The Wrap: Red cards ruining rugby? Think again

By Geoff Parkes / Expert

On July 13th this year Sunwolves player Ed Quirk found himself on top of Reds fly-half Hamish Stuart at the bottom of a ruck, and couldn’t resist the opportunity to punch him in the face.

As far as strikes go this was no Mike Tyson haymaker, but it was enough for referee Ben O’Keeffe, acting within the letter of the law, to issue a red card.

Very quickly, all hell broke out, with the coaches of both teams, Tony Brown and Brad Thorn, joining fans, media and players in expressing “genuine fears about the future of the sport.”

Online forums adopted the mantra that ‘red cards are ruining rugby’, supported by the likes of Wallabies skills coach Mick Byrne who, decrying how matches were decided immediately one side gained a numerical 15 versus 14 advantage, said, “people pay their good money to watch a contest.”

Three months on, with Super Rugby completed, the Rugby Championships decided, the Mitre 10 Cup, NRC and Currie Cup all but completed, and the northern hemisphere club competitions swinging into action, it would appear that the death of rugby has been placed on hold for now – and it’s interesting to discover why.

First, to the curious case of Jerome Kaino and Lucas Pointud, playing last week for Toulouse against Bath in the European Champions Cup. Kaino produced one of his trademark defensive hits in midfield, stopping Bath centre Jamie Roberts – himself a sizeable man – in his tracks.

Referee Andrew Brace had one of those moments referees dread, where the crowd reacted to something he hadn’t seen clearly himself, and after a number of replays admitted, “I’m not sure where the point of contact is, but it’s reckless, yellow.”

The citing commissioner went a step further, later suspending Kaino for five weeks and, for good measure, also suspending teammate Pointud for four weeks, for striking an opponent with his head.

You know where this is heading, right?

Bath lost the match 20-22, playing with 15 against 15 when Toulouse should have been reduced to 13 men on the pitch. Bath fans quickly forgot about Freddie Burns ambling around behind the dead ball line, forgetting to force the ball, or missing goals he normally nails in his sleep.

No, they lost because no red cards, for offences that met the red card threshold, made the match an unfair contest.

Confused? It seems that if red cards aren’t ruining rugby, no red cards are!

And what of England prop Joe Marler confusing matters even more, admitting to deliberately seeking to be red-carded, so as to avoid selection for high-pressure international matches, thereby avoiding the wrath of The Roar’s Brett McKay for not scrumming straight?

In all seriousness, the Quirk and Kaino/Pointud scenarios sit at opposite ends of the debate and show just how difficult it is to devise laws and sanctions, and interpret and adjudicate on them to the satisfaction of everyone or that adequately cover every circumstance.

It also demonstrates how reasoned, objective analysis and interpretation too often flies out the window according to the colour of the shirt in question.

Remember Israel Folau and Peter O’Mahoney? Swap roles and imagine how public opinion in Australia and Ireland would have flipped in an instant.

(AAP Image/Craig Golding)

Aside from one of those inexplicable moments that World Rugby has every so often, where they failed to support their man Angus Gardner, whose folly was to correctly, by law, issue a red card to France’s Benjamin Fall, a resolute push remains in place from the top, to reduce instances of concussion, by punishing contact to the head.

This weekend, Castres’ Maama Vaipulu and Gloucester’s Danny Cipriani were the latest to see red in European club action, both for high tackles making contact with an opponent’s head.

Roberts’ perspective is worth considering – after all, he left the field and failed an HIA, tweeting the next day about how sore his jaw was. Singing straight from the World Rugby hymn book, he stated, “Saying the game’s gone soft is a load of bullsh*t, if you’ll excuse the term. Players have to sink their hips and get their tackle height right”.

It will be a sad day for rugby if defensive enforcers like Kaino are no longer able to ply their trade, and five weeks seems harsh for what appeared to be nothing more than a solid shot on Roberts. But what is undeniable is that Roberts was hit in the head – either directly or by Kaino’s shoulder riding up off his sternum – and it will be a sadder day when he, and other players, are forced to retire early and/or experience difficulties later in life as a result of repeated concussions.

There is no getting around it – get used to the armpit line folks, it’s here to stay. And get used to match officials getting a few wrong and the ‘death of rugby’ chorus to crank up again – despite there being little evidence to support such a claim.

Super Rugby in 2017 saw 13 red cards issued across 142 matches, or one every 11 matches. Ten of those players pleaded guilty to offences ranging from dangerous/high contact (6), knee to the head (1), fighting (2), and dangerously taking a player out in the air (Kwagga Smith, famously in the final, won, away from home, by the Crusaders).

The remaining three red cards were to Beauden Barrett, Nic Stirzaker and Matt Duffie, all for a second yellow card offence, for which no further suspension was applied.

Interestingly, the side that was reduced to 14 men won six of those thirteen matches, with two draws thrown in – hardly a ringing endorsement of the ‘red cards ruin the contest’ argument.

For the 2018 season, nine red cards were issued across 129 matches, a ratio of one every 14.3 matches. Here the breakdown was dangerous/high contact (5), dangerous tip tackle (1), head-butt (1), Tevita Nabura’s unusual kung-fu kick to Cameron Clark’s head, and Quirk’s punch on Stewart.

While there was uproar over Quirk, and also Folau Fainga’a, whose head contact was stupid but of minimal force, it is noteworthy that all players, including Quirk, pleaded guilty. This time just two matches were won by the affected side, although in some cases the matches were essentially decided anyway, when the red cards were issued.

This data begs the question, is one red card every 14-15 matches really a scourge on the game?

A clue can be found in the grouping of the cards. Following Scott Higginbotham’s dismissal in Round 2 (the Reds’ opening match), there wasn’t another red card until Round 14. In fact, the remaining eight red cards all came between Round 14 and 19, so it would certainly have felt that there was a spate of cards and a potential crisis occurring over this six-week period.

SANZAAR did, in fact, react, admitting to “some challenges regarding match officiating processes”, and conducted a late-season review. Because SANZAAR aren’t responsible for the laws of the game, their focus was on something they could control – the level of and method of TMO involvement. For many people, this was the main cause of concern anyway.

By the time of the finals, things were back on an even keel and, moving into next season, there is an expectation that there will be more clarity and consistency in the way TMOs and referees interact.

Test rugby throws up even stronger evidence that concern about rugby’s potential demise is overblown and without basis. In 2017 and 2018 to date, there were six red cards issued to players from rugby’s 12 highest ranked nations, in all of their Test matches.

Sonny-Bill Williams for a shoulder charge, Damien de Allende for a dangerous late tackle, Sekope Kepu for a shoulder to the head, Tomas Lavanini for receiving two yellow cards, Benjamin Fall for taking a player out in the air, and Ross Moriarty for a choke, make up the list of offenders.

(Photo by Anthony Au-Yeung/Getty Images)

Both Fall and de Allende had their cards rescinded, suggesting a lack of clarity over interpretation, but there can be little doubt that Williams, Kepu and Moriarty were all clear-cut cases that were handled sensibly, on and off the field.

Hardly an epidemic of confusion and chaos is it?

What can reasonably be determined from these numbers is that the higher the level, the better the player, the more disciplined the player, the better the referee, the higher the stakes – all of these factors combine to produce fewer red cards in total, and, fewer instances of red cards issued for ‘nanny state’ reasons.

It is true that things are taking some time to settle down in the northern hemisphere this season, and some players, coaches and referees are yet to find the underside of the high contact line. But rest assured, it will happen.

What about the NRC, where there has been only one player sent off in the last two years, and none this season? Quite simply, the laws and officiating are not a concern. Players are simply getting on with the game.

And what about instances of a player taking out a catcher dangerously in the air – an aspect of the game that regularly raises emotionally charged ‘rugby is becoming too sanitised’ hackles?

Just one case in two full seasons of 271 Super Rugby matches, shows how easily professional players can adapt their technique, and accept that laws aimed at protecting the safety of players, override any ‘but I kept my eyes on the ball’ style defence, whilst not detracting from the spectacle or the essence of rugby.

Undoubtedly there will be more contentious red cards issued in the future that send people scurrying to their computers to re-prosecute the case that cards are ruining rugby.

But when those cases do occur, it will almost certainly be because a player has made an error – got the point of contact slightly wrong, or mistimed their run into an aerial contest – as opposed to the laws of rugby not being fit for purpose.

When these cases do occur, we’d all be doing ourselves a favour to discuss each specific instance for what it really is, and leave the ‘red cards are ruining rugby’ argument locked away in the bottom drawer, where it belongs.

The weekend also saw the finalists decided in all ‘big three’ domestic competitions. In Cape Town, it took 20 minutes of extra-time for Western Province to set-up a repeat of last year’s Currie Cup final against the Sharks, while in New Zealand, a resurgent Auckland will host their traditional rival, Canterbury.

Both NRC semis were slosh-a-thons, with Queensland Country’s 45-24 win over the Western Force featuring a rare ten-minute break in play due to the danger of a lightning strike.

Country will travel to Fiji to face the Drua, who looked to be in trouble for much of their semi-final against a well-organised Canberra Vikings. But a change of front-row shifted momentum to the Drua, who will enter the final with a wet sail and high on belief.

The Crowd Says:

2018-10-24T23:18:46+00:00

RedandBlack

Guest


As ever both sides of this argument can make valid arguments. This is because the perspective we start from is wrong. The pro Red Card group start from a player safetey is paramount perspective while the antis (and I confess this includes me) tend to begin with the it ruins the contest. The correct perspective is the good of the game - if we begin from the point of what is good for rugby the landscape immediately changes. Are red cards ruining matches, ripping off player and fans alike? Undoubtedly - and this is bad for the game. Is player safety paramount and will too many concussions cast a blight on the game? Undoubtedly. So we can see that far from trying to present one side or the other as a positive answer we are in fact aruging about 2 negetives. We don't want negetives so we should fix both. Red cards must return to the deliberate foul play box from whence they came. A solution must be found to protect players heads. Personally I think we are well on the way to doing this anyway and the whole red card thing is a typical bit of PC Nazi-ism. But for those who argue that it isn't so replacements after a period combined with a stern judiciary would appear to be the logical argument. No coach wants a more limited squad than necessary and no club wants to be paying a bloke who can't play. The suspensions need not start high but should continue to escalate with each offence so serial offenders would effectively be drummed out of the game over time. The bottom line is we have never had a huge problem in rugby but on the back of the terrible NFL research we need to be ensuring that we don't get one. So we are moving on it. There is no need for drastic or sudden solutions such as the Red Card. We can steadily correct the ship, we have the time. We do not need to destroy the game while we do it.

2018-10-24T22:07:55+00:00

Carlos the Argie

Roar Guru


Geoff, I apologize for the late comments and if others mentioned this before. But! Players don't go alone to the sessions with judges. They take their lawyers (solicitors, counselors or whatever you want to call the b%^*(%ds). They are strongly encouraged to show humility, remorse and plead guilty. This way they are surely getting a shorter sentence. Claiming that they opened guilty doesn't really mean much. It is another game. I do agree with you that players are adapting to the new rules.

2018-10-24T21:35:54+00:00

Buk

Guest


Good article, & thanks for the NRC updates; the Joe Marler comment a classic Red cards don't ruin the spectacle when: they are given to the team that is playing against the team you support they are given to the team you support, but your team still wins they are not given to the team you support, but probably should be you are playing monopoly & the card says collect $200 from a bank error in your favour In other situations, red cards are a blight on the game, a travesty of justice, ruin the spectacle, are killing rugby, turn spectators away, achieve nothing, detract from enjoyment, waste time, penalise the innocent, promote dysfunctional outcomes, reverse the positives of neo-pleistocenic anarchy, & a myriad of other non-positives, which make life interesting and give us something entertaining to read about.

2018-10-24T14:02:52+00:00

RobC

Roar Guru


Thanks GP. I've got no issues with lowering the tackle. You can still deliver solid hits at that level Defenders just need to understand when they are beaten and not throw the arm out Coaches need to understand that the offload will be a thing. And they need to take advantage of it

2018-10-24T02:27:33+00:00

taylorman

Roar Guru


I dont think his moving back to the Blues in a world cup year was entirely a coincidence. I think he still wants a piece of it.

2018-10-23T12:00:12+00:00

Bakkies

Roar Guru


The referee was Jaco Peyper, enough said there.

2018-10-23T09:27:42+00:00

soapit

Roar Guru


id also add the nrl has had 1 send off this year and it was the first since 2015 but playmakers arent taken out of the game by blatant fouls. perhaps keeping the send off in the back pocket but almost never use it except for the worst of the worst is the answer and then have a 20 minuter for the things in between yellow and blatant assaults.

2018-10-23T09:21:00+00:00

soapit

Roar Guru


theyd be accountable for getting suspended for 5 weeks. wr could make it no pay on suspension also. so why dont teams take out the key playmaker or goal kicker in the last 10 minutes? it would be a very effective strategy if they followed that mindset. they wouldn't even be able to replace their playmaker if the other options had already been subbed. fact is lengthy suspensions is sufficient deterrent to make it a non issue. the other thing is its not actually that easy to guarantee you'll take someone out of the match. you can keep it the same for the lower levels where this sort of stuff might be tried but its just not likely in higher ups. theres plenty that could be done to make a change work very well. (make it 30 mins, or 40 if you like) but first for options to be considered there has to be a view that the current system isnt definitely the best it could possibly be and i dont think your in that space at the mo.

2018-10-23T08:24:59+00:00

Just Nuisance

Roar Rookie


Late to read this Geoff ...... 21 September 2018 the family of Kyle Barnes , a player from Goodwood Rugby club in Capetown agreed to turn off his life support system . There was no further hope. Here is a copy of a press exert of the reasons .......... " Barnes, 31, was left on life support following a freakish head and neck injury after being hit in a nasty tackle last Saturday. " Red cards stay . Whatever can be done to make the sport safer must stay.

2018-10-23T07:44:32+00:00

jcmasher

Roar Rookie


Because the consequence of the action in the game doesn't match the offence. I think it also opens up the opportunity for a player to take out a critical opposition player that will have a far greater affect on the game. I know we'd all love to think this wouldn't occur but I'm pretty sure that if there was enough pressure it would be considered. Taking out someone like Dan Carter in a final so that he can't play and the only sanction for your team is a brief period of less players and then your team is back to full strength, maybe even better as you don't use your top player to cause the incident, but the other team loses the skillsets of a Dan Carter means that the team not infringing is punished more than the team that infringes. Sorry mate, and maybe we'll never agree but I don't think there is anything wrong with the Red Card. I agree there needs to be more consistency in both the issuing of it and the punishment but I'm not sure that will ever happen as it doesn't happen in a lot of other areas as well.

AUTHOR

2018-10-23T07:42:27+00:00

Geoff Parkes

Expert


Ah yes, the old 'All Blacks are a protected species' conspiracy theory...

AUTHOR

2018-10-23T07:40:49+00:00

Geoff Parkes

Expert


According to the referee, two linesmen and judiciary it did. But what would they know?

2018-10-23T07:14:46+00:00

FunBus

Roar Rookie


‘Hardly an epidemic of confusion and chaos’ Not so sure about that. Still struggling to see how Tu’ungafasi can smash the French winger in the face with his shoulder with such force that it puts him in hospital, clearly visible on the replay which the ref watched in real time, and receive nothing in terms of punishment, and Cipriani be sent off for his tackle. I think I’m beginning to understand how SBW was the first AB ever to be sent off at home, and the first AB sent off anywhere in 50 years.

2018-10-23T04:21:32+00:00

Bakkies

Roar Guru


I heard you the first time. It never looked like a good, solid and fair hit. Cane had been cited not so long before that for a shoulder charge to a Jaguares' player's head.

AUTHOR

2018-10-23T02:52:55+00:00

Geoff Parkes

Expert


My guess NV is that there are two reasons - midfield has become a position of relative depth with Crotty, SBW, Laumape, ALB and Goodhue all currently in the mix. If Nonu were to press for selection, then great, but it's not as if he's desperately needed - the French Top 14 isn't closely followed in NZ. So most people have no idea if Nonu is on top of his game or not. The general perception would be that he was at the end of his career when he left and (even if people haven't seen him) the expectation would be he'd be unlikely to have improved at all, playing in that competition, at his age If he comes back and tears it up for the Blues, then I'm sure that the interest level will rise very rapidly.

AUTHOR

2018-10-23T02:37:23+00:00

Geoff Parkes

Expert


That's right elvis, and that is the 'unintended consequences' I'm referring to. Rugby does have a degree of complexity to it that some other sports don't. This contributes to players of all shapes and sizes being able to play, and makes the game interesting in terms of strategy, variations and so on. And there is a need to balance the physical side of the game - which is an attraction for players and fans - with safety concerns. So sll of that demands that laws are to a degree, complex. And like you, I don't want to see the intricacies and nuances taken out of the game. But I think it's possible to say all of that and still make aspects of the game, via the lawbook, more simple. For example, I was talking to a leading referee yesterday, who explained to me how the TMO protocols were different in Super Rugby and Test matches. That adds an extra layer of confusion for referees and fans which doesn't need to be there.

2018-10-23T01:54:57+00:00

soapit

Roar Guru


the forced sub would stop them keeping playing. The only change from the current system is that the time they were down to 14 would be reduced for the first 60 mins of the (after that its moot). a suspension afterwards will stop them from playing for even longer. can you explain why you think such a change would stop the player being blamed for his own actions?

2018-10-23T00:11:43+00:00

The Neutral View From Sweden

Roar Guru


Totally agree with your statement Kane. There is no too old or too young. If you are good enough, you play. But it is intriguing that there is zero speculation about this almost.

2018-10-22T23:58:06+00:00

elvis

Roar Rookie


That's a great handwaving exercise, but meaningless unless you come up with something concrete. Like me saying, "they" should fix the economy. What rules do you want simplified and how would you make them simpler? The simpler the games (RL and RU) get, they less scope there is for thinking players to succeed, instead of just athletes trained to play football.

2018-10-22T23:35:05+00:00

soapit

Roar Guru


i dont see how being down to 14 for 20mins is no consequence.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar