2016: The year of the batting collapse

By Ronan O'Connell / Expert

2016 has been the year of the batting collapse in Test cricket.

Australia 10-86. South Africa 83 all out. England 10-64. Sri Lanka 117 all out. Bangladesh 9-49. Pakistan 123 all out. West Indies 108 all out. New Zealand 8-73. Zimbabwe 10-87.

Every Test side bar India has had at least one Test innings this year where their entire batting line-up, or close to it, has capitulated in extraordinary fashion.

Australia’s astonishing loss of 10-86 yesterday was just the latest batting calamity for them in recent months.

In Sri Lanka, the side made 379 batting first in the third Test. But in their other five innings for the series, the average total was a paltry 163.

The frequent collapses we’ve seen across the world in Test cricket this year very rarely have been the result of a difficult pitch.

When South Africa were rolled for 83 in Johannesburg in January, the English openers then came out and cruised to a 64-run opening stand as England won the Test.

England’s loss of 10-64 in the second Test against Bangladesh this week came after they had cantered to 0-100. The Kiwis, meanwhile, lost 8-73 last month on an Indore pitch on which India made an enormous 8-773 for the Test.

Sri Lanka’s 117 all out in the first Test against Australia was on a day one Pallekele deck which offered nothing out of the ordinary for the bowlers.

Bangladesh were dominating at 1-171 when they then lost 9-49 in the first Test against England last month. Zimbabwe’s 10-87 occurred in a Test in which they’d made 362 in their first innings and New Zealand had scored a whopping 6-750 for the match.

And Pakistan got rolled for 123 at home by the lowly West Indies last month after having racked up an incredible 3-579 in their first innings. Each of these are stark examples of the frailty of modern Test batting line-ups.

Here in Australia we love to slam our batsmen for lacking gumption and being prone to collapses, and they deserve this criticism.

But it is a worldwide phenomenon. We could debate all day about the myriad reasons why there are so few tough-to-remove batsmen left in the Test format. The reality is that hard-nosed Test batting, as we once knew, is dead and buried.

The current generation of Test batsmen are frequently exposed as being incapable of weathering tough spells of bowling. The next generation surely will be no better equipped. In fact, it is logical to assume they’ll be even more susceptible given they will have spent less time playing with the red ball and more with the white during their development years.

Apocalyptic batting collapses are only going to become more common in Test cricket. More carnage is on the horizon thanks to the third Test being played under lights at Adelaide.

The Australian and South African batting line-ups have been exposed in Perth on a pitch which should be good for batting. The WACA deck has offered bowlers nice pace and bounce, but of the consistent kind which should not concern Test batsmen. There has been no significant seam movement, which is something the batsmen will face at Adelaide.

It is expected the Adelaide pitch again will be juicy, which is necessary to protect the fragile pink ball. That match could be over inside three days given the presence of quality pacemen Mitchell Starc, Josh Hazlewood, Peter Siddle, Kagiso Rabada, Vernon Philander and Morne Morkel.

Of course, that match is still a while away and there’s a Test still up for grabs at Perth.

South Africa are nicely placed, leading by 102 with eight wickets in hand. In years gone by I would have said they were in a dominant position. In this era, however, Tests regularly are flipped on their head in the space of an hour.

Australia will know that if they start well today they could scythe through the Proteas and keep the fourth innings target to 200. Anything less than 280 should, in theory at least, be a gettable total on a third and fourth day WACA pitch which is coming onto the bat nicely, against a Proteas attack missing its best bowler.

Champion South African quick Dale Steyn has been ruled out of the rest of this series with a fractured shoulder. This leaves South Africa with just two pacemen, a debutant spinner in Keshav Maharaj and a part-time tweaker in JP Duminy this Test.

That would appear to be a vulnerable attack. But, for all we know, it could skittle Australia for 120. Welcome to 2016 – the year of the collapse.

The Crowd Says:

2016-11-11T18:02:09+00:00

Amrit

Roar Guru


Add Zimbabwe's recent collapse in their home series to Sri Lanka to the list as well, the year's not finished I guess STILL MORE TO COME

2016-11-06T01:17:29+00:00

Neil Back

Roar Rookie


You mean that now where Paris and Pattinson just rolled the Saffers? Or the now where AB and Steyn are still proven greats. You know, I get to this point in conversations with four year olds. Pointless.

2016-11-06T00:40:41+00:00

Don Freo

Guest


Which history is that? I'm talking about now...not "back when".

2016-11-05T22:19:27+00:00

Neil Back

Roar Rookie


And now you're simply rewriting history and inventing that which didn't happen. It really doesn't get any more fanciful .... or hilarious.

2016-11-05T13:40:05+00:00

Don Freo

Guest


Not equating...no. The Aussies are missed far more than those 2 Saffers. Cummins, Paris and Pattinson (not Patterson) would have rolled SA for under 200 and the game would be comfortably in Oz hands. De Villiers has not reached his lofty heights for a while now and Steyn just bowls short wide stuff in Australia. "Equate"? No . Dismiss as fanciful? Yes.

2016-11-05T12:10:58+00:00

Brasstacks

Guest


So you are equating missing 3 very inexperience but talented bowlers with missing 2 of the best players in Test match cricket of the current generation prove over a 10 year period? Nice.

2016-11-05T11:16:17+00:00

doogs

Guest


I liked the way SA batted today. They really gutsed it out. I am not saying they would do that in every test they play but today would have been a great example. They have batsman who can really hang around. It seems they have a few that bleed out the funs at 40 per 100 balls. Not very fast these days but It was super effective for them today. Some might find that boring but I loved the way they valued their wicket. The collapse by Australia was bad of course and somewhat sad lol. However, SA bowled way too short in the first 120 odd runs. They then got it right and had bad luck in the first hour. After that they bowled beautifully and got some overdue luck. Steyn was gone after he got Warner. It was the perfect time to really guts it out and put pressure on the other SA bowlers. Shaun Marsh did have some luck but he really put his head down. That is what SA did today and look where they are.

2016-11-05T07:37:49+00:00

Tanmoy kar

Guest


It means batting line-up of every side barring India are fragile. By the Tea-time of 3rd.day South Africa has taken a lead of 293 losing only 3 wickets. Both Duminy and Elgar hit centuries. S.A. needs a lead of about 400 runs to win as they have lost the services of Dale Steyn.

2016-11-05T06:22:53+00:00

Chris Love

Roar Guru


A couple of dubious decisions helped that collapse immensely yesterday. I could not believe the finger going up when Smith was that far down the pitch. Time to take the LBW decision out of umpire hands. If they think it's close they can make the TV sign like they do for a run out then have the old 50% or more hitting for all LBW decisions. As for Nevill, I thought he looked likely yesterday before being given out. He looks like he's closer to a big score than Marsh is by a long way.

2016-11-05T05:10:04+00:00

Pom in Oz

Roar Guru


I always thought it a shame that Smith practically gave up on his bowling. Such a waste...

2016-11-05T05:01:47+00:00

Cliff (Bishkek)

Guest


Forget the collapses - for Australia, our collapses happen - because our batsmen do not know how to bat in tests! Simple. We are rubbish!! A long hot summer!!

2016-11-05T04:56:13+00:00

BurgyGreen

Guest


Agree, not quite enough.

2016-11-05T04:49:38+00:00

David a Pom

Guest


They're minus AB. And judging by how this 2nd innings is going, I don't think I'm wrong.

2016-11-05T04:44:49+00:00

Neil Back

Roar Rookie


Steyn would make no difference. Everyone stops reading right there.

2016-11-05T03:49:24+00:00

Peter

Roar Rookie


I'm from NSW and would love Aus to have our own KP, but I'd pick Max Klinger.

2016-11-05T03:43:51+00:00

BurgyGreen

Guest


Warner's seam-up, on the other hand, is possibly the filthiest I have ever seen

2016-11-05T03:04:44+00:00

Rellum

Roar Guru


He got 81 of 138 balls. CAn't see that being enough for anyone but Maxwell fans, but it is close to put some pressure on.

2016-11-05T03:02:29+00:00

Cadfael

Roar Guru


I agree. Smith was initially selected as a leg spinner and Warner hasn't looked too bad when given the ball.

2016-11-05T02:18:53+00:00

Rob JM

Guest


Het was behind haddin and neville for the keeping position which is why he stepped up to open. We really need at least one grinder in position 4-6, only smith comes close.

2016-11-05T02:18:41+00:00

Tim Holt

Roar Guru


Cadfael, The interesting aside is the focus brought on bowlers needing to bat but not the same rule applied to batsman honing their bowling. Think of the same situation now and the more options available if Smith/warner had been encouraged to maintain and fully hone/develop their leg spin...........

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar