What should Australia’s Test squad look like?

By Paul / Roar Guru

Cricket Australia announced a 21-man squad for the short tour of England starting in September. In normal times this number would be wildly excessive, but these are far from normal times.

By the time white ball hits bat most of these players won’t have played a proper ODI or T20 game in at least four or five months, so selectors don’t have any recent form to go by when putting together this squad.

In similar vein, depending on how things pan out with various travel restrictions, selectors might have few first-class games to choose its squad for the upcoming Test series, so this is a first draft about who they might take into the First Test of the summer.

I’ve named a squad of 22 which, again, seems excessive, but there’s method to the madness.

Sports opinion delivered daily 

   

The last international ODI in England will be played on 16 September and the first game of the IPL starts in the UAE three days later. Players from both England and Australia who are contracted to IPL franchises have to spend a mandated week in quarantine, which means all are likely to miss the first week of the tournament when travel time to get to the UAE is factored in.

Missing the first week becomes important because franchises would be loath to release players back to Australia if they were playing well and the team was likely to figure in the finals. A lot of money has been paid for these guys and obviously each team wants maximum bang for buck.

The final of the IPL is scheduled for 10 November, and with travel back to Australia, followed by additional quarantine measures on the players’ return, more than one of the current Test side are likely to be missing for the game against Afghanistan on 21 November.

(Dibyangshu Sarkar/AFP/Getty Images)

The format and venues for the Indian tour is also a bit of a lottery at present. Cricket Australia will obviously be keen to play the four-Test series at the venues it announced earlier in the year, especially the Tests at the MCG and SCG, but the situation in Victoria and possibly Sydney may not allow games to be played there.

There are also significant travel restrictions in place, so once the India series starts, if these restrictions are still there, flying in ready-to-go replacements might be impossible.

Given those factors, this is my squad, with asterisked players denoting those playing in the IPL: Dave Warner*, Joe Burns, Marnus Labuschagne, Steve Smith*, Matthew Wade, Travis Head, Tim Paine, Pat Cummins*, Mitchell Starc, Nathan Lyon, Josh Hazlewood*, James Pattinson, Usman Khawaja, Alex Carey, Trent Copeland, Riley Meredith, Aaron Finch, Cameron Green, Will Puckovski, Matthew Renshaw, Lloyd Pope, Adam Zampa.

(Photo by Alex Davidson/Getty Images)

The first 12 names are self-explanatory. Alex Carey is also a fairly simple choice as an understudy to Tim Paine, while I expect James Pattinson to play three of the five Tests this summer. The other choices require more explanation.

Australia at present has a dearth of Test-quality first-class batsmen outside our best Test XI. In recent times a number of guys have been given opportunities, especially as openers, but not only have they failed to take them, their form has dropped away alarmingly – for example, Marcus Harris and Cameron Bancroft.

Usman Khawaja is a standby opener. This is by far his best position in Tests, and he could form a very solid combination with Joe Burns assuming Warner misses the Afghanistan Test due to IPL commitments or if form or injury affects either opener.

Will Puckovski and Cameron Green are my ‘potential’ selections. That is, they’ve both shown plenty at an early stage of their careers to warrant being included in this squad.

Aaron Finch and Matt Renshaw are my smokies to bat in the middle order. Neither had a great time of it when asked to open the batting at Test level. In Finch’s case that was simply a case of putting the right bloke in the wrong position in the line-up. He’d be well-suited to batting at No. 5 or No. 6, especially after the top four have set up a platform for him.

Finch would also be my standby captain if anything were to prevent Paine from playing. He’s good enough to hold a spot in the middle order and has shown he has plenty of cricket smarts with the way he’s led the Australian white-ball teams. If Paine were injured, Carey would come in to keep and Finch would bat at No. 5 in place of Wade.

Renshaw might seem a surprising choice, but he’s already hinted at dropping down the order for the Bulls, and I think he has a good enough technique to make a real go of batting Nos. 4, 5 or 6. He would be last in the pecking order for a middle-order spot, but he could be the future of the line-up along with Labuschagne, Smith, Puckovski and Head if he can make a go of the drop down the order.

Meredith and Copeland are like-for-like selections if anything were to happen to any of the quicks. Chris Tremain is another who could be in the mix instead of Copeland. I don’t see a place for Michael Neser or Chad Sayers unless they play more than one day-night Test or play more than one Test at the Gabba.

I mentioned earlier that Australia is weak in the batting department, but we’re even worse off for Test-quality spinners, especially when playing a team like India.

Adam Zampa was favourite last season to either play with Lyon if conditions suited playing two spinners or instead of Lyon if he were injured. He may well be the next cab off the rank, but I think he’s better suited to white-ball cricket in the same way Ashton Agar’s bowling is.

I’d include Zampa, but I like Lloyd Pope as another option.

At some point soon Pope needs to decide whether he wants to be a Test spinner or a white-ball spinner, because it’s very difficult to be both. His first-class figures aren’t great, but he’s played only the five games and he’s also only 20 years old. He’s got a pretty useful wrong ‘un, he’s a bowler the Indians won’t have experienced and he’s capable of taking a swag as the following footage highlights.

I’m not sure he’s ready for Test cricket, but the spinning stocks are that bare, he might get a call-up.

If things play out as I suspect they might, with the clash of the IPL finals and the start date of the Perth Test, the Australian XI for that game could well be:

  1. Usman Khawaja
  2. Joe Burns
  3. Marnus Labuschagne
  4. Aaron Finch
  5. Matthew Wade
  6. Travis Head
  7. Tim Paine
  8. James Pattinson
  9. Mitch Starc
  10. Nathan Lyon
  11. Trent Copeland

Finch would bat in the middle order assuming he’s in some sort of form following the England tournament.

It will be interesting to see what Cricket Australia decides to do. Much will obviously depend on restrictions about playing cricket, quarantining et cetera, but there’s no doubt we’re in for an exciting summer of Test cricket.

The Crowd Says:

2020-08-19T14:27:45+00:00

Steele

Roar Rookie


Nothing beats “ashes cricket in Australia”, except of course for Ashes cricket in England.......

AUTHOR

2020-08-18T04:17:43+00:00

Paul

Roar Guru


Patterson had a good 2018/19 summer but couldn't do anything last season thanks to injury. If selectors have to pick sides on form, it's a stretch to go back 2 years to justify him being considered. The problem is, the other contenders simply aren't stepping up with the bat, so you're right, he should be looked at.

2020-08-18T04:07:31+00:00

bowledover

Roar Rookie


Agree with Maddinson, but also Patterson, should both be looked at for starters.

AUTHOR

2020-08-18T03:47:50+00:00

Paul

Roar Guru


Who are they though? A decade ago there were at least 2 or 3 guys in most States who were having good to very good Shield seasons year after year, but I'm hard pressed to come up with one name across the competition who's done that in recent times. Maybe Nic Maddinson? Cameron Green when he wasn't injured was not too bad?

2020-08-18T03:05:29+00:00

Insult_2_Injury

Roar Rookie


You're confused? That makes 2 of us!

2020-08-18T02:04:56+00:00

John

Guest


I agree with all of the above re Copeland. His SS stats speak for themselves!

2020-08-18T01:01:45+00:00

Rowdy

Roar Rookie


Well my thoughts on bowlers, wickys and all-rounders being captain is well known. Marnus could be a possibility and Head has to screw and sikaflex his position. ----- Paine was our best choice all things considered. I just find him tactically dull.

2020-08-18T00:27:36+00:00

bowledover

Roar Rookie


Paine is setting a standard from a cultural point. I think he is a decent leader of men – not the best – but a quality leader. Tactically he could be sharper, but the reality is, he isnt going to be around for a whole lot longer. That said, I dont think i’d be rushing him out of the door. Head might be someone to look at; and I bet they are also looking at others, like Carey – his ‘leadership’ skills get spruiked a bit (the whole AFL thing gets raised a bit) and maybe even Marnus. I dont see Cummins being an amazing captain – not because he couldnt do it, maybe he could, but I dont think he has any demonstrated leadership under his belt and already carries a heavy workload as the premier strike bowler.

2020-08-18T00:09:51+00:00

Rowdy

Roar Rookie


Well l wasn’t a fan of Smith. So l agree with you there. —– I reckon fielding and bowling are the captain’s most important aspects. Followed by being a good leader. Clarke was good tactically but not a leader of men. Border the opposite. Both are not in the category of Benaud, Chappelli, Taylor or Waugh. Smith was neither.

AUTHOR

2020-08-17T23:47:34+00:00

Paul

Roar Guru


Sorry, I'm confused. Wade is the incumbent, which IMO is the only reason why he's in the team. As I said elsewhere, he had a very ordinary Ashes, an even worse summer at home and averages less than the guy batting at 7, who people criticise for not making enough big scores! It highlights to me just how few inform batting options we have across the order at present, when a guy averaging just over 30 is our number 5 or 6 batsman. If I was a selector with a casting vote, Puckoski, Patterson or Finch would be in the team, but Finch would get the nod if we needed captaincy skills. I've got a lot of time for Head and think the Ashes then the Black Caps tour in particular might have been something of a turning point. I said in the article he should form the backbone of the batting lineup, along with Labuschgne, Smith & Puckovski for the next decade. I'm really hoping he nails it this Test summer, to kill off the naysayers once and for all. Then he can start to consider the captaincy role.

2020-08-17T23:22:07+00:00

Rellum

Roar Guru


Being a poor leader of men lead the team down a path of little success and probably the worst cheating scandal in our history. Afterwards we have had more success with a Captain and a Coach who are good leaders of men. The tactical side of it is not as important.

2020-08-17T23:15:43+00:00

Insult_2_Injury

Roar Rookie


You picked Wade, Paul. If you don't think he should be there then pick Finch as Paine's successor. Surely he should be in the side if he's the best captaincy option. Especially as you think Head's last 12 months doesn't warrant a regular spot. Personally I think the selectors have made a dogs breakfast of the V-C position and can only think it was a temporary measure 'til Smith was eligible again. I'd have appointed Head as sole V-C with a view to be being Captain and if he had a lean trot, so be it. I just don't see why Wade should be dropped for another players injury. If he isn't in the best XI then drop him, but I don't believe his spot was the problem.

2020-08-17T23:07:19+00:00

Rowdy

Roar Rookie


I was using the abstract of Bill Hayden and Bob Hawke. TBC, none of those three were as good as the Drover's Dog.

2020-08-17T23:05:13+00:00

Rowdy

Roar Rookie


I’m not sure what your point is. We haven’t had a captain that’s ticked the main boxes since Steve Waugh. Michael Clarke was good tactically but a poor leader of men.

2020-08-17T22:58:24+00:00

Rellum

Roar Guru


The events leading up to and during Cape Town and all the cricket afterwords should show you that is not the case.

AUTHOR

2020-08-17T22:40:22+00:00

Paul

Roar Guru


Steve Smith couldn't. Graeme Yallop, Kim Hughes.......

2020-08-17T22:37:07+00:00

Rowdy

Roar Rookie


The Drover's Dog could do what does. And former captains being overly polite

AUTHOR

2020-08-17T22:29:17+00:00

Paul

Roar Guru


His overall record suggests he's not too bad though. He also got the nod of approval from most of the Test captains I listened to over the past 12 months, including the Poms and they're a hard lot to please. I guess this summer will be his litmus test as skipper. If I'm right, your days of yelling at the TV should be over. :happy:

AUTHOR

2020-08-17T22:24:33+00:00

Paul

Roar Guru


All good players Brett, but I wonder if they're Test quality? Neser is if the conditions suit him and Maddinson could be an option for sure ( I went with Khawaja because I've got a soft spot for left handed openers). If we were playing the West Indies, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh, in other words, sides further down the ICC pecking order, I think these guys could be worth a look, but against India? Hmmmm

2020-08-17T22:21:21+00:00

Rowdy

Roar Rookie


I’m not picking an outlier. His wan marshalling of the bowlers and his muffled sorting of fields drives me Joh-bonkers Bananas. He lacks killer —- I was yelling at the TV about 3-4 times per fielding stint. —- Yes he’s the Bonhommie Champion and all that. But captains take wickets without bowling a ball. Fielding is the most important thing a captain does. Bar none.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar