ashes and that that would created greater interest in that series here and abroad?”

He would think it over.

“Yeah, but so what; we wouldn’t be playing for the Ashes at the end of it all, would we?”

And to that, I’d think, this guy sounds just like one of the glass half-empty troglodytes you’d find at The Roar.

“Okay,” I’d then answer, “yes, I guess you’ll have a damp squib here and there, but again, I think that’s a small price to pay.”

And he’d say, “Well I don’t, mate: I think it’s a big price to pay, especially seeing that we could conceivably go decades playing the Poms without it ever being for the Ashes.”

And this would then fire up all the sports nuts with the incredibly disapproving expressions. They’d all walk a foot taller now, and you’d hear ‘hare brained’ spat out with extreme prejudice, and the twitching corpse that is Test cricket would soon be twitching no more.

The Crowd Says:

2016-01-28T11:55:09+00:00

Luke Reynolds

Roar Rookie


Nice work Peter. Of course it would never happen, but it is an easier to follow, more logical idea than (sadly) anything that has ever been suggested for a World Test Championship. Good mix of teams in your post 2000 list too. Something needs to be done now for Test cricket relevance.

2015-12-02T05:52:59+00:00

Peter Z

Guest


Hey Buk, Has to be the Ashes The idea would fizz out before it was out of the blocks if it was something else. The Ashes has just the right mix of everything to resurrect the game all over the globe. It's holy damn it.

2015-12-02T04:27:30+00:00

Buk

Guest


Great idea Peter, just don't call it the Ashes Challenge Cup or something

2015-11-29T20:26:42+00:00

Peter Z

Guest


Fair point, Floyd. It's really much ado about nothing ... well much ado about an idea that has as much chance getting off the ground as the seminal Wright brother contraptions. But should it be that you haven't grasped it, as opposed to it mortifying you, I'm saying that letting every country vie for the Ashes could give Test cricket a shot in the arm.

2015-11-29T10:28:02+00:00

Floyd Calhoun

Guest


What the hell was all that about?!

2015-11-29T00:22:19+00:00

Peter Z

Guest


Yep, checked Windies, didn't lose a series between 1980 to 1994/95 (wow, they were an incredible team!). They would have got it back some time in the early 80's after losing to NZ in 1979/80. Of course that's another torpedo for the idea ... 15 years of Ashes series without it being for the Ashes: there's something crook in the cosmos when that could happen.

2015-11-29T00:05:27+00:00

Peter Z

Guest


Yeah if I get a chance today, I'll go back further. One thing we can say for sure is this: the Windies would have held the urn for 20 years straight!! (late 70's to 1994-1995?) Though there was that loss to NZ when Colin Croft mowed through an ump in his delivery stride, wasn't there? So I guess the Kiwis held it for a bit as well. Also, on my other research, I noted that half the Anglo-Aus series from 2000 - 2015 would have had the urn up for grabs, but it was actually only 3 series. If there ever was a chance for this idea to get off the ground, that torpedo's it. No one would stand for that many actual Ashes series not being for the Ashes! Ah well, still reckon it would do wonders for the health of Tests.

2015-11-29T00:02:48+00:00

Peter Z

Guest


.

2015-11-28T23:38:51+00:00

Dutski

Roar Guru


Hey Peter. Thanks for doing this analysis! I wonder how far back you could go with this? Or if you do it from 2000 you could follow the title holders around and see where the PK200 Memorial Ashes ends up? Who do Pakistan play next?

2015-11-28T06:18:44+00:00

Peter Z

Guest


Just for the record, if the system started 1/1/2000, here's how it would have panned out (notwithstanding, you'd record some teams may have choked when their chance came (and hello to our friends over in Joburg!) (Note the number represents the number of series after winning the urn that the team played as Ashes custodians.) 2000 Australia 2 2000 India 2 2001 Sri Lanka 4 2002 England 2 2003 Australia 11 2005 England 1 2005 Pakistan 3 2006 England 1 2007 Australia 4 2009 India 11 2011 England 1 2011 Pakistan 1 2012 Sri Lanka 1 2013 Australia 1 2013 India 2 2014 South Africa 1 2014 Australia 1 2015 Pakistan 4 I noted that half the Anglo - Australian series had the Ashes up for grabs ... but only thanks to us Aussies. The poms didn't enter any of the series as the holders. And India were a surprise. They held it for 11 series from 2009? And that's home and away, of course. Sadly, NZ and the West Indies didn't nab it ... they had a few chances though ... and I reckon that would have created great excitement.

2015-11-28T03:51:27+00:00

Peter Z

Guest


misprepresented??? ... misrepresented!

2015-11-28T03:45:48+00:00

Peter Z

Guest


Yeah a bit late now ... unless we dare to dream Thanks for your interest mate.

2015-11-28T03:44:55+00:00

Peter Z

Guest


Unless it was the Ashes, coz it's prestige and magic and history make it way way more than lineal ... should it be misprepresented as that in this construct

2015-11-28T02:32:27+00:00

Matthew Tomczyk

Roar Pro


A lineal trophy would be the most pointless trophy in world sport. Everyone knows who the best teams are anyway.

2015-11-28T02:19:21+00:00

Camo McD

Roar Guru


Interesting idea Peter. Initially like most others I felt it was ridiculous but if you were to have a trophy that passes from team to team, the Ashes of English cricket is not the worst idea given most of the competing teams are former British Colonies etc. who would probably enjoy holding the Ashes of their former masters or mother country and the founders of cricket. A pity this wasn't considered 100+ years ago when other teams were joining test cricket but it's probably a tad late now.

2015-11-28T01:39:02+00:00

Peter Z

Guest


Guilty as charged, put the cuffs on, drag me to the gallows, lock me in and throw away the key. Brilliant Republican ... but I hope you feel at least my heart's in the right place!

2015-11-28T01:22:49+00:00

Peter Z

Guest


Again Sheek, fear not, you won't have to worry about sharing the Ashes's magic with the rest of the world. Pigs the size of Led Zepplins would have to fly before my idea even took root. But it's a shame you feel that way, coz you sound to me like you feel that it would make a difference, but you'd be filthy if we had to make the sacrifice to make it happen

2015-11-28T00:47:39+00:00

sheek

Roar Guru


PZ, I'm not into embracing the whole world thing. My love doesn't stretch that far. Besides, you want something for the whole world to embrace - it's called a world cup.

2015-11-28T00:30:10+00:00

Peter Z

Guest


On Aus v Eng series when someone else has the Ashes, yeah, that'd leave a gaping chasm, but still I reckon bragging rights would get it over the line (or maybe the Grace-Bradman trophy.) All the same, we're so damned good at cricket that you'd reckon we'd hold the ashes more often than not, so I'll put my faith in that. Moreover, if the ashes were out of the equation for a while it would make an Anglo-australian series all the more special when it was.

2015-11-28T00:11:20+00:00

Republican

Guest


Another voice of 'rationalism' which is all about an insatiable culture that espouses the more is better view. Does anyone value history and tradition at all these days or is it simply good enough to construct the illusion, spread it thinly and market it to ensure it is not rendered completely irrelevant?

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar