How good?! Wallabies extend the Australian form line with superb win

By Brett McKay / Expert

I’m sure I wasn’t the only Wallabies fan who sat down nervously before kick-off on Saturday night. The first Test match of the year is always well-anticipated, but the transition from Super Rugby to the international scene has often been rocky for Australia.

Plus, this was against Ireland, who snuck into the country while we were still in our corners playing Super Rugby, and bringing an impressive winning streak, a Grand Slam Six Nations championship, and a bucket-load of provincial form with them.

This would be – and still is, to be fair – Australian rugby’s biggest June Test since England arrived here a couple of years ago.

The nerves were real, but the nerves were healthy, too. There had been a genuine shift in the perception of the Australian playing group over the preceding few weeks. Hope was giving way to green shoots of confidence.

What followed was as gritty and as defensively impressive a performance from the Wallabies as seen in recent times.

The 18-9 win has set a benchmark for hard work this year, from which they can build toward a series win that felt unlikely less than a month ago.

And they will need to build, for as good as the performance was, it certainly wasn’t faultless. Likewise, we certainly can’t bank on Ireland being off the pace for the second Test, in Melbourne, as they were in Brisbane.

What worked
David Pocock worked – worked bloody hard, too. he was a monster at the ruck as he has been since returning from injury this season, and even when he wasn’t winning turnovers, he was so effective at slowing down and disrupting the ball coming back for Ireland scrumhalf Conor Murray.

Though he wore No.6, Pocock played on the ball all over the field, like he always does, made some nice carries out on the edges, and scored the match-winning try, which was well-deserved.

It was interesting to see him packing scrums at No.8 at times, and equally interesting that he was replaced shortly after scoring in the 72nd minute, coming off at the same time as Will Genia, in what felt like a bold strategy.

It’s hard to recall a Wallabies player having as significant an impact as Pocock did. I’m sure there are examples, and I’m sure some of you will even make suggestions, but I’m confident none will have been in the 18 months it’s been since Pocock last pulled on the Australian jersey.

It was an incredible performance, and one that’s rightly being widely lauded across the rugby world. Any possible lingering doubts about Pocock’s ability to keep up with the modern game have well and truly been erased.

Supplied

Kurtley Beale worked, too. He was the Wallabies’ next best on the field, after Pocock, and was excellent in most aspects of his game, but specifically, his tactical kicking was top-notch, and his front-line defence set the tone.

Beale did most of the exit and the tactical kicking in the first half, and it was of a quality not properly realised until Bernard Foley seemed to take over both tasks after halftime.

The change didn’t really make any sense at the time, and it certainly didn’t make sense when the Irish back-three started coming forward to field balls, rather than being in position or even being forced backwards as Beale’s kicks often did.

Those first 20 or so minutes after the break was when Ireland looked most likely, even taking the lead for a period. Foley had a decent game aside from his kicking, but he was at his most effective when playing distributor for Beale.

When Beale resumed the tactical kicking duties again, the Wallabies immediately benefitted from better field position, culminating in Israel Folau’s disallowed try on the hour and Pocock’s match-winner 11 minutes later.

Beale led the way in shutting down the Irish centres, Bundee Aki and Robbie Henshaw, which in turn applied more pressure on young flyhalf Joey Carberry.

But the real story in defence was the Wallabies’ starting pack, who combined for 102 of the side’s 165 tackles made, with only four missed tackles between them. That’s 96 per cent effectiveness, if you’re doing the mental maths, an incredible display.

The physicality in defence – in the first half in particular – absolutely set the bar, just as it set Ireland on the back foot.

[latest_videos_strip category=”rugby” name=”Rugby”]

What still needs work
Certainly, the lineout will near the top of the list, although no massive remedial effort is required.

Brandon Paenga-Amosa gets a certain amount of leeway for being on debut, where his nerves to hit the lineout targets might even have been greater than the nerves of playing his first Test. Some timing collaborations will definitely help, but the old adage ‘better for the run’ will apply here.

The midfield defensive alignment, and more specifically, the defensive re-alignment in broken play was found wanting on occasion, with several of Ireland’s breaks through the middle made in this way.

But given that the Wallabies’ defence was more effective with fewer moving parts, an honest review this week and another week together in camp will go a long way toward addressing this too.

A reminder about discipline would be in order, given indiscretion gave Carberry four shots at penalty goal – two of them in the first half, 12 minutes apart, and two more after the break, six minutes apart.

Working with the assumption that Jonny Sexton will surely start in Melbourne, the Wallabies can’t afford opportunities like this, which could invite their opponents into the game, as they did twice in Brisbane.

With all this said – and it’s by no means a complete list of what can be improved or of what was bloody great about the win – I wouldn’t change the side for the second Test.

There may be consideration for going back to a 5-3 bench, but the bench also worked really well.

Sometimes playing groups deserve the chance to wrap up a series, and the 23 from Brisbane should get that opportunity in Melbourne.

The Crowd Says:

2018-06-14T10:33:53+00:00

ThugbyFan

Guest


Yeah to my uncle Sekope T. :)

2018-06-13T19:59:02+00:00

Faith

Guest


Uncle Thugby

2018-06-13T19:54:16+00:00

Faith

Guest


Billy Vunipola was a an overweight beast before EJ put his mitts on him and convinced him to lose weight so that he could go 80 but also go crazy at the gym so he could retain his natural power. All the new muscle and strain has ended up in new injuries for muscles Billy did not know he had. Amd as Tman mentions a Sarries and EJ schedule would be too much for most. Billy needs a 'sabbatical' as his post-match interview showed with a lol weirdness. It was EJ Kool Aid at work ...

2018-06-13T19:36:54+00:00

Faith

Guest


Lol. Amigo days.

2018-06-13T18:17:18+00:00

Cathal

Guest


That’s why you shouldn’t play a 12 at 13 at international level. Henshaw is a very good player at 12 but he just doesnt have the footwork to be a top class international 13 (feel Aki at 13 would have been better). Ringrose is expected to be back at 13 so the Irish midfield will have a lot more bite to it.

2018-06-13T18:13:54+00:00

Cathal

Guest


And by destroy would mean wheel the scrum and get a pen on one scrum, yes it was a pen but would say “destroy” is abit of an exaduration.

2018-06-13T08:56:33+00:00

piru

Roar Rookie


Rugger you are a sad insecure little man you have my pity

2018-06-13T08:49:25+00:00

Dave from Mt Druitt

Guest


Some people just don't get it. It's fine saying the players are from Brisbane or Sydney but as the squads are restricted to a number of players there was no guarantee that they would ever been selected to play for the Tahs or Reds. The Western Force gave these players an opportunity to play Super Rugby and subsequently the Wallabies.

2018-06-13T04:06:04+00:00

jacko

Guest


Thorn is in charge of their coaching...thats what head coaches do Drongo....i know you really struggle with the fact Thorn is a success but get used to it or it will drive you nuts......oppps too late

2018-06-13T03:00:54+00:00

Tooly

Roar Rookie


The changes for the good . Pococks leadership and game Beales attack , defence and kicking The kicking game Selections the replacement of some flat tyres ie Hanigan Defence from the Islanders Hooper playing in the forwards Team play Poor Mid field backs defence Coleman’s idiotic cheap shots Folau being constantly in front of the kicker

2018-06-13T00:00:23+00:00

Fionn

Guest


Thanks quite alright, Neil, although I do appreciate your concern.

2018-06-12T22:10:54+00:00

Baz

Guest


I wouldn't outlaw it. I think it is a major part of lower impact ruck clean out play. I think it is relatively easy to police. No gripping above the arm pits.

2018-06-12T21:47:23+00:00

Paulo

Roar Rookie


That may create more issues. The body roll is the mechanism to move opposition sideways out of a ruck. Seeing as you can’t drive in from the side, this is the most effective way to clear a body sideways. Removing this means you have to drive them backwards, you can only come from behind the last feet, so effectively you will be creating missiles in an effort to blast people backwards. This would encourage much more heavy driving contact than there already is. I think we just need more consistency in identifying rolls and (audibly swallows) more TMO involvement.

2018-06-12T17:08:53+00:00

cuw

Guest


he has played little rugger for 3 months if i recall. he played Aviva finals but think had a couple of injuries before that. he is not match fit and playing in rare air does not help even Nathan Hughes was injured if i remember.

2018-06-12T17:04:50+00:00

cuw

Guest


the main difference between a non contact game as opposed to a contact game is just that - contact. rugger , UFC, boxing , though of different time tend to be more taxing on the body than say tennis or cricket. one issue is the damages to the tissues and cells from contact. it affects the body more than admitted. the contact on head may or may not cause concussions for eg. but Mohamed Ali and a few other boxers in their later years showed the effects. if u see Pele now - again it shows the wear and tear of the body from his playing days. u dont see many tennis or cricket players having difficulties in later years. these people are idiots - they are basically killing the egg laying goose. too many games and soon rugger will lose most of their best. for eg - look at Billy V , he was nothing . he is comming back after a couple of injuries. rugger is anyway injury prone - so u need to rest the players as much as possible.

2018-06-12T16:20:14+00:00

Harry Jones

Expert


WR rankings out: OZ is up to 3rd. 1/ NZ 93.99 2/ IRE 88.05 3/ OZ 86.56 4/ ENG 85.19 5/ WAL 85.13 6/ SCOT 83.83 7/ SA 83.81 8/ FR 79.10 9/ FIJI 77.93 10/ ARG 77.54 Seems like NZ and IRE are safe at 1 and 2, for now. But England could keep falling, and SA could jump Scotland.

2018-06-12T15:44:28+00:00

Derm

Roar Guru


Yes

2018-06-12T15:21:55+00:00

ThugbyFan

Guest


Derm, that team would be a massive surprise. I thought James Ryan was easily the best Irishman on the paddock last Saturday, in fact you could argue he was the best lock in the match. But then Devin Toner isn't a bad player either. :) And to be sure I like the cut of the jib of Gary Ringrose. He could be anything over the next 10 years. So they move Robbie Henshaw in one spot to cover K.Beale and punt Bundee Aki? If that is the team for Melbourne, it still looks a good team but is it the TOP side? Would it be fair to say that coach Joe Schmidt is more into giving everyone a run on the tour than winning the series; that is gain experience and build patterns with his eye firmly on building a squad for RWC2019.

2018-06-12T14:17:42+00:00

taylorman

Roar Guru


Always have drongo, theyre ruining the game with their greedy clubs. They buy up your players and ours and run them all into the ground just for the sake of selling seats. A pity you dont see the impact its having on the test level.

2018-06-12T14:10:48+00:00

taylorman

Roar Guru


Yes Paulo, I mean Pocock played well for an Australian.?

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar