Pattinson and Head in Australia's best XI for South Africa Tests

By Ronan O'Connell / Expert

James Pattinson and Travis Head should return to Australia’s starting XI for the first Test against South Africa, while the Aussie T20 team should persist with their five-bowler strategy in New Zealand next month.

They are two of my key takeaways from Australia’s announcement yesterday of their 19-man Test squad to tour South Africa and their 18-man T20 squad to go to New Zealand.

There were no surprises in Australia’s Test squad, and Josh Inglis was the only significant omission from the T20 unit.

With 37 Aussie cricketers involved in these two tours it’s strange Inglis won’t feature despite being the best gloveman in the country after Tim Paine and a blossoming strokemaker in both formats.

The upside is Inglis can continue his strokemaker development in the Sheffield Shield, where he’s made 354 runs at 118 this season.

Carey’s selection in the Test squad again confirms he’s seen as Paine’s successor when the Aussie skipper retires, likely in the next 18 months.

The South Australian has been deprived of regular first-class cricket due to his role in the ODI and T20 sides. Yet Carey has still managed to improve greatly as a red-ball batsman. In his past ten first-class matches Carey has piled up 751 runs at 58, including three tons.

While Inglis is an attractive option to succeed Paine, Carey’s selection to tour South Africa was not unjustified. Carey will, however, likely be a spectator for all three Tests against the Proteas along with the likes of reserve bowlers Mark Steketee, Sean Abbott and Mitchell Swepson.

Australia were right to resist the temptation of picking pace prodigy Jhye Richardson for this Test tour. The 24-year-old shapes as a potential pillar of Australia’s Test attack over the next decade, so he needs to be carefully managed. Having not played a first-class match in 14 months due to a shoulder issue, it would have been unwise to rush him back into the Test set-up.

In Pattinson and Michael Neser, Australia already have two fine pace options to complement the big three of Pat Cummins, Josh Hazlewood and Mitchell Starc. The latter, however, should not feature in the first Test against South Africa. Starc destabilised the Aussie attack with his wayward efforts in the final two Tests against India. The left-armer took 3-292 across those matches and was lacking rhythm, precision and pace.

Sports opinion delivered daily 

   

When Starc falls apart like that he drags the attack down with him. He bleeds runs at such a rate that it makes it very difficult for his bowling colleagues to build any pressure. Australia cannot risk a repeat performance in the series opener against SA.

Pattinson is a safer bet if fully fit. As a natural strike bowler the Victorian’s also a good like-for-like replacement for Starc.

Neser too has a strong case to take Starc’s spot. The typically bowler-friendly pitches in SA would suit the accurate Queenslander, who gains consistent swing and seam movement. But in a Test as important as the opener against the Proteas, Australia would be wiser to bet on Pattinson’s experience than pick a debutant in Neser.

If there are any doubts about Pattinson’s fitness, then Neser should play ahead of Starc. Meanwhile, a lack of a strong spin alternative should save the spot of Nathan Lyon, who was even less effective than Starc against India.

James Pattinson (Photo by Ryan Pierse/Getty Images)

The only reserve spinner touring South Africa, Swepson had a sensational start to this Shield season, with 23 wickets at 21. It remains to be seen whether Swepson has turned the corner as a red-ball spinner or if that was merely a three-match purple patch – in his previous two years of first-class cricket Swepson averaged 37. He has not yet done enough to unseat the 399-wicket veteran Lyon.

Australia’s Test top six, meanwhile, is straightforward – David Warner, Will Pucovski, Marnus Labuschagne, Steve Smith and Cameron Green are automatic picks. That leaves a choice between Head and Moises Henriques at No. 5. Averaging a shade under 40 in Tests, Head is unlucky to have been dropped twice in the space of Australia’s last ten matches.

Henriques is in fine first-class form, having averaged 51 with the blade over the past two Aussie summers. But that streak amounts to just 11 matches, and in Henriques’s 20 first-class matches previous to that he averaged just 30.

So Henriques has ordinary long-term form and turns 34 years old next week. Compared to Head, who owns a solid Test record and at 27 years old has time to become a plank of Australia’s middle order, the choice is fairly obvious.

Travis Head (Photo by Ryan Pierse/Getty Images)

I would argue it’s also obvious that, on the T20 tour of New Zealand, Australia need to persist with the five-bowler strategy that helped them spend a lot of time at number one on the T20 rankings over the past 18 months.

Ashton Agar and Jhye Richardson can give them decent depth at seven and eight in the batting order. That leaves Australia with a strong attack of three quality quicks – Richardson, Kane Richardson and Jason Behrendorff – and an elite spin combo in Adam Zampa and Ashton Agar, who are fourth and sixth respectively in the T20 bowler rankings.

Even without access to the 19 players on the Test tour of South Africa, Australia’s T20 line-up looks potent.

Australia’s best XI for the first Test in South Africa

  1. David Warner
  2. Will Pucovski
  3. Marnus Labuschagne
  4. Steve Smith
  5. Travis Head
  6. Cameron Green
  7. Tim Paine (wicketkeepr) (captain)
  8. James Pattinson
  9. Pat Cummins
  10. Nathan Lyon
  11. Josh Hazlewood

Australia’s best T20 XI for the tour of New Zealand

  1. Aaron Finch (captain)
  2. Matt Wade
  3. Marcus Stoinis
  4. Glenn Maxwell
  5. Josh Philippe (wicketkeeper)
  6. Mitch Marsh
  7. Ashton Agar
  8. Jhye Richardson
  9. Adam Zampa
  10. Kane Richardson
  11. Jason Behrendorff

Australia Test squad for three-Test series in South Africa
Tim Paine (captain), Pat Cummins (vice-captain), Sean Abbott, Alex Carey, Cameron Green, Marcus Harris, Josh Hazlewood, Travis Head, Moises Henriques, Marnus Labuschagne, Nathan Lyon, Michael Neser, James Pattinson, Will Pucovski, Steve Smith, Mitchell Starc, Mark Steketee, Mitchell Swepson, David Warner

Australia T20 squad for five-match series in New Zealand
Aaron Finch (captain), Matthew Wade (vice-captain), Ashton Agar, Jason Behrendorff, Mitchell Marsh, Glenn Maxwell, Ben McDermott, Riley Meredith, Josh Philippe, Jhye Richardson, Kane Richardson, Daniel Sams, Tanveer Sangha, D’Arcy Short, Marcus Stoinis, Ashton Turner, Andrew Tye, Adam Zampa.

The Crowd Says:

2021-02-04T05:08:20+00:00

JamesH

Roar Guru


And like I said above, Pattinson's test average at the MCG is only based on a small, sporadic sample of games - vs India in 2011, vs West Indies in 2015 (who were a train wreck) and vs NZ last summer. One test in five years is simply not enough data to support your statement that "you have to find a place for Patto", particularly when it would require removing an experienced, in-form incumbent. Your SCG comment is probably fair enough, as our bowling group was likely to need freshening up due to hub life and not having played much red ball cricket in 2020. Of course, Pattinson was unavailable by then due to injury. It would have been Neser coming in.

2021-02-04T00:32:33+00:00

Pierro

Roar Rookie


Not really pattinson has average of 16 at mcg . Pattinson economy lower in his outings at mcg . There's more debate over mcg but little debate over scg . Fact is you have to find a place for Patto at mcg he's a weapon and we did let them get away from us In Middle order batting and that's where they won the match with pant and jedeja , I was there watching . Ok our batting wasnt so great but Patto may have decimated them . His average is better than all other bowlers at mcg . Scg was a no brainer on starcs poor average sometimes you have to rotate them out knowing they don't bowl as well at s ground and certain conditions . After all same four bowlers against india twice at mcg and twice at scg were well beaten by india . I kept saying prior we have problems with starc and lyon at these two grounds . Results were losses without rotating yet sgain

2021-02-03T23:10:30+00:00

JamesH

Roar Guru


Lol Starc leaked runs at the MCG? He took 4 wickets at 24.5, with an economy of exactly 3rpo in the first innings (with the second innings being a non-event). He completely justified his selection in that game. The fact remains that Starc bowled well in Adelaide and Melbourne. It wasn't until Sydney that he was below par. Suggeting that we would have performed significantly better in Melbourne with Pattinson is pure speculation. And as for Pattinson's test record at the MCG, he's played 3 tests there in a decade, with one of those against the West Indies. It's not much of a sample size.

2021-02-03T14:11:12+00:00

Pierro

Roar Rookie


Not so sure your right some people agreed Patto had a great record , jeff included on here , the averages speak for themselves. I certainly did on comments on here and nearly wrote an article but actually thought people would have an attitude like non change like you. Fact is two losses against india same four bowlers within two years . Patto played last year and bagged alot of wickets he loved it there . The results don’t lie and for me it got predictable m we got flogged first innings in Adelaide and only two bowlers made the difference cummins hazel second innings getting 9 wickets I think between them . Lyon and starc have leaked runs in four tests at mcg and scg against india in two years . Do you need a third time to let it sink in ? I’ve been on to lyon and starc at mcg and scg for some time , against weak opp ok but england and india have caught then out as big totals have accrued even when they get a few wickets . england got on top of us the year before india at mcg too . We have problems there 3 times in four years and scg is an issue for starc and lyon on averages. If we want to keep losing there then stick to the same formula , fact is it’s pattos pitch and 3 tests played for 3 wins . Can’t argue with that and his average of 16 . Lunacy not to pick him and the results show it too

2021-02-03T05:16:48+00:00

JamesH

Roar Guru


That same attack had just dismissed India for 36. Literally no one was calling for a change to the attack after Adelaide, and to now suggest it should have happened is 100% hindsight. No selection panel in the world was going to drop Starc to bring in a guy who hadn't played a first class match in almost a year, no matter how good his average at the MCG is.

2021-02-02T12:57:22+00:00

Pierro

Roar Rookie


James if anything on starcs average selector need the forsight to not play him at scg on a flatter pitch m the data and average suggest it is true ore series and last series against india same ground . I think mcg was trickier but Patto has the best average of all bowlers we have there so you have to make a call. Maybe it was lyon out , maybe rotate hazelwood but more likely you rotate starc out . The result was 326 runs may have been 225 runs with pattos average of 16 . It worked last year but was due to Hazel’s injury but Patto has never lost at test at mcg on three tedt matches there . sure the bats didn’t perform but picking burns was another gross mistake from the start of the series with a small second innings chase with less pressure . He wasn’t inform at all . Elevating labs and sliding in marsh or carey to middle order was the go there . We got outbatted first innings at adelaide . I think the combo was Patto hazelwood and cummins and then select one of lyon or starc at mcg . Two tests losses in a row to india there same four bowlers. Writing was on the wall and I suggested it before the match several times . Thing is pant , jadeja got away with the runs at mcg In middle order quickly from starc and lyon and a greener green (who I do like ) but pattos omission seemed very costly with the best average there in the Australian squad by some distance

2021-02-02T02:02:11+00:00

JamesH

Roar Guru


At whose expense though? Starc was in good form in Adelaide (and was our most productive quick at the MCG) while Cummins, Lyon and Hazlewood weren't going to be rotated out. Our problem at the MCG was the batting, not the bowling. India only got 326, and that was on the back of one good partnership between Rahane and Jadeja. The rotation should have happened at the Gabba after we couldn't bowl India out in the final innings at the SCG, with Starc really labouring. The alarm bells were going off then and they were ignored.

2021-02-01T09:53:00+00:00

Simoc

Guest


Pattinson is the most over rated bowler ever for Australia. He does lots of huff n puff and pretence but the game is about taking wickets. Starc is a way better wicket taking bowler. Pattinson has never and never will win a test for Australia. He is not up to it and was only briefly any good at all, which so many think is his norm. He came good for 5 mins. Now just a stock bowler at test level. Every batter wants to face him because he serves up the hittable balls. Granted Starc does as well but he also has many more jaffa balls as his figures indicate.

2021-01-31T21:02:35+00:00

mrrexdog

Roar Guru


McDermott is in the T20 squad

2021-01-30T15:18:05+00:00

Pierro

Roar Rookie


What we have seen is paine have a poor series with bat against England , last summer was a batting paradise and now he's had another home deck. He made some runs which were valuable but sadly his keeping has slipped the drop of pant was critical and easy to take and pant survived for hours after it on day 5 of scg . He dropped several other catches but still it's the Captaincy that let aus down the most general his fields as Geoff lawson and others point out were terrible as was his captaining decisions under pressure at scg and gabba on top of headingly . I think carey is no worse with gloves now and the future whilst paines captaining has cost us matches . Let's hope cummins and co can do some vital damage in sa but I don't think we need timmy in sa either way . As he's gone I think all know it's pretty much a done deal he'll go after ashes so we may be delaying the inevitable and wasting valuable opp to future players like carey

2021-01-30T10:03:52+00:00

Jeff

Roar Rookie


He was the best keeper-batsman of the tournament. However his actual keeping was so-so. Whilst he led the number of dismissals, a keeper takes the edges presented from the bowlers, so that is an irrelevant stat in isolation, perhaps with the exception of stumpings, though missed stumpings are rarely tallied across a tournament; Carey had two stumpings. Carey dropped a couple of regulation chances which is poor - one of them very costly - and he conceded the second most number of byes. So on that basis his keeping was indeed average. His batting performance was irrelevant in the context of my comment and the discussion in the thread, which is about keeping.

2021-01-30T05:54:17+00:00

redbackfan

Roar Rookie


30 as an opener in odi’s is not good enough general, he averages under 30 in first class cricket which is an indicator of his ability. Had a good series against the India b team

2021-01-30T05:48:42+00:00

redbackfan

Roar Rookie


Dropped one in each of the first 2, 3 in the 3rd, easy catch in 1st innings of the 4th and the stumping in the second innings.

2021-01-30T05:43:33+00:00

redbackfan

Roar Rookie


Paine averages under 30 in first class cricket

2021-01-30T05:28:26+00:00

TheGeneral

Roar Rookie


Paine was dropped once from memory against India. Labs was dropped three times in one innings, and Green twice in one innings. Don't be picky. The facts are Paine OPENED in 24 of his first 26 ODI's before his injuries that kept him out of the game for seven years. Good enough to do so with Hayden, Ponting, Hussey, Clarke etc in the side. Still comes down to the fact that Paine has more ODI scores over 50 than Carey.

2021-01-30T04:35:46+00:00

Pierro

Roar Rookie


It's true he wasn't bad at mcg james , but the point is they had to find a place for Patto at mcg as that av if 16 is phenomenal and is better than cummins and any other bowler in the team . He's never lost a test there . It was a prime time to rotate him in . I had a feeling we would struggle at mcg without patto

2021-01-30T04:34:04+00:00

Pierro

Roar Rookie


Generally I agree micko , starc is an asset at certain grounds where he can get the yorker and reverse swing going . Neser and Patto deserved chances against india and I'm pretty amazed the selectors couldn't work this out pre series .

2021-01-30T04:21:33+00:00

Pierro

Roar Rookie


Think your living in the past with paine he’s had a couple of home summers on Flatter decks and chanced a few lucky innings against india where he could have been out early numerous times . He went missing with bat in England by and large , carey was smashing runs in uk with second best aus average in side 60 plus from memory and at many stages held the batting together for aus . That was against the worlds best . He’s going to be the better player to tour with . That said one feels like paine is being afforded the luxury of an ashes sign off on home soil and that will be it at his age of 36 going on 37. England supporters are pleading with us to keep paine as captain due to his tactical errors under pressure

2021-01-29T14:16:14+00:00

John

Guest


Dude he was the keeper of the tournament.

2021-01-29T10:57:50+00:00

DP Schaefer

Roar Rookie


Many people are all for Pattinson to replace Starc, unfortunately this means 3 right handers and while I'm a fan of Patto, it reduces the variety. Smarter for someone to work with Starc and help him sort it out and then get his captain to utilise him better. Replacing Starc with Patto isn't the answer.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar