What is a Springbok flyhalf?

By Pundit / Roar Guru

Put the Springbok flyhalves during golden ages of South African rugby in retrospective. Take Joel Stransky who kicked the 1995 World Cup-winning goal.

How about the tough goal-kicking, sometimes controversial Butch James? How about Morne Steyn who was the figure of solidity before the emergence of Pat Lambie and Handre Pollard?

Finally, consider Handre Pollard who kicked South Africa to wins over Wales and England to clinch the World Cup in 2019.

In all these periods of Bok success, what was in common between the flyhalves of different eras?

All of them had brilliant tactical kicking, and excellent goal-kicking. All had the ability to slot into the pocket and drop goals out from afar.

Take Stransky’s iconic drop goal in 1995 to win the World Cup for an example. How about Pollard’s drop goal in the 2015 World Cup quarter-final that got a three-point edger that contributed to securing a semi-final spot with the All Blacks as they got pass Wales in a thriller?

Fast-forward four years and Pollard drops a long-range goal against the All Blacks in the pool stages.

These Bok 10s were solid rocks in defence. Butch James has been one big tackler. Morne Steyn epitomises it. Handre Pollard made multiple tackles on bigger players in the World Cup Final, and his power was crucial to generating slow first phase ball for the English.

Also, Pollard’s potential was claimed to be that he was the best defensive 10 by Heyneke Meyer when he was merely 21.

Also, all of them served as dependable links in play. The Springboks had flashier players out wide, with the likes of the legendary Jean De Villiers, and the dazzling playmaker Wille Le Roux. The combination of speed and skills in their outside backs have served them well.

When you have high levels of unnerving dare out wide, you need a cool, collected, and temperamental head at 10; a smooth operator, to bridge the play with passes. Making the right decisions, is always better than making decisions to feature in the highlights package.

Springboks flyhalf Handre Pollard. (Photo by Mark Tantrum/Getty Images)

As their main role is to effectively bridge the play, they have excellent precision in passing, and their versatile skillsets allowed them to get the ball wide fast. Handre Pollard did this extremely well against Japan, Wales, and England in the World Cup, looking for space with long passes, often deadly flat to create opportunities and cause the defenders to scramble.

They serve as generals on the pitch, directing the plays around the park with passing and kicking.

This does not mean that the successful Bok 10s are uncreative.

All have their own unique edges, which respectively make them world-class flyhalves.

Morne Steyn has a brilliant running game, and he has well perfected a dummy-running tactic with chip-and-chase skills.

Handre Pollard incorporates both his running threat and his deadly passing into his game, which is an extremely creative blend of his capabilities.

Pollard, when he combines his passing and running, he becomes a dual-threat flyhalf, whose physicality and pace pose a threat to any team, while he can bring the ball right up to the gain line and passing right before he gets tackled.

The passing is often flat, allowing the ball to go wide and a good strike on the defence. His array of missiles in passing is scintillating and deadly.

A prototypical Bok 10 for success is a strong goal-kicking, defending player. Someone who possesses an solid overall passing and kicking game that allows him to effectively marshal his side and direct play. He needs a cool head to smoothly bridge play.

More than that, he needs his own unique edge that he can add to the game, to be a strong player and a playmaker.

The Boks lack a new man at 10, and Handre Pollard’s ACL injury has exposed a long-time Achilles Heel often covered up by his brilliance.

If the Boks are to grow a new man at 10, they need working on the quintessential of a Bok flyhalf for success. It is not the unique edge.

It is the much-required skills of a good Springbok flyhalf; solid in these areas-distribution, goal-kicking, temperament, rugby IQ, tactical passing and kicking, and a solid rock in defence.

Curwin Bosch might not quite be the Springbok 10, because he is a defensive turnstile. He has that unique edge, but other than that he does not possess any of the other traits of a Springbok flyhalf.

(Shaun Botterill/Getty Images)

To be a good Springbok flyhalf you need to play winning rugby, not entertaining rugby. This was proved in 2017, when, under Allister Coetzee, the Boks were a joy to watch in attack, but realistically their lack of a set-shape caused their sharp decline.

Coetzee had focused on playing entertaining rugby and Janjities, through this game-plan, created some wonderful plays, but also experienced pure shambolism in the disorganisation.

What I think is that most of the current Bok 10 contenders, have great flair, in their unique edges the 20 per cent. However, for any of them to become a true Springbok 10, they need to couple that with the quintessential of a Bok flyhalf.

The 80 per cent should come before the 20 per cent, and the Boks should choose a 10 primarily based on how he fulfils the quintessential, and then if that is fulfilled then look at the 20 per cent.

Guys like Bosch are not goners. They are very good players, but some problems need to be fixed before throwing them out onto the international stage. As a Springbok fan, I think that throwing these young stars out premature will damage their confidence in failure and their talent may be lost.

Springboks need a prototypical true Bok 10 for excellence. Nationality alone does not fulfil that. When the Boks excel, they have a true Springbok flyhalf on the pitch.

The South African flyhalves possibly can improve, considering Pollard’s exponential regain of form over 2018 and 2019. Could they groom another Stransky, another Butch James, another Steyn, or another Pollard?

The Crowd Says:

AUTHOR

2020-11-27T14:05:12+00:00

Pundit

Roar Guru


https://media.giphy.com/media/SpN4kWrSPbu0MatX1o/giphy.gif

AUTHOR

2020-11-17T01:11:32+00:00

Pundit

Roar Guru


'you will struggle to find a more adept and physical defender than England’s Owen Farrell at the position. He is one of the few fly-halves who can stay reasonably high in the tackle and live with the physicality that opposition ball-carriers will attempt to exert on him. As long as he wraps his arms, he’s the standard bearer at the position defensively.'-RugbyPass article in April sbout having a perfect flyhalf. Farrell defends better than Pollard and Biggar and Pollard physically bullies him in the world cup final

AUTHOR

2020-11-17T00:32:14+00:00

Pundit

Roar Guru


haha and rugbypass rates farrell as the best defensive 10. haha for me it is biggar/pollard/mo'unga. Farrell just sticks his shoulder out :silly: :laughing:

AUTHOR

2020-11-11T14:47:02+00:00

Pundit

Roar Guru


hey harry, i am reconsidering willemse after stormers v griquas.

AUTHOR

2020-11-11T14:29:40+00:00

Pundit

Roar Guru


willemse was great against the griquas. considering a piece on that

AUTHOR

2020-10-17T08:58:21+00:00

Pundit

Roar Guru


Morne is a solid tackler and good distributor. He used to pose a running threat but i think he has gotten old.

2020-10-15T07:35:23+00:00

Charging Rhino

Roar Guru


Hi mate, I had completely forgotten about 2016, I just remember 2010 to circa 2015. Morne seems like such a nice guy, so it annoys me to criticise his play, but I’ve never really rated him as a fly half for the Boks, including his kicking game in general play, but he is an excellent goal kicker. Butch James’s general kicking was far superior than Morne’s, as was Honibal’s and Pollard’s. The Boks play far better when they have a 10 who can attack the gain line himself, and keep the opposition guessing through a variety of strategies and plays including: passing to a player running into a hole (ala Quade Cooper.... or Honibal), or identifying when to swing it wide, probing kicks such as chips, territory, grubbers, long, and bombs (Morne kicked great bombs), and running himself. Pollard does all of this as did Honibal, and to an extent Stransky. In 2009 Ruan Pienaar started the Tests against BIL that we won, and the 1st NZ test that we won, with Morne coming off the bench. Ruan really set the backline alight doing all the hard work for those vital wins. 2013 was probably Morne’s best year, but you still got the feeling that the backline needed more good attacking ball. Anyway, my opinion, I think if we can model our flyhalves our Honibal we’d be well placed, a Johnny Wilkinson type who can attack, kick well in general play, has great game awareness and who is a fearsome defender.

AUTHOR

2020-10-14T12:14:53+00:00

Pundit

Roar Guru


he can kick well still-honestly why people criticise his kick-based playstyle is because of that terrible stinker against New ZEALAND IN 2016

2020-10-13T11:00:13+00:00

Harry Jones

Expert


Pollard fits well within a tradition of Honibal and James; not a 10 that has to be hidden in the defensive scheme. SA plays best when our flyhalf is a bastard.

2020-10-13T09:40:46+00:00

Charging Rhino

Roar Guru


Henry Honibal was far and wide the best flyhalf that SA has had in the professional era. I don’t how old you are, but the 97-98 season was just magic where the Boks put record scores up against a few teams. 96 on Wales and 52 on France off the top of my head. Joost and Lem were an outstanding partnership. IMO all SA 10’s should be modelled on Honibal, and the most similar since then were Butch and now Pollard. Pollard is excellent, and very underrated by some pundits. If he continues and builds a successful partnership with Faf, they will be in the mix for arguments of the best. Whatever the Boks do, they have to stay away from the Morne Steyn mould as player, as much as Morne appears to be a lovely gent and I appreciate his kick against the BIL in 2009.

2020-10-12T14:25:06+00:00

Busted Fullback

Roar Rookie


True, but I'd rather have a hard nut for a flyhalf than someone who has to have help, or worse, has to be hidden in the defensive structure. (Hated them as a fullback when I was playing, attack with a whole team but defend already outnumbered.) Even though not a flyhalf, I'd like to mention Michael Classens, at Bath a little longer than James, and another who was very underappreciated, except by the Bath fans. Found a home there.

AUTHOR

2020-10-12T12:43:47+00:00

Pundit

Roar Guru


hey both are thuggish and controversial. Difference is, when Butch James tackles properly he actually makes good tackles, when Farrell does he can get bumped off.

2020-10-12T11:54:30+00:00

The Ferret

Roar Rookie


I heard the stories too... but I think his reputation for taking a head or two off and shoulder charges will be what he is remembered for.

AUTHOR

2020-10-12T10:41:37+00:00

Pundit

Roar Guru


shoulder irritated rassie into sarcasm

2020-10-12T10:38:31+00:00

FunBus

Roar Rookie


Except, of course, he's not the 'dirtiest player in the game.' He's a player whose face irritates Aussies and Kiwis, which really isn't the same thing no matter how hard you wish it.

AUTHOR

2020-10-12T10:36:07+00:00

Pundit

Roar Guru


mate i think it was a collision

2020-10-12T10:25:38+00:00

CPM

Roar Rookie


Ah yes it was a broken eye socket. I will watch again in any case and also see who landed the punch to Pollard. My money is on the dirtiest player in the game.. Farrell.

AUTHOR

2020-10-12T10:10:18+00:00

Pundit

Roar Guru


All three were. Him, wille, and Faf. Also, his jaw wasnt broken, and faf never turned. I think it was his natura,l lingo of communication. His eye-socket was broken, not his jaw.

2020-10-12T10:04:57+00:00

CPM

Roar Rookie


I think that Pollard had resort to sign-language since his jaw was broken but did Faf read the signs correctly. I will have to watch the match again to see who was calling the shots,

AUTHOR

2020-10-12T09:22:16+00:00

Pundit

Roar Guru


He and Wille are wide but not wide out . He and Wille are constantly pointing to the rucks and constantly calling, and Faf runs strike phases.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar