A tribute to George Bailey

By Stephen Vagg / Roar Guru

So George Bailey has become an Australian selector, thus ending his career as a player.

It’s been a fine career. Better than fine. Almost 10,000 first class runs at an average of just under 40. Over 90 ODIs with an average of 40. Five Test matches – all of them Australian victories. Several domestic title wins.

And you rarely hear a bad word against him. He seems be not just popular, but loved and respected. Amiable, positive, a good leader.

You did hear some bad words. The one group who seemed to particularly dislike him were the cabal at Channel Nine in the 2010s – the leaders of the boofhead brigade of Australian cricket. They had a lot problems with Bailey. His technique was too weird. He smiled too much. He looked too clean cut, too much a school captain, which is presumably why John Inverarity liked him. Too interested in his garden. Too close to Ed Cowan.

There was Brad McNamara’s infamous crack about Bailey “flipping burgers”, which probably ranks among the all time silly comments, even at Channel Nine.

This dislike helped turn Bailey into a cult figure. He became king of the snags, with a lot of defenders out there, including Cowan, Jarrod Kimber and Geoff Lemon. Kimber’s profile on Bailey in particular is one of the best ever written.

(AAP Image/Richard Wainwright)

I remember being so anxious for Bailey in that wonderful 2013-14 Ashes series. I was a fan by then – his ODI consistency won me over – and I wanted him to do well and I was worried he wouldn’t. His first-class average never really clambered over 40.

In the end Bailey was the only Australian player who didn’t make hay that summer, although he had his moments that contributed to the folklore of that series, notably when he took 28 runs off one Jimmy Anderson over, and when Michael Clarke threatened Anderson with a broken arm after Anderson teased Bailey.

But 183 runs at 26.14 wasn’t awesome.

And yet one sensed, even at the time, that maybe Bailey should have been persevered with. At least for a tour or two.

But he was dispatched in indecent haste for the 2014 tour of South Africa. Maybe Bailey didn’t lock down his spot but the selectors punted him for Shaun Marsh and Alex Doolan, neither of whom really demanded selection either.

Was it the right call?

In the short term, yes. Marsh and Doolan played crucial innings to help Australia win in South Africa.

But in the long term, Doolan went to the UAE, then fell out of international consideration. Marsh went his frustratingly erratic way, which still continues. Bailey didn’t go on that 2014 UAE tour when Australia realised they had not in fact become awesome under Darren Lehmann. We were awesome at home and bad overseas. And so we’ve remained.

Would Bailey have helped stop that? Unlikely.

But in Tests, he could’ve been used on another tour or two. Australia seemed to lack leaders in the mid 2010s. You had Clarke trying to stamp his authority, not always getting along with Lehmann. Brad Haddin’s form slipped away. Steve Smith was pushed into leadership well before he was ready. David Warner was constantly adjusting his aggro levels. Surely Bailey’s presence could only have helped?

Sports opinion delivered daily 

   

Bailey also could and should have been flown out to South Africa in the wake of the sandpaper scandal. The ones they did send – Joe Burns, Matt Renshaw and Glenn Maxwell – are all fine players, but there was a leadership vacuum in the team at the time. And Bailey’s presence would have helped sooth things.

He was definitely dispensed with far too early in ODI cricket. Bailey had helped keep the Australian team together during the many absences of Michael Clarke, but on Clarke’s retirement, they were keen to get rid of Bailey and usher in the reign of Steve Smith. The dreadful form of the Australian ODI team from 2016-19 coincides with the turfing of Bailey.

But now he’s going to be one of the most powerful men in Australian cricket.

His skills as a player and captain don’t necessarily mean he’ll be a good selector – they are different things.

But he’ll leave a massive gap when he retires.

And I wish him all the best.

The Crowd Says:

2019-11-28T10:17:41+00:00

Robbie148

Guest


I think he wasn’t selected as much for his batting as he was as a potential captain. Clarke was carrying a bad back into that Ashes series, Bailey had won a lot of supporters as fill in ODI captain, I get the idea the selectors we’re trying to cover their bases

2019-11-28T01:30:20+00:00

Pope Paul VII

Roar Rookie


I just think you should always pick your best top 6, regardless of preferred position.

2019-11-27T23:31:11+00:00

JamesH

Roar Guru


He didn't even have to play in that SA tour. Even if he'd ended up as 12th man (in place of Maxwell) his influence around the side would have been valuable.

2019-11-27T23:29:54+00:00

JamesH

Roar Guru


Perhaps, but Hughes and Khawaja were seen more as top order players, despite both batting in the middle order at times during what was a pretty tumultuous period in Australian cricket. And they were each on the outer after being turfed in England earlier that year.

2019-11-27T22:10:25+00:00

Paul

Roar Guru


It would be hard to write a better tribute for a highly respected cricketer, Stephen. He's had an almost great career, just a pity he didn't play more Tests. That over off Anderson was memorable, but his demeanour, on and off the field, was representative of what I'd expect from all Australian cricketers. You make an excellent point about him not going to South Africa after the Smith/Warner faux pas. He'd have been the perfect choice IMO, given his outstanding leadership skills. Perhaps his lack of runs in that Ashes series came back to haunt him. I really hope he makes a go of the national selector's role. He certainly has strong credibility with the current crop of first class players.

2019-11-27T21:48:10+00:00

Pope Paul VII

Roar Rookie


A great bloke by all accounts. Extremely fortunate to be selected of Hughes and Khawaja in 2013/14 though.

2019-11-27T21:30:23+00:00

Max power

Guest


“His technique was too weird. He smiled too much. He looked too clean cut, too much a school captain, which is presumably why John Inverarity liked him. Too interested in his garden. Too close to Ed Cowan.“ I’m pretty sure most of these are urban myths Brad McNamara isn’t even on camera

2019-11-27T21:14:35+00:00

Spanner

Roar Rookie


Great article Stephen - without meeting him, I get the impression George would be a character within the changerooms - a good team man and they are a vital ingredient. I wish him well and relish the chance that mature Tassie and SA players may now be given at test level under his watch, rather than Chappell's biased approach towards Academy boys !

Read more at The Roar