Eight early takes from the Sheffield Shield

By Paul / Roar Guru

The Sheffield Shield is back – here’s what I’ve observed so far.

1.Isn’t it great to have some first class cricket to watch?
Cricket Australia’s coverage of the Shield cricket is such a welcome way to start the new cricket season.

For those of us not lucky enough to be able to go out and watch the games being played in Adelaide, this is almost the next best thing.

I say “almost”, because it would be great if they’d invest in a camera at either end. I’m not complaining because I’m just happy to watch some four-day cricket, but this coverage takes me back to the days when the ABC covered the game and Norman May was the voice of the sport on TV.

At least this coverage is in colour, not black and white!

2. Test hopefuls need to make the most of their chances
Joe Burns can be excused for getting out to an absolute beauty from Peter Siddle. That will happen early in an innings against the new ball, but I’m not sure what Usman Khawaja was thinking when he played completely across the line, nine balls into his knock?

It’s only the first innings of a new season, but there will not be a lot of chances for guys like Khawaja to shine, before the side for the First Test is announced. He and others vying for selection must make every post a winner if they’re to be any chance of getting into the Australian side.

I was saying Boo-urns: Joe Burns. (Photo by Ryan Pierse/Getty Images)

3. Matt Renshaw looked the goods
If Matty Renshaw’s first Shield innings is any indication, he’s used his off-season down-time well.

One commentator said he “looked a million bucks” and he certainly seemed very comfortable and totally in control. He played well within himself and left the ball well, which had been one of several issues he had last season.

Batting down the order might be the best option for him. Now he needs to string together a series of big scores to prove that’s the case and to put pressure on Matt Wade and Travis Head to match his efforts.

Special mention too for Cameron Bancroft. Great to see him back at the top of the order for WA. Hopefully he’s got his head together and can make some big scores.

4. Can we help the umpires please?
I’ve banged on about this over the past 12 months, but Cricket Australia could do worse things than use DRS reviews for Shield cricket. Two example highlight why this is important.

Both Usman Khawaja and Matt Renshaw are trying to get back into the Test side. Both were given out to tight decisions, one LBW to a right hander coming around the wicket (Khawaja) and the other run out at the bowlers end attempting a quick single, with the umpire scrambling to get into position.

I’m not suggesting either decision was wrong, but we’re talking about guys’ futures in the game here. These are players desperate to break back into Test cricket and if their innings was cut short as a result of a wrong decision, that can hurt their chances immensely.

Of course some might suggest they shouldn’t have played the shot or attempted the single, but that’s beside the point.

Shield games should be seen as a springboard to Test level. Bowlers gain nothing by picking up wickets with deliveries that will either miss the stumps or miss the edge of the bat and batsmen will obviously have little chance to impress, if they’re sitting in the sheds thanks to a bad decision.

5. Marnus Labuschagne looked very good in making 167
Granted he rode his luck early, but for a first innings of the new Shield season, he looked mighty good.

So did Josh Inglis. Tim Paine has the Test keeping spot locked up for at least the next two Aussie summers, but there’s been an assumption Alex Carey will take over the gloves when Paine retires from Test cricket.

Inglis maiden Test century is a nice reminder that there are other talented keepers out there. Now all he has to do is keep well and make runs.

(Ryan Pierse/Getty Images)

6. Lloyd Pope has a long way to go
It’s a great achievement to take the first five wickets in any match, but for a leggie to do it in the first Shield game, on a pitch offering little to anyone, is a real achievement. But….

His wickets cost him 164 runs which is way too expensive for a first class spinner (6.07 runs per over). He can bowl unplayable deliveries, like the ball that dismissed Cam Bancroft, but there are way too many long hops or full tosses.

In fairness, Pope’s only 20 years old, so there’s plenty of hope he can and will improve his control over the next few seasons. We badly need another quality spinner who can develop into a replacement for Nathan Lyon.

7. Shield pitches need to become more sporting
At the time of writing, over 650 runs had been scored in the game between Western Australia and SA for the loss of only six wickets, while the pitch used in the Queensland/Tasmania game, looked like it was offering little to the bowlers.

It’s only the first game of the season and curators would be wanting to make sure they prepared surfaces that lasted the full four days, so there are excuses.

Hopefully as the season progresses, we’ll see more pitches that offer something to both the quicks and the spinners, which in turn will present genuine challenges to batsmen to score runs when the ball is moving around.

8. What’s Peter Siddle thinking with that haircut?
I’m guessing Joe Burns might have been wondering the same thing, when Siddle got him with a great ball.

Perhaps the move to Tassie colours made him think he had to do something special for his new teammate s, or maybe he changed the colour to win a bet.

Whatever the reason, he certainly stands out when he takes off the hat to bowl.

The Crowd Says:

2020-10-27T03:23:50+00:00

DingoGray

Roar Guru


I think considering Sam Heazlett can't get a run in our Best Team at the moment, even though he's absolutely dominating Queensland Grade Cricket, Leaves QLD in a pretty good spot. To be honest, there is every chance currently on form we will only be missing Marnus.....

2020-10-15T06:02:15+00:00

Joshua Kerr

Roar Guru


Michael Gough has been talking about how important it is to train your ears as an umpire and I think that's what might need to be focused on here. Can you hear that edge? LBWs are a different kettle of fish - is it pitching outside leg? How far up the pad has it hit the batsman? That's why we have umpire's call on the DRS. As long as the umps don't get the pitching in-line, impact in-line, wickets hitting decisions wrong, you can get away with an incorrect LBW call every now and again - that's where you're if in doubt, not out comes in. At the end of the day, the umpires are human, they might get things wrong - anything in the 90s percent is good but, of course, the higher the better. So, yes, I'm in complete agreement with you Paul - some sort of independent panel who rates the umpires could be something to look into. Back when I was on Twitter, I read far too many rants from someone who umpires club games that he can do better than the international guys (I'm paraphrasing, he probably wasn't being that arrogant :laughing: ). I took it all with a pinch of salt but he wasn't completely wrong - if a guy who doesn't umpire full-time has a better correct decisions percentage than the full-time umpires, something may not be right. I don't follow the NRL so I'll have to take your word on it for how they rate their refs. Is anything going to change though? Probably not... (P.S. Bumble started to argue with the DRS technology whilst Nasser spent ages erring whether it was out or not! :laughing: It may be on YouTube somewhere)

2020-10-15T01:46:54+00:00

DJM

Roar Rookie


A bit late making a comeback to this discussion but.... one of the players who has done this was Doug Walters. What I find extraordinary about this is that in a first class career of 258 games, Dougie got his highest score and best bowling figures in the first innings of the same match.

AUTHOR

2020-10-14T22:33:39+00:00

Paul

Roar Guru


I'd have loved to have seen Hussein and Bumbles umpiring! In the NRL, referees have each match assessed to see how they went with their decision making. I'm not sure the same thing happens at any level of cricket? Yes, captains put in umpire reports, but they're hardly in the best position to decide whether the umpires have done a good or a bad job. I've no issue with umpires erring on the side of caution for close decisions, Joshua, so if they get an lbw decision "wrong", because later replays show the ball would have hit part of a stump or a bail, then IMO they've actually done their job because they probably weren't sure. In one Shield game already, I've seen the same batsman given not out to catches behind the wicket that looked very out. I'm guessing maybe one bad decision per innings, which IMO is way too high at this level. Again, I'm not talking about the really close decisions, but ones where blind Freddy could see the batsman was not out - or out, as the case may be. If I'm right, a 10% bad decision ratio tells me that umpire isn't up to snuff. Joel Wilson would be well over that number on the ICC panel! If players are getting better, the higher up the cricket chain they go, but umpiring standards are not, surely we have to do something? Maybe Bumbles might want a second career!

2020-10-14T21:38:01+00:00

qwetzen

Roar Rookie


Ashley, I'm struggling to think of a top-class Oz quick of the last 50 years who hasn't been "injury-prone". Otto, McGrath is the only contender.

2020-10-14T13:10:17+00:00

Joshua Kerr

Roar Guru


Sky tested the knowledge of Bumble and Nasser, asking them to umpire some LBW decisions at Lord's. They replayed it during a rain delay this summer. I think something like that would work - getting a batsman in and having them let the ball hit them on the pads. Or even just having umpires watching videos - I suppose it would be difficult to get a few players to stage caught behinds - and get them to give their decision that way like a test of some kind. I must admit that I haven't watched any of the Shield action and have just passively taken in info about it - these rubbish decisions you mention, how frequent would you say there are? Because there's a certain tolerance for the amount of incorrect decisions. After all, the umps are human, they will make mistakes. Either way, I'm not sure if the umpires do have regular testing - I suppose they don't need it with plenty of 'match practice' - but it wouldn't hurt to sharpen up the skills somehow every once in a while if standards are slipping a little.

AUTHOR

2020-10-14T11:54:48+00:00

Paul

Roar Guru


That could be an option if they have good teachers, but who'd fit that bill? I wonder what Simon Taufel's doing? Shame Dickie's in his 80's. He'd be great

2020-10-14T09:58:04+00:00

Tom


Weatherald does this every season. Tons up, then goes missing for 3 or 4 matches and makes a series of sub 20 scores. There's a reason someone like Dan Hughes has a similar amount of 100's and 50's in a similar amount of matches yet averages almost 8 runs more. He's far too inconsistent at this stage.

2020-10-14T09:34:45+00:00


Average of 41 at First Class level doesnt scream "terrific player" or "a very good batsman" after 20 years in professional cricket. He's terrible, just call it as it is.

2020-10-14T08:54:26+00:00


Smith and Warner $2.4m for their 6 week IPL stint would argue against the "hit and giggle" sentiment, especially as they are literally playing against the same Indians who they will be facing in 6 weeks time. So they're getting more a head start than the current shield cricketers.

2020-10-14T08:49:02+00:00


Why would you be against side on cameras for Shield matches? Your line of thought lacks any merit whatsoever....

2020-10-14T07:51:26+00:00

Joshua Kerr

Roar Guru


"If there’s a way to improve the standard of umpiring to reduce these really bad decisions without using technology, I’m all for that." Send them back to school!

2020-10-14T07:50:13+00:00

Joshua Kerr

Roar Guru


Imagine an alternate world where Cricket Australia isn't blinded by money...

2020-10-14T07:46:53+00:00

Joshua Kerr

Roar Guru


How else are you going to get the ball rolling? Like your own comment and watch the peer pressure start to take hold :laughing:

2020-10-14T03:45:13+00:00

Don Freo

Roar Rookie


He's not doing anything of note. That's why he's far behind.

AUTHOR

2020-10-14T01:44:19+00:00

Paul

Roar Guru


Both Green & Puckovski are coming back from injury, while Renshaw's coming back into form. At wort, there even par. How can a bloke who's played Test cricket be so far behind either of them? If anything, they're miles behind Renshaw.

2020-10-14T01:32:00+00:00

Tom


Thats an absolutely ridiculous comment, Shaun Marsh has always been a very good batsmen at domestic level regardless of conditions.

2020-10-13T23:28:27+00:00

dungerBob

Roar Rookie


Yep, that seems to be the current thinking. Makes sense. Let's hope it works Micko. Don't know about you but I'm sick of seeing our up and coming fast bowlers on the injury list.

2020-10-13T23:28:02+00:00

Don Freo

Roar Rookie


Agar is definitely ready. He has missed recent Shield seasons with finger and shoulder injuries and Oz white ball cricket. If you take a line through his white ball economy and strike rate and link it to his last full Shield season (when he took more wickets than SOK and Fawad), he is well and truly there. I'm not at all confident that the low arm bowling of Herath would help the very different high delivery of Agar.

2020-10-13T23:09:58+00:00

AREH

Roar Guru


The stream does a terrific job it seems! Imagine an alternate world where Channel 10 have complete access and matches (yes, even Shield ones) are televised free to all.....

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar