Australia’s six-match ODI winning streak, which continued with a dominant victory against Pakistan yesterday, has helped mask the worrying batting form of all-rounder Marcus Stoinis.
Over the past year, Stoinis has made just 391 runs at 28 from his 18 ODIs. While such figures could be forgiven if they were owned by fellow all-rounder Glenn Maxwell because of his extraordinarily high strike rate, Stoinis has been scoring very slowly at just 4.92 runs per over in that time.
This scoring rate is too gentle even for a top-order anchor batsman, let alone for a player in Stoinis who is meant to be Australia’s second power hitter in the middle order alongside Maxwell.
With Australia’s number seven, wicketkeeper Alex Carey, already proven to lack hitting power late in an ODI innings, Stoinis’ snail-paced batting is leaving the Australian line-up poorly balanced.
At present, the responsibility to up the ante late in Australia’s innings is resting entirely on the blade of Maxwell. A well-balanced ODI team will have at least two players batting between five and eight capable of scoring say 40 from 30 balls, as Maxwell does so comfortably.
Stoinis is meant to be such a player but, instead, consistently has been getting bogged down early in his ODI innings.
To emphasise this point, consider this stat: He has reached 30 balls faced in seven ODI innings over the past year. These are the number of runs that he had at the 30-ball mark of those innings: 10, 12, 18, 19, 21, 24 and 38.
Which means that only once in 18 ODIs over the past year has Stoinis reached 30 balls faced at anything other than a slow pace.
Further damning is Stoinis’ strike rate for between 1-30 balls faced across all his ODI innings in the past year. It is 69. That is awfully low for a batsman who is tasked with being dynamic.
Australia already have plenty of batsmen who are tasked with building an innings – which can at times require a slow start – in Aaron Finch, Usman Khawaja, Shaun Marsh and Steve Smith.
They do not need another slow starter, which is just what Stoinis has become. He relies on trying to make up for these leisurely starts by accelerating once he is well set. But such an approach is a luxury a middle-order ODI batsman can only afford when he has lots of overs left to bat.
If Australia’s top four continues to fire – and it has David Warner and Smith to bolster it soon – then Stoinis more often than not will be coming to the crease in the final 15-20 overs needing to score briskly from the get-go.
While Australia are travelling nicely now, they may find themselves needing to score 330-plus in a do-or-die match in the World Cup, given England has been by far the highest scoring venue for ODIs over the past four years.
In such a scenario they need middle-order batsmen capable of arriving at the crease and wasting few balls. Such middle-order batsmen need to be on 30, at a minimum, after facing 30 balls not bogged down on 15-20 like Stoinis is consistently at present.
Due to Australia’s logjam of ODI batting options, there has been a lot of speculation about which players out of Smith, Warner, Mitch Marsh, Khawaja and Peter Handscomb may be squeezed out of the World Cup XI. Yet it is Stoinis who deserves to be most vulnerable right now.
Of course, dropping Stoinis would have knock-on effects. It would mean that Australia would need to get ten overs out of Glenn Maxwell and rank part-time spinners like Aaron Finch and Maxwell. Or it would require them to replace Stoinis with another all-rounder such as Marsh, who has a fine ODI record but has not played an ODI for 14 months.
Regardless, it cannot be ignored that Stoinis is failing to execute his role as a swift scorer in the middle order.
Zavjalova
Roar Rookie
Well hes no gayle
Peter Warrington
Guest
Because competition is tight and he hasn't done much for 6 games in a row.
Geoff from Bruce Stadium
Roar Rookie
Why on earth would you drop Stoinis when the side is travelling so well? He does his job in the middle order and bowls some handy wicket taking overs as well. There have been times when he has soaked up a few balls early in his innings - he does the same thing in T20s but haven't heard much criticism of him there. His strike rate was 82 against India in the recent ODI series whereas Dhoni was going at 74. You don't hear much criticism of Dhoni whose career ODI strike rate is 88 whereas Stoinis's career ODI strike rate is 94. We are on a seven ODI winning streak so why would you want to tamper with it?
JD St George
Roar Pro
Didn't Stoinis only bowl 3 overs last night or did he get injured?
Adam Ludeke
Roar Pro
The power hitting of M.Marsh, Wade and McDermott could have been handy at this World Cup, given that the top order seems to have found its groove - but the selectors have invested too heavily in Stoinis and Carey to change their minds now.
VivGilchrist
Roar Rookie
Anyone can reach 30 in ODI cricket if the urgency to score quickly is taken out of the equation.
Neel
Roar Guru
Both the March boys seem to be better limited overs players than Test match players. Stoinis bowls handy medium pacers, but his spot is definitely on the line.
Ronan O'Connell
Expert
"Agree Roman." Cheers Darien
Ronan O'Connell
Expert
It’s a shame we don’t have a Jadeja type player Agar is just this style of player, although not nearly as accomplished as Jadeja. But Agar is also 5 years younger than Jadeja and, given time, I think he can become a very handy bowling all-rounder in white ball cricket for Australia. Unfortunately injury has ruined his run at the WC - he probably would have been in the side in India ahead of Lyon if not for that.
Simon
Guest
Stoinis is used mainly as a death bowler. Obviously his economy rate is bad, you have to look further than that in ODIs. They're actually more likely to give him the ball in the last ten than Berehdorff or Hazlewood
James
Roar Rookie
Yes, Dan Christian, what a terrific cricketer he is. No coincidence that he has been in so many winning T20 teams
James
Roar Rookie
Yes, I agree and he doesn't seem perturbed that his slow starts place huge pressure on his team mates as well. His bowling is not being used much either.
Barney
Roar Rookie
Turner is still very much unproven at this level. Excellent slogger, but so are Short and Lynn
Barney
Roar Rookie
Marcus needs to stop reading the press about how good he is
jameswm
Roar Guru
He's a block or hit batsman.
jameswm
Roar Guru
If Stoinis is dropped, Turner would be the logical one to come in. But where do we get the overs from in the top 6?
Peter Warrington
Guest
Why not a Warner type at 4 and another at ? One of whom can seam it! Wade without gloves?
mrrexdog
Roar Guru
Would Dan Christian work at 7? He had a good big bash and his bowling is better than Stoinis but he hasn’t played 50 over cricket since 2017
The Bush
Roar Guru
Why are they idiots? Don’t agree with their selection, that’s fine, by why insult them?
Peter Warrington
Guest
I think he means the sandpaper twins. I think?