Don't worry about the state of the game

By Patrick Evans / Roar Rookie

The doomsayers have been out in force in the last month critiquing the look and standard of the AFL.

As is often the case, a few comments from ex-players about how their modern counterparts were turning the ball over exploded into a wave of public furore, with fans more outraged by an inability to hit the 45-degree kick into the corridor than the royal commission into the banks.

In fairness, I did watch the Good Friday clash between North Melbourne and St Kilda, and it was deplorable. Missed handballs from two metres, unpressured foot passes sprayed and some truly shocking set shots on goal in perfectly fine conditions.

However, this was a match played between two of the lesser skilled sides in the competition that are crying out for polish; think back to last year when the Saints and the Kangaroos were leading the charge for a then uncontracted Josh Kelly.

However, the idea that the league is filled with players who couldn’t hit a barn door from 30 metres is simply false. Are there more athletes in the system who are still learning the game than in the past? Of course there are. Is there still a place for the traditional footballer? The answer is the same.

The reality is that the physical capabilities of teams to apply pressure all over the ground has never been more pronounced, and one need only look at Richmond: the likes of Kamdyn McIntosh, Nathan Broad, Dylan Grimes and Jacob Townsend may not be stars, but when you see the way sides wilt against the Tigers, be it in the first 10 minutes or late in the final quarter, it becomes clear that almost all players will cough the footy up under intense scrutiny.

(AAP Image/Julian Smith)

Yet Round 8 provided a great example of why the AFL is going along just fine. Friday night football is the showcase game of most home-and-away rounds, and Sydney’s narrow win over Hawthorn was a contest of the highest order. Seven goals and the sealer from pint-sized third-gamer Ben Ronke in the absence of Buddy Franklin, another excellent yet controversial performance from James Sicily, a polarising report of Luke Parker, and all in bitterly cold and slippery conditions. Pure theatre.

Bob Murphy pre-emptively called it the game of the round on Saturday morning, but he was wrong. There was talk early in the week that the showdown had lost some significance, but this couldn’t be further from the truth based on Saturday night’s game, a frenetic affair that featured nearly 100 points each. Players were at each other before the first bounce, and though Port Adelaide led late in the fourth quarter, built on a superhuman five-goal third term from Power magician Robbie Gray, there were a couple of twists to come.

When the margin was swallowed up by a booming captain’s goal from Tex Walker and yet another example of Mitch McGovern’s uncanny ability to step up in clutch moments, it looked like the Crows had stolen the four points. Yet it was Steven Motlop, so often maligned for lacking impact but perennially capable of kicking the matchwinner, who once again popped up at the right moment to steal victory for his new club.

[latest_videos_strip category=”afl” name=”AFL”]

These were the two standout games of the round, but there was plenty more to celebrate: Charlie Curnow continuing his ascension to one of the best young players in the game and leading Carlton to its first win of the season with a clutch third quarter, Nat Fyfe recapturing his Brownlow form for the third time in four weeks and Ben Jacobs proving that caging Dustin Martin is possible.

Geelong’s holy trinity of Patrick Dangerfield, Joel Selwood and Gary Ablett played in their first victory together; Dayne Zorko, averaging 15 disposals up until last weekend, booted four goals for the second time in a fortnight; and West Coast, tipped by some pundits to claim the wooden spoon, knocked off GWS at Spotless Stadium withou Jeremy McGovern, Luke Shuey and Nick Naitanui to go two games clear in second place with a top-of-the-table clash beckoning this Sunday against the reigning premiers.

Sure, there are issues with the AFL, and there always will be, but the next time you see a poor-standard match or, God forbid, a turnover in the middle of the ground, take a deep breath and rest assured that footy is travelling just fine.

The Crowd Says:

2018-05-17T23:36:57+00:00

I ate pies

Guest


Good point Anon. A brand new ball is hard to kick. Normally it only takes about half a quarter to become perfect.

2018-05-17T23:33:37+00:00

I ate pies

Guest


They should be marking beasts - players aren't allowed to defend anymore.

2018-05-17T23:32:44+00:00

I ate pies

Guest


To be able to have an informed opinion I have to do research.

2018-05-17T23:20:01+00:00

I ate pies

Guest


Decades? Maybe one decade. It'll stop so many players getting to the ruck contest. Of course it'd make a difference.

2018-05-17T23:19:09+00:00

I ate pies

Guest


Those are just footballing incidents. Neither of them warrant a change in the rules.

2018-05-17T23:15:40+00:00

I ate pies

Guest


Or rewriting a rule that hasn't changed for 150 years because you don't like the "look" of third man up.

2018-05-17T23:06:53+00:00

I ate pies

Guest


It's a 20+ year waste of money that could be spent in the heartland. It also dilutes the standard of the competition.

2018-05-17T23:04:54+00:00

Aligee

Guest


@DG, I said nothing of the sort about aesthetics, studies by professionals not internet posters say reducing I/C numbers will reduce congestion and injuries, that is not me making it up but a study over years and years. Kevin Norton is the man , a professor at Uni of Adelaide. Google him and his studies relating to I/C, injuries, fatigue and related studies. He has been researching this over many years.

2018-05-17T23:02:56+00:00

Kangajets

Guest


Agree The congestion at the ball is terrible

2018-05-17T22:29:07+00:00

The Brazilian

Roar Rookie


Thank you.

2018-05-17T21:26:43+00:00

PeteB

Guest


Reduce the number of players on the ground to reduce congestion.

2018-05-17T14:10:11+00:00

anon

Roar Pro


Maybe the theory will have more credence if I put it out there into the universe. I wasn't aware that Fev brought it up, but to me the topic is something that needs to be talked about. The decline in kicking has coincided with the use of multiple balls within a game (less opportunity for a ball to be 'broken in') as well as the change in the shape of the ball -- much more pointy thus a smaller 'sweet spot'.

2018-05-17T12:18:17+00:00

Doctor Rotcod

Guest


Disagree about 90% with Mike ,Chris,Rick. The reason for the perceived ugliness is that every player is coached to the hilt.And probably better educated in the finer points of accumulation,tackling(except NN of course,who has laid 543 tackles in his career and been cited once),stoppages and clearances than ever before. Interchanges aren't to give players a rest; they provide updates from the plethora of coaches who are churning data relentlessly for three hours. Limit the coaches box to four max, that's where the congestion is and one runner, whose time on the ground is time-limited On-field coaching,like Hurn does or Cotchin. That'd move the game along

2018-05-17T12:11:48+00:00

Peter the Scribe

Roar Guru


Bucks isn't complaining Cat, I am.

2018-05-17T12:07:30+00:00

Peter the Scribe

Roar Guru


Oh wow truetiger yes I am clearly HTH and all those others, in fact I log in here to have chats with myself. You are a very perceptive man.

2018-05-17T11:58:48+00:00

Col from Brissie

Roar Guru


You are probably correct Kevo. Very strange that our self described football expert Anon wants to claim credit for it.

2018-05-17T11:43:39+00:00

Kevo

Roar Rookie


Actually I think it was originally several years ago Fevola said they were too pointy and then following year Akermanis said they were fat and slippery - Sherrin even talked about breaking them in for games -would have been while Aker was playing at Bulldogs so 2009/10 maybe

2018-05-17T11:22:44+00:00

Maggie

Guest


??

2018-05-17T11:21:38+00:00

Dalgety Carrington

Roar Guru


So are you saying they'll be more concerned by the aesthetics than winning?

2018-05-17T10:12:00+00:00

Birdman

Guest


Good points. Probably felt the need to protect his players who folded when it mattered most. Man I felt flat when I left the 'G last Friday. I esp. hate to lose to the Swans and I suspect so does Clarko.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar