The last six rounds of the NRL have been confirmed by Channel 9 - I mean, the NRL

By The Gurgler / Roar Guru

The NRL released the draw for the final six rounds of the season, and all it did was essentially delay the inevitable. The inevitable meaning plenty of all Sydney clashes, but you get used to that.

Yes it’s easy to highlight Channel Nine’s failures all the time and harp on about it, but they do tend to make it easy to find fault. And yes I have Fox Sports now and that has been a recent and most welcome addition, and I have become a Fox Sports NRL snob as a result.

So since I have the best coverage why should I care? Well, I still feel for the League fans who don’t and despise Channel Nine’s selfish running of the game. And sport in general.

Yes Channel Nine paid a large sum of money to obtain the TV rights, so of course there are commercial obligations and ratings for them to think about, but should that be the first priority and first concern?

Yes, the Sydney market is important, but should a 11th v 15th or 13th v 16th or even 14th v 16th match take centre stage over clashes that are likely to affect the finals outcomes, or even entertain league fans instead of watching two struggling teams battle for the better position in the bottom half of the table?

While league position shouldn’t always be the main factor, as premium clashes based on great rivalries are usually good viewing, surely heading into the finals it should take some precedence over an ordinary clash between two teams in the bottom four that have no great rivalry like Souths and Newcastle?

The reason for leaving the draw for the last six rounds until now was so that the best choices could be made heading into the finals, and looking through the selections of the games, it has the same familiar bias and choices as the previous 20 weeks’ selections.

For instance Gus loves his Sunday Football because 13 of the 20 games on the Sunday are in Sydney between two Sydney teams, and that bias towards Sydney teams rather than ladder position continues- although the game in New Zealand in the final Round on a Sunday is quite the surprise.

But it’s not just a Sydney complaint (they do supply nine of the 16 teams) – six of the bottom eight heading into Round 16 were from Sydney, and realistically only three of those are a decent chance of challenging for finals football. So to load up on Sydney clashes only makes commercial sense, and there should be more to it than that if the NRL wants to grow outside the two states.

Analysis of the last six rounds
Average League Position of the teams – 8.8
Top 8 Sides / Bottom 8 Sides – 18 / 18
Top 4 Sides / All Teams – 10 / 36
Bottom 4 Sides / All Teams – 11 / 36
Sydney Team 24 / 36
All Sydney Games – 7 / 18

Three sides don’t feature in the last six rounds – Gold Coast, Canberra, and unbelievably the Sharks, who are on top of the ladder no less. How on earth can a team that lead the competition and are highly likely to finish top four not be given one single game, while teams in the bottom four feature 11 times?

A lost opportunity too is two of the prospective top eight sides, both of whom are on excellent run of form, and arguably play some of the better rugby league at the moment in Gold Coast and Canberra. Their potential progress to the finals will be for Fox Sports fans exclusively.

Full list of teams
Broncos 6
Bulldogs 5
Roosters 4
Eels 3
Dragons 3
Cowboys 3
Sea Eagles 3
Rabbitohs 2
Tigers 2
Knights 2
Warriors 1
Panthers 1
Storm 1

Want more proof of the bias? The NRL website released an article on the Top ten clashes in the final six rounds. How many of those important games are on Free to Air? One.

Lists can be subjective, but after some of the stats above it shows that the NRL has lost a great opportunity to get people in the mood for finals in the last few weeks of the competition.

The main issue with all of the above, and Channel Nine’s selection of games in general, is that they tell us what they think we should watch, telling us about audience preference based on TV ratings, instead of putting faith in the NRL product and just featuring the best league on offer every week.

Hopefully the NRL can get more of a say next year.

Channel 9 games from Round 21 to Round 26
Round 21 Roosters v Broncos
Round 21 Bulldogs v Dragons
Round 21 Manly v Newcastle
Round 22 Dragons v Broncos
Round 22 Parramatta v Manly
Round 22 Tigers v Cowboys
Round 23 Bulldogs v Manly
Round 23 Broncos v Parramatta
Round 23 Roosters v Cowboys
Round 24 Broncos v Bulldogs
Round 24 Penrith v Tigers
Round 24 Roosters v Dragons
Round 25 Bulldogs v Cowboys
Round 25 Melbourne v Broncos
Round 25 Newcastle v Souths
Round 26 Broncos v Roosters
Round 26 Bulldogs v Souths
Round 26 NZ v Parramatta

Note: Positions are as per pre-kick-off of Round 16 and we used current ladder position for Parramatta to save another calculation.

The Crowd Says:

2016-06-28T05:17:50+00:00

Sharks Man

Guest


Yes - I'd pay for that every week. That is why the Sharks don't get to play in Brisbane anymore - the Broncos don't want to get beaten at home and nine hates us. Hopefully Vortex can watch us win the Grand Final on any format he likes.

2016-06-28T00:02:22+00:00

no one in particular

Roar Guru


Fox Sports has Mark Gasnier, Joel Caine, Gary Belcher and Matt Russell calling games. All are woeful. People praise Fox because of what they don't have, without looking at what they do have

2016-06-27T23:54:41+00:00

Renegade

Roar Guru


Yeah everyone prefers to watch the Broncos get beaten by 40 every week.

2016-06-27T21:26:01+00:00

Edward Kelly

Roar Guru


Wow you are hard to please. Perhaps you want more ads, or to watch in SD or crap Nine commentators, or no intelligent footy talk shows.

2016-06-27T13:48:09+00:00

Vortex

Guest


No one wants to watch the Sharks. They are June premiers and the wheels will inevitably fall off come September. They are destined to never win a premiership, it's in their DNA.

AUTHOR

2016-06-27T12:26:29+00:00

The Gurgler

Roar Guru


Cheers for the link, very interesting. Makes this bit a little irrelevant now. Hard to believe that was how it was all done. I still don't think there would be a massive change given how Channel 9 run things.

2016-06-27T09:39:12+00:00

db

Guest


What are some of the improvements you would make to improve the Foxtel coverage?

2016-06-27T06:51:15+00:00

Alex L

Roar Rookie


Shame the Foxtel coverage is also objectively crap.

2016-06-27T06:41:44+00:00

Bernie

Guest


Actually its Foxtel who are the winner http://www.smh.com.au/rugby-league/league-news/dave-smiths-broadcast-negotiations-cruel-nrl-of-blockbusters-after-locking-in-schedule-last-year-20160625-gprszx.html

2016-06-27T06:26:45+00:00

dodge72

Roar Rookie


I will not watch channel nine coverage,it is crap,only watch Foxtel.Will not even bother to watch last state of adverts(sorry origin) on nine

2016-06-27T04:43:02+00:00

andrew

Guest


No, they tell you their biggest selling point during the coverage - "its live and its free".. problem is, it comes across as cheap. I would love to survey people and find out how many people would pay a fee to watch NRL on Ch 9?!

2016-06-27T04:13:50+00:00

up up cronulla

Guest


Im glad sharks are getting night games because weve only just been winning at night during day games weve played better so we need to get better for the grand final that will be at night!!!

2016-06-27T03:43:22+00:00

Alex L

Roar Rookie


1. You'll always see an over representation of QLD (mostly Broncos) games on Ch9, mostly because you don't hire Lockyer and Lewis to commentate on the NSW teams. 2. As a knock on from 1, you'll always see an under representation of the Storm, Knights, Raiders, and Warriors as Ray Warren doesn't cope well with flying, so Mat Thompson has to cover pretty much all the games outside of Sydney. 3. The Titans will also always be under represented because the Titans should never play night games due to being on the Gold Coast.

2016-06-27T02:41:00+00:00

Rellum

Roar Guru


Broncos get all these night games which everyone complains about, rightly in a lot of cases but the Broncs and especially their fans want to have Sunday arvo games. Not a single one all season. To have no sharks games in the lead up to the finals in staggering and the biggest game in round 6 will probably feature either the Gold coast or the raiders trying to get into the last eight with a win, and of course the majority will not get to see it.

2016-06-27T02:33:51+00:00

Squidward

Roar Rookie


Good. Karma for being Corey Parker and all he stands for

2016-06-27T02:03:23+00:00

armchair expert

Guest


Do Nine have shares in Foxtel? Can be the only explanation. Raiders supporters are used to it, I am sure we have been the biggest Foxsports subscribers for years. I am another that hasn't seen 9's coverage this year until Origin, only 1 to go and then I can forget about the source button on the remote. PS, good to hear Blocker on the telly again.

2016-06-27T01:58:10+00:00

Sleiman Azizi

Roar Guru


"It seems like nines biggest selling point is that people don’t know what they’re missing" That is exactly it. In a closed pond, you really don't need to be a big fish to act big.

2016-06-27T01:52:58+00:00

Emcie

Roar Guru


The thing that bugs me the most about nine is how they put up truck loads of money for the rights but seem to refuse to put any money into decent game coverage or marketing. Honestly, I've seen higher production values in primary school plays then in the Sunday footy show. It seems like nines biggest selling point is that people don't know what they're missing

2016-06-27T01:35:28+00:00

Sleiman Azizi

Roar Guru


You and I are finding more and more in common these days turbodewd!

2016-06-27T01:32:13+00:00

scott

Guest


Plus Nein in their infinite compassion for the game have ensured Corey Parker's last home Broncos game, and possibly his last ever game at Suncorp, will be played on a Thursday night. One home Sunday game a year isn't that much to ask for.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar