Golden Ashes: Australia's greatest bowling partnerships

By Daniel Jeffrey / Editor

Is there anything Australian cricket fans revere more than a great bowler? I’d argue not.

Down the years, they have been a hallmark of all the great Australian sides, and rarely have they been as prevalent as in the Ashes.

From Fred Spofforth’s match-winning haul in the match that gave birth to the rivalry as we know it today back in 1882 to Richie Benaud’s heroics at Old Trafford, from the pace and fire of Lillee and Thommo to the sheer brilliance of McGrath and Warne, great Australian bowling performances have so often coincided with our meetings with the Old Enemy.

More’s the pity for England.

But while the standout individual performances of the likes of Spofforth and Benaud are extraordinary, they aren’t quite the same as seeing a bowling duo destroy the English together. Nothing unites Australian cricket fans like a bowling partnership destroying the wickets of English batsmen in tandem, as we’ve seen with McGrath and Warne, Johnson and Harris, Lindwall and Miller and, perhaps most of all, Lillee and Thomson.

And so, with the Ashes upon us for another year, it’s time to look back – in no particular order – at three of the greatest bowling partnerships Australia has ever unleashed in the Ashes.

Glenn McGrath & Shane Warne

Where to start with McGrath and Warne? Arguably the greatest bowling duo ever produced by Australia – and without a doubt if you limit it to just the past 30 years – the two tormented England time and time again.

They never lost an Ashes Test on home soil, and the only series in England to go the hosts’ way when both Warne and McGrath were in the country was the memorable 2005 contest. That series saw only a bit-part contribution from McGrath after infamously stepping on a cricket ball and rolling his ankle minutes before the start of the second Test. In the one match prior to his injury, McGrath had dismantled England, taking 9 for 82 at Lord’s.

Together, Warne and McGrath took 1001 Test wickets, but so often they saved their best performances for the Ashes. Their three most successful Tests as a duo all came against England, with the aforementioned 2005 Lord’s Test also coming in at number six on that list. While Warne sits atop the list of leading Ashes wicket-takers with 195, McGrath is next with 157.

The numbers, put simply, are astounding.

Then there was their ability to dominate key batsmen in the English line-up. Michael Atherton averaged seven against Warne and was dismissed 19 times in just 17 Tests by McGrath. Warne claimed Andrew Strauss’s wicket eight times, including bowling the opener to claim his 700th Test scalp on Boxing Day, 2006. Nasser Hussain enjoyed a woeful average of nine against McGrath, while the beanpole quick claimed Alec Stewart’s wicket on ten occasions.

But individual statistics don’t tell the whole story of this simply outstanding partnership. The two, from a bowling sense, were alike as chalk and cheese. While Warne’s bag of tricks were as varied as they were lethal, McGrath’s wickets so often came from persistent brilliance, from hitting the same line and length time and time again.

In isolation, both are all-time greats of the game. Together, McGrath and Warne were nigh on unstoppable, combining for some of the most memorable moments in Ashes history.

(Photo by Hamish Blair/Getty Images)

Perhaps the most astounding was the Adelaide Test against England in 2006, a match Australia had no right to win. The two could only muster a single wicket in England’s mammoth first innings, but with a draw looking certain on the final day, Warne was outstanding, bowling with a brilliance not done justice by his figures of 4 for 49.

Warne triggered the collapse before McGrath finished off the innings with the final two wickets, and Australia went on to win the unwinnable Test and complete a 5-0 series whitewash.

Ray Lindwall & Keith Miller

It’s always hard to evaluate players you never saw play, but such is the record of Lindwall and Miller that it is impossible to leave the duo off this list.

The two played a significant part in Australia’s post-World War II success, opening the bowling and collecting 243 wickets together. Only Glenn McGrath and Jason Gillespie have formed a more lethal new-ball partnership for Australia.

Lindwall and Miller were markedly different bowlers. Lindwall by all reports was the faster of the two, relying on rapid outswing to trouble the batsmen, while Miller would get the ball to move in, whether through the air or off the pitch.

While Lindwall’s shorter height and lower action would lead to skidding, angling deliveries, Miller’s six-foot frame allowed him to garner sharper bounce off the wicket.

That contrast was just as evident off the field as on it. The two were great mates, but while Lindwall was a much-respected, reserved, church-going man, Miller was a far more exuberant, extroverted character who frequently earned the ire of officialdom – and Don Bradman.

Were he playing today, there’s not a doubt in the world we’d be happy to overlook Miller’s extravagant lifestyle. With his Test bowling and batting averages sitting at 23 and 37 respectively (and a first-class average with the willow of 49), he remains the finest all-rounder ever to don the baggy green.

Together, Lindwall and Miller enjoyed constant success against England, but never more than in the famous ‘Invincibles’ tour of 1948. The two combined for 40 wickets during the Tests in England that year, Lindwall claiming 27 at an average of under 20 and Miller the other 13 at a tick over 23 despite a persistent back injury that remained from the war.

There was hardly a shortage of highlights for Australia that tour, but Lindwall’s role in setting up the comprehensive innings victory in the final Test is right up there.

England were skittled for just 52, Lindwall taking advantage of a damp pitch with a phenomenal post-lunch spell of 5 for 8 off 8.1 overs. He finished the innings with six scalps – and took nine for the match – and his performance earned comparisons to those of Harold Larwood during the Bodyline series.

As for Bradman, he simply described the spell as “the most devastating and one of the fastest” he had ever seen in Test cricket.

(Photo by Central Press/Getty Images)

Dennis Lillee & Jeff Thomson

Ashes to Ashes,
Dust to dust,
If Lillee don’t get you,
Thommo must.

Yeah, this was an easy one to pick.

No duo can match the legendary nature of the Dennis Lillee-Jeff Thomson partnership from that famous 1974-75 Ashes series, and for good reason.

The pair’s stats from that summer are simply terrific. Fifty-eight wickets between them, Thomson with 33 and Lillee 25. Thomson’s average (17.9) and strike rate (42) were simply outstanding, while Lillee’s (23.8 and 58 respectively) weren’t exactly shabby either.

But those numbers can’t capture the legacy Lillee and Thommo have left behind, nor the fear they struck into the hearts of England.

“Never in the 98 years of Test cricket have batsmen been so grievously bruised and battered by ferocious, hostile, short-pitched balls,” was how Wisden described Thomson’s efforts during the series.

Mitchell Johnson’s demolition job in the 2013-14 Ashes is as close as we’ve seen to someone recreating that fear in a modern series, but with helmets now common and protective gear so far advanced compared to what was available in the 70s, we’re unlikely to ever have a true repeat of 74-75.

Johnson might have snapped Michael Carberry’s bat in half, but he never quite managed to replicate what Thomson did to poor old David Lloyd.

No Australian will ever get tired of that tale.

So battered and bruised were England by Lillee and Thomson (mainly Thomson) that they ended up calling up 41-year-old Colin Cowdrey to their squad. So eager were the Australian crowds for more that they broke into a chant of “Kill, kill, kill” in the Sydney Test when Thomson and Lillee had the ball.

Taking 58 wickets as a duo is exceptional, but not unheard of. But the awesome, fearsome nature of Lillee and Thommo back in 1974-75 is something we’ll be lucky to see again.

Unless you’re a batsman.

Golden partnership series
» Australia’s best Ashes batting partnerships

You and your mates can celebrate XXXX GOLD’s partnership with Australian cricket by donning your very own XXXX GOLDIES cap this summer. The more times you catch up, the more chances to win a share in $350,000 in prizes. Full details here.

The Crowd Says:

2022-03-18T08:39:11+00:00

Bazza54

Guest


Kill,kill, kill?? I was there at the Sydney test in 1975 (5 January to be precise) and that never occurred. I think that was mistaken for the "Lillee, Lillee" chant. England showed tremendous courage in face of the most fearsome and relentless onslaught I have ever witnessed. What went unsaid was the Australian groundsmen were instructed to provide "sporting" wickets after the fungus fusorium farce of Headingley in 1972. The Australians were tired of the doctored wickets produced overseas to nullify their perceived advantages. Unsurprisingly this hasn't been as much of an issue since.

2017-11-22T04:46:44+00:00

Kurt S

Roar Pro


And the fact in those days players were not professionals. That gave them a certain latitude to off field behavior.

AUTHOR

2017-11-20T10:44:16+00:00

Daniel Jeffrey

Editor


Splinters aplenty Ret.

2017-11-20T09:55:16+00:00

Duncan Smith

Guest


Make a top ten Daniel.

2017-11-20T09:55:06+00:00

Ret

Guest


Splinters Daniel? Wasim Akram is probably my favourite fast bowler, so I'll pick the Pakistanis. They were probably the consistently fastest too. But they were all great bowlers who brought their own unique qualities to play. Grew up watching Dennis-the most complete fast bowler ever.

2017-11-20T09:42:32+00:00

Ret

Guest


Bradman rated O'Reilly as the best bowler he faced. He bowled leg spin at close to medium pace, and this, combined with the bounce he attained, due to his height and aggression, made him a unique threat.

2017-11-20T09:40:07+00:00

sheek

Guest


Well Onside, Bradman did have Lindwall & Miller, but not until after WW2. In the 1930s curiously Australia possessed no great fast bowlers. The best 1930-34 was Tim Wall & the best 1935-39 was Ernie McCormick. Both were solid pacemen but not great, or particularly very fast. The best pacemen came from elsewhere. Larwood was purely brilliant, but poorly used by England other than in Bodyline. Good for Australia, stupid of England. They also had Farnes, Voce & Bowes while Gubby Allen was a useful all-rounder. The best elsewhere were surprisingly a pair of Indians, Amar Singh & Mohammed Nissar, plus the Kiwi Jack Cowie. Singh was a Sikh & Nissar from the Pakistani region before partition. These guys were seriously fast & incredible to think India has never produced fast bowlers with their pace since. Kapil Dev of course, was a brilliant all-rounder but not super fast. Had Cowie been an Aussie, we would probably be talking about him in the same breath as our other great fast bowlers. He was starved of international competition. Cowie's only pre-WW2 tests were three against England in 1937, when he was 25. Had he been an Aussie, he would probably have gone to England in 1934 & had the opportunity to rack up a max 19 tests before he war. The Windies had the electrifying all-rounder Learie Constantine & the solid Manny Martindale, while the best Saffie was Sandy Bell.

2017-11-20T07:56:55+00:00

bigbaz

Roar Guru


Agree with you Rellum, all probably better than Thommo , but watching him in his prime, wow I'd happily pay double against all other bowlers. 74 in Brissy, just felt sorry for the poms.

2017-11-20T07:26:56+00:00

JGK

Roar Guru


Was just about to add Ferris and Turner and Richie and Davo myself. Grimmett and O'Reilly had their moments as well.

2017-11-20T07:02:14+00:00

sheek

Guest


Yeah Evan, The session that Pope Paul VI mentions is often talked about by Caribbean folk who saw it. He also had an "Indian" summer in 1982/83 taking 22 wickets in 4 tests against the Poms. Ironically he replaced Lillee who was injured. But otherwise he didn't do much post WSC, at test level. Which was a shame.

2017-11-20T06:52:05+00:00

Onside

Guest


Thanks for those responses Evan and T/ boy. Maybe its easier being a captain with a pair of good fast bowlers, maybe Benaud was a better captain than what current "pub' cricket watchers give him credit for. Once again I read somewhere (in the paper so it must be true), that Clive Lloyd wasn't overly stretched in his role of captain, with his stable of express bowlers. I reckon I would rather have two world class opening bowlers, than two world class opening batsmen, because to win, the opposition must be bowled out twice.

AUTHOR

2017-11-20T06:35:25+00:00

Daniel Jeffrey

Editor


Really hard for me to judge having not seen the majority of these pairs live, and going off stats alone is a bit of a fool's errand. But I'm not averse to making a fool of myself every now and then, so I'll say that, for those two Ashes series they clicked together, they're as good as anyone else. But Wasim & Waqar and Marshall & Holding are right up there as well.

2017-11-20T06:03:28+00:00

Pope Paul VII

Guest


Ha maybe Dougie should have gone. Trevor Chappell shouldn't have. That English bloke has a good series.

2017-11-20T05:56:37+00:00

AJ

Guest


Don't forget the "sandshoe crusher" on Tony Greig.

2017-11-20T05:20:00+00:00

Taurangaboy

Guest


And right through the 1930's Australian captains, Woodfull and Bradman, only lost one series - the Bodyline one - yet had NOT ONE quality fast bowler let alone a pair. They relied on O'Reilly and Grimmett (and of course Bradman!).

2017-11-20T05:02:58+00:00

Pope Paul VII

Guest


He did fire up on occasion. 6/77 vs full strength WI in 1978 was a pretty fast episode by all accounts.

2017-11-20T04:54:18+00:00

Evan Askew

Guest


benaud was a successful test captain. But until McKenzie teamed up with Davidson in 61 I would say Benaud's team was short one great fast bowler

2017-11-20T04:52:24+00:00

Evan Askew

Guest


They were a pretty great combo. I am guessing they weren't mentioned because they ended up losing heavily. But if they had another batsman half as good as Border in the side they would have won 3-1 instead of losing 3-1. Maybe they should have taken Walters.

2017-11-20T04:49:24+00:00

Evan Askew

Guest


Didn't thommo still capture 120 test wickets after the should injury? Not to mention 20 wsc super test wickets?

2017-11-20T04:49:03+00:00

Mango Jack

Roar Guru


Daniel, a majority here seem to consider Lillee and Thompson to be our greatest bowling partnership. How would you rate them against partnerships from other countries? Roberts and Holding, for example. Wasim Akram and Waqar Younis?

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar