How did Argentina claim a historical win over the All Blacks?

By Pundit / Roar Guru

On Saturday, 14 November 2020, the inspirational Argentineans claimed a win over the All Blacks, and the ten-point margin at fulltime means that this was a convincing win, not a fluke.

So how did the Argentineans, a team that went out in the pools last year after being smashed into submission by France and England, bounce back magnificently by beating the All Blacks?

Here are four factors behind this milestone in Argentinean rugby: team spirit, the attacking ploy, the defensive strategy and the points-oriented gameplay.

When upsets happen, they are almost always down to passion.

When Argentina played, they had so much intent, so much ambition, and the ferocious drive from them was simply commendable. The love they have for their nation. The passion they played with, hitting every ruck with vigour, punching the line hard. They trusted each other and advanced as one to overcome, in skipper Pablo Matera’s words, “the best side in the world”.

The kind of passion was epitomised in Matera explaining why he got into a scuffle. They won a penalty, but then some interference from the All Blacks was met by apparent aggression from Matera. This was not thuggishness or arrogance. This was drive. This was a look at the heart of every Argentinean on the pitch.

Matera pointed to the emblem of UAR on his jersey and said to the referee: “I play for my country”. This was not a mere cliche statement; this was the drive and the love of Argentinean rugby in Matera and the team that won them the game.

They interwove this passion with tactical prowess, managing the win.

Let us address their defensive strategy.

They know how the All Blacks try to recycle quickly and then exploit the defensive scramble to crack with a magical strike play. They take away the All Blacks’ greatest advantage by just holding up the attackers. They are a pack of big physical prime Argentinean beef. Tall, muscular, heavy – the perfect build for mauling the opposition. They held up the All Blacks and slowed down the ball by seconds for their defence to realign and neutralise the next phase.

The All Blacks played a Z-sequence of passing. A pass to a three-man screen pod and slide out the back to a distributor from the backline, who then passes to a carrying option. The All Blacks tried this all the time against Argentina.

At some point they had identified the passing Z, shooting in each time and killing play.

About their attacking ploys, they had two main forms of playing: off quick ball from Tomas Cubelli or off their mercurial playmaker Nicolas Sanchez.

Off Cubelli is so much about the No. 9’s fitness and passing. His passing is fast, accurate and deadly. His following of the ball is also excellent. He is always there at every ruck. This often buys the half-second for the phases to cross the gain-line and eventually the space for Sanchez to run strike plays.

Sports opinion delivered daily 

   

We saw flat distribution off Sanchez on one phase and him back into the game on another.

The All Blacks tried to rush him, but he kept on firing flat passes.

Here’s an example. He stands at first receiver and the All Blacks rush up, but he slings a flat pass out wide to a carrying option. His teammate makes some ground but was penalised for not releasing.

There are two notable examples of switches and loops. There was one switch run with Sanchez running a good line and putting away a no-look to an inside runner. There was another bit of play with him passing and looping around his teammate, doing some footwork and passing back in.

Off that we saw a move I would term as ‘forward ball-handling’. The ball had alternative distribution with Santiago Carreras slinging a wide pass to a series of loose forwards lined up in the wide channel, putting their man away with Rodrigo Bruni moving down the field.

One phase on from that they got a penalty.

(Photo by Cameron Spencer/Getty Images)

Then we get to their set-piece attack. Poetry in motion.

Off a scrum they attacked with a flyhalf standing first receiver with two second receivers on either shoulder. Nicolas Sanchez has two realistic carrying options at his disposal: a centre on his inside and Pablo Matera on his outside. He scans the defence and drops a no-look pass to the centre on his inside shoulder.

Sanchez cleared the immense pressure from the All Blacks on many occasions, intelligently hoisting kicks or slinging good passes out wide.

I cannot get past their attack without mentioning their first try. After Sanchez’s switch run got them ground we saw the ball go back to Sanchez in the first receiver spot in a small space in the left side of the ruck. Sanchez reads the game, sees how poorly positioned the All Blacks are and has the nerve to put in a chip over the top. The lucky bounce and a second grubber from No. 8 Bruni sees Sanchez beat a number of All Black backs to score.

Onto the points-oriented game plan.

I know this sound damning, but the Argentineans were playing smart rugby. If you get a kickable penalty, go for the posts. This saw them play a little territorially. They had runners with good hands and a classy No. 9-10 combo. This saw them playing phases and advancing up the field.

When they got into opposition territory, if the opportunity presented itself, they took it. If not, and if the opposition had illegally disrupted them, they went for the points.

Their kicking game was high, hanging and short. This allowed runners to chase the ball and hopefully win it back, if not smash the catcher instantly.

Here is an example: Nicolas Sanchez does a ‘cross-kick’ into space. The All Blacks retain the ball, but the Argies got the ball back as they were there to get back the ball back through applying pressure.

Also, there was one occasion of Sanchez chipping over the top, intending his teammates to chase. Though the All Blacks got the ball back, they were able to pressure them.

They have many great jacklers and disrupted most breakdowns, getting over the ball well and holding the ball. Slowing the ball, they won penalties that were free three points. With a monster goal kicker in Nicolas Sanchez they could kick goals from anywhere within 55 metres – we saw Sanchez converting 50-metre penalty goals. This meant any penalty within the opposition half could be a shot at the poles and a very high chance of getting three points.

The Pumas were brilliant, and as much I hate to say this as an All Blacks supporter, they are deservingly likely to win the Tri Nations.

The Crowd Says:

AUTHOR

2020-12-29T13:40:22+00:00

Pundit

Roar Guru


Japan, back next year

2020-11-18T03:11:49+00:00

Rhys

Roar Rookie


I think it's a good tactic with the rush defence employed that could be used more in the right moments. Would prefer it not to be like the Wallabies in 2008, 2009 where for some reason I remember how much grubbering and chipping we did to no avail. It's probably unfair to blame him but I seem to remember Berrick Barnes doing that a lot.

2020-11-18T02:30:18+00:00

jeznez

Roar Guru


:laughing: small they certainly aren’t!

2020-11-18T02:20:31+00:00

Gun Dog

Roar Rookie


I haven't seen it anywhere..it's bollocks anyway..they are not f...en little..

2020-11-18T01:44:17+00:00

jeznez

Roar Guru


I think you’d have to ask the person I was misquoting. But according to Jibba it’s the Aussie media.

2020-11-18T01:25:32+00:00

Gun Dog

Roar Rookie


I don't think that they played with "desperation they played with grunt..mongrel and bottle..if any team played with "desperation it was the AB's who were soundly beaten by a far better team. :thumbup:

2020-11-18T01:22:21+00:00

Gun Dog

Roar Rookie


Hi..who calls the Argentinian team the " little Pumas " ???

2020-11-17T22:35:34+00:00

FunBus

Roar Rookie


This is the key point. Kiwis seem desperate to paint the Puma’s performance as some sort of superhuman effort that would have wiped the floor with any side in the world. As Nick Bishop outlines in his article, that’s probably not the case, but it does mask the fact that a smart, physical, disciplined performance was all it took to beat these ABs.

2020-11-17T22:30:38+00:00

FunBus

Roar Rookie


‘What was on display’ was a smart, disciplined, physical performance from The Pumas. The key point is, that was all that was required to beat these ABs. It wasn’t a ‘magnificent’ performance dredging up the souls of their ancestors to inspire them to superhuman efforts. It didn’t need to be.

2020-11-17T18:17:28+00:00

Carlos the Argie

Roar Guru


If you are rude, that is your problem. If you don't understand the difference between foul and proper language, then your education is faulty. If you use this as "common" expression, then I don't want to be around you. All posters here use language that is not foul. Please, learn and write accordingly.

2020-11-17T17:25:10+00:00

Manu

Roar Rookie


take your manners and go to another place

2020-11-17T17:24:42+00:00

Manu

Roar Rookie


You are name as "the argie" but it seems like you are not from Argentina, it is a common expression here and sometimes is not taken as foul language. Of "argie" you have a little carlos....

2020-11-17T16:51:34+00:00

Carlos the Argie

Roar Guru


It is inappropriate to use foul language, especially in another language. Shame on you, have some manners.

2020-11-17T15:09:37+00:00

Manu

Roar Rookie


as an Argentinian i dont care they calling us little pumas, we are use to it and we dont care. What yes irritate to us is that they are saying Argentina won because of the AB performance. I believe that Argentina take out the AB of their confort zone and that made the AB played so bad. It is to soon to believe that Argentina deserves to win the tri nations, there are left three test matches consecutives and injuries will start to appear. I think that if Argentina dont win this tri nations is unlikely that other year we have the same opportunities we have now.

2020-11-17T14:04:44+00:00

jeznez

Roar Guru


You have the right policy there Paulo. I couldn’t help myself from biting having seen that article earlier in the day. I think Saturday’s match up is fascinating. Who knows what we’ll get. Both teams capable of some seriously good or pretty average rugby. Hopefully we see the best of each team.

2020-11-17T12:33:54+00:00

No Arms

Roar Rookie


Los Pumas we’re great but I think that game was closer than portrayed. All Blacks had terrible game management but it would’ve only take a couple of key almost moments to go the other way....world rugby is highly competitive nowadays that’s for sure

2020-11-17T12:23:57+00:00

No Arms

Roar Rookie


Chip away I say :)

2020-11-17T10:13:18+00:00

Paulo

Roar Rookie


I think consistency is the big thing we need to see (from all tri nation teams tbh), the Argies have always had that performance in them, it’s just getting it there and doing it every week. This next match will be tougher for them I think. The hang over game is always rough. I tend to ignore comments like Jibbas. I think it’s tough to argue either way with the media. If he wants to lick a fight with Funbus he can. Apologies if my wording or tone was off, it reads more snarky than I intended. I just think it dangerous trying to generalise media based of one trite op price from a business now governed by clicks rather than relevance or authenticity. I mean seriously, why on Earth bother to list the worst performances ever? Why not the most emphatic upsets of all time?

2020-11-17T08:10:24+00:00

jeznez

Roar Guru


Paulo, I'm not entirely convinced that those FunBus is railing against are entirely wrong. I think we need to see consistent performance from the Pumas before we start saying they have a playing group as strong as the All Blacks. I did find it funny you felt the need to correct my comment and not Jibba's though

2020-11-17T06:54:24+00:00

Paulo

Roar Rookie


No. But you are free to interpret it that way.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar