'Summer of 36': Yet another wake up call for Indian Test cricket?

By Suresh Rangaseshan / Roar Rookie

From a position of strength to being decimated in an hour, Indian team hit the abyss.

36 all out and all over in a couple of hours. It is certainly depressing but in my view, it was an accident waiting to happen, though the severity and the timing of it has taken me aback quite a bit.

Over the years India has performed poorly in overseas Tests, particularly in South Africa, England, New Zealand and Australia (SENA), the exception being 2018-19 in Australia where India won the series against an Australia side who were sans Steve Smith and David Warner).

So we need to view that as an aberration and not a trend change.

The good thing that has happened in Indian Test cricket is the strengthening of the pace attack (we always had good spin resources) and now it is a balanced potent attack that we possess. We are a better fielding side now, barring the recent setbacks.

We need to appreciate the administration for addressing these issues. However, what has let India down has been their poor batting performance under swinging and seaming conditions where the Indian bowlers have done their job while batsmen have let them down – and not to forget poor catching in Tests off late.

Batting first – The way we built our pace attack, we need to address our batting woes as well.

The team total has not gone beyond 250 in the last seven overseas innings in run up to this debacle.

Barring Virat Kohli and Cheteshwar Pujara, no one seems capable of scoring meaningful runs. Opening has been a challenge and in my view both Prithvi Shaw and Mayank Agarwal have technical issues that can be easily exploited by the opposition.

This puts more pressure on Pujara and Kohli.

Ajinkya Rahane – for someone who is primarily into Test cricket, should have performed much better. Hanuma Vihari is a defensive player with limited abilities, not sure how he can prove useful. Then we have wicket keeper Wriddhiman Saha who is good at keeping but what about runs? Not even 10!

I am not sure if India can bounce back from here but it is important that batting woes are addressed on SOS basis, from within the existing squad.

How low can India go? (Photo by Kai Schwoerer/Getty Images)

My suggestions are as below:

Give Shubman Gill a chance to open in the next three Tests.

I feel Ravi Jadeja at No.6 is a better bet, no matter what the conditions are instead of Hanuma Vihari.

Get KL Rahul at No.4 in the absence of Virat Kohli.

Mayank Agarwal can be given one more chance but should he fail, bring back Vihari as an opener.

Rishabh Pant to replace Saha until you find a long term solution on both.

These are interim measures to steady the ship. After this series, India will be back to playing at home with Virat back and mind you England are a very strong side, capable of beating India at home.

From a long-term perspective, we need a far more professional set up in terms of coaching staff for the team across formats in terms of batting, bowling, fielding and fitness. We need people who can own up!

Youngsters like Dev Padikkal, Yashaswi Jaiswal and Rituraj Gaikwad to name a few, have good techniques and can become very good Test players provided they are groomed and trained for tough conditions under the watchful eyes of people like Rahul Dravid, VVS Laxmann, Anil Kumble etc.

Preserve them and pay them for not playing IPL. Not everyone can be Virat Kohli, someone who can do well in all formats.

Test cricket in my view is the epitome of pride and purity for a cricketer and a cricket-playing nation. We need Test cricket to not just survive but thrive. So much of money and resources are spent by franchises to identify talents for IPL.

The BCCI is paying players better for Tests but it would help if BCCI can take measures to find good Test talent and invest on select players for a better future of Indian batting in Tests.

I don’t see why we cannot and if we do, don’t see why we cannot be victorious in bowler friendly conditions in overseas tours. It is a long process but let’s kick start it now.

The Crowd Says:

AUTHOR

2020-12-22T10:23:53+00:00

Suresh Rangaseshan

Roar Rookie


Thanks Andy. Yes, efforts need to made to develop Test specialists and strengthen batting in Test cricket

2020-12-22T06:11:59+00:00

Simoc

Guest


Look at the successful batting coaches. There are none employed by national teams. It's a nonsense. A batsman needs a clear head. All the coach can point out is technical deficiencies. Handscomb is the perfect star. I doubt he has ever followed any coaching advice ever. Batsman get to the top by being strong-willed and decision making. Just tell them they are going great when they are focused and let them do their thing. I don't read to much into the 36 debacle. It happened and just forget and move on.

2020-12-22T00:26:11+00:00

The Late News

Roar Rookie


Maybe too much short form cricket?

2020-12-21T22:41:38+00:00

Paul

Roar Guru


The current England team will not beat India in India. I'm very keen to see how the new look England side goes. There are plenty of guys who did well in England in their summer, especially the batsmen, but as you suggest, playing India at home will be a challenge. Much depends on the type of pitches India prepares, presumably flat turners. If that's the case, you're right, England can't match the Indian spinners, but if there's anything there for the quicks, England could do well with their pace attack. Hopefully it will be a close series.

2020-12-21T21:32:29+00:00

DingoGray

Roar Guru


Whatever happened to Karun Nair?

2020-12-21T21:19:04+00:00

andyfnq

Roar Rookie


Great first article, congratulations! I really liked this piece, it was an insightful analysis not just of the "Massacre in Adelaide", but the longer term problems that led up to it. I thought your attempt at team selection was pretty good too, with each selection well-justified. I think Jadeja is an obvious one as he only missed through injury, but the rest seemed pretty good. And finally, I liked how you have identified that IPL may be (adversely) affecting India's developing batting talent. I'm not sure if increasing contracts for young players is the answer, but the BCCI do need to address this concern, or I feel that their batting will begin to regress. Maybe they could buy drop-in pitches from Australia for one or two venues in India, to give players more chances to develop on them at a competative level? Thanks for your thoughts and I look forward to your next article.

2020-12-21T21:11:15+00:00

andyfnq

Roar Rookie


No, I can see what the article is saying. This collapse was simply highlighting a long term underlying problem.

2020-12-21T12:04:36+00:00

Paul

Roar Guru


good to hear from you again.

2020-12-21T11:30:31+00:00

Brian

Guest


I don’t see the point of playing 36 yo Saha. Agarwal Gill Pujara Rahul Rahane Pant Jadeja Ashwin Yadav Bumrah Siraj I would see what Gill, Pant and Siraj can do. Also 5 bowlers if Smith is really out of form that’s how you might win. If Rahul fails again bring in Rohit

AUTHOR

2020-12-21T10:11:54+00:00

Suresh Rangaseshan

Roar Rookie


Thanks Barry

AUTHOR

2020-12-21T10:11:22+00:00

Suresh Rangaseshan

Roar Rookie


Thanks Paul. 2 changes Virat & Shami are already imposed. Whether we end up making it 3 or 4, I don't think is going to be knee-jerk. Irrespective, i sincerely hope that people who are chosen to play, perform to the best of their abilities and the Team management do a better assessment of their abilities.

AUTHOR

2020-12-21T10:02:22+00:00

Suresh Rangaseshan

Roar Rookie


Thanks Anindo. I fully agree with you on competent batting coach requirement and also with the progress made on the bowling front which I had also highlighted in my article, though not with so much details as you have shared. I was a little concerned about the size of the article so did not elaborate, I am glad you did. I am not saying we need wholesale changes but we need to assess properly what the abilities are of each player under tough batting conditions and decide accordingly Jadeja in place of Vihari - I want Vihari to do well as he plays only Test cricket but the more I see him it feels like someone struggling hard to perform but is not able to. Bit sad i would say. Well we can debate but at this point if you ask me on who i would bet my money on, to score 20 runs, i feel more confident to put it on Jadeja. Plus he is the best fielder, good bowler, great asset in a team irrespective of the format, would have him as an allrounder (wish we had Hardik though). Pant or Saha - As i mentioned in my article, we need to find a long term solution. A wicket keeper who is a decent bat at No.6 or No.7. Someone who is a safe keeper and can contribute 20 -25 runs consistently in overseas tours, Not expecting 50s or 100s. The problem is Saha at 36y is still a good keeper compared to Pant but i dont see how he is going to make runs. As far as Pant is concerned, he is not as good as Saha behind the wickets but with the bat he has the ability to score, though he has not lived up to it thus far. Pant purely as a batsman at N0.6, i am not convinced at all. India have 12 tests to play in the next 9 months (3 Aus and 9 Eng), at least thats what the schedule says. Enough time to assess both I guess. Let's hope we bounce back

2020-12-21T09:01:09+00:00

Anindya Dutta

Roar Guru


As you can see from my comment above Paul, I agree.

2020-12-21T08:59:42+00:00

Anindya Dutta

Roar Guru


There was a Times of India article earlier today that suggests they do. Let’s see.

2020-12-21T08:59:00+00:00

Anindya Dutta

Roar Guru


Very true Matt. Good to be back here after a very long time!

AUTHOR

2020-12-21T06:59:20+00:00

Suresh Rangaseshan

Roar Rookie


Hi The Late News No doubt excellent bowling from Aussies, something one has to expect from a top notch side given the conditions (seemed like the pitch had quickened up a bit more). However, what made it look extraordinary and unplayable (where a batting team could muster a mere 36) was the inept nature of Indian batting. It is this part that i thought at some point will get exposed in a big way...referred it to an "accident waiting to happen". Trust this clarifies

2020-12-21T03:18:29+00:00

matth

Roar Guru


I would add a much greater emphasis on fitness as helping both the bowling unit and fielding.

2020-12-21T03:12:49+00:00

Paul

Roar Guru


I'd hope the selectors would give Saha a confidence boost by keeping him in the team. Yes he was less than stellar in this Test, but then again, he wasn't on his pat malone. Pant has had 7 Test innings since his last tour in Australia and has made 118 runs at 16.85. He might be the future of some form of cricket for India, but those numbers are very ordinary for a bloke with his ability.

2020-12-21T02:52:06+00:00

Jed

Guest


Surely Pant has to play ahead of Saha. On true Australian wickets the difference in keeping is marginal and Rishabh is definitely more likely to score runs against this Aussie attack than Saha. Add to the fact that Saha is 36. If you are going to lose 4 zip lose with players who you can build a team around for the future.

2020-12-21T02:49:15+00:00

Jed

Guest


India have massive issues but I'll be blunt about one thing. Even if they lose this series 4 zip, it will have zero bearing on their chances at home against England. In the last twenty years India have lost just twice at home - once to an all time great Australian team in 2004 and the other in 2012 to a good England side when India were in rebuilding mode. The current England team will not beat India in India.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar