The Wallabies need to adopt a no Plan B selection culture

By Rhys Bosley / Roar Pro

Former international bodybuilding champion, Hollywood actor and California governor Arnold Schwarzenegger gave a speech a few years ago, where in four words he showed why he has been successful at everything he has ever done. Those words were: I hate Plan B.

Arnie spoke about how having a Plan B saps our attention, energy and willingness to try again after failure until we succeed at achieving what we really want, and ultimately means that failure becomes far more likely.

New Wallabies coach Dave Rennie and his selectors might do well to think like Arnie if they want to win.

What a no Plan B approach to selections would mean for Australian rugby is that players who are selected for the Wallabies starting 15 would be required to have been the best player in Australia playing in that position over the previous Super Rugby season or in an equivalent overseas competition for Giteau’s Law players.

The only place in the Wallabies for a great utility player who didn’t demonstrate that they are the best in position at the start of an international season should be on the bench.

This rule would help rid Australian rugby of its tendency to select naturally talented players into Wallabies positions, where they do not have the full range of position specific skills to succeed in at an international level.

Dave Rennie should listen to Arnie. (Photo by Stu Forster/Getty Images)

The selections of Kurtley Beale and Adam Ashley-Cooper, who have been moved around multiple back line positions, are prime examples of this failed approach. They are both outstanding rugby players who never quite achieved what they could have in gold, because they benefited from a “too good to leave off the park” mentality for their entire Wallabies careers.

Instead of having to be the best in a position over the preceding provincial season, these players knew that they could be selected anywhere. It is likely that had these players been forced to compete for their favoured single position, they would have achieved the class of the All Blacks players, who they were beaten by so often.

Yet despite the failure of this Australian approach to selection for so many years, we can already see the same thinking creeping in about the next generation of players. For example, Isaac Lucas – a prodigiously talented rugby player who has been a schoolboy and club rugby flyhalf and inside centre for most of his career and who has just spent a successful season at ten with Brisbane City in the NRC – is being pegged by writers such as Nick Bishop and Wayne Smith as a potential Wallabies 15.

This appears to be on the basis of a few notable games at 15 with the Reds and in the Australian under-20s in 2019, and the desire to accommodate both Lucas and Waratahs flyhalf Will Harrison in the same starting 15.

Is this experiment that worked well in the under-20s and at Super Rugby level going to cut it at international level? Lucas admitted after his first Super Rugby start in 2019, when he played fullback against the Waratahs, that he is still learning the skills of a specialist fullback.

(AAP Image/Julian Smith)

Moreover, as Bishop has pointed out in his recent article, Lucas does not have a long kicking game. It isn’t hard to imagine how that would work out for him at 15 against the great tactical kickers that he would face in the international environment.

The likes of Ben Smith would just keep belting 50-metre kicks to him parallel to the sideline, and Lucas’ much shorter kick would see the Wallabies caught deep in their own half. Unless Lucas puts a lot of effort into learning the position, he would be likely to have a hard time.

In any case, we already have good options in that position in the likes of Dane Haylett-Petty, Tom Banks and Reece Hodge (if he can get the game time at 15 at the Rebels), all of whom have big boots and do well in other aspects of the fullback’s role.

Sports opinion delivered daily 

   

Wouldn’t it be better for talented Wallabies contenders like Lucas to commit to head-to-head contests with their competitors in the same preferred positions in other teams, than having the distraction of alternative potential paths in their minds?

It would be better for those individuals and for Australian rugby as a whole. At best it could result in four or more players with all the requirements to play a given position at international level at any given time – depth that Australian rugby has yearned for.

So let’s embrace a selection culture of no Plan B to get the most out of all the excellent players that Australian professional rugby is currently blessed with.

The Crowd Says:

2020-01-26T23:04:43+00:00

Train Without A Station

Roar Guru


I don’t think you can dismiss the JEM as a “popularity contest”. It’s not a fan vote. It’s voted by players who know the game plans, roles, etc. Players aren’t going to see a peer fail to do their prescribed job and vote for them.

2020-01-26T22:58:44+00:00

Train Without A Station

Roar Guru


No. Don’t try something different for the sake of change. Try something different because what you’ve seen indicates it’s likely to be an improvement.

2020-01-26T11:50:49+00:00

Funbus

Guest


Hold it. The main problem England had in the final was their tighthead prop was injured after 2 minutes so their sub had to play for 78. There were also some selection errors (which Eddie admitted to) particularly putting too much on Mako Vunipola who hadn’t played for nearly 6 months before the RWC. The Boks certainly deserved to win, but had a gilded ride after the first pool match and could afford to manage their players. England don’t have a ‘depth’ problem up front. Launchbury and Genge struggled to make the 23 in the RWC. Both would be nailed on starters for the Wallabies.

AUTHOR

2020-01-26T11:12:29+00:00

Rhys Bosley

Roar Pro


Ah, don't try something different because the Wallabies might get worse than they worst position they have ever been in. That's the spirit :thumbup:

2020-01-25T14:02:51+00:00

Train Without A Station

Roar Guru


Yes. They were two players considered despite their strengths, not better for the team.

AUTHOR

2020-01-25T13:58:12+00:00

Rhys Bosley

Roar Pro


Not really, Mogg has an excellent long kicking game understood the positional play required of a fullback, while still being excellent in attack. McKenzie did the same as he did to Toomus to Mogg, gave him his first start against the All Blacks then when he struggled as so many have, dumped him for the coaches preferred choice. It was a shame because he was an excellent player, Latham rated him and he would know. https://www.sbs.com.au/news/stick-with-mogg-latham-tell-wallabies My enduring memory was of Mogg out jumping Folsu and scoring in one of the Super games, Folau's face looked like thunder at being shown up by a rival. It was bloody funny.

2020-01-25T13:40:02+00:00

Train Without A Station

Roar Guru


Sure who knows. But considering most of that happened before he came to rugby what do you expect would have changed?

2020-01-25T13:37:55+00:00

Train Without A Station

Roar Guru


No. I’m defending a selection that was part of it. You can’t be certain that actually lead to it. And I’m defending part of it because that’s nothing to say without it, the team would not have been worse than it was.

2020-01-25T11:47:15+00:00

Paul D

Roar Rookie


Mogg? Now you’re just taking the pi$$

AUTHOR

2020-01-25T11:19:41+00:00

Rhys Bosley

Roar Pro


He had smoke blown up his backside since he was 18 years old, if not earlier, who knows what he would have achieved if somebody had taken a harder line with him. And if he genuinely couldn't learn, then select somebody else who could, he was never indispensable.

AUTHOR

2020-01-25T11:17:06+00:00

Rhys Bosley

Roar Pro


We have had some very talented alternatives at 15 who never had a chance to compete for the jersey, because of the mortgage that Folau was given over it. Jesse Mogg and Luke Morahan were two who had a better handle on the core responsibilities of the position that Folau. I would have had no problem having a Wallabies team with either of them at 15 and Folau on the wing if he was prepared to play there during the Super Season, or on the bench until he learned to play the role or adjusted his attitude. But both of those players went overseas, probably when they realised that they were never going to get a fair go because of Folau. That is what happens with that sort of favouritism, it undermines the incentive and morale of the entire team.

AUTHOR

2020-01-25T11:09:55+00:00

Rhys Bosley

Roar Pro


He won a popularity contest and a record in a provincial rugby competition. So what, that is an extremely poor record of achievement for such an overhyped and overpaid player.

AUTHOR

2020-01-25T10:59:19+00:00

Rhys Bosley

Roar Pro


You are defending the selection approach that led the Wallabies to their all time worst position in world rankings and a sub 50% win rate. The bloke in Peter K's avatar had a definition of insanity you might like to look up, because it is very relevant.

2020-01-25T07:50:44+00:00

Nicholas Bishop

Expert


Thanks for that RR - it does sound like that is the way BT is leaning...

2020-01-25T07:38:36+00:00

Red Rob

Roar Rookie


Yep and yep

AUTHOR

2020-01-25T05:53:11+00:00

Rhys Bosley

Roar Pro


Being able to cover all positions from the bench with a player with experience in that position is important, but I still think the priority should be on developing specialists for the starting team. We have always had good utility footballers who haven’t quite made it as best in position, but who have been useful off the bench due to their adaptability. Reece Hodge is our latest example but Pat McCabe, Berrick Barnes and Rob Horne all come to mind. Everyone may want a Wallabies starting spot but the reality is that most Super Players don’t get a spot at all, so being adaptable enough to always get the 22 or 23 jersey could be seen as a blessing rather than a curse. While on tour opportunities inevitability rise to impress off the bench or in lower tier matches, so it isn’t like those players would forever be locked out of the starting 15. I just don’t like seeing those decisions made as compromises to accomodate talented players who haven’t proven that they can do the job.

AUTHOR

2020-01-25T05:12:32+00:00

Rhys Bosley

Roar Pro


For the Tahs abd Wallabies sake, the sooner somebody else like Maddocks gets a decent crack at the 15 jersey the better. Beale is 31 and is as inconsistent as he ever was, he isn't getting any better and it is time to move on. Nawaqanitawase on the other hand scares the Red cr@p out of me.

2020-01-25T01:55:03+00:00

jeznez

Roar Guru


Reasonably accurate memory there. He also dropped one kick, in traffic but with no real pressure (he was the only one jumping for the ball, others just arriving). The one that killed me though he was back covering touch and stood too far in field, ball went over his head, bounced between him and the touch line and went out. That is to go with a couple of handling errors in general play as well. Didn’t really have any stand out moments to counteract those poor ones.

2020-01-25T00:37:53+00:00

Red Rob

Roar Rookie


Geo-blocked? Get a VPN, mate!!

2020-01-25T00:29:22+00:00

Red Rob

Roar Rookie


Yeah KB is an enduring mystery, isn’t he? One eye catching moment when he fields a kick inside his 22, under no pressure, dithers, runs sideways then puts in a rubbish kick. (Hope my recollection is accurate, I had a few Friday sherbets) All that talent and experience and he can still do things like that? Must drive his coaches nuts!

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar