The Nations Championship is back in the news, and for all the wrong reasons.
A report in the Sydney Morning Herald suggests the global governing body is now presenting a ten-team proposal as a “compromise”.
Ten teams obviously means the Six Nations and SANZAAR members, and according to the report, it would remain that way until 2026. Fiji and Japan were slated for inclusion in the original proposal, but are nowhere to be found in the revised version.
So rather than a step forward for global rugby, this would mean a giant leap backward.
The tier one nations would play each other at least once a year, and the rest of World Rugby’s 120-or-so member unions would be left out in the cold. That sounds less like a compromise than an outright capitulation.
If that’s the way they want it, they should also reduce the World Cup to ten teams, because no one else will stand a chance.
But they won’t do that because the World Cup is the game’s biggest money-spinner, and they need those other teams to make up the numbers. Better to just scrap the idea altogether and continue with the increasing integration of first, second and third tier nations during the Autumn tours.
I would also add Fiji to SANZAAR. They beat France in France last year, are ranked ninth in the world (ahead of Argentina) and are undoubtedly one of the most entertaining teams in all of sports.
If it means reducing the Rugby Championship to a single round of games, so be it. The current model is becoming a case of overkill anyway.
Good to hear Fiji are to play the Maori All Blacks in July. But they should also be playing regular Test matches against their New Zealand and Australian neighbours. You have to wonder what the criteria for inclusion is.
Meanwhile, there has been some conjecture about the future of Australia’s domestic league in which the Fijian Drua compete. I’m no expert on the NRC, but I’ve seen the empty stadiums on YouTube and have to wonder just how sustainable the competition is.
Just because the provincial set-ups have worked so well in New Zealand and South Africa doesn’t mean Australia has to have one as well. The Wallabies won two World Cups in the 1990s without the NRC, after all, while the Home Unions seem to be doing just fine with nothing between club and international level.
In fact, the most popular club competitions appear to be those which are independent of their national unions. France’s, for example, has been great for the development of players from all over the world.
Competitions in which teams are controlled by the national unions, and designed primarily to bring through players for the national team, struggle to maintain long-term support and always seem a little contrived.
The New Zealand provincial championships may be the envy of Australia, but they did not actually begin until the mid-1970s and were poorly attended toward the end of the amateur era.
It took Super Rugby to bring the domestic game back to life, in fact. It was also a tremendous boon for Australia, and remains its coveted stepping stone from club rugby to international level.
Super Rugby looks set to return to round-robin format in 2021, meaning the Australian teams will only meet each other once a year, not twice.
So how about a pre-season tournament involving the four Australian franchises, plus the Western Force and Fijian Drua? Voila! A high-profile domestic championship with six crowd-pulling teams.
No, it wouldn’t serve the same purpose as the NRC, and that’s not what I have in mind. Just think of it as a mini-Super Rugby tournament, as well as a great way to warm up for the championship itself.
For their part, the Force have recently won a mini-series with Hong Kong’s South China Tigers and Singapore’s Asia-Pacific Barbarians. They were sorely tested in their away fixture against the latter, however, scraping a 7-3 win.
Over the coming two months, the Force will be taking on Fiji’s Latui and Samoa’s Kagifa in a second mini-series. The Kagifa are scheduled to play all their games away from home.
Throw in a Japanese side or two and an eight or nine-team league looks a viable prospect for next year. It may even come to rival Super Rugby for entertainment value with the Pacific Islanders involved.
Perhaps some day they will stage a fixture between the winners of Super Rugby and the proposed Rapid Rugby comp. That’s how the Super Bowl got started in the 1960s, as a finale between the winners of rival American football championships.
Many fans ridiculed the concept to begin with, believing the NFC was much too strong, especially as the Green Bay Packers won the first two Super Bowls hands down.
But on the eve of Super Bowl III New York Jets quarterback Joe Namath, relaxing on a beach in Miami, calmly “guaranteed” the press his AFC franchise would defy the odds and beat the Baltimore Colts. The rest is history.
The Late News
Roar Rookie
Dunno Wingman. Sounds like a fair title to me! Excellent article as per usual. We need to talk about all things not just the popular ones. It's our global game after all .
The Late News
Roar Rookie
After Scotland and Ireland losing to Japan...well surely it will change the thinking...
Istanbul Wingman
Roar Guru
Does Australia still have an inter-state match between NSW & Q'land? If not, they should bring this back as a State of Origin. Who cares if league got their first? The 13-man has stolen enough ideas from union. Make it a 3 match series if NRC goes under.
JRVJ
Roar Rookie
That's my understanding, too. However, I wanted to refer to more recent times, because the fact of the matter is that Argentina's efforts to develop post RWC 2007 would certainly have been all the poorer if not for South African help.... to the tune of the Pumas having beaten the Boks 3 times already and the Jaguars perhaps winning the South African SR Conference this year.....
Istanbul Wingman
Roar Guru
Massive win for Colombia. I think they're improving quicker than the Brazilians! 18.05 San Miguel de Tucumán Argentina 'B' 55-3 Chile South American 6 Nations 18.05 São Paulo Brazil 19-38 Uruguay 'B' South American 6 Nations 18.05 Medellín Colombia 36-13 Paraguay South American 6 Nations
Istanbul Wingman
Roar Guru
Yes, SA's involvement with Argentine rugby goes a long way back. I believe the Pumas got their nickname on a tour of SA, in fact, when their emblem was mistaken by the locals.
Istanbul Wingman
Roar Guru
Today's results: 18.05 Andorra la Vella Andorra 33-0 Serbia Rugby Europe Conference 2 South 18.05 Ljubljana Slovenia 91-5 Slovakia Rugby Europe Conference 2 South 18.05 Incheon South Korea 52-14 Malaysia Asian Championship 18.05 Phasuk (Thailand) Kazakhstan 17-8 Guam Asian Championship Division 2, 3rd Place Match 18.05 Phasuk Thailand 12-50 United Arab Emirates Asian Championship Division 2, Final There will be further action in South America this evening GMT
JRVJ
Roar Rookie
SA has been extremely generous to Argentina, though. They invited the Pampas XV to play in the Currie Cup some 9 years ago, were crucial in getting the Jaguars included in SR and are about to let a new Argentina XV side participate in the Currie Cup. IMO, the story of SA pushing to have the Sunwolves kicked out of SR failed to point out how much UAR supported SARU in this decision.
Istanbul Wingman
Roar Guru
A Kagifa side bearing the name Samoa, but featuring few Samoan players and not a single one based in Samoa have lost their opening game of Global Rapid Rugby; a last-second thriller won 38-32 by the Fijian Latui at Churchill Park in Lautoka. https://www.samoaobserver.ws/category/s ... cFo2SJ1Dvw
Istanbul Wingman
Roar Guru
That's true, but I was referring to the players, not the national unions.
mjseesred
Roar Rookie
I would challenge your comment on France. They are slowly strangling the same Pacific nations you are arguing need to be saved. Their money and backing are taking islander and 2nd tier players and stopping them from representing their countries for fear of them injuring themselves. I don't see independence as a valid argument of success.
Istanbul Wingman
Roar Guru
The 8 foundation unions don't appear to care much about growth, with the exception of France, which did a lot of work in Europe during the amateur era. Similarly, we now see Argentina heavily involved in developing the game in South America. Left to the Home Unions, Australasia and SA, the game would have never expanded at all. We probably owe a lot to league, whose poaching raids forced the Aussies and Kiwis to set up a World Cup in the late 80s and ultimately turn pro.
Isaac Buatava
Roar Pro
Hi IW, if this goes ahead then Rugby may as well be called cricket! They obviously don’t really care about growth.
Kashmir Pete
Roar Guru
IW Thanks for article! Cheers KP
liquorbox_
Roar Rookie
FSANZAAR SAFNZAAR SANZFAAR SANZAFAR SANZAAFR Too hard to fit in Fiji? I prefer SANZAFAR
Istanbul Wingman
Roar Guru
Europe makes more sense than the Far East for SA teams. The Far East is the antipodes of SA. It's like expecting Australian & NZ teams to compete in Europe.
Aussieinexile
Roar Rookie
The question does South Africa still believe in SAANZAR or will they move to PRO 14? speaking to the SA Sides the competition is more manageable not just the travelling aspect.
JD Kiwi
Roar Rookie
Great article IW! I like the idea of that pre season comp, and would love to see the struggling Kings and Cheetahs join Rapid Rugby and eventually a play off game for promotion relegation against the bottom SR team.
Istanbul Wingman
Roar Guru
I was going to call it Musings of a Wandering Mind, but somehow that just didn't seem right for an Aussie rugby forum...????