Missing from the Richmond dynasty? A legitimate rival

By Cameron Rose / Expert

Richmond has done what was seen as impossible by any right-minded person only four years ago and claimed their third premiership in that time. The dynasty is now sealed, but perhaps not complete.

If there has been one thing missing during this premiership era for the Tigers, it is something not of their own doing, and that is a legitimate rival or challenger.

When we think of any great era, there is normally one or more great rivalries to accompany it.

Hawthorn of the 1980s had first Essendon and then Carlton. They met the Bombers in five finals across 1983-85, including three brutal grand finals, splitting eyebrows, results and flags. The Blues had a 3-1 advantage in four finals against them across 1986-87, but they ended with one premiership apiece, defeating the other on the biggest stage.

While the Hawks lost these numeric battles, they won the war of longevity over both.

The ’90s didn’t give us any dynasties, splitting ten premierships over seven clubs.

In the 2000s, Brisbane had ‘if it bleeds you can kill it’ against the might of Essendon, and found a rival against a combative Collingwood in two grand finals and a qualifying final in 02-03 with a couple of closely fought contests.

Geelong of 2007-11, although as dominant a team as we have seen this century, did have a few worthy rivals. Their greatest opponent was Hawthorn over many years of memorable battles, the famous Kennett Curse going down in footy folklore.

Jeff Kennett (Quinn Rooney/Getty Images)

St Kilda and then Collingwood rose up to take on the Cats in a mini-era where the top two teams in any given season were light years ahead of their opponents. Geelong took them all on, and largely beat them, creating many storylines that live in the memory.

Hawthorn of the mid-2010s had Sydney as their main rival, both finishing in the top four for five years in a row, beating each other in one grand final apiece – the Swans claiming 2012 and the Hawks reversing that result in 2014. Of course, extra spice was added with Lance Franklin defecting from one to the other.

But when we look back on Tiger time of 2017 and beyond for a fierce rival, what will history recall?

Richmond has faced off against eight different clubs in four finals series leading to three flags.

While they have seen off Geelong in three finals, needing to come from behind in two of them, the Cats were never able to keep up the fight for four quarters and the average winning margin for the Tigers has been an ultimately comfortable 34 points.

Brisbane and Greater Western Sydney have played them twice. The Lions have a 1-1 record in finals, but have gone 0-2 in their other finals and not even made a grand final. The Giants lost by 36 and then 89 points.

Collingwood, inspired by Mason Cox, did get the better of Richmond in the 2018 preliminary final, but have never been good enough to face them at the pointy end of the season again, a couple of unfulfilled years following that performance.

The team that should have been Richmond’s fiercest rival, the most capable and fitting, is one the Tigers have not played in a final across 2017-20, despite this team making finals in all four of those years.

West Coast are that missing team, one that hasn’t fulfilled their promise.

After finishing eighth in 2017 and winning an after-the-siren elimination final against Port, the Eagles were set for a premiership assault in 2018.

A flying start to the season for both clubs saw them take a 7-1 record into their Round 9 clash in Perth, a hotly anticipated game. West Coast dazzled and completely dismantled Richmond’s pressure game with their precise and penetrating kicking, almost doubling the Tigers’ marks as they controlled proceedings.

With Richmond not holding up their end of the bargain to force a re-match in the 2018 grand final, the Eagles won their flag, and the scene was set.

Lewis Jetta of the Eagles celebrates victory on the siren during the 2018 AFL grand final (Photo by Ryan Pierse/AFL Media/Getty Images)

Entering 2019, they had one flag each from the previous two seasons and were set up as worthy challengers.

The two best key defenders in the game in Alex Rance and Jeremy McGovern. The best dual key forwards with Tom Lynch and Jack Riewoldt, as well as Josh Kennedy and Jack Darling. Rebounding defenders and dangerous small forwards. Midfields of depth and quality.

But also, and the great rivals need this, contrasts. West Coast with their kick-and-mark game, Richmond with the swarm and pressure. Eagles with a star ruckman and the best tap-artist of a generation, while the Tigers opted for workhorses and place little premium on clearances.

Further whetting the appetite was the fact that they weren’t scheduled to meet until Round 22 in 2019, 15 months between meetings, and the lead-up was intense. Both were in the top four. Richmond had won seven in a row. West Coast had won seven of their last eight. Most suspected they were the best two teams in it.

The match was one of those rare occasions that exceeded expectations, delivering a home-and-away epic, declared the best game of the season by any that saw it.

It started in brilliant sunshine and finished in pouring rain. Half the game played in pristine conditions, suiting the Eagles as they burst out of the blocks to build a substantial lead; half the game played in inclement weather, suiting the Tigers as they clawed their way back.

Lynch, Kennedy and Riewoldt traded goals in the finals stanza, with Richmond finishing six-point victors and keeping their top-four hopes alive. The term ‘grand final preview’ was thrown around freely.

History records that this game took more out of West Coast than it did their opponents, the Eagles somehow losing to Hawthorn at home to close out the season and fall from third to fifth. They couldn’t even get past the second week of finals – at halftime of that Richmond game they looked every chance to finish on top of the ladder.

West Coast and Richmond were both slow out of the blocks in 2019 and picked up momentum through the middle part of the season. The Eagles were in the four after Round 13, with a game in hand on all of their fellow top-eight rivals, yet once again failed to close the deal.

Ironically, it was the Tigers who derailed them in Round 14, again a loss from which West Coast never recovered. For the third time in five seasons, they missed the top four on percentage only and this time suffered an elimination final loss.

Sports opinion delivered daily 

   

It’s remarkable to think that the Eagles went backwards with the addition of Tim Kelly, while the team that lost him went forwards.

Whichever way you look at it, one top-four finish from 2016-2020 is an underwhelming result for West Coast. A bit more resilience here, a bit more steel there and they could have built on their 2018 flag with one of the great rivalries of the age, and potentially added another trophy to their cabinet.

There’s still time.

Until then, Richmond stands ahead of all others, waiting for a challenger that can test them – over four quarters of a game, over the course of a full season, and in the heat of finals.

The Crowd Says:

2021-03-22T05:55:38+00:00

2dogz

Roar Rookie


Greatest comment ever

2021-03-19T19:23:48+00:00

Ukraine Tiger

Roar Rookie


Sad

2021-03-19T19:19:21+00:00

Ukraine Tiger

Roar Rookie


The Tigers don't need a "legitimate challenger", they are going quite well against all comers. I suspect that had they not had that down night against the Magpies they would now be eyeing off a 5th straight title. To consider the Eagles as even remotely close as a legitimate "rival" as you call them is ridiculous. They are good, no doubt, but Geelong have proven themselves better, as have GWS and Port proven themselves as good. One top four finish in 5 years does not constitute a great team let alone a rival.

2020-11-17T21:09:36+00:00

Waddster

Roar Rookie


Richmond dominate because their mental game is so much stronger. Its a team game, sure great players help, but unless the team puts the stars in position to create opportunities then you fail.

2020-11-17T21:04:32+00:00

Waddster

Roar Rookie


One final at Geelong in over 100 years, they lost it. If their fans had bought more tickets, they wouldn't have had to worry about the noise.

2020-11-14T00:51:58+00:00

Greg

Guest


Dusty is a phenomona. Hes worth the Pies 3 discarded players and Grundy thrown in !! If wasnt for 2018 Tigers glitch would be going for 5 in a row in 2021. But n4 is imminent

2020-10-31T10:21:18+00:00

Micko

Roar Rookie


And with (presumably) large amounts of away fans from games against Melbourne sides it would be an attractive proposition to have a Geelong stadium at around 60,000 capacity. I guess it would be hard to sell that to politicians to justify that spend for what, probably half a dozen games a year though?

2020-10-31T10:14:41+00:00

sven

Roar Rookie


yeah think its a few years off, dont know if its feasible but for a team thats as successful as they are would be nice if they got it up to 60k, pretty sure they would have no probs filling it esp against the better teams, that would give them serious ammo in their battle for home finals

2020-10-31T10:11:44+00:00

sven

Roar Rookie


no i dont discount it, my opinion is the best teams find a way, def cant agree cats were superior as a team (ladder position notwithstanding), the cats arent that bad at the mcg (sure they prob prefer scat park), but they were beaten pretty convincingly in the end by the tiges, the cats had no probs with the 'g' when belting the swannies the next wek, but adelaide then hammering them prob told the tale of where they were at..... mate i cant be bothered debating the rights or wrongs of the afl's various machinations including denying cats home finals, in the end its just a heap of electrons burnt in vain with no happy ending

2020-10-31T10:05:35+00:00

Micko

Roar Rookie


I think they're still in the process of upgrading Geelong's stadium aren't they? It's going to be over 40,000 capacity eventually, and hopefully they'll let Geelong play all their home finals there.

2020-10-31T10:00:46+00:00

Micko

Roar Rookie


Absolutely sven. The point I make is they should receive that home advantage come finals time otherwise what is the point of superior ladder position?!! You don't discount Richmond's 2017 success due to their unfair advantage in getting to play the superior team Geelong in a final at their home ground do you?

2020-10-31T09:55:32+00:00

sven

Roar Rookie


i was lucky enough as a young fellah to go to a lot of the old suburban grounds, but guess we just have to accept with the growing professionalism of the comp they werent quite up to scratch, & would cost an absolute mozza to get to the standard the event goers expect these days. back to our earlier discussion its a shame scat park wasnt upgraded to accomodate more people when they did all that work 10 odd years ago, been there once to watch my daughter play in the womens footy, beautiful ground

2020-10-31T09:50:36+00:00

sven

Roar Rookie


look obviously im not making myself very clear, but maybe rather than telling me im saying things like geelong should build a ground bigger than the 'g' or force cats to play fulltime in melb, maybe cut n paste it from my posts cause im pretty sure i never said that... regardless im not looking for an argument, thought we were having a footy convo .... im trying to respond to your question why the cats had failed to make the granny since '11, & offered the opinion that perhaps their strong record at scat park helps them finish fairly high after the h/a season, the fact that they dont then get to play finals at scat park then takes away that home ground advantage, could be part of the reason they havent done that well come finals (right or wrong, fair or not, its not what i was discussing). that said, dont think they have been quite the same calibre as those great teams from '07 - '11

2020-10-31T09:39:59+00:00

Micko

Roar Rookie


And I would love Melbourne suburban grounds to feature still. But who pays for their upgrade?

2020-10-31T09:30:59+00:00

Micko

Roar Rookie


Mate seriously read what you write. Moving sides from old suburban grounds in Melbourne (which would need massive investment to bring them up to standard in the 21st century) to play at two central Melbourne stadiums with transport links, one owned by the AFL, the other by the MCC (with huge Victorian government investment too I believe?), makes complete sense. How doesn't it make sense to do that? but then you argue forcing Geelong to play in Melbourne fulltime makes sense????

2020-10-31T09:15:50+00:00

sven

Roar Rookie


mate u keep putting words in my mouth, i never said anything about building scat park bigger than the 'g', never said stop cats playing at geelong, just pointed a few things out which seemed to lead u to make some leaps of logic ..... there is no fairness & little logic re these points u bring up, as i said, its been debated to death... all i said is some sides finish higher due to softer draws & more pronounced home ground advantages, but get exposed come finals as maybe not as strong as their ladder position at h/a seasons end mightve suggested

2020-10-31T09:02:07+00:00

Micko

Roar Rookie


Because presumably it’s easier and cheaper to have all Melbourne teams at two centrally located stadiums that are privately run and maintained, and with good public transport links. Why is it logical to shut Geelong out of playing in Geelong and forcing them to play in Melbourne fulltime? That makes no logical sense! :laughing:

2020-10-31T08:51:55+00:00

sven

Roar Rookie


if youre looking for integrity from the afl theres lot more to address than the cats playing finals at scat park .... where do i say anything about a stadium bigger than the 'g' ? maybe just a few more seats so some opposition supporters can get in too, its not even 40k capacity, whilst at it maybe widen the ground a fraction ... why was it more logical to shut suburban grounds in melb but not geelong ?

2020-10-31T08:40:02+00:00

Micko

Roar Rookie


The competition should have integrity sven. By your logic Geelong should build a stadium larger than the MCG, which isn't feasible. And Geelong isn't part of Melbourne, so not logical to tell them to give up their home ground.

2020-10-31T08:35:25+00:00

sven

Roar Rookie


im not accepting anything, just pointing out some things i see as pretty obvious

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar