The reason England have never won a world cup

By Cricket Buffet / Roar Guru

Why have England never won a World Cup?

They’ve been in all 11 tournaments, they had some excellent cricketers over the last 44 years and they’ve hosted the tournament more than anyone else. But they are still on 0 wins. The answer is one simple phrase, but we will get to that in a minute.

Let’s look at the teams that have won it, and why they have won it. Sure having the best players is often part of the reason, but its not the only reason.

A closer look at some of the past winners reveals where they’ve got it right.

If we start at the 1987 Australian team, they based their whole cricketing philosophy on two things. Whoever took the most singles in a match would win it, and to get the fielding as good as it could be.

Heavily influenced by Bob Simpson, the emphasis on taking singles and rotating the strike was the way Australia played 1980s one day cricket.

The runs out produced by Dean Jones and Allan Border, both superb direct hits against India in both teams first match of the 1987 tournament set the tone for the next four weeks. A World Cup that was eventually won by Australia.

In 1992 Pakistan were up against it. They had won one in five matches and one more loss would have ended their tournament in rather meek fashion. Imran had an idea, it may have seemed like a bit of a novelty but there was meaning in it.

Pakistan batsman Imran Khan(Photo by Allsport/Getty Images)

He walked out to the toss wearing a shirt with a tiger on it. He went from meek pussy cats to the hunter. His team followed his lead.

They went from pushovers to a team that beat Australia, Sri Lanka, New Zealand twice and England to win the trophy. Imran had rallied them with an inspired idea and from that point on, there was no stopping them.

Prior to 1996 Sri Lanka had decided that Australia’s plan of conserving wickets, taking singles and accelerating at the end was outdated in one day cricket. New Zealand had briefly diced with accelerating from the start with Mark Greatbatch going hard from the opening overs, but what Sri Lanka did was an acceleration from the start of the innings from both ends.

They threw caution to the wind. By promoting Sanath Jayasuriya to open with wicket keeper Roshan Kaluwitharana they attacked from the get go.

In the 1996 World Cup, chasing India’s 3/271 in a group match, Sri Lanka were 0/42 off three overs. A score previously unheard of. In fact, 0/42 off the first 15 was just about acceptable a decade prior, but Sri Lanka had changed the playing field.

They went on to win the World Cup.

In 1999 Australia had developed a slogan of ‘no regrets.’ The Australian way to never give up was tested on a number of occasions. When they had lost two out of their first three matches, when they were 3/48 chasing 272 against South Africa in the super six match, and when they were only defending 213 in the semi final and South Africa were 0/45. Australia pulled through in all times they were challenged and faced adversity. They left England with no regrets, and a World Cup win.

Enough examples. Now its time to answer the question, why have England never won a World Cup?

They have lacked an identity. They have not found a ‘our way we do things’ and as a result, have come up short time and again.

Australia in 1987 identified themselves by their fielding, and their running between wickets. Pakistan by being the hunter. Sri Lanka by their attacking flair and Australia again by their will to never give up.

What World Cup England team do you remember ever having a clear and defining attribute about them?

What England team went to a World Cup with a unique style that you could say they developed all by themselves?

England at the World Cup is more remembered for Mike Gatting’s reverse sweep in the 1987 final. Beefy Botham trudging off after Wasim Akram had him caught behind in the 1992 final or a string of early exits from the more recent tournaments were they have failed to make any lasting impressions on the cricket fan.

In 2011 they lost their quarter-final against Sri Lanka by 10 wickets. Defending 229 they didn’t take a single Sri Lankan wicket as they exited the tournament in a surrender. In 2015 they didn’t get close to the quarter-finals, finishing three points behind fourth placed Bangladesh.

England’s Ben Stokes leaves the pitch (AP Photo/Rui Vieira)

The good news however for England is this. In 2019 they have it. They have found what they have been looking for. After many years without one, they now have a clear identity. They now have a clear plan and they now have the quality of cricketers to go out and execute it.

England have an excellent top order. Jonny Bairstow and Joe Root average close to 50, with both their strike rates being very good. Jos Butler will be key. He is a clean hitter of the ball with a beautiful free flow of the bat.

As their quickest scorer if he keeps going once he is in. he will win matches by himself. Captain Eoin Morgan is experienced and has been building to this moment for some time now. He has kept his team on the right track over the last few years, and knows the importance of keeping them on that path for a few months still.

With Stokes and Ali in the middle order they have players that are more than capable with the bat and handy with the ball. They may miss Alex Hales, who has played some great innings for them in recent times, but they can win the tournament without him.

England’s ability to pile on big scores isn’t matched by a bowling unit that is of the same quality. But they know their roles, and they know their conditions.

With Curren, Archer and Woakes, England have their old style English medium pacers that can do their job, especially if that job is part of defending totals that force the opposition to keep taking risks.

It’s been a long work in progress for England but after 44 years without knowing what they do in one day cricket, they look like they are just about there. They have come close in the early periods of this tournament, but have regressed since.

Now that they have found their identity, can they go about their task and for the first time be world Cup champions?

The Crowd Says:

2019-05-26T02:42:36+00:00

Neel

Roar Guru


They just seem to choke in the pressure games or they meet a team that is playing on another level. It might be different this time around but I wouldn’t be surprised if they fail to win the World Cup again.

2019-05-24T17:25:26+00:00

PhilB

Guest


The problem is you could say exactly the same thing about any team in the competition. Every team will have a bad day. Truth is the World Cup isn't ever a representation of who is the best, it simply tells you who performed the best over a short period in specific conditions against a small sample of teams (they won't play everyone). I've always believed that being the consistent number 1 in that specific format is far more representative of quality than winning a tournament. India for example have been head and shoulders above the rest in tests for the past few years whilst England has been equally dominant in ODIs. The world Cup will be interesting to see who performs best but it doesn't nessecarily mean they are the best.

2019-05-24T16:03:32+00:00

Magic

Guest


And cricket buffets my logic is completely different from you because I think England didn't won any world cup because of England's inability to adapt different condition, different match situation, and different mind set and on behalf of that logic I want to ask a question to all of my roar friends and the question is that could England win the match after posting the score of 220? or could England win the match after giving 350 my answer is no ,even in this world cup my answer will be no, but for Australia I (was, am and will be) sure that AUS can still defend 250 and can chase 350 that's why I still believe this would be AUS who is real condidate following by every team

2019-05-24T09:50:16+00:00

OffCycling

Guest


Pretty much any team is going to struggle if they're rolled for 200. Checking win rates for batting first with a score of 220 or less batting first over the last 4 years is not pretty reading. Out of the teams at the World cup the one with the best rate after scoring less than 220 is Afghanistan at 4/11, but out of those only West Indies was against another team at the World cup. Then it's Bangladesh (1/5 win against Zimbabwe), against Pakistan (1/4, win against Sri Lanka) and South Africa (2/11 wins against Australia and Zimbabwe). The following countries have not won any matches whilst being bowled out for <220 in the last 4 years, with the number of matches in brackets: India (3), Australia (5), England (6), Sri Lanka (16). Scoring from 220-250 is a bit better (India have won 2/2, England 1/2, Australia 2/6, New Zealand 2/6 over the last 4 years scoring from 220-250), but still only gives the bowlers of any country an outside chance. Unfortunately I can't easily check how many of those were rain affected which may make the numbers even worse. One off day and anyone's tournament could be over. It's worth remembering that even if England's win rate of 70.7% over the last 4 years continues then, assuming they get into the semis, that gives almost exactly a 50/50 chance of winning overall.

2019-05-24T07:48:30+00:00

AREH

Roar Guru


This is exactly the key thing for mine - it all depends when the inevitable blow-up game happens for them. They will be hoping if it does, it's when a second chance remains.

AUTHOR

2019-05-24T02:41:31+00:00

Cricket Buffet

Roar Guru


The good news for England is it is coming off far more often than it is not, which means they should make the semi finals. They just got to hope that if they do, their bad day doesnt come there and then or in their final match!

AUTHOR

2019-05-24T02:40:15+00:00

Cricket Buffet

Roar Guru


Dont get me wrong, they had a pretty good team. But im more pointing out their strategy helped define them. They took what was thought to be a tried and tested approach and went the opposite way. It was completely different to what we had come to expect from one day cricket.

2019-05-24T02:21:28+00:00

elvis

Roar Rookie


An innovative approach definitely, but could it have been done without - Vaas, Murali, Jayasuriya, Arivinda De Silva, Ranatunga, Kaluwitharana, Tillakaratne, Mahanama, Gurusinha? All Sri Lankan all time greats, and a good half the team at home in any all time great team. It's a myth this team of underdogs beat the mighty Aussies, they were a better team full stop.

2019-05-24T00:39:39+00:00

Ouch

Roar Rookie


Aston Martins, McClaren and some of the new Jags are good. But yeh, their ODI cricket has been more like the Robin Reliant over the decades.

2019-05-24T00:08:57+00:00

cob

Guest


England's game plan is great.. until they are rolled for 200 and their bowlers have to defend that. I'm not sure they have the quality to do that. Especially with all the talk about the pitches being roads on tiny grounds. It will only take one off day and their tournament could be over. Which would be great to see as an Aussie.

AUTHOR

2019-05-23T23:45:40+00:00

Cricket Buffet

Roar Guru


'Retro-stodge' really couldn't be any more accurate! ;)

2019-05-23T23:25:02+00:00

Paul

Roar Guru


I think you got it exactly right with your last sentence CB, when you mentioned a clear plan, which I take to be a little different from the team identity you mentioned earlier. I remember listening to some Indian guys talking about the preparations for the World Cup in 2011 and they even tried to find out exactly when the dew would form and how much they might expect! England have been building to this for 4 years with the style of batting they've adopted and the tram they've created. From that point f view, you're right, they've planned and created an identity, now they have to complete the task and win the Cup.

2019-05-23T23:22:00+00:00

dungerBob

Roar Rookie


Interesting theory there CB, though I contend that they did have a style and identity during the dark times. I like to call it 'retro-stodge'. They played the game as though it were a mini Test match and loaded their teams with test players so it wasn't as though they had no plans, they were just bad plans.

AUTHOR

2019-05-23T23:16:40+00:00

Cricket Buffet

Roar Guru


The problem with just keeping it to the best players win would be overlooking what Sri Lanka did. SL didnt have the best bowlers in the world, but they got their spinner to do a job and found a new method to approach batting. There was a lot of thought that went in to how they were going to win a WC, then they executed it all quite brilliantly.

AUTHOR

2019-05-23T23:14:24+00:00

Cricket Buffet

Roar Guru


Yes no doubt great players and great teams win tournaments. Just looking outside the box and looking as to why one of cricket's stronger nations hasnt had a break through. Where as you could see a clear plan from other nations in their approach, it's hard to have ever found one with England.

2019-05-23T22:51:04+00:00

Paul

Roar Guru


I think it's a huge stretch to suggest England haven't won a tournament, 44 years old, because they lack an identity, CB. I'm sure there's been a few other factors like some red hot teams that DID win ( just how many WC games did Australia win in a row?), an inability to adapt to different playing conditions or something really simple - they didn't have a squad of players good enough to get the job done. This time round they do have a great squad and the Cup is theirs to lose.

AUTHOR

2019-05-23T21:47:56+00:00

Cricket Buffet

Roar Guru


Hard to believe Aus hasn’t won there since 2001, esp given how many wins from 89 to 01. Hopefully can win that series. I’m not sure about Aus this WC. Not without a chance but I think England are a little stronger overall. But Aus at the WC can never really discard.

AUTHOR

2019-05-23T21:46:01+00:00

Cricket Buffet

Roar Guru


I’ve had a theory they win world cups every 37 years. Football in 66, rugby 03 so I wasn’t expecting anything til 2040. But they are my top this wc which goes against that theory!

AUTHOR

2019-05-23T21:44:46+00:00

Cricket Buffet

Roar Guru


Fair comment. That was more aimed at Woakes and Curran.

2019-05-23T21:43:14+00:00

elvis

Roar Rookie


This is just confirmation bias. As if none of the other competing teams had a slogan, or a plan or even a cool tshirt. The difference is they lost and no one remembers it. This is what wins world cups, the best bowlers and batsmen or sometimes a hot steak of luck or form.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar