After demolishing Sri Lanka at home, here's how Australia's Ashes squad is shaping up

By Daniel Jeffrey / Editor

The next time Australia walk onto a cricket field for a Test match, it’ll be for the opening Ashes encounter on August 1 in Birmingham.

There’s still half a Sheffield Shield season, an Australia A tour of England, some County Cricket and, of course, an entire World Cup between now and then, but the fact remains the best part of Australia’s six-month lead-up to the Ashes will be devoid of five-day cricket.

»The Ashes Squads

So with the side’s last Test before Edgbaston out of the way, how is the squad shaping up for the tour of the UK?

The certainties

Tim Paine
Paine would have loved to notch some more runs against Sri Lanka; his first-class century drought still extends all the way back to 2006. But he’s led the team well through one of the trickiest periods in Australian Test history, and his glovework remains superb.

He’ll be captaining the side on August 1.

Pat Cummins
There’s no doubt Cummins is Australia’s best player at the moment. After being the pick of the quicks against India, the New South Welshman tore through Sri Lanka with 14 wickets at an average of just over seven.

Add in his solid – and improving – batting and recent elevation to the co-vice-captaincy, and you’ve got another automatic selection for the Ashes opener.

(AAP Image/Julian Smith)

Nathan Lyon
Lyon mightn’t have picked up a stack of wickets against Sri Lanka, but given Cummins’ performance on the seam-friendly Gabba pitch in the first Test and the lack of spin in the second, that’s no great surprise.

He still chipped in with valuable scalps, he still remains Australia’s best spinner by the length of the straight, and he still will be one of the first names on the teamsheet come August 1.

Travis Head
Justly criticised for throwing away too many good starts against India, Head responded well with a series-high 304 runs against Sri Lanka, including a maiden Test century in Canberra. Can’t see him not being in the XI for Edgbaston.

(Photo by Ryan Pierse/Getty Images)

Mitchell Starc
Cheap wickets against a poor Test nation, or a frightening return to form for Starc? It probably doesn’t matter – the left-armer’s bag of ten at Manuka Oval was a timely reminder of the damage he can wreak, even on lifeless pitches.

Given how prickly his teammates and coaching staff have been in defending his form, it’s a safe assumption that this performance will be enough to see him all the way to the Ashes, injury permitting of course.

The very-likelies

Steve Smith
He’ll almost certainly be there, but I’ll hold off on marking Smith’s name on the teamsheet for now. There’s an abundance of question marks over him: can he walk back into the international arena in the same form he left it? Will he be able to handle the frosty reception he’ll no doubt receive in England? What happens if he has a bad World Cup? Is his elbow injury going to heal in time?

Ultimately, Australia have sorely missed Smith’s prowess with the bat over the past year, and he’ll be in the side if fit, even if the World Cup is a lacklustre return to top-level cricket.

(Photo by Cameron Spencer/Getty Images)

David Warner
All the same questions asked of Smith hover over David Warner too, plus another one or two about his place in the team from a cultural point of view. He helped himself by staying quiet earlier in the summer while Smith and Cameron Bancroft were in the headlines, though, and will surely line up at the top of the order in England.

Usman Khawaja
Khawaja’s ton at Manuka – his first since that superb knock in the UAE last year – has been subjected to a serious case of “Yeah, but it was…”, but I’d not be surprised if the mental achievement of reaching three figures again is far more important than anything else here.

Given the well-publicised arrest of his older brother, and the disrupted lead-in to the summer on account of a meniscus injury, is it any surprise Khawaja has struggled recently?

He remains Australia’s best batsman outside Smith and Warner, and should be in the XI for Edgbaston.

Joe Burns
In any other country, you’d think the best-performing first-class batsman in domestic cricket who also happens to have four centuries from 16 Tests to his name would be a sure-fire selection, particularly coming off a mammoth score of 180.

But Burns has been dropped as many times as he’s tonned up, so there’s no guarantee he’s a lock for Australia’s next Test. A drop in form or some compelling performances from Matthew Renshaw or Marcus Harris could see the Queenslander forced from the side. Still, he’s a frontrunner at the moment.

(Photo by Ryan Pierse/Getty Images)

Josh Hazlewood
A strange summer for Hazlewood, who was below his metronomic best against India before missing the Sri Lankan series through injury. If fit, you’d assume he’ll be a shoo-in for the Ashes, given how well his line-and-length approach is suited to English pitches. But…

The maybes

Jhye Richardson
Richardson’s excellent debut performance – which was somehow subject to far fewer disclaimers about the pitch and quality of the opposition than, say, Khawaja’s hundred – has thrown a spanner in the works when it comes to selecting the Australian attack.

Still, six wickets in two Tests on home soil against a poor opposition do not an automatic selection make, and you’d imagine the four bowlers picked for Edgbaston will likely be the same quartet which lined up against India last year. Still, if Richardson impresses in the next six months, he could force his way into the XI.

(AAP Image/Darren England)

Marcus Harris
Touted as one of the few locks for the Ashes before the two Tests against Sri Lanka, Harris did himself no favours with three poor dismissals, all of which he could have opted to leave instead of playing away from his body.

That kind of technique will be exposed in England, and the Victorian now needs some good first-class returns to jump back ahead of Joe Burns in the pecking order.

Kurtis Patterson
Patterson will go to England, of that there can surely be no doubt. But having only played two innings against Sri Lanka – impressive as they were – he’ll need to keep up his good form for the next six months to keep his place in the side.

(Photo by Robert Cianflone/Getty Images)

Matthew Renshaw
Renshaw looms as perhaps the biggest enigma ahead of the Ashes. His 2018 County season was superb, with 513 runs from six first-class matches, but his returns since then have been far poorer. Still, with last year’s performances in England on his resume, some substantial innings in the next few months will have him on the plane to the UK.

Peter Siddle
Jhye Richardson has leapt ahead of Siddle in the race for an Ashes gig, but the Victorian seamer will still almost certainly be in the squad thanks to his experience in English conditions and ability to find a nagging length, and might play a Test or two during the series.

(Photo by Francois Nel/Getty Images)

The long-shots

Marnus Labuschagne
Having failed twice with the bat in Canberra when runs were there for the taking, it’s hard to see how Labuschagne can get a spot in the Test XI if Warner and Smith both come straight back into the side. Still, he did cop an unplayable ball in the first innings and clearly is a favourite in the current set-up.

Will Pucovski
No one copped a rawer deal through the decision to name the squad to play Sri Lanka so early than Pucovski, who went from staring down a likely Test debut to leaving the squad to manage another bout of mental illness.

First of all, a note of congratulations to Pucovski for having the courage to publicise his current struggles; he clearly has the talent and technique to play for Australia, but getting his health sorted is a more important consideration. If he can do that, then he’s an attractive prospect to take to England, but the selectors will no doubt be doubly cautious about bringing him on a long tour.

(Photo: Paul Kane/Getty Images)

Chris Tremain
Having been overlooked for Richardson following Josh Hazlewood’s injury, it’s hard to see Chris Tremain getting a run for the Ashes. Still, he’d no doubt do a fine job if given the chance.

Glenn Maxwell
Maxwell won’t have much – if any – red-ball cricket between now and August thanks to the World Cup, but selectors have shown in the past that they aren’t averse to picking Test squads on white-ball form. Maxwell’s all-round qualities will help him, although the squad for the Canberra Test would indicate he’s less preferred to…

Marcus Stoinis
Stoinis faces the same issues as Maxwell vis-a-vis lack of first-class cricket and forcing his way into the Ashes squad with some good performances in the World Cup. But being picked in the squad for the second Test against Sri Lanka indicates he’s got the inside running if selectors decide to bring an all-rounder with them to England – which you’d think they will.

(Photo by Jono Searle – CA/Cricket Australia/Getty Images)

Matthew Wade
Smith and Warner’s return, and Head, Burns and Patterson’s centuries, will make it nigh-on impossible for Wade to be picked as a specialist batsman. Still, he’s in outstanding form with the bat, his glovework has improved in recent years, and he should be the squad’s back-up wicketkeeper.

Peter Handscomb
Handscomb’s lack of runs against India and unorthodox technique make him an unlikely selection. Given how he was targeted by England in the last Ashes in Australia, you can’t imagine the Old Enemy would be too upset if he does find his way onto the tour.

Sports opinion delivered daily 

   

Aaron Finch
Similarly, Finch’s Test career is unlikely to be revived in time for the Ashes. Given the amount of limited-overs cricket between now and August, Finch won’t have the opportunity to show his red-ball credentials. To be fair, it’s in the best interests of Australian cricket right now that he focuses on the white ball with the World Cup looming.

Australia’s Ashes XI if it was picked today

1. Joe Burns
2. David Warner
3. Usman Khawaja
4. Steve Smith
5. Travis Head
6. Kurtis Patterson
7. Tim Paine (c, wk)
8. Pat Cummins
9. Mitchell Starc
10. Nathan Lyon
11. Josh Hazlewood

12. Jhye Richardson

The Crowd Says:

2019-02-09T07:42:08+00:00

Don Freo

Roar Rookie


He doesn't need to be a wicket taker...that's not the role we need him to play. Yet he does regularly take 1, 2 or 3 wickets/innings when he regularly plays Shield cricket.

2019-02-09T03:04:00+00:00

Geoff from Bruce Stadium

Roar Rookie


Don - I would really like Agar to do well - he's a solid batsman and he can bowl tightly at times - but I just don't see him as a wicket taker. He is still young and has time to improve. I just wouldn't have in my eleven if Lyon was injured at this stage.

2019-02-09T02:30:31+00:00

Don Freo

Roar Rookie


Have you noticed when those test bowling stats were compiled? His last Shield season when he played most games (2...maybe 3 seasons ago) he took more wickets than both Fawad and SOK. He just needs to stop breaking fingers and dislocating shoulders...and touring as a drinks waiter...so that he can play full Shield seasons. Historical stats argue nothing. Ever notice the first few seasons of Steve Waugh or Steve Smith...or Shane Warne? Agar's recent bowling for Oz in white ball cricket exactly call, "Pick me!" Remember, his role is not as the strike bowler. Agar plays his role very, very well.

2019-02-09T01:29:46+00:00

Charlie Turner

Guest


Don, Agar is a curious choice for favourite Aussie cricketer. Does premature balding figure high in your criteria?

2019-02-09T00:04:50+00:00

ChrisH

Roar Rookie


Peter, in the second, it was Warner who was the initiator and the aggressor, relentlessly abusing de Kock as they walked off the field. That’s way unsporting, as it’s not in play. de Kock held back (but probably wanted to punch Warner) then could take no more so hit back with that comment, which Warner then took huge offence at and wanted to go fisticuffs. Typical bully ploy. Push someone to the brink, then when they crack, get all self-righteous and diminish or ignore their part. And it worked. So many people came out in his defence.

2019-02-08T05:35:59+00:00

Peter Warrington

Guest


Presumably you support his outrage if not his method of displaying it, for the second in your list of allegations?

2019-02-07T02:44:36+00:00

Matt H

Roar Guru


It rubbed me up the wrong way. It went against the grain., etc

2019-02-07T00:01:36+00:00

AREH

Roar Guru


It may happen given Carey is far from explosive, and hasn't really done much to suggest he is the preferred ODI keeper/bat. The issue is they have again cornered themselves by prematurely handing him the VC position. That said, like M.Marsh in the test scene, having that label won't make your selection automatic.

2019-02-06T20:13:00+00:00

Peter Warrington

Guest


They could try him at 7. Apparently he's an expert on it... him and Finch...

2019-02-06T10:49:08+00:00

Rowdy

Roar Rookie


I did have a comment but it has gone to be vetted. I don't know what was so offensive. I am baffled by it as I've seen far worse get through. And, despite an inquiring email, I get no response

2019-02-06T10:41:49+00:00

Rowdy

Roar Rookie


Abrasive?

2019-02-06T09:55:36+00:00

Maxwell Charlesworth

Roar Rookie


I was thinking this aswell. He isnt vital to our WC campaign. His last 2 series he averaged 20 with the bat.

2019-02-06T09:51:26+00:00

Maxwell Charlesworth

Roar Rookie


The bloke punched another player in a bar, tried to get into a punchup with the opposition after they sledged him for the fact his wife was caught having sex in a public place, known to be frequently racist with his sledges, has hurled abuse at crowds. Etcetera Etcetera. Smith deserves a second chance. Warner has had too many already.

2019-02-06T06:48:57+00:00

Peter Warrington

Guest


i could just as speculatively suggest it's the absence of Smith and his superiority and rigidity that has let people shine. but i won't.

2019-02-06T06:47:11+00:00

Peter Warrington

Guest


exactly, he has the game, just use it when appropriate. (I am sure if he wasn't skipper there would be times when a message would be sent out asking him to up the rate. but he is the skipper, and feels the weight of a potential collapse. to be honest if he wants to bat like this he could open. or go in 5.)

2019-02-06T05:59:18+00:00

DTM

Guest


I've never really been a fan of Warner but I think we need to accept that he will have served his penalty - without creating adverse publicity or challenging it through the courts (which he could have done and it would have got very ugly). Let's put it into perspective - he didn't shoot anyone, he just cheated at cricket (the same way that's been done by many other players before). He was the instigator and deserved his ban but once he has served his time, he should be on equal footing to other prospective players. I think he'll go to the World Cup and I would have him in the squad for the Ashes but would only pick him to play on form.

2019-02-06T05:54:22+00:00

Matt H

Roar Guru


If you are taking the 10 in Canberra, then it's only between Renshaw and Marnus for the spare batting slot

2019-02-06T05:53:11+00:00

Matt H

Roar Guru


It sounds like Smith at least may be sent on the Australia A tour rather than go to the World Cup. This seems a good strategy to me. There are others who can match him in the ODI format, but we have nothing to compare in the test arena, unless Greg Chappell is retiring as a selector in order to put the pads back on.

2019-02-06T05:50:29+00:00

Matt H

Roar Guru


Given the schedule I'd me amazed if we can keep the same three pace bowlers for all five tests. I'll also be amazed if Broad and Anderson both go the distance.

2019-02-06T05:47:59+00:00

AREH

Roar Guru


I think Warner can take it coming back pretty well, he gives plenty of lip himself, and knows it. The Jason Hughes thing though, was completely different. I doubt Warner was offended or impacted by what was said that day, but because of who said it.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar