This is the third and final article on playmakers and distributors and the roles they play for the Waratahs, Rebels and Brumbies.
I asked the question, ‘Do the Wallabies need two playmakers in the run-on 15?’. If we do, do they have to be at No. 15 as well as No. 10? I also discussed the role of distributors to support playmakers.
The definitions I used were: playmaker, which is someone who can play a traditional stand-off role and control a game with good passing to both sides and a tactical kicking game and who is more involved than a distributor, which is someone who can effectively pass both sides and can read a game for opportunities.
The players I reviewed in detail were Bernard Foley, Kurtley Beale, Christian Lealiifano, Tom Banks, Quade Cooper and Dane Haylett-Petty, and this week Matt To’omua because he started at No. 10 for the Rebels.
The focus of the review was the players’ attacking skills, positional play and unforced errors, noting only actions that were above or below what should be expected from Test players in a Super Rugby game. I did not review their tackling or simply doing what’s expected of them.
The hypothesis I was testing is that Australian teams can be successful with one playmaker in the 15 as long as that player is supported by good distributors.
I conducted the same analysis after last weekend’s games, reviewing the same players and, this week, To’omua. This week I continued to include the number of involvements by each player. By ‘involvements’ I mean the number of times the ball was passed to the player. These totals do not include taking the ball from a kick or taking penalty kicks for touch.
Player | First half | Second half |
---|---|---|
Kurtley Beale | 9 | 16 |
Bernard Foley | 9 | 10 |
Matt To’omua* | 12 | 7 |
Quade Cooper^ | 0 | 3 |
Dane Haylett-Petty | 5 | 5 |
Christian Lealiifano | 16 | 9 |
Tom Banks | 6 | 5 |
*To’omua was off after 70 minutes
^Cooper was on for the last 10 minutes
This last weekend reinforced that fact that within the group of distributors some have a focus on running and others on kicking or passing. More on that later.
Here are the highs and lows of each game.
Brumbies vs Waratahs
Rebels vs Crusaders
The involvement figures again highlight that the Waratahs use Beale and Foley equally as playmakers with about the same number of involvements, whereas the Brumbies (Christian Lealiifano) and Rebels (To’omua and Cooper) clearly prioritise one playmaker with substantial support from a key distributor with a rough ratio of two involvements to one respectively.
To see if the last three games I reviewed in detail were indicative of this Super Rugby season I reviewed the stats for the season so far from Fox Sports. To these players I have added other potential distributors in Kerevi and Meakes, but not To’omua due to the limited data sample.
Player | Games | Involvements (game average) | Run | Pass | Kick |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Foley | 14 | 32 | 16 per cent | 62 per cent | 23 per cent |
Beale | 13 | 30 | 29 per cent | 47 per cent | 24 per cent |
Cooper | 15 | 27 | 20 per cent | 62 per cent | 19 per cent |
Lealiifano | 15 | 24 | 17 per cent | 61 per cent | 22 per cent |
Kerevi | 14 | 22 | 59 per cent | 33 per cent | 8 per cent |
Haylett-Petty | 10 | 16 | 51 per cent | 28 per cent | 21 per cent |
Banks | 15 | 13 | 57 per cent | 25 per cent | 18 per cent |
Meakes | 15 | 11 | 53 per cent | 44 per cent | 3 per cent |
This summary of the Super Rugby season so far is consistent with the figures I have shown for the past three weeks – that is, the Waratahs heavily rely on two plays for their playmaking and distribution whereas the Brumbies and Rebels distribute this responsibility more widely. This is not a criticism but an important observation for any opponent. Diffusion of your points of attack, all things being equal, should lead to greater pointscoring opportunities.
In this assessment of potential No. 10s and No. 15s for the Wallabies I noted that I haven’t looked at the defensive abilities of the players. Below is a snapshot of tackles made and tackles missed so far this season.
Player | Tackles made | Tackles missed |
---|---|---|
Foley | 108 | 39 |
Beale | 45 | 20 |
Cooper | 71 | 29 |
Lealiifano | 107 | 18 |
Kerevi | 78 | 28 |
Haylett-Petty | 38 | 8 |
Banks | 32 | 14 |
Meakes | 108 | 29 |
Also, while the No. 10 or No. 15 does not have to be the goalkicker for the Wallabies, the most likely candidates are Foley, Cooper and Lealiifano. To evaluate this we need only consider the conversion of tries, as there is no choice as to take or not to take the kick, thus removing this variable.
Player | Conversions auccess | Attempts | Percentage |
---|---|---|---|
Foley | 28 | 38 | 74 per cent |
Cooper | 40 | 55 | 73 per cent |
Lealiifano | 39 | 54 | 72 per cent |
After reviewing the games of the last three weeks for the Waratahs, Rebels and Brumbies and looking at the overall figures for the season so far, only the Waratahs play with two equally involved playmakers and distributors. Michael Hooper has the next highest number of involvements per game (13 with 36 per cent passing).
The Brumbies and Rebels clearly rely on their primary playmakers in Lealiifano (with support from Tom Banks and Irae Simone) and Cooper (with support from Haylett-Petty and Meakes). Not surprising for the Rebels is Isi Naisarani’s involvements per game (17 with 29 per cent passing).
So based on the figures above I ask again: do the Wallabies need two playmakers in the run-on 15?
RahRah
Roar Rookie
So make Hodge stay behind at training and kick one hundred high balls a day to him until he has nightmares about it. I seem to remember Andre Agassi's was made to hit 2000 tennis balls a day.
Nobody
Roar Rookie
So I redid it as percentage of successful tackles completed (higher is better now). Here are the results, highest to lowest. Lealiifano 85.6 Haylett-Petty 82.6 Meakes 78.8 Kerevi 73.6 Foley 73.5 Cooper 71 Banks 69.6 Beale 69.2 Same order as before, but not quite as damning (Beale misses 30.8% of tackles, not 44.4% as I wrote the first time)
PeterK
Roar Guru
I stated DHP is the better passer , i.e also the better distributor. I have never seen DHP run away from anyone, he gets caught by forwards often. He is easily beaten by pace running around him either on the wing or f/b.
Rugby101
Roar Guru
Thanks Nobody. Always important to acknowledge one's errors. Happy to acknowledge mine. Never-the-less a good stat to have. Cheers
Rugby101
Roar Guru
PeterK, I suggest you review Robbie Dean's comments during the Rebels game against the Sunwolves. He highlighted a number of DHP's positive attributes (and this was about him in general, not just that game), amongst them his speed 'when it was needed', and 'he was able to move to another gear' or words to that effect. He also talked about DHP's ability to get his arms free after the talk to distribute. It's possible you're a little closed minded on this one ...
Nobody
Roar Rookie
Oops, it just occurred to me that my figures are wrong. What I actually showed was not missed tackles out of every hundred made (what I meant to show), but missed tackles for every hundred successfully completed. I'll post new values tomorrow.
Rob M
Roar Rookie
No, I mean CLL and Foley - not QC. As I understand it, Nic White is available for Wallabies - big plus.
Rugby101
Roar Guru
" CLL has earn’t his spot"? Do you mean QC? Nic White has signed with RA, just not allocated to a Super team yet.
numpty
Roar Rookie
a center pairing of kerevi/meakes would be reminiscent of nonu/smith.
Rob M
Roar Rookie
CLL and Foley deserve to be in the squad as 10's for me. CLL has earn't his spot. Foley isn't in great form, but far better than QC atm. QC is still a shadow of himself pre 2011. The stats on intercepts and turnovers over this season would put him well below either CLL and Foley. QC's body language atm is particularly painful to watch - for me he's a big part of the problem the Rebels have had over the past 2 months. And I don't think we need a second playmaker. Happy to have two in-form giants in Kerevi and Kurindrani in the centres. I'd prefer Banks or Hodge at FB for long clearing kicks, not Beale. Beale is ideal from the bench where he can go on with 20 left against tiring defences and cover multiple positions. For me the biggest change might actually be getting Nic White back at 9. He runs and actually has a box-kick that works. White's pass is quick and accurate. I think he will make more difference than a second playmaker. (Genia on the bench for me)
Ken Catchpole's Other Leg
Roar Guru
He played 13 in the UK. His uncle was a rep level 13 back in the 80’s if that counts for anything.
Rugby101
Roar Guru
Thanks Ralph. Yes absolutely stats don't show the whole picture. That is why for the past three weeks I tried to capture the highs and lows of the key 10s and 15s. What was above or below the expected level of Test players at Super level. For example, CLL does little that is extraordinary but also makes very few bad plays, and he is the central playmaker.
Rugby101
Roar Guru
Yes I've heard that but never seen it. I did an article on a RWC 31 and didn't have him in because thought he is solely a 12. If he can also cover 13, given his form, what he brings and combination with Cooper (if selected), he should definitely be in!
Rugby101
Roar Guru
I clearly remember in one of the games I reviewed Horan stating how important it was for Beale to get into First Receiver to give Foley a rest, 'because there's a lot to do at 10 (or words to that effect).
Rugby101
Roar Guru
I think most people feel this is right (Meakes like Kerevi, Hunt like To'omua) from watching them, and the stats tend to back this up.
Rugby101
Roar Guru
"That was part of my domino effect that I forgot to spell out. That selecting Foley makes the patterns and personnel dependent on having BOTH Foley and Beale available and in form because they are not interchangeable with other players." My analysis certainly supports this view.
Rugby101
Roar Guru
Yes Meakes does, and part of the reason Hodge didn't displace him is because of the less glamorous but important work he does. And has good combination with QC.
Ken Catchpole's Other Leg
Roar Guru
I believe Meakes prefers 13, so I would like to see him there at some point.
PeterK
Roar Guru
sure and DHP was at least matched by Beale, neither kicked well.
numpty
Roar Rookie
Agreed, I also rate him. He is stronger through the tackle and in traffic then alot of people give him credit for and has a perfect mix of distribution to running. Tbh I was trying to find a spot for him in the 15 for a while, but TK and SK are both in very good form. He would be my 2nd choice 12 for sure. Tbh I think he and Kerevi would complement each other really well, I'd love to see them on the same field at the same time running off a set piece.