The Carey conundrum

By JamesH / Roar Guru

Just over four months remain before the first ball of the 2019 World Cup and it is difficult to recall the Australian One Day International cricket team ever having so many question marks hanging over it leading into a major tournament.

Can Aaron Finch regain form in time to take his place as captain? Will David Warner and Steve Smith return to the line-up?

Can Glenn Maxwell continue to bat at seven with so little firepower below him?

Can Mitchell Starc reprise his role as a new ball threat? Who are Australia’s first choice pacemen? Should they consider playing two spinners?

Important questions, all, but arguably the most pressing query is: should Australia persist with Alex Carey?

It’s easy to see why the selectors like Carey. He’s busy at the crease and tidy behind the stumps. He’s also vocal on the field, speaks well in front of the cameras and, by all accounts, is popular within the playing group – traits which shouldn’t come as a surprise, given Carey’s former role as inaugural captain of the GWS Giants in the 2010 TAC Cup.

Just about the only missing ingredient is a breakout performance with the bat for his country.
In his nine ODIs to date Carey has compiled 246 runs at an average of 27.33 and a strike rate of 76.3, with a top score of 47. In 19 Twenty20 Internationals he’s scored 125 runs (from 13 innings) at 13.88, with a strike rate of 123.76 and a high score of 37 not out.

Not awful numbers, but not noteworthy either.

Carey’s modest start to his ODI career is in keeping with his overall List A record. Across his 34 matches he has accumulated 963 runs at 28.32, with a strike rate of 76.36 and a top score of 92. His domestic average and strike rate are remarkably similar to his current ODI numbers.

Alex Carey of Australia leaves the field after being dismissed during the International Twenty20 match between Australia and South Africa at Metricon Stadium on November 17, 2018 in Gold Coast, Australia. (Photo by Chris Hyde/Getty Images)

In the BBL, Carey has fared better. Over the last two seasons with the Adelaide Strikers he has built a strong stat line: 23 matches, 772 runs, an average of 36.76, a strike rate of 132.52 and a top score of 100. Unfortunately, that hasn’t translated into international T20 success as yet.

The problem is not limited to Carey’s output with the bat. If that were the case, it would be a simple question of substituting one wicketkeeper-batsman for another.

No, the situation is complicated by the fact that Carey doesn’t have anything resembling a settled position in the batting order. In his 28 internationals to date – consisting of nine ODIs and 19 T20Is – Carey has opened (five times) and batted at five (six times), six (five times), seven (five times) and eight (once), not having been required in the other six matches.

Each time Carey is moved around the batting order the rest of the line-up also gets shuffled, to the detriment of other players still trying to establish themselves or refine their own role in Australia’s line-up. Those players either move up or down the order as required, or are dropped to make way for another batsman coming into a different position.

While none of this is Carey’s fault, such movement is hardly conducive to consistency for Carey or his teammates in the lead-up to the World Cup.

On the basis of his two best ODI innings so far – a patient 47 against South Africa in Adelaide in November and a run-a-ball 42 in Hobart the following game – Carey looks most suited to the middle order. From limited opportunities he has shown an ability to either rebuild after early wickets or keep the run rate steady and support a set batsman.

On batting alone, though, Carey wouldn’t be Australia’s first choice to play this role. The ODI incumbents at four, five and six – Shaun Marsh, Peter Handscomb and Marcus Stoinis – have been some of Australia’s best performers of late and won’t be making way for Carey any time soon.

Even if one or more of them was to be shuffled up or out of the order, it seems likely that Maxwell would simply push up to bat at 6. Mitch Marsh, Travis Head and the injured Smith are all waiting in the wings, too, each of whom could slot into the middle order and all of whom own ODI and List A records superior to those of Carey.

Carey’s BBL success has come at the top of the order, with the field up and space to hit into. Logic suggests that this might be his position in the national setup, even factoring in his modest returns in his first five attempts at opening the batting.

Sports opinion delivered daily 

   

However, despite having opened in all three of the recent home ODIs against India, Carey probably sits behind Aaron Finch, Warner, D’Arcy Short, Marcus Stoinis, Usman Khawaja, Travis Head and Matthew Wade in the current pecking order as a pure opener.

That leaves the role of finisher. Although very capable of clearing the fence, nothing about Carey’s career to date suggests he has the power game to regularly find boundaries late in an innings with the field spread. Australia is crying out for a big-hitting number seven or eight to slot in below Maxwell but Carey doesn’t look to be that player.

If Carey were to be dropped altogether then the obvious solution would be to give the gloves to Handscomb and bring in another batsman. Warner (or perhaps Short, while Warner is unavailable) could simply slot in at the top, requiring minimal reshuffling.

Alternatively, Khawaja could be bumped up to partner Finch at the top, where he is arguably best suited, opening up a space in the middle or lower order for Smith, Mitch Marsh, Head or Wade (who could also take the gloves).

In either of those scenarios the batting line-up suddenly looks stronger than anything served up in ODIs this summer.

One factor that might give Carey a reprieve is the long list of recent leadership casualties. In the last 12 months alone, whether due to poor form, injury or suspension, Smith (all formats), Warner (all formats), Tim Paine (ODIs), Mitch Marsh (Tests), Josh Hazlewood (Tests) and now Carey himself (T20Is) have all been left out of an Australian side while occupying the role of captain or vice captain.

Alex Carey was a rare bright spot against South Africa. (Giuseppe Cacace/AFP)

Throw in the omissions of current and former Test co-vice captains Head and Mitch Marsh from the latest ODI and T20 squads, as well as uncertainty around the positions of skipper Finch and co-vice captain Pat Cummins in Australia’s ODI starting XI, and it’s easy to see why the selectors might be hesitant to drop Carey at this point in time.

But if the selectors are going to drop Carey before the World Cup then they need to do it now. There is no point persisting with Carey, only to axe him on the eve of the tournament. The rest of the players – particularly Handscomb, should he take the gloves – need the opportunity to feel settled in their roles before they head to England.

It is difficult to shake the feeling that Carey has been elevated into the ODI team because the selectors see him as Australia’s next Test wicketkeeper (despite a first class batting average of 29.43) and want to give him international exposure via limited overs cricket.

In isolation that might be fair enough. With a World Cup around the corner, though, they simply can’t afford to be taking the long view.

Either Carey is currently in Australia’s best ODI XI, or he isn’t. The time to make a call is now.

The Crowd Says:

2019-03-01T20:18:04+00:00

badmanners

Roar Rookie


matth, cricket has been called "The team game for individuals" It's also said that "Great leaders are born not made" My first point is there's a cliche for everything! :-) Secondly, I've always felt that the hardest part of management is personnel and it must be extremely hard to pull together an Aus cricket team from different states when positions aren't settled as they are now, thankfully they took selection off the captain. AB was a less than average captain (tactically) when he started but became a great leader so shortcomings were overlooked. Taylor was tactically brilliant but did have some very useful players at his disposal. Everyone is different, Chappell G was definitely the best batsmen but not a great captain, but Kohli is proving to be both. I feel for test's we need a captain to carry on after the Smith captaincy ban expires as for me he has forfeited his right to leadership, he wasn't tactically great anyway. Who should it be? No idea!

AUTHOR

2019-03-01T11:02:51+00:00

JamesH

Roar Guru


I was just going off the number of balls that might actually be left alone, missed or edged in a 50 over game (or where there are runout opportunities that the keeper is involved in, if you want to cover everything). In total there just aren't many such deliveries, relative to a test match. It's really a matter of degrees. You obviously can't just throw anyone behind the stumps. There has to be a tipping point where a less skilled keeper becomes a liability, as hard as that might be to measure. But as long as the selectors are confident that someone like Handscomb or Wade is comfortably on the right side of that tipping point then the question of who's a more talented keeper becomes outweighed by any appreciable difference in batting ability.

2019-03-01T06:50:54+00:00

El Loco

Roar Rookie


"In general, I would say the shorter the format, the less opportunity there is for a keeper to influence a game behind the stumps." True to an extent but 50 overs is barely a short format anymore. Teams are making scores that would make a strong test first innings score. It used to be that giving a batter a reprieve in an ODI was tolerable because you could still focus on tight bowling and restrict totals that way. Now it seems the only way to restrict scores is to have batters back in the shed. I'm not saying Handscomb isn't the better option, just that there are ways to win an ODI other than just a boundary shootout. Superior fielding skills shouldn't be forgotten in all this.

2019-03-01T03:09:41+00:00

Noah Barling

Roar Pro


Dont forget young Harry Nielsen for SA. Only 23, he has had solid performances against India and England in touring matches

AUTHOR

2019-03-01T00:18:32+00:00

JamesH

Roar Guru


Good questions. I think it takes a certain level of self-confidence to be exceptional at anything. The rare people who have both that AND the capacity step back and view things at a macro level make the best leaders. If we don't have anyone like that cemented in the team then we're stuck choosing between great players who aren't natural leaders and simply 'good' players who are. With a bit of luck Cummins or Head could become what we're looking for.

AUTHOR

2019-03-01T00:10:36+00:00

JamesH

Roar Guru


Perhaps, Tom. One thing I didn’t mention is the fact that Carey is already 27 (he’ll turn 28 during the Ashes). That doesn’t necessarily stop him from taking over from Paine and it might even work in his favour if our batting lineup is still a work in progress when Paine retires, but it’s something to consider. Mind you, Peirson is 26, too.

2019-03-01T00:10:28+00:00

matth

Roar Guru


The list of leadership casualties is interesting as well. Post sandpaper, it seems we are picking quality blokes to be leaders instead of the best players. And guess what? These quality blokes are not the best players so they keep getting dropped. Does this mean that to be the absolute best at your sport, you pretty much have to be 'not a quality bloke'? Do need a level of obsession and selfishness to get to that point that is not conducive to leadership? Stuck in your own bubble? And then as a team, do we accept that our leaders possibly weaken the team from a skills point of view, but are necessary to maintain our good blokiness? Or do we accept that we have captains who are not the nicest guys, but we like to win so ...?

2019-03-01T00:06:30+00:00

matth

Roar Guru


Good article and spot on. Handscomb for me.

2019-02-28T23:45:55+00:00

tom

Guest


Hopefully by the time we need a new test keeper guys like Peirson and Inglis are also pushing for that spot. I think both those guys look like more promising long form bats than Carey.

AUTHOR

2019-02-28T23:03:20+00:00

JamesH

Roar Guru


As long as Marsh keeps facing 100 balls then there's no problem, is there? He's our best ODI batsman at the moment, without a shadow of a doubt. The failure has been with our top 3, who aren't getting us off to strong starts. Marsh keeps having to rebuild.

AUTHOR

2019-02-28T23:01:15+00:00

JamesH

Roar Guru


I agree with what you say about the ratio of importance of keeping vs batting, Paul. It definitely gets lower as you move to white ball cricket. Handscomb and Wade seem to be the obvious options for the gloves, having more firepower than Carey.

AUTHOR

2019-02-28T22:58:07+00:00

JamesH

Roar Guru


That's pretty much my view too, Rob.

AUTHOR

2019-02-28T22:56:50+00:00

JamesH

Roar Guru


In general, I would say the shorter the format, the less opportunity there is for a keeper to influence a game behind the stumps. It's why I'd never advocate for playing say, Wade as a test keeper ahead of Carey, but it's also why I'm perfectly happy for Handscomb to take the gloves in white ball cricket. Throw in the fact that Handscomb is actually a decent gloveman and the difficulty in finding a spot for Carey in the lineup and I think going with Handscomb makes sense.

2019-02-28T22:29:39+00:00

Rob

Guest


Absolutely love Carey but just don't see where he fits in this side. Don't think his form warrants a spot in the side just for his keeping.

2019-02-28T22:22:52+00:00

Paul

Roar Guru


I meant what I wrote Viv. If we don't have that type of player, we're no chance in the Cup

2019-02-28T22:15:32+00:00

VivGilchrist

Roar Rookie


You mean like S.Marsh until he’s faced 100 balls?

2019-02-28T22:14:31+00:00

VivGilchrist

Roar Rookie


I agree. If his keeping is up to standard then I’d go with him. He is a very good catcher in the field. Carey’s time will come. I would have no problem with him being our next Test keeper.

2019-02-28T22:06:04+00:00

Paul

Roar Guru


hi James, thanks for this piece, it's an interesting take on what to do with Carey. One issue that doesn't rate a big mention is, how much do we need a gun keeper at Test level versus ODI versus T20? I'd suggest the need for a gun batsman increases and the need for a great keeper decreases as you move to the shorter forms of the game. In other words, we can get away with an okay keeper in a pinch, if it means our ODI batting is strengthened The other issue that stands out for me is about the makeup of other sides considered contenders for the World Cup. All have keepers more than capable of dominating the scoring England - Butler, Bairstow India - Dhoni, Pant South Africa - de Kock Pakistan - Ahmed New Zealand - Tom Latham Australia - ? We simply cannot afford to have a player not scoring more than a run a ball in the World Cup, unless they bat 11.

2019-02-28T22:01:54+00:00

El Loco

Roar Rookie


Agree with all you say, my only reservation with dropping Carey is what do we lose in keeping ability. Yes there will be scores of 400 at this World Cup, but the best way to prevent them is taking wickets. I'm not actually clear on Handscomb's keeping ability, but if he drops a nick from Buttler or misses a leg side stumping of Kohli early on it won't matter if he makes a busy 45 from 38 balls.

Read more at The Roar