Australian rugby must innovate or perish

By Cole / Roar Rookie

There is no silver bullet to fix Australian rugby. For those of us who have grown up playing and watching rugby in this country we can all agree that the glory days are well behind us.

In the late 90s and early 00s showing up to a pub full of Wallabies supporters to watch the match, struggling to find a seat, the sound of Gordon Bray deafening from bar stool to cubicle was just another Saturday night.

Now, if you’re daft enough, you show up to a full pub of people who have no idea the match is even on! The bar staff seem completely miffed by the question as to “what screen will the Wallabies match will be on?”

“The Wallabies?”

Some staff member will then realise it is ‘on’, in the corner, on ‘mute’, in the smoking section, of the gaming room and the only people looking at the screen all appear to be cheering for whoever the Wallabies are playing against.

In political terms, ‘the pub test’ shows Australian rugby is currently in a death spiral. 2001 to now seem like two different universes as far as mainstream support and awareness, and in the age of social media, for rugby to be so invisible in the football landscape is an indictment on Rugby Australia and the state unions.

Did rugby in Australia lose a war? I think, sadly, it did. But now perhaps, an insurgency needs to be made to regain some of the ground lost over the past 20 years.

Matt Toomua (AAP Image/NZN/SNPA, David Rowland)

Australia is a crowded market for football with four codes in the winter weekend market. The one with no international appeal is the clear winner in terms of market share of revenue, participation and die-hard fans.

Although, rugby fans may be commended if they chose to watch an entire Super Rugby season, Test season and the NRC, which in spite of being very entertaining, had the state of NSW largely ignore it and was won by Fiji!

Cries for Australian viewers to be ‘taken for a HIA’ can’t be far off as only someone with either a head injury or some sort of sadistic death wish would happily put themselves through something as painful as watching your team show up and get beaten down week in, week out. And yet, here we are.

But, with the problems Australian rugby face ostensibly simple – not enough broad support, revenue and participation, the solutions appear less so.

The long-term strategic policy targets for Rugby Australia are probably best left to a journo like Geoff Parkes to flesh out (as he has in his book); the benefits of Ireland and New Zealand’s switch to central contracting or European clubs professionalism in training, club culture and recruitment.

Should Rugby Australia and the union states be looking into these ideas and drafting a plan to adopt or counter them? Well as an Australian rugby supporter, you’d hope they already are!

So with long-term goals a discussion for another day I want to turn my focus to the short-term strategies. As I believe, if rugby wants to be successful, it will require a different set of short-term strategies and methods than it will require in achieving the long term growth and prosperity we all want to see in Australian rugby.

Achieving the former with no goal to the latter seems pointless and reminiscent of Australian rugby of the late 90s, but achieving the latter appears completely dependent on the success of the former. As Australian rugby will starve to death long before any long-term strategy is realised, unless some significant upswing in the short-term results are driven by a sugar hit of success and silverware.

Glory days (Photo by Getty Images)

So what short-term strategies have been offered up? That Australia leave Super Rugby, Rugby Australia stop paying massive pay cheques to current Wallabies and throw it all at grassroots, scrap the NRC and focus on Shute Shield or vice versa have all been bandied around lately. But would any of these ideas work?

Or would a complete shrinking from the professional market place of global rugby leave Australia in a similar circumstance to our Pacific neighbours of Tonga, Fiji and Samoa? In my view, Australia and New Zealand are pinned to Super Rugby, for better or for worse, and can only hope it grows, not shrinks, to keep pace with the ever more lucrative rugby market place in Europe and America. This growth should run parallel with our own NRL and AFL who will continue to dominate market share of revenue and participation.

This appears to be a problem of not enough money and influence to do what we think we should, and so we do what we must.

I believe our short-term success hinges on the true spirit of Australian rugby that we all remember from our glory days: innovation and an ability to play what is in front of us.

This is what is required if we intend to ever regain the Bledisloe or Web Ellis Trophy in the coming years.

In nature, complex relationships, both competitive and cooperative, are formed between different organisms. These symbioses can be mutually beneficial or parasitic in nature, a certain flux with buffers is achieved so no organism’s population is truly annihilated by another just balanced in the food web.

Perhaps it is time for Rugby Australia to accept its place, for now at least, within the football market place, on the sporting food chain so to speak.

From there they can innovate and adopt a short-term plan of ‘parasitically leeching’ the glut of resources, staff and potential athletes in the junior ranks of the apex predators of the AFL and NRL.

We must view our competitive football market as an advantage over other rugby union nations and thrive on its varied skill requirements and conditioning techniques.

We must find ways to function in symbiosis with the AFL and the NRL both competitively and cooperatively.

I am not suggesting simply a poaching expedition of potential Dally M or Brownlow medallists as we have done in the past, professional athletes in their prime are expensive and often never worth more than their marketing value and profile.

But a concerted campaign to highlight the lucrative career of a Wallaby jersey in Australia and overseas can bring if an AFL or NRL call up is looking just out of reach for those juniors wishing to be a professional athlete.

As well as posting scouts and pathways to attract the youth back more needs to be done to attract the retired.

No sooner had Billy Slater hung up his boots last month then the news dropped of his dual role of ‘leadership development’ for both the Storm and St Kilda in the AFL.

How many young fullbacks in the NRC, Super Rugby or Under 20s would benefit from some of what Billy has to impart?

How many young Aussie flyhalves or halfbacks could benefit from a Cameron Smith, Johnathan Thurston or Cooper Cronk ‘leadership development role’ at their NRC or Super Rugby club.

Billy Slater: cross code champion. (Photo by Kelly Defina/Getty Images)

Even as a part time or contract as is the case with Billy Slater, their influence and knowledge of how to run a game and win is unparalleled in the Australian sporting marketplace.

As a small fish in a big sporting market we need to be incisive and scavenge the glut of talent and skills both these codes provide and use these to our advantage. As the empire building of AFL and NRL increase so does their inability to protect their expansive borders from insurgents.

The good news is, the Reds appear to be the litmus test, this year, for this idea. With Brad Thorn and his new recruit Peter Ryan, both ex Broncos, taking the reins as head and defensive coaches respectively.

The experiment should continue further with Rugby Australia ready to pounce on potential skills coaches, mentors, even using the NRC as a trialling ground for this discarded cross code talent. Strategic use of funds is key, not to blow our budget on a whale but fish for a catch we can conceivably haul on board.

A coach like Geoff Toovey as opposed to a Wayne Bennett, a Cooper Cronk in a part time skills coaching and mentoring role as opposed to attempting to harpoon Angus Crichton to slot into the Wallabies first fifteen.

The cross pollination of coaching and players of different codes introduced into the wild of our rugby landscape is the innovative stop gap measure we need while we get our house in order for long-term growth. And at this stage, what have we got to lose?

The Crowd Says:

2018-11-12T14:22:38+00:00

MW7

Guest


Can you explain further why rugby union shouldn't be called rugby?

2018-11-12T04:34:49+00:00

MitchO

Guest


kids like playing with their mates so for the most part they will play sports their mates do. AFL does attract the best athletes in the country and they work hard at it. Apparently the Sydney Swans Academy is pulling in and converting guys in regional NSW from soccer, Union and League and they've always put the pressure on basketballers and on kids who were also good at cricket. You do gotta get in there with some senior and current professional coaches and keep at those kids and inspire them to want to come on board. Or you are sunk. People seem to forget that playing soccer is fun. Playing footy is fun. playing league is fun. Playing union is fun. If they are all fun then which game does the 12 year old go to? Cole also mentions that you really need to snaffle that guy who probably isn't going to make the AFL but is damn close. I went to school with such a guy. One of the last kids cut from the u/16 u/17 state footy teams but a 50 metre kick either foot, good hands and ran the 100m in a tick under 11 secs. There's a lot of them out there but they end up running around in suburban footy drinking beer with their mates - having fun. Twiggy has the Force guys on contract put in 300 hours in the community. is there such a requirement in the states with a super rugby team?

2018-11-11T13:06:12+00:00

GusTee

Roar Pro


Innovate - no. Just get rid of the existing hierarchy of the ARU. Then get real rugby/business brains into the key positions. The ship can be turned, all it needs is new blood at the top and a wide broom.

2018-11-11T02:01:30+00:00

Waxhead

Guest


I agree Mister Football. If it needs to be provided free to the major FTA networks then ok - it's that urgent and necessary. Aust Rugby simply cannot compete with the 3 other codes without FTA coverage. Provide it free now and then as popularity and ratings improve it will become marketable in the future.

AUTHOR

2018-11-09T23:33:55+00:00

Cole

Roar Rookie


The Reds are a great example and one I reference in the article. With this year being the experiment of two ex Broncos in the coaching box whether that innovation will translate into success. If it does it will certainly bring the crowds back.

2018-11-09T05:19:15+00:00

andrewM

Guest


Groan..How slow can a week go Piru? Does world rugby meet next week?

2018-11-09T05:17:22+00:00

andrewM

Guest


Taking WA again as an example Adam, it is pretty well documented that the number of established Super and Wallaby players from WA prior to the establishment of the Force could have been counted on one hand. Now you could put forward a respectable 'State of Origin' team with a one or two internationals to boot (now there's an idea). Having that exposure was a tremendous boost to the local game at all levels. I have heard that Queensland schools are especially active in scouting for talent in WA and offering scholarships, but asking families to uproot on a dream is a big ask. We see this in the AFL, with uprooted rookies moved to other states falling by the wayside. Whilst the most determined will overcome these challenges, your statement misses the point as to why should they? It is only a valid argument if you subscribe to the view that Shrinking to Greatness is the only viable long term alternative for the survival of the game in Australia.

2018-11-09T03:51:05+00:00

James

Roar Rookie


Good article. Possible over analysis though. I think that Australia is just a really polarising sports market, and that as soon as the Wallabies begin to win consistently, crowds will return. Simple as that. Look at the Reds crowds of 2011 vs now -- the one variable in that equation is the success rate of the team. Same on a broader scale for rugby in Australia.

2018-11-09T00:23:58+00:00

In Brief

Guest


I disagree in that I think by and large both sports attract different players who stick to the one sport. The size of rugby union players is not the issue, nor the mobility. In comparison, I would imagine there are bigger guys in rugby. However, there are some skill deficiencies in rugby union in Australia - the main one being tackling. This goes back to coaching, which is poor in many Australian sports, and particularly poor in rugby union. For internationals to get the tackle technique wrong so often is ludicrous but the issue starts in the junior game.

2018-11-08T15:33:26+00:00

Ad-0

Guest


Whether you like our league players or not, the fact remains that the ranks of professional Rugby in Australia consist of guys that weren't good enough for the NRL. Too small, not mobile enough, can't tackle, lacks vision, poor technique. Look through the Wallabies and every one of our players will have one of these deficiencies. I'm surprised we are still able to be as competitive as we are with hundreds of our top Rugby athlete's playing a different sport.

AUTHOR

2018-11-08T11:01:14+00:00

Cole

Roar Rookie


I agree the field has improved. I also agree that the WBs play with heart and have been at times this season quite enjoyable to watch, even the third bled. match showed some skill. But this article is about the cold hard facts of winning, success and the Wallabies winning back some silverware which will have to include beating the ABs twice in one year for a Bledisloe Cup. The team I watched this year won't be doing that anytime soon. This article is about professional structures and using existing professional skills coaching, that RA itself has acknowledged does not exist yet (look at Kafer's new job), and mixing skill sets that are superior in other codes. If you seriously think any of our WBs can match it with any regular AFL squad member for kicking talent then....

AUTHOR

2018-11-08T10:45:11+00:00

Cole

Roar Rookie


"This article and the one by weapon are both based on the false premise that the NRL is the greatest show on earth played by the greatest athletes on the planet" I make no reference to this in article and so would prefer you keep the 'straw man' arguments off my article thanks.

AUTHOR

2018-11-08T10:34:23+00:00

Cole

Roar Rookie


Exactly. As the article states quite clearly, this is not a poaching expedition of NRL players in some fantasy that filling our first fifteen with the Blues team from SOO will fix all of our problems. Both of the AFL and NRL have more money, better facilities and have been able to train better more professionally run coaching and mentoring programs. We need to leech off this and improve through taking what we need. ie. A few kicking coaches for our NRC teams from the AFL and a few defensive coaches from the NRL.

AUTHOR

2018-11-08T10:29:07+00:00

Cole

Roar Rookie


"The final false assumption is that rugby is dying in Australia." I agree I used the phrase death spiraled and used an anecdote about how viewing Rugby at a pub in the 90's as opposed to now is. I stand by that.

AUTHOR

2018-11-08T10:26:27+00:00

Cole

Roar Rookie


Yep! I want the next Crichton, not the million dollar one in his prime! Poaching of juniors, and skills coaches mainly. I am no longer sure if "rock bottom" is something I fear will happen next year or something I relish happening. We need to rebuild, and you need a true demolition job like the one Cheika is currently carrying out on the Wallabies, for that to happen.

2018-11-08T09:44:24+00:00

TimO

Roar Rookie


Tempting to overrate Kangaroos are NRL and underrate Wallabies and Aus Super teams, because rugby is subject to much tougher international competition than league.

2018-11-08T08:23:08+00:00

In Brief

Guest


This article and the one by weapon are both based on the false premise that the NRL is the greatest show on earth played by the greatest athletes on the planet. Do you guy really believe the hype? The other false premise is that the Wallabies are in demise- this is based on the many hand wringing roar articles. The final false assumption is that rugby is dying in Australia.

2018-11-08T08:13:10+00:00

In Brief

Guest


Really?? The obvious question mark is kicking- apart from the short kicking game I don't see any skilful kickers in league. With the catch pass skills there is far less passing in league and backline moves were last seen in the 90s when the Broncos ran a few. In league the playmaker has all the time in the world and there is little pressure. Half the time they appear to be standing still on the 5th tackle deciding on the option of kick, or kick. Where is the charge down? I actually like the way the Wallabies are playing - they have made some crucial errors at critical times - so much so that it is more than bad luck. But they have created a lot and played with heart. Perhaps the field has improved?

2018-11-08T08:03:48+00:00

adam smith

Guest


Although I didn’t/don’t support RA/ARU getting rid of the Force, I fail to see why it is such a “big deal”, players having to move to another area to progress their career. People have been moving towns/states/countries for better opportunities from time immemorial. Again, why should only some players expect to stay wherever they are to progress? I moved from one town to another, then to another country for better opportunities, are Rugby players somehow better then the rest of us?

2018-11-08T07:50:55+00:00

Cliff Bishkek

Roar Rookie


Hoy, a friend of mine was a swimming coach who went as assistant coach with Australian Teams to the World Series competitions. He said swimming is stuffed in Australia. All the money goes to the Top Swimmers and Top Coaches. Where once you had squads in every town from Timbuktu to the Black Stump, these have dried up as not supported and all major squads are generally capital city. The Admin Structures and grassroot pathways of swimming, cricket and rugby have a lot in comment - absolute failure.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar