All new Wallabies: The Dave Rennie brief

By Matt Cleary / Expert

Dave Rennie? Sure – why not? Last Kiwi coach went okay, didn’t he? Well, mmmkay, say.

Robbie Deans took Canterbury to a bunch of titles. Was well known as a top coach. Came over. Brushed Matt Giteau. Wallabies went mmmkay. And off he went.

Ewen McKenzie came in because apparently, as in cricket, we needed an Aussie coach to teach the Aussie way.

And the Wallabies were still mmmkay, also, before the well-credentialled Michael Cheika extracted all the juice he could, and Australia played out of their skin in starbursts, and largely mmmkay otherwise.

And now our man Rennie can… well, do his best. For there’s a bit of a job ahead of him given, y’know, the ‘players’ he can call on and blood.

Because that’s pretty much his brief. The Australia Under-20s and schoolboys beat New Zealand teams in the last year or so. That’s the next wave. These guys, the kids, why not just bung ‘em in?

Forget 2020 in terms of scoreboard results. Let’s lose heroically! Even magnificently! Use 2020 as a petri dish. Make the Wallabies a virtual Under-23 team.

Call ‘em Dave’s Babes.

Michael Hooper can captain. Scott Sio can stay too. And everyone else? Dave’s Babes, baby.

Why not? Who’s coming out in June? Ireland? Who cares who it is? Every Test from here til France in 2023 should be about blooding Davey’s babies, and forging men.

So what if we get flogged by the All Blacks? going to happen anyway. Who cares if it’s 40-20 or 50-10?

Long as in 2023 we go to France with battle-scarred, fit, skilful players who’ve been humbled, bashed and beaten, and didn’t like it, and now want dear sweet revenge.

Worked for Phil Kearns giving Sean Fitzpatrick the two-finger salute.

It’s an oldie but a goodie: good enough, old enough. And even if they aren’t, bung ’em in until they are.

See: Tim Horan, Jason Little, John Eales, Joe Roff.

Pat Howard? Not so much.

But at least we knew.

Jordan Petaia should’ve been first picked in Game 1 of the World Cup and unleashed on Wales. Roff was good enough. So is this boy Petaia. Not playing him obviously made sense, but it’s like plunging on the 5-2 favourite that you know will run a race when you also know the three-year-old colt is the best horse in the race.

Jordan Petaia. (Dan Mullan/Getty Images)

And Rugby Australia should now clear the decks and blood the kids, and bring over some hot leaguies – find a group North Sydney hedge-fund managers to buy Kalyn Ponga, Latrell Mitchell, Jordan Rapana and David Fifita.

Give ’em Sonny Bill Williams money. There’s more of it where that came from. Australia’s pot of superannuation is the world’s greatest ever perpetually growing well of gold. Dip in while no-one’s looking, bring Ponga to rugby. Everyone’s happy, at least until the Royal Commission, but no-one will be jailed and everyone will be paid.

They’re not going to do that, though, are they.

And chances are Rennie’s not going to have an Under-23s team staining his CV. Rennie doesn’t want to get flogged.

He’ll pick the best team he can, from the best-performing Super Rugby team, and the Waratahs, and into the Ireland or Wales or whoever it is Test match we’ll go, with the kids on the bench given a sniff here or there.

Bugger that! Bung. Them. In!

Start them. Have an entire backline, no-one over 22.

Won’t happen? Sure. And Rennie will pick his best XXIII, and maybe they’ll win a game here or there. And that will be nice. But come the World Cup, Bledisloe, Mandela and Cook of 2023, and we’ll be shuffling deckchairs again.

Or we could play long game. Silverware in three or four years, or death. And do it with a group of men then in their mid-20s who’ve played 4000 minutes of Test rugby. Yep – kids with 50 full Tests.

The Wallabies in Japan, if we’re fair dinkum, going out in the quarter-final was par. Anything else was a bonus. That’s how good a rugby nation Australia is. That’s the level – what are we? Sixth or seventh on the IRB rankings? Anything below No.3, it’s effectively the abyss.

If we’d beaten Wales, which never looked likely anyway, and taken the easier South African side route into the semi-finals, it would’ve scotched over stuff, just as getting into the 2015 Rugby World Cup final did.

Giving good consolatory hugs is a bonus. (Photo by Dan Mullan/Getty Images)

The Wallabies are… well, they’re not very good. Not in relative terms to the top five, say, world units.

Yes, beating the All Blacks in Perth was only a few months ago. Seems like 1912. And of that team, lots are off to Japan or France or to save ever more white rhinos.

Samu Kerevi’s off to Japan and he’ll play for Fiji down the track, is my tip. Why not? Off tangent a bit but Oceania rugby teams should get first dibs on guys who want to play for Oceania. First-world nations Australia and New Zealand can train them up – call it foreign aid – and then these types can make a call when they’ve had enough.

That or World Rugby takes some money from the mega-millions the World Cup created and make it financially attractive for those guys to play for their parents’ homeland, the place to which they feel so culturally attached.

Those guys go and play for these teams, and sing the anthem, they cry. They love Australia, no doubt. They don’t cry in the anthem.

Sports opinion delivered daily 

   

Another story. But it’ll be a thing – blokes with heritage will come through the Aussie system, play five years, earn 20, 40 caps, whatever, then brush it for Europe or Japan, and after a year or two, whatever they have to wait, tear out for Tonga.

Leaguies are doing it. Tonga’s going gangbusters. It’s shaken up international league.

That probably won’t happen either.

Dave’s Babes? Dare to dream.

The Crowd Says:

2019-11-23T22:24:48+00:00

Rugby Tragic

Roar Rookie


Good post Robbo

2019-11-23T00:30:27+00:00

John Wagner

Roar Rookie


Will Train and Wayne S please stop hogging the Roar site?! Thank you.

2019-11-22T11:11:02+00:00

Train Without A Station

Roar Guru


You do not have to swear on the bible in Australia. You can swear on the Koran, or any other religious book. Or not even on a religious text. https://www.judcom.nsw.gov.au/publications/benchbks/criminal/oaths_affirmations.html

2019-11-22T11:06:02+00:00

WayneS

Roar Rookie


Train... No slippery slope. It all depends on who wants what to change and how much power and support there is available at the time. All change has happened that way. As for the Bible, it is the book for more than just Christians and the basis for many laws and practices. Next time you go to court, refuse to swear on the Bible hahaha

2019-11-22T10:47:25+00:00

Train Without A Station

Roar Guru


Ahh the old slippery slope argument. Who cares what the bible says. The only relevance it should have in society is to Christians who choose to adhere to it.

2019-11-22T10:45:40+00:00

WayneS

Roar Rookie


Train... The Bible is unlikely to be rewritten just yet so for the time being people should just live and let live and not read people's twitter etc. As for SSM, that was supposedly about fairness but it was only a step in the radicals agenda. Most gay people I know didn't really care and have no intention of getting married. Perhaps we will be looking at underage marriage, polygamy and other unions in the future if there is enough support or if enough pro radicals can get into positions of influence.

2019-11-22T10:25:28+00:00

Train Without A Station

Roar Guru


No. I doubt it covers a conversation between two people. But it certainly covers what Folau chooses to publish on social media. If “Christians” didn’t seem to think it was critical to their faith to denigrate people or force their views on others (eg. SSM), perhaps others would be more tolerant of them?

2019-11-22T10:22:53+00:00

WayneS

Roar Rookie


Train... The code of conduct must obviously be able to cover anything anyone says or does then so that makes it impossible. The guy is a part time preacher who reiterated Bible quotes and upset a major sponsor and some other rainbow people. One has to wonder the damage this is doing to young Christians. By the way, you of course are aware that religious intolerance is on the rise in most countries around the world.

2019-11-22T10:10:18+00:00

Train Without A Station

Roar Guru


When he signed his contract he agreed to the Code of Conduct. His contract requires him to abide by that document among other things.

2019-11-22T10:06:55+00:00

Train Without A Station

Roar Guru


How is a panel where the union appoints 33% and has to agree to another 33% heavily weighted against players? Go and breach your employment conditions. You could only dream of such a favourable panel to decide your fate.

2019-11-22T10:06:12+00:00

WayneS

Roar Rookie


Train… He didn’t sign the conditions that you are referring to. He was sacked because As Clyne said, Folau put “RA in a difficult position that left them at odds with numerous employees, sponsors and rugby stakeholders” and “we’d have no sponsors at all because no sponsor has indicated they would be willing to be associated with social media posts of that sort”. I of course blame the PC advocates and the social engineering that is being forced upon us for these situations.

2019-11-22T10:05:19+00:00

Paul D

Roar Rookie


heavily and unfairly weighted. How? What evidence do you have that RA put pressure on the RUPA to not effectively advocate for Folau? That is what you are insinuating, correct?

2019-11-22T10:01:10+00:00

WayneS

Roar Rookie


Train… I accept the facts about the panel but you don't accept that the system is weighted against the players and in Folau's case, heavily and unfairly weighted.

2019-11-22T09:57:09+00:00

Train Without A Station

Roar Guru


Why would it be just if Folau was able to breach the conditions of his contract and then sue RA?

2019-11-22T09:56:01+00:00

Train Without A Station

Roar Guru


It’s not a view to agree on. Those were these appointments. Some things are facts. And you refuse to accept the facts around the panel which assessed Folau’s breach.

2019-11-22T09:52:49+00:00

WayneS

Roar Rookie


Train… We will agree to disagree then. Historically of recent times, players organisations really have not been able to protect their members due to the dictatorial methods/attitudes of their sporting bodies. It’s all about money and sponsorships.

2019-11-22T09:40:48+00:00

WayneS

Roar Rookie


Train... BTW, for Australian rugby's future, I hope Folau loses, but if it was only a case of a just decision, then Folau would win.

2019-11-22T09:38:20+00:00

Train Without A Station

Roar Guru


No I understand it perfectly. The player union chose one panel member. They agreed to one further panel member. At least one of them had to agree that Folau breached his CoC to terminate Folau. That’s it. That’s indisputable. Are you saying RUPA didn’t advocate correctly for Folau? If so that’s not RA’s fault.

2019-11-22T09:35:01+00:00

WayneS

Roar Rookie


Train.. If you really believe that, you don't understand the system, the driving force of a major sponsor and the power of the gay activist groups.

2019-11-22T09:21:42+00:00

Train Without A Station

Roar Guru


She is only one of 3. RUPA appoint another and agree to the 3rd. They have say in enough of the panel to get a decision in their favour.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar