A close look at the Socceroos deep midfield

By Evan Morgan Grahame / Expert

The formation Ange Postecoglou is propagating at the national level is a big, complex machine, and one that can only thrum cleanly through its revolutions if the parts are hand-crafted and fitted perfectly.

The players must not only be suited to their roles but must also execute them in a way that supports and mobilises the rest of the team. Crucial to the functionality of the back three system are the roles and play of the two central midfielders, and they’re likewise critical in attack.

Tn tandem they must support their defenders while also in an entirely different way support their attackers. It’s a difficult brief, and luckily two of our most versatile and intelligent footballers – Mark Milligan and Aaron Mooy – can fill these twin roles.

Early on, within a minute and a half, we saw the virtues of a well-supported back-three blossom into view.

The ball, held steadily and patiently by the Roos, was worked around the deep midfield, shunted out to the wings and returned back to the centre backs.

Milligan and Mooy – exactly as they are supposed to – were sitting barely in front of their defence, acting as immediate, safe passing options for the centre backs. Additionally, this positioning, in theory, is supposed to lubricate the way forward for Trent Sainsbury, who is a fine ball-playing defender – with Milligan in such close proximity, Sainsbury can be comforted by the assurance that Milligan will slide into his vacant position if he’s to suddenly stride out of defence.

Theory was put beautifully into practice, and Sainsbury glided right up the middle of the Cameroonian team, taking them by surprise, and initiating a promising early attack. You can see Milligan linger dutifully back in defence, safeguarding Sainsbury’s territory while also allowing for the other centre backs to spread, which in turn urges the wing-backs to skip forward and join the attack. Gersbach, evidently, was successfully urged, crossing dangerously.

Of course it’s the defensive side of things that has over the last handful of matches become the more pressing concern when it comes to the back three system. Cameroon are a team well-equipped to suddenly charge out on the break, and we saw within five minutes how damaging their counter-attacking threat could be.

A foul on Robbie Kruse is not called, and from Australia’s slightly scattered situation you can see both Mooy and Milligan allowing themselves to be drawn out of position, both of them inching up with the scent of an available ball in their nostrils. Both are too high and are leaving vacant space behind them in front of the back three.

The Cameroonians work the ball out to the near side, and with Gersbach drawn up toward the man in possession, all it takes is a simple pass inside into the space Mooy should be occupying and suddenly a one-on-one between Bailey Wright and Christian Bassogog – a heavy missmatch – has been arranged.

Bassogog, the Africa Cup of Nations player of the tournament, easily scorches Wright but shoots weakly. There are a horde of yellow shirts in the box covering crossing options well, but the penetration so easily made by Bassogog is of great concern.

Also take a look at the edge of the box when Bassogog shoots: any Cameroonian sharpshooter might have wandered into the yawning track of land available there, with all the Roos drawn well inside the penalty area.

There is a reason why quasi-centre-backs are often played in these flanking centre-back positions in back-three formations – Cesar Azpilicueta at Chelsea, for instance. These combo-defenders are more comfortable stepping out to meet wingers on the flanks when needed. Wright, forced into this position by the original indiscipline of Mooy and Milligan, looked anything but comfortable.

It’s vital that Mooy and Milligan hinge back and forth in counterweighted unison. One must not be caught roaming forward while the other is roaming up there in the rarefied air as well.

Mile Jedinak is injured and as a result is absent from this tournament. As far as his place in the pecking order goes, it’s difficult to see him being a better choice than either Milligan or Mooy for either midfield spot. Take this moment, just before the 20-minute mark.

Again the ball is worked back to the centre-backs, with Mooy and Milligan flitting supportively ahead of them. The ball is flicked out ahead of Mooy, who taps it back to Milligan. The pass Milligan then makes, effectively spanked between two Cameroon rovers and past a third, speared into the feet of Rogic, is not one I would trust Jedinak to make. Neither is this pass Milligan makes in the second half under heavy pressure.

The on-the-ball skill set, the footspeed and the agility required to fill these two midfield roles is one that few would argue Jedinak has a firm grasp on, let alone can being able to carry out at a higher level than either Mooy or Milligan. He simply is not as good a passer, nor can he take and redistribute the ball under pressure as quickly as Mooy and Milligan can.

This sequence in the final ten minutes of the match perhaps best displays the mastery both Milligan and Mooy have over the ball, and then – in rather well-timed fashion – the lack thereof of some other starting Roos, here the unfortunate Leckie. Perhaps Jedinak would better used as part of the back three than in the midfield.

The goal Australia conceded a few moments before half time was largely the fault of Mat Ryan, who came sauntering out into no man’s land and was duly chipped. A direct long-ball punt had created the chance – you’d have thought it was Cameroon’s manager Hugo Broos’ fantasy version of the Socceroos that had scored it.

By and large though, the first half saw Mooy and Milligan carry out their varied duties sensibly, only rarely suffering dangerous lapses. That the indomitable Lions’ goal had to come via a complete bypass of the Roos’ midfield is a small testament to that.

The second half, with Australia chasing parity, saw Mooy take more risks – justifiably – surging forward to join the advanced midfield when attacking. He is the more offensively capable of the two midfielders, and his hustle and energy means he can affect the game defensively from a higher field position. Still, he can’t let a game-chasing situation – one Australia will find themselves in a lot in major tournaments – disrupt his defensive instincts in the critical areas of his own half. Take the following example.

The Cameroonians work the ball swiftly and with intent across the belt of the pitch. We can see Mooy noticing exactly which man he has to pick up: Arnaud Sutchuin-Djoum, number 17, drifting between the lines. Mooy has to be aware that in this situation, if Djoum is allowed to turn and pass freely, he can set up another of those perilous one-on-one battles between a Cameroonian winger and an Australian centre-back.

Mooy had to close down Djoum quickly, but doesn’t, and a simple inside pass catches Wright ice-cold, with a Bassogog streaking in behind. The moment should have given the game its second goal, but wayward finishing saves Australia. A few minutes later Milligan slots in a penalty equaliser; these are all impossibly fine moments, teetering on an unseen balance.

Mooy’s freed attacking inhibitions were utilised in a positive way, too.

After the goal, with Australia ahead of the whitewater in a surge of momentum, Mooy and Milligan again combine in a deeper area, with the latter eventually setting up Matt Leckie, who then releases Robbie Kruse. You can see when Milligan makes his pass to Leckie that he and Mooy are virtually level. Later in the attack, though, when Leckie’s attempted jink is denied, it’s Mooy who springs forth, high up the pitch now, to revive the attack, making a sharp interception and pass.

Mooy’s agility and his ability to read the intentions of opposing attackers – he was a leading interceptor in the Championship last season – allows him to assist the advanced attack in a way Milligan can’t.

Again, a few minutes later, he showed off his playmaking skills as well. These excursions weren’t just the result of Mooy’s own personal attacking inclinations; Tom Rogic was being suffocated, oppressively man-marked by Djoum in the second half, and Mooy had to step in and offer some attacking invention while Rogic was tied up.

Cameroon had more than enough chances to win this game, on the counter mostly, in the second half. Australia had a few of their own as well. It’s also worth mentioning this was far from a full strength Lions squad, with multiple Cameroonians – most of them playing in France and England’s first divisions – absent from the team.

Postecoglu, the admirable idealist, seems to be steadfastly sticking with his tactical approach, and so instead of railing against the formation, we now have hope for needed adjustments to be made within the parameters of the system.

The midfield pairing is so crucial, and this 1-1 draw with the African champions showed perfectly how – and by whom – these roles need to be played, where it functions successfully, and where improvements are needed.

The Crowd Says:

2017-06-27T22:48:47+00:00

tim

Guest


Technical point, but at that tournament head-to-head was the first tie-breaker, not goal difference. 1-0 would've actually been enough.

2017-06-26T13:44:16+00:00

Ruudolfson

Guest


Great summary of the midfield variation cheers!

2017-06-26T02:50:12+00:00

Gorgonzola

Guest


A few years ago when he was at his best for Palace, Jedinak's performances were measured by various benchmarks (eg pass completion rates) and he was rated one of the best midfielders in Europe. Yes Europe, not just the Premier League. Now I agree that he might be past his use-by date but there's no doubting Jedinak's quality earlier in his career.

2017-06-25T10:45:51+00:00

BES

Roar Rookie


Great article. Surely we have seen the end of Jedinak in the Green and Gold......? I mean no disrespect to the individual who clearly gives all he has and it is not him selecting himself to the National team - but it remains one of the great mysteries of recent years how he ever got into the squad in the first place.

2017-06-25T10:16:09+00:00

Waz

Roar Rookie


Why?

2017-06-25T08:34:39+00:00

Nemesis

Guest


"I’d call that 3 good games – all in the latter stages which is when most teams that win or make final play their best football." Fair point. Maybe, we should wait until 3 am tomorrow morning before declaring the 2017 Confed Cup a disaster? Losing 2-3 to Germany & drawing with Cameroon rates pretty well for me when compared to our exploits against India & Bahrain at Asia Cup 2007

2017-06-25T07:53:44+00:00

Swampy

Guest


Hadn't forgotten the 'Dutch way forward' - clearly we may need to make a change on this front.

2017-06-25T07:30:12+00:00

Stevo

Roar Rookie


We should at some point acknowledge that Cameroon saw an opportunity to play it forward quickly, and it was a lovely ball, and it caught Degenek trying to mark a pacy opponent who had half a yard on him and just enough time to spoon it over Ryan. If Ryan had allowed Degenek to deal with the danger the opportunity to lob him would not have presented itself. Losing the ball on the pitch happens all the time - whether it's up front, in the middle or at the back. Even the best teams lose the ball. It happens but for the loss to be converted into a goal is another matter.

2017-06-25T07:20:28+00:00

Ben of Phnom Penh

Roar Guru


It is part of the reason many queried the non-selection of Goodwin & Gersbach, and to an extent Amini, as they have attributes that are better suited to the system in that wing-back role than others who made the squad.

2017-06-25T06:17:38+00:00

Waz

Roar Rookie


jb. I can't help with what it is they are trying to achieve. I recon I missed an explanation or two along the way lol.

2017-06-25T06:16:21+00:00

Waz

Roar Rookie


All good jb. By the time these kids emerge through Ange will be gone and we'll have 4 at the back again lol. Our critical need is to have an improvement in coaching across the board at junior level - there's still too many dad-coaches with great energy but not the skills.

2017-06-25T05:45:53+00:00

AGO74

Guest


worth remembering Iraq was at war. They were also at war when they won the Asian cup. Iraq have shown themselves to be a great team during our period in Asia. I'd call that 3 good games - all in the latter stages which is when most teams that win or make final play their best football.

2017-06-25T05:38:10+00:00

Nemesis

Guest


"stuff-ups happen no matter how you play" Thank you. This is what I've been trying to suggest for the past few weeks.

2017-06-25T05:36:12+00:00

Redondo

Roar Rookie


I agree - as you point out elsewhere in these comments, when the 70s Dutch played 4-3-3 their positions were relatively fluid in attack, but when they lost the ball they quickly reverted into their 4-3-3 positioning. Occasionally that meant someone playing out of position to cover for someone else who had advanced upfield in attack. But the key was that everyone knew what they had to do when they lost the ball. And what they did made sense defensively. The way Australia regroups when they don't have the ball in their current 3-at-the-back formation makes no sense.

2017-06-25T05:21:08+00:00

j,binnie

Guest


Waz - I find myself ,when watching this present Socceroo team play, trying to work out what it is they are trying to achieve. Against Cameroon we apparently had two right wingers, Leckie and Kruse, playing the same position with one of them,usually Leckie, expected to work back and help his defenders when under pressure.(Somewhat similar to what Borella was doing last year at Roar). If we switch to the left side of the field we find Gersbach expected to cover the whole wing ,back and front ,in order to supply the same potential effect ,and when he cannot possibly do this for 90 minutes we invariably find a fast break being organised by opponents to exploit that vacant area and in doing so draw Wright out wide thus "spreading" the defence. Funnily enough, at Roar, with Brown and Broich trying to emulate this tactic we find also, that during a game Jade North is too often dragged wide and that is not surprising for Broich ,as you say, never had the legs to complete this maneuver well, so that Roar lost a lot of goals engineered on their left defensive flank We did not see a lot of high end attacking play from the Socceroos in the Cameroon game ,but the one outstanding example was when Leckie,caught forward, "burned off" the full back with sheer pace and delivered a beautiful cut back which was wastefully spooned over the bar by his central attacker, but where there is this example there is hope,but not by using Leckie as an erstwhile wing back. So we get back to the inherent fault in playing this system. If you don't have players with a full comprehension of how it is supposed to work then the chances of success remain slim and when watching, one cannot help but wonder if just before an approaching World Cup qualifying round, this is the time or place to be changing. Cheers jb.

2017-06-25T05:10:35+00:00

Nemesis

Guest


"Australia made the final in 2011 Asian cup " We played 2 good games and 4 rubbish matches. Group matches 1) India: Win * India qualified as winners of the 2008 Asian Challenge Cup, which was a competition for the lowest ranked teams in Asia. * India provided limited opposition, unimpressive win given the opposition 2) KOR: Draw * we were played off the park 3) Bahrain: Win * Unimpressive win; Bahrain got behind our back 4 on numerous occasions Knockout Rounds QF: Harry scores the winner in ET; solid win against the reigning Asian champions. But, worth remembering Iraq is at war. SF: UZB. A fantastic win for Australia against an opponent who looked very strong early in the tournament. Finale: JPN: Very good performance by Australia. Losing to a world class goal. So, yes. We finished the tournament well, after rubbish Group matches.

2017-06-25T04:53:26+00:00

Redondo

Roar Rookie


I’m not arguing for or against 3 at the back or 4 at the back – stuff-ups happen no matter how you play. But if we are playing 3 at the back then, when we don’t have the ball, the wing backs and midfielders have to reposition to support the back 3. We don’t do this very well at the moment.

2017-06-25T04:51:58+00:00

Swanny

Guest


Correct me if I wrong but Australia made the final in 2011 Asian cup , so there other sound efforts in Asia and qualifying 2 nd in there group for the World Cup .

2017-06-25T04:48:34+00:00

j,binnie

Guest


Mid - Another mis-conception about today's "system. The idea of a sweeper /keeper was first used by the Dutch national team back in 1974 but had very strict guidelines as to how this "game' was to be played. The Dutch perfected a system of giving themselves the benefit of having an extra man wherever the ball was at any point in time. This was accomplished by certain players "sliding" as soon as possession was procured and usually saw Joengblut ,Krol and Cruyff operate the "slide", the keeper moving out to the edge of the box to play as a sweeper, the centre-back Krol push into midfield (a la Beckenbaur),and Cruyff ,move up into attack up front with Neeskens. In this formation Holland actually had 11 outfield players attacking 10 of their opponents, BUT , and it's a BIG but,, as soon as possession was lost ,the formation just as quickly reverted to the favoured Dutch 4-3-3 with all the aforementioned players back in their starting places. Ryan WAS caught in no -mans land in the situation as described and it could be he was caught trying to do his sweeping role, when in fact his opponents were ,and had been ,in control of the ball for quite some time. By the way the British press ridiculed Joengblut as a "maniac" when he first ventured to the edge of his box and took part in passing movements with his team-mates.Holland,using this system, reached the World Cup finals in both 1974 and 78.losing narrowly to Germany and Argentine. Enough said about the wisdom of the press? Cheers jb.

2017-06-25T04:22:51+00:00

j,binnie

Guest


Waz - I agree with your observation, and so you understand, I am under no illusion as to the talents and skills we are to look for, but Swampy was talking about players coming through the "system" that will see kids adapt easily to the formation AP is trying to instigate. I simply pointed out that the basis for the NC is a simplistic 4-3-3.as professed by the Ditch designers of the NC,but in actual fact is a system of play first used by Brazil in the World Cup back in 1958. Cheers jb.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar