Marsh confirms his status as Australia's new Watson

By Ronan O'Connell / Expert

Only three all-rounders in ODI cricket average more than 35 with the bat and less than 35 with the ball. Two of these cricketers are Australian – Mitch Marsh and James Faulkner.

The third (based on having played at least 30 ODIs at the time of writing this article early in the New Zealand innings yesterday) is Sri Lankan skipper Angelo Mathews. All three of these players are among the most valuable ODI cricketers on the planet.

Yet Marsh has become the new Shane Watson. By that I mean that he has become the Australian cricketer who attracts more clueless criticism than any other.

Watson is one of the greatest ODI cricketers of all time. So good, in fact, that it is arguable he is the second-best batting all-rounder the format has seen, after the legendary Jacques Kallis, thanks to Watson’s batting average of 41 and bowling mark of 32 in ODIs.

Regardless of his status as one of the truly elite ODI players, Watson copped it from Australian fans, who seemed incapable of separating his ordinary Test performances from his 50-over dominance.

The minute Watson had one ugly dismissal or one poor spell in an ODI he would be attacked from all corners. “How does this spud Watson keep getting a game, he is a waste of space,” is the sort of tripe you’d read online in such scenarios.

And so it was yesterday when Mitch Marsh committed the heinous crime of moving to 14 not out from 15 balls. To this point the all-rounder had received a sequence of superb yorkers from New Zealand’s two best bowlers Trent Boult and Tim Southee.

But that mattered little to his detractors who saw an opportunity and pounced. One Roarer came on to the site and described Marsh as “very mediocre” and said he was “playing terribly”.

Similar harsh judgments were meted out by fans on Twitter, Facebook and sports websites.

No sooner had these unfair assessments been posted than Marsh began to vaporise the Kiwi attack.

After his middling start, the West Australian went berserk, hammering 62 from his next 25 balls, including seven sixes. He finished on 76 not out from 40 balls, hauling Australia to a match winning total of 5-378. Now that’s how you mute your critics.

There is little doubt Marsh has underperformed heavily in his Test career and was given a very generous run by the selectors. In ODI cricket, however, he would walk into any team in the world.

To gauge Marsh’s performances to this stage of his ODI career compare his record to very highly-rated English all-rounder Ben Stokes, who is the same age as Marsh and has played a similar number of matches.

Marsh – Batting average 38.68, bowling average 34.95
Stokes – Batting average 27.94, bowling average 37.76

To further emphasise the gulf in ODI performances between this pair, Marsh has won six man-of-the-match awards compared to one for Stokes, despite Marsh having heavier competition by virtue of playing in a better team.

Marsh is not the only current Australian player who cops more flak than he deserves. Two of his teammates yesterday – Matthew Wade and Pat Cummins – are also regular targets.

When Cummins struggled for control in the opening ODI match against New Zealand there were scores of Australian fans pointing to his effort as evidence he didn’t deserve to be in the squad. Admittedly, John Hastings was unlucky to miss out after being Australia’s leading ODI wicket taker this year.

That doesn’t, however, mean Cummins was not worthy of making his international comeback after a long injury layoff. The 23-year-old express pacemn was the equal leading wicket taker in the recent Matador Cup, with 15 wickets at 18. And in his last ODI series for Australia, in England last year, he was comfortably the best bowler from either side. He took 12 wickets at 19 in that series.

To get an idea of how impressive that was, consider the combined return of 15 wicket at 44 for England’s six specialist quicks used in that series.

Cummins sprayed the ball around in his first two spells on Sunday. But he rebounded to kill the game off with two fine pieces of bowling to dismiss Colin Munro and Matt Henry, who had dragged the Kiwis back into the game with a quickfire 50-run stand.

Yesterday he again all but ended New Zealand’s hopes of victory when he had dynamic opener Martin Guptill caught behind with a lovely leg cutter. With power hitters Ross Taylor and Corey Anderson missing from the side, Guptill needed to clout another scorching ton if the Kiwis were to chase down 378.

The man who pouched the edge from Guptill also deserves greater leeway from fans after a fine few months. For years wicketkeeper Wade underperformed in coloured clothing for Australia. But in his latest stint in the ODI line-up he has displayed noticeably neater glovework and has also been highly effective with the blade.

In his past 16 matches Wade has made 375 runs at 38, scoring at a run-a-ball. His selflessness with the blade is also to be commended, with Wade never hesitating to throw his bat when required. In this current series his 48 runs from 27 balls have helped push Australia towards huge totals.

I was one of many Australian cricket followers who disagreed with Wade’s recent ascension into the Test team.

But that should not distract from his very good form in 50-over cricket. Like Marsh and Cummins, he has earned his place in the Australian XI.

The Crowd Says:

2016-12-13T05:50:10+00:00

matth

Guest


Which means those performances don't resonate with the fans as much

2016-12-13T05:46:55+00:00

matth

Guest


That is a much too sensible comment for the Roar

2016-12-08T11:00:19+00:00

The Bush

Roar Guru


He looked fantastically upright in both games. Great to see, gives you so much ability to get really bounce off the wicket.

2016-12-08T07:31:24+00:00

Broken-hearted Toy

Guest


It's tough for the one day international players to play Shield cricket. They end up missing half the season if not more. In some ways, I'd prefer Marsh to get dropped from the one day team to work on his batting, but there is little chance of that as he's a useful member of the team.

2016-12-08T03:14:08+00:00

Don Freo

Guest


And...will he complain if the GOAT gets a bowl ahead of him?

2016-12-08T02:19:57+00:00

The Barry

Roar Guru


It's a funny old game isn't it? Here we are earnestly debating whether someone is better suited at 5 than 6 or if someone is not suited to 4, let's play him at 3. Can you ever see Marsh being selected as one of the first four bowlers?

2016-12-08T00:15:40+00:00

Don Freo

Guest


"On top of the guys you mention..."

2016-12-07T23:39:31+00:00

Basil

Guest


No, I just find it funny that the WA blinkers see Coulter-Nile, Paris, and the Dorf. Just another non-WA name would add balance.

2016-12-07T21:53:30+00:00

Don Freo

Guest


The two are unrelated. Injuries happen.

2016-12-07T21:13:42+00:00

Red Kev

Roar Guru


It does matter where the allrounder bats. Especially if they are absent more than 40% of the time through injury as Watson was throughout his career. Disruption to the batting order, especially the top order is to be avoided.

2016-12-07T19:41:07+00:00

Magnus M. Østergaard

Roar Guru


Chris Love. Joe Burns TEST Average as an opener 37.95. Shane Watson TEST Average as an opener 41.79

2016-12-07T18:34:17+00:00

Statler and Waldorf

Roar Guru


"hammering 62 from his next 25 balls" should have done it in 24....... :)

AUTHOR

2016-12-07T15:04:10+00:00

Ronan O'Connell

Expert


Barry I would have Khawaja in the ODI side quick smart but he's a top 3 batsman in ODI cricket, he's not nearly as well suited to number 4 in my opinion. Smith is a more versatile 50-over batsman than Khawaja so let him slip down to 4 with Khawaja at 3. I'm really happy with MMarsh at 5 as he's shown a fairly rare ability to either steady the innings when need be or go ballistic like the other night. This would be an extremely strong side looking ahead to the Champions Trophy: 1. Warner 2. SMarsh 3. Khawaja 4. Smith 5. MMarsh 6. Maxwell 7. Wade 8. Faulkner/Cummins 9. Starc 10. Zampa 11. Hazlewood

2016-12-07T14:47:05+00:00

Don Freo

Guest


That's an quaint observation. Shaun Marsh is usually the first player excluded. How many games do you think he has played? For instance, how does Aaron Finch play 20 more ODI matches than Shaun despite an inferior record? Shaun has played only 19 Tests (yet he has an average over 40). Where is the generous treatment?

2016-12-07T14:36:31+00:00

The Barry

Roar Guru


That's interesting Ronan and probably a little surprising but... Coming in at 3-140 is hardly a crisis and it's probably not that surprising that he scores more 50s when he's had the chance to build an innings. Who doesn't? But Khawaja is better at that role than Marsh and Marsh is a better lower order hitter than most. I'm not questioning Marsh's place in the side at all. I just think he's a better 6 or 7 than a 5. Particularly with Bailey at 4. I would need a lot of convincing that a 4/5/6 lineup of Bailey, Marsh, Head is better balanced than Khawaja, Head/Bailey (or whoever), Marsh. Australia seems obsessed with pushing their all rounders higher up the order.

2016-12-07T13:42:57+00:00

Don Freo

Guest


...in a Joey Johns universe.

2016-12-07T13:34:53+00:00

Don Freo

Guest


Do you have a problem with those numbers just because Paris is West Australian?

2016-12-07T13:17:10+00:00

Chris Love

Roar Guru


I was one that was critical of Marsh the test batsman. I was also happy with his test selection way back when because his ODI form was so strong. 2015 was a Stella year for Marsh in ODI and would be one that has his spot fairly cemented in the ODI side. He had his run in tests to prove himself and failed. He needs to go back to shield and pour on the runs before he's picked in the test squad again. That shouldn't detract from ODI selection.......he's well and truely earns his place in the ODI squad.

2016-12-07T12:45:12+00:00

Alex L

Roar Rookie


On the topic of Billy, where the bloody hell has he gone this year?

2016-12-07T12:07:10+00:00

Nudge

Guest


Don't forget Billy Stanlake. That guy could be a serious freak. About 205cm really accurate and sends them down at 150. Imagine facing someone that tall bowling at that pace

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar